SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop combination that sits firmly in the upper-middle tier of the performance database, with a combined percentile of 79 against all recorded builds. The CPU lands at the 82nd percentile versus all CPUs and the GPU at the 75th percentile versus all GPUs, which frames this as a well-matched pairing rather than a lopsided one. One important caveat applies throughout: the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — dataIsMeasured is false — so all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from benchmark scores rather than directly measured gameplay. The Ryzen 7 8700F is an eight-core, sixteen-thread Zen 4 "Phoenix" processor on AM5, launched with a $270 launch MSRP, while the RTX 3070 Ti is an Ampere-generation GA104 card with a 599 USD launch MSRP that is now marked end-of-life.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a near-evenly weighted pairing with a mild tilt toward GPU-bound behavior in games. The CPU's 82nd percentile against all CPUs is comfortably ahead of the GPU's 75th percentile, and that gap is the structural signature of a build where the graphics card is the first component to saturate in graphically demanding titles. In practical terms, at higher resolutions and ultra settings the RTX 3070 Ti's PassMark G3D score of 23356 will be the ceiling, and the 8700F's strong per-thread results — a Geekbench single-core score of 2290 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3872 — mean the processor is unlikely to be the limiting factor in frame delivery.

The scaling evidence supports this. The 8700F's 3DMark CPU profile climbs from 1008 points single-threaded to 3839 at four threads, 6559 at eight threads, and 7861 at maximum threads, which is effectively identical to the 7883 recorded at sixteen threads. That near-flat curve from eight threads upward tells us the chip exhausts its threading advantage once a workload uses all eight cores — a classic eight-core characteristic. Games, which rarely scale past eight threads well, therefore get essentially the whole processor, while heavily threaded production tasks top out at the same ceiling.

Where the CPU becomes the bottleneck is in simulation-heavy or draw-call-heavy scenarios at low resolution, where the GPU has headroom to spare and the single-thread score of 1008 in 3DMark becomes the gating number. Conversely, in ray-traced or memory-hungry rendering workloads, the GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6X becomes the constraint long before the processor does. The balance verdict: GPU-limited at ultra settings in modern AAA titles, CPU-capable across the board, and memory-limited only in the heaviest GPU rendering scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With a PassMark G3D score of 23356 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3478, the RTX 3070 Ti sits in the 75th GPU percentile — within a fraction of a percent of the RTX 5070 Mobile, the Radeon RX 6800, and the RTX 2080 Ti. That tier of card, benchmark results indicate, is well suited to high-refresh 1080p and high-frame-rate 1440p play in most titles at ultra settings, though the most demanding games will need setting reductions to sustain very high refresh rates. The 8700F's strong single-thread numbers mean the CPU will not sabotage those frame rates.

Streaming. The sixteen threads of the 8700F, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26646, provide enough spare capacity to handle encoding alongside gameplay. The GPU's 192 tensor cores also open up NVIDIA's hardware-accelerated encoding path on Ampere. This is a competent single-PC streaming configuration.

Video editing. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11601 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 119718 give the card genuine acceleration credentials for timeline scrubbing and effects preview, and 608.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth keeps frame buffers moving. The 8 GB VRAM pool is the main caveat for heavy 4K timelines.

3D rendering. GPU rendering leans on the 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 192 tensor cores, and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 139541 — notably higher than the OpenCL result — indicates strong performance in Vulkan-based renderers. Long CPU-based renders will run at the PassMark multithread level of 30893, which is mid-pack for eight-core chips.

Software development. Code compilation is threading-sensitive, and the 8700F's near-identical scores at eight and sixteen threads (6559 versus 7861 in 3DMark) mean builds scale cleanly across all physical cores. The PassMark integer math score of 100371 and single-thread score of 3872 point to responsive IDEs and fast single-file rebuilds.

Student and office work. For everyday productivity the pairing is frankly oversized, but the data shows why it still works: a Geekbench single-core score of 2290 means snappy application launches, and the 65 W TDP keeps the processor efficient for all-day use. The absence of integrated graphics is the one caveat — the discrete RTX 3070 Ti must always be present for display output.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3070 Ti is built on Samsung's 8 nm process and packs 17,400 million transistors into a 392 mm² GA104 die, yielding a density of 44.4M transistors per mm². The shader array consists of 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render outputs, producing a texture fill rate of 339.8 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s. FP32 compute lands at 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio for the same throughput — a doubling that benefits some compute and inference workloads.

Clock speeds are 1575 MHz base and 1770 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus. That bus, feeding 8 GB of GDDR6X, delivers 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that comfortably services the shader array at 1440p but is the card's defining limit in texture-heavy ultra scenarios. Ray tracing is handled by 48 RT cores and AI workloads by 192 tensor cores, both hallmarks of the Ampere generation. Feature support is current on paper: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

What the benchmark scores mean for rendering is straightforward. The PassMark G3D score of 23356 places it at the 75th percentile, statistically inseparable from the RTX 5070 Mobile (0.1% apart), the RTX 2080 Ti (0.5% apart), the RX 6800 (0.5% apart), and the RX 6700 (1.6% apart). That cluster defines its class: a strong 1440p card, capable at 4K with compromises, and competitive in GPU compute via the 11601 PassMark compute score and the 139541 Geekbench Vulkan result. The production status is end-of-life, so availability is secondary-market territory, but the performance data remains relevant.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 8700F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 30746 puts it within a percentage point of everything in its rival set: 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600H, 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, and 0.9% behind the Intel Core i7-13700TE. In practice these chips are performance peers.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti stack up against competing GPUs?

A: Its average score of 29945 is 0.1% ahead of the RTX 5070 Mobile, 0.5% behind the RX 6800, 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti, and 1.6% behind the RX 6700 — effectively a five-way tie for practical purposes.

Q: Is 8 GB of VRAM enough?

A: The FACT PACK lists 8 GB of GDDR6X with 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth. For 1440p ultra play the bandwidth figure is the more important number and it is generous; the capacity itself is the tighter constraint in the most memory-demanding modern titles, where texture settings may need to be reduced.

Q: Does the 8700F have integrated graphics?

A: No. The integrated graphics field is N/A, so a discrete card like the RTX 3070 Ti is mandatory for display output in this build.

Q: Are the frame rates in this article measured?

A: No. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; dataIsMeasured is false. All frame-rate discussion is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The FACT PACK specifies a suggested PSU of 600 W for the RTX 3070 Ti, whose TDP is 290 W; the CPU adds a 65 W TDP on top of that.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes. The multiplier is unlocked, and the chip uses the AM5 socket with DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8700F is a Zen 4 "Phoenix" design fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm node, carrying 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. It runs eight cores and sixteen threads between a 4.10 GHz base clock and a 5.00 GHz boost clock, within a 65 W TDP. Cache allocation is 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus a shared 16 MB L3 — there is no 3D V-Cache variant here. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s of theoretical bandwidth, ECC is not supported, and the platform is AM5 with PCIe Gen 4 across 20 CPU lanes.

The benchmark picture describes a chip with excellent per-core speed and solid, honest multi-core scaling. Single-thread results — 1008 in 3DMark, 378 in Cinebench R15, 1579 in R20, 3761 in R23, 2290 in Geekbench, and 3872 in PassMark — are the numbers that matter most for gaming, and they place the chip at the 82nd percentile against all CPUs. Multi-core results — 2685 in R15, 11191 in R20, 26646 in R23, 13523 in Geekbench, and 30893 in PassMark multithread — describe a capable but not workstation-class throughput ceiling, consistent with eight cores.

For real workloads this translates to: fast compiler builds (integer math of 100371, extended instructions of 28474), quick file operations (data compression at 378160, string sorting at 45425), solid cryptographic performance (22117 in encryption), and physics simulation capability (1553). The 82nd percentile, with an average score of 30746, positions it just behind the i7-13700TE and just ahead of the i5-13600H and Core Ultra 5 225T — a competitive neighborhood for a 65 W desktop part launched at a $270 launch MSRP.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: this exact CPU+GPU combination has no measured FPS entries in the database, so the following are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than recorded gameplay data.

The RTX 3070 Ti's PassMark G3D score of 23356 and its 75th-percentile placement — bracketed by the RX 6800 above and the RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 5070 Mobile alongside — allow confident tier-level estimates. At 1080p ultra, benchmark results indicate frame rates well into the high-refresh territory in most titles, with the 8700F's single-thread strength (2290 Geekbench single-core) keeping the CPU-side frame delivery smooth. At 1440p ultra, this GPU class is in its comfort zone; cards within a percent or two of this score are the reference point for strong 1440p ultra play, and the 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth supports high texture settings without the stutter that starved cards exhibit. At 4K ultra, estimates become more conservative: the G3D score suggests playable but not always high-refresh results, and the 8 GB VRAM pool is the likeliest limiter in the newest, most texture-dense games.

Ray tracing changes the math. The 48 RT cores are genuine Ampere hardware, but ray-traced ultra scenarios will push frame estimates down meaningfully, and DLSS-style upscaling from the 192 tensor cores becomes the practical path to maintaining frame rates. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3478 — a modern, demanding DX12 test — is the best single proxy for contemporary game engines, and it confirms the card's standing in the strong-1440p tier rather than the 4K-ultra tier.

Benchmark Performance

The complete scorecard for the Ryzen 7 8700F: 3DMark CPU profile of 1008 (single-thread), 1989 (two threads), 3839 (four threads), 6559 (eight threads), 7861 (max threads), and 7883 (sixteen threads); Cinebench R15 at 2685 multi / 378 single; R20 at 11191 / 1579; R23 at 26646 / 3761; Geekbench at 13523 multi / 2290 single; and PassMark results spanning 30893 multithread, 3872 single-thread, 378160 compression, 22117 encryption, 28474 extended instructions, 98 prime finding, 62629 floating point, 100371 integer, 1553 physics, and 45425 string sorting. Average benchmark score: 30746, at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs.

For the RTX 3070 Ti: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3478; Geekbench OpenCL at 119718 and Vulkan at 139541; PassMark G3D at 23356, GPU compute at 11601, G2D at 1055; and DirectX tests of 261 (DX9), 192 (DX11), 155 (DX10), and 91 (DX12). Average benchmark score: 29945, at the 75th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined picture is a build percentile of 79. The interpretation: neither component drags the other meaningfully. The CPU outranks the GPU by seven percentile points, which is close enough that the pairing avoids the wasted-potential scenario of a flagship GPU starved by a weak processor, or the reverse. In aggregate, this is a configuration whose benchmark identity is "upper-tier mainstream," competitive with rival sets that include mobile-class chips on the CPU side (the 8645HS, i5-13600H) and previous-flagship cards on the GPU side (the RTX 2080 Ti).

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build: the 8700F is a Desktop-segment, Active-status AM5 processor, and the RTX 3070 Ti is a dual-slot desktop card measuring 267 mm long and 112 mm high, drawing 290 W through a single 12-pin connector. The platform details matter for assembly: AM5 socket, DDR5-only memory (dual-channel, 83.2 GB/s), PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes feeding the card's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and a suggested 600 W PSU. Display connectivity is one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, supporting up to four displays.

The generational split is notable — a 2024-launched CPU (release date March 2024, part number 100-000001590) paired with a 2021-launched, end-of-life GPU. Functionally, the pairing works because the PCIe interface generations match at Gen 4. Tier-wise, the combined 79th percentile and the component percentiles (82 CPU, 75 GPU) place this in the upper-middle class of the database: clearly above mainstream entry configurations, clearly below enthusiast flagships.

Who Should Build It

The data supports this pairing for several distinct user groups. Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh and 1440p ultra are the primary audience — the GPU's score cluster alongside the RX 6800 and RTX 2080 Ti defines exactly that envelope, and the CPU's 82nd percentile single-thread performance keeps frame pacing intact. Content creators doing 1080p-to-1440p video editing benefit from the 11601 GPU compute score, 139541 Vulkan score, and the sixteen-thread CPU, though 8 GB of VRAM sets a ceiling on 4K-heavy timelines. 3D artists using GPU renderers get 21.75 TFLOPS and 192 tensor cores; those relying on CPU rendering get a mid-tier eight-core ceiling rather than a workstation one.

Software developers — particularly those compiling large codebases — are well served by the clean eight-core scaling and strong integer performance, and the 65 W TDP makes the chip agreeable for all-day workstation duty. Students and small businesses building a do-everything desktop will find the single-thread responsiveness excellent, with the single caveat that there is no integrated graphics as a fallback. What the data does not support is 4K-ultra-maximum gaming at high refresh rates or heavily VRAM-bound production workloads — for those users, the 8 GB memory pool and 75th GPU percentile mark the boundary. For everyone inside those limits, this is a balanced, benchmark-verified upper-mainstream desktop.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds