SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT pairing combines a modern 8-core Zen 4 desktop processor with a high-end RDNA 3.0 graphics card. The data indicates a system with significant compute potential, yet the pairing presents a distinct imbalance: the CPU is a solid mid-range performer, while the GPU is a top-tier rendering monster. This analysis will dissect the benchmark scores to show that while this combination is capable of excellent high-resolution gaming, the processor will frequently be the limiting factor in lower-resolution and CPU-bound scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is built on the Zen 4 architecture using TSMC's 4 nm process node. With 8 cores and 16 threads, it is a mainstream desktop part designed for a balance of multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. Its base clock of 4.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz provide a strong frequency foundation. The processor features a 65 W TDP and is an unlocked multiplier part, indicating overclocking headroom for users seeking extra performance. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress logically: 1008 for single-thread, 1989 for 2 threads, 3839 for 4 threads, 6559 for 8 threads, and 7883 for 16 threads. The near-identical scores for 16 threads (7883) and max threads (7861) confirm that the 8-core/16-thread configuration is fully utilized. In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves 3761 in single-core and 26646 in multi-core, showcasing its ability to handle both lightly-threaded tasks and heavily parallel workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 30893 reinforces this, while the integer math score of 100371 and floating-point math score of 62629 indicate strong computational throughput for general and scientific workloads.

The CPU's performance places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, a strong showing for a mainstream chip. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tightly contested field. The 8700F's average benchmark score is 30746. It is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, which scores 30879, a delta of -0.4%. It also edges out the Intel Core i5-13600H (30548, +0.6%) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (30468, +0.9%). The Intel Core i7-13700TE scores slightly higher at 31028, giving it a delta of -0.9% relative to the 8700F. These results indicate that the 8700F sits at the top of a performance tier occupied by high-end mobile and low-power desktop parts, despite being a desktop chip itself. For real-world workloads, this translates to snappy system responsiveness, fast application loading, and capable multi-tasking, though it is not positioned as a high-core-count workstation CPU.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system performance is represented by a combined percentile of 69, indicating a build that outperforms the majority of all tracked desktop configurations. The CPU and GPU tell very different performance stories. The Ryzen 7 8700F achieves an average benchmark score of 30746, placing it in the 82nd percentile. This is a strong result, but the GPU's performance profile is more complex.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT shows exceptional raw graphics power in certain tests. Its PassMark G3D score is a massive 29009, placing it in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. However, its average benchmark score of 13745 is dragged down by its nearest rivals, which are not comparable high-end cards. The nearest rivals for the 7900 XT include the AMD Radeon 660M (13812, -0.5%), NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (13821, -0.5%), and AMD Radeon RX 570X (13871, -0.9%). These are all integrated or low-end mobile GPUs, and the 7900 XT's average score is comparable to them, which is misleading. Its true competitor, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, scores 13543, placing the 7900 XT 1.5% ahead. This data suggests that the 7900 XT's average score is not representative of its gaming capabilities, which are better highlighted by its specific DirectX and compute scores.

In synthetic graphics tests, the 7900 XT achieves a Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 and an OpenCL score of 12756, indicating strong compute and modern API performance. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 is a more relevant indicator of modern gaming performance. The combined picture is of a CPU that is a solid, upper-mid-range performer and a GPU that has immense rendering power, but the system's overall percentile is moderated by the CPU's performance class. The data shows a pairing where the GPU is the dominant component for graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU provides a competent but not exceptional foundation.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming (1080p/1440p): This scenario is heavily CPU-bound. The Ryzen 7 8700F's single-thread score of 1008 in 3DMark and 3872 in PassMark single-thread is adequate, but it will likely become the bottleneck before the RX 7900 XT at these resolutions. The GPU's immense power, evidenced by its 29009 PassMark G3D score, will often be underutilized as the CPU struggles to feed frames fast enough.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread configuration is well-suited for concurrent gaming and encoding. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26646 provides ample headroom for a software encoder, though using the GPU's dedicated encoder would offload this task and yield higher in-game frame rates.

Video Editing: This workload benefits from both the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 13523 Geekbench multi-core score will handle timeline editing and effects processing, while the GPU's compute power, reflected in its 16828 PassMark GPU Compute score, will accelerate rendering and export times significantly.

3D Rendering: The RX 7900 XT is the clear workhorse here. Its 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 800.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are ideal for viewport interaction and final frame rendering. The CPU's 26646 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will also contribute to CPU-based rendering tasks, making this a capable, if not top-tier, rendering workstation.

Software Development: The processor's strong multi-threaded performance, with a PassMark multithread score of 30893, allows for fast compilation of large codebases. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the GPU's power is largely irrelevant for this task. The 82nd percentile CPU ranking ensures a smooth development experience.

Student and Office Work: This is a scenario where the system's power is vastly overqualified. The CPU's 3872 PassMark single-thread score ensures instant application launches and fluid multitasking for documents, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The dedicated GPU provides no benefit for these tasks, but its presence means the system is ready for any future demanding application.

Who Should Build It

This build is for a user who prioritizes high-end graphics performance above all else. The primary target is a gamer playing at 4K resolution or with a high-refresh-rate 1440p monitor in graphically demanding titles. The RX 7900 XT's 20 GB of VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth make it a future-proof choice for these scenarios, and its 55th percentile ranking, while misleading, does not reflect its actual gaming might. Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes will also benefit from the GPU's compute capabilities.

The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking makes it a solid foundation for this system, but it is not a workstation-class chip. This is not the ideal build for a developer whose primary task is compiling massive codebases, nor is it for a professional rendering a complex scene for hours on end—those users would benefit more from a higher-core-count CPU. However, for a software developer who also games heavily, or a student in a demanding engineering program who wants a top-tier gaming machine, this balance is appropriate. Small business workstations could use this for CAD or video production, but the cost would be hard to justify for standard office tasks. The system is best described as a high-performance gaming and content creation machine where the GPU is the star and the CPU is a capable supporting actor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM5, which is a current and active platform. This ensures a clear upgrade path for the CPU. Users can later move to a higher-core-count Zen 4 or newer processor without changing the motherboard. The system supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 connection, ensuring full bandwidth for the graphics card.

The RX 7900 XT is listed as an end-of-life product, meaning its upgrade path is not on this socket but rather a future GPU replacement. The card has a 300 W TDP, and the system's suggested PSU is 700 W, providing a reasonable amount of headroom for the CPU and other components. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count AM5 CPU, such as a Ryzen 9, to better balance the system for multi-threaded workloads and reduce the bottleneck in CPU-bound scenarios. This would be a drop-in replacement that would extend the system's longevity without a platform change.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates based on the relative benchmark scores of the components and should be treated as approximations.

The gaming performance is dictated by the significant gap between the CPU and GPU. In a best-case scenario, such as a 4K resolution with ultra settings, the RX 7900 XT will be the primary driver. Its 29009 PassMark G3D score and 5623 3DMark Steel Nomad score indicate it can handle the immense pixel throughput required at 4K. The CPU's 82nd percentile performance is likely sufficient to keep up at this resolution, leading to high and stable frame rates.

However, at 1080p or 1440p with less demanding graphics settings, the dynamic changes. The CPU's single-thread performance, while good, is not exceptional compared to the GPU's raw power. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 will likely become the limiting factor, preventing the GPU from reaching its full frame rate potential. This is a classic GPU-bottleneck-turned-CPU-bottleneck scenario. Therefore, estimates suggest that while the system excels at 4K, users targeting 1080p with a 240 Hz monitor may find the CPU unable to deliver the maximum frame rates the GPU is capable of producing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The RX 7900 XT is a top-tier graphics card, while the Ryzen 7 8700F is a solid mainstream processor. The data clearly shows this imbalance. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 29009 is exceptionally high, while the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30893, while good, is not in the same elite class relative to all other CPUs.

The bottleneck is situational. In graphics-intensive workloads like 4K gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU is the primary worker, and the CPU provides adequate support. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking ensures it does not hold back the GPU in these scenarios. However, in CPU-bound tasks like 1080p gaming at high frame rates, physics calculations, or data compression (PassMark score of 378160), the CPU becomes the limiting factor. The GPU will be waiting for the CPU to send draw calls, resulting in lower frame rates than the GPU could theoretically achieve. The 1.5% performance delta between the 7900 XT and its closest high-end rival, the RX 9070 XT, suggests the GPU is at its performance peak, but the CPU's 0.6% delta over the Intel Core i5-13600H indicates it is in a more contested, mid-range tier. This reinforces the verdict that the CPU is the system's bottleneck in any workload that is not purely graphics-bound.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 69.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 8700F compare to the Intel Core i5-13600H?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F has an average benchmark score of 30746, which is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i5-13600H's score of 30548.

Q: What is the VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth of the RX 7900 XT?

A: The RX 7900 XT features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck in this system?

A: The bottleneck is workload-dependent. In 4K gaming, the GPU is the main worker, but in lower-resolution or CPU-intensive tasks, the Ryzen 7 8700F is the limiting component due to its lower performance tier relative to the GPU.

Q: What is the TDP of the processor and the suggested PSU for the system?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a TDP of 65 W, and the suggested power supply for the system is 700 W.

Q: What is the performance difference between the RX 7900 XT and the RX 9070 XT?

A: The RX 7900 XT has an average benchmark score of 13745, which is 1.5% higher than the RX 9070 XT's score of 13543.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 8700F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics for the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F are listed as N/A, meaning it requires a dedicated graphics card for display output.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is a high-end graphics card built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture. It is a massive chip, with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, manufactured using TSMC's 5 nm process. The card features 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 raster output processors. It is equipped with 84 dedicated ray tracing cores, which provide hardware acceleration for real-time ray tracing effects.

The memory subsystem is a key strength. With 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, the card offers 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a significant advantage for high-resolution textures and compute-heavy workloads. The card's clock speeds are robust, with a base clock of 1387 MHz, a game clock of 2025 MHz, and a boost clock of 2394 MHz. This results in a pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 804.4 GTexel/s. The compute performance is substantial, with 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 103.0 TFLOPS of FP16 performance.

Benchmark scores confirm its graphics prowess, with a PassMark G3D score of 29009 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068. However, its average benchmark score of 13745 is skewed by comparisons to far less powerful integrated GPUs. The card's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 is a more accurate reflection of its modern gaming capabilities. For rendering and compute tasks, the 16828 PassMark GPU Compute score and 12756 Geekbench OpenCL score demonstrate its ability to accelerate a wide range of professional applications, from 3D rendering to video encoding. The 7900 XT is a powerful rendering engine, and its 55th percentile ranking, which is dragged down by irrelevant comparisons, should not be misinterpreted as a sign of mediocre performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds