SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is a balanced desktop combination built around eight Zen 4 cores and a 12 GB RDNA 3 accelerator, landing at a combined percentile of 75 across tracked builds. The data shows a CPU sitting in the 82nd percentile of all processors and a GPU in the 67th percentile of all graphics cards — a deliberately CPU-forward pairing for a mid-range gaming desktop. The Ryzen 7 8700F carries a launch MSRP of $270 and the RX 7700 XT launched at 449 USD. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly recorded.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8700F is an eight-core, sixteen-thread Zen 4 processor on the Phoenix codename, fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process. It runs a 4.10 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.00 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Cache allocation is 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus 16 MB of shared L3. There is no 3D V-Cache variant configuration listed, and the integrated graphics field is N/A — the "F" suffix processor requires a discrete card, which the RX 7700 XT supplies.

The performance profile is distinctly modern-mobile-derived. With a 65 W TDP, the Phoenix design delivers strong efficiency, and the benchmark spread confirms it: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26646 against a single-core score of 3761 shows the eight cores scale well, while the Geekbench single-core result of 2290 and Passmark single-thread score of 3872 indicate snappy per-thread responsiveness for everyday applications and older game engines alike.

The 3DMark CPU thread scaling tells a clear story. The single-thread score is 1008; four threads reach 3839; eight threads hit 6559; and sixteen threads deliver 7883, with the max-threads result of 7861 essentially matching it. Scaling from one to eight threads is nearly linear, and the final step to sixteen threads adds only a modest gain — SMT provides a finishing touch rather than a headline benefit. For real workloads, this means the chip behaves like a true eight-core performer in rendering, compilation, and streaming encode scenarios, with diminishing returns beyond physical core counts.

Against its nearest rivals, the 8700F is remarkably tightly clustered. Its average benchmark score of 30746 sits within a percentage point of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (30879, -0.4%), the Intel Core i5-13600H (30548, +0.6%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (30468, +0.9%), and the Intel Core i7-13700TE (31028, -0.9%). That is a remarkably competitive band: no rival escapes it by even one percent. The practical read is that CPU choice in this tier comes down to platform features rather than raw throughput, and the 8700F's AM5 socket and DDR5 support are its differentiators.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's composite standing is an 82nd percentile ranking against all tracked processors, with an average benchmark score of 30746. Individual results reinforce that position: Cinebench R20 multi-core at 11191, Geekbench multi-core at 13523, and Passmark multithread at 30893. The Passmark component scores reveal specific strengths — integer math at 100371, floating point math at 62629, data compression at 378160, and encryption at 22117 — numbers that matter for file archival, disk encryption, and scientific computation. The extended instructions score of 28474 shows healthy AVX utilization, useful for optimized media workloads.

The RX 7700 XT posts an average benchmark score of 22549 and a 67th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its Passmark G3D score of 22547 anchors that composite, with the Geekbench Vulkan result of 46443 and OpenCL result of 138383 covering compute workloads, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 covering modern rasterization. The GPU compute Passmark score of 12912 confirms the card is more than a gaming part — OpenCL-accelerated applications will find usable throughput here.

In rival terms, the GPU is bracketed by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22435, +0.5%), the RTX 4060 Mobile (22729, -0.8%), the RTX 2080 (22895, -1.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (22170, +1.7%). Being statistically level with those parts places it squarely in the upper mid-range: comfortably ahead of entry-tier cards, but a clear step below halo GPUs. Combined, the build's 75th percentile reflects a machine where the processor slightly outranks the graphics card — a sensible configuration for a gaming-plus-productivity desktop.

Gaming Performance

The database contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU pairing, so the figures discussed here are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than recorded results. That caveat stated, the scores permit confident qualitative framing.

A Passmark G3D score of 22547, sitting between the RTX 4060 Mobile and the RTX 2080 in average performance, points to a card built for high-refresh 1440p gaming and comfortable 4K play in less demanding titles. The 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth means texture-heavy modern games have headroom that 8 GB cards lack, and the 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 rate with 3456 shading units provides the raw rasterization muscle for ultra settings at 1440p.

The CPU side is not the limiter in most scenarios. With a 3DMark eight-thread score of 6559 and single-thread performance at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, the 8700F can feed the 7700 XT in esports and AAA titles alike; simulation-heavy games that lean on a few fast threads are handled by the 1008 3DMark single-thread score and the 2290 Geekbench single-core result. Ray tracing is supported through 54 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate capability, though as with all cards in this tier, rasterized workloads are where the performance envelope is widest. These are expectations, not measurements — the absence of per-game FPS rows means titles and resolutions cannot be cited with recorded numbers.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 67th percentile standing and its proximity to the RTX 2080 and RTX 4060 Mobile in average score indicate strong 1080p and 1440p frame delivery, with the CPU's 82nd percentile single-thread results ensuring the processor rarely throttles frame rates in fast-paced titles.

Streaming: Sixteen threads and a Passmark multithread score of 30893 give the 8700F room to run a game and an encode simultaneously; the 3DMark sixteen-thread score of 7883 confirms near-full utilization of the thread count under mixed load.

Video editing: The Geekbench multi-core result of 13523 and extended instructions score of 28474 support timeline scrubbing and export work, while the 7700 XT's OpenCL score of 138383 enables GPU-accelerated effects in OpenCL-aware editors — a genuinely useful compute asset at this tier.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 26646 and R20 at 11191 characterize a capable mid-tier rendering node for design iteration rather than final-frame farm duty; the Vulkan compute score of 46443 adds a GPU path for renderers that use it.

Software development: Compile times benefit from eight physical cores, evidenced by the near-linear thread scaling from 1008 single-thread to 6559 at eight threads, and containers or parallel test suites fit comfortably inside sixteen threads.

Student and office work: A 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool for desk-bound productivity, and single-core scores (3761 Cinebench R23, 3872 Passmark) mean browsers, office suites, and video calls feel instant.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is AMD Socket AM5 with DDR5 support on a dual-channel memory bus delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. AM5 gives this build a genuine forward path: the CPU is listed as Active in production, and the socket supports newer AMD desktop processors, making a future chip swap straightforward without replacing the board. ECC memory is not supported, so this is a consumer workstation rather than a mission-critical one.

PCIe is Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, which matches the RX 7700 XT's PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface exactly — no bandwidth is wasted, and no Gen 5 premium is paid for on a card that cannot use it. Remaining lanes cover an NVMe SSD and chipset devices.

Power headroom is generous. The CPU's 65 W TDP plus the GPU's 245 W TDP leaves a suggested 550 W PSU running with comfortable margin under combined load — the recommendation already accounts for both components, and transient spikes from the dual 8-pin connected card are factored into that figure. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm long, 135 mm tall, and 50 mm wide, so mid-tower cases accommodate it without exotic cooling. A sensible next upgrade is the graphics card: with the CPU at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 67th, a stronger GPU would raise the combined 75th percentile without the processor becoming a drag at 1440p and above.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh and 1440p ultra settings are the primary audience — the GPU's rival cluster around the RTX 4060 Mobile and RTX 2080 defines exactly that bracket. Content creators doing 1080p-to-1440p video work benefit from the 13523 Geekbench multi-core score and the 138383 OpenCL result, a combination that handles editing and GPU effects in one box. Developers get sixteen threads and strong single-core responsiveness for mixed compile-and-test workflows. Students and small-business workstation builders get a 65 W processor that keeps systems cool and quiet, plus the AM5 platform's upgrade runway. What this build is not: a 4K-max ray tracing rig or a rendering farm node — the percentile data places both components firmly in the capable mid-range, not the flagship tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is CPU-forward. The processor ranks at the 82nd percentile while the GPU ranks at the 67th, a fifteen-point spread that means the graphics card is the limiting component in GPU-bound games. That is the correct orientation for a gaming build — you want the CPU waiting on the GPU, not the reverse.

The evidence is in the scaling data. The 8700F's eight-thread 3DMark score of 6559 and its single-thread percentile standing indicate it can drive frame rates well beyond what a card in the RTX 2080 performance neighborhood can render at 1440p ultra. At lower resolutions and higher refresh rates the gap narrows, and CPU-bound scenarios can appear in esports titles — but with a single-thread score of 1008, the 8700F holds high frame rates comfortably. For production workloads the balance inverts usefully: rendering and compute tasks lean on whichever component suits them, with the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core of 26646 and the GPU's OpenCL 138383 providing two genuinely different acceleration paths. At the estimated gaming loads, a GPU upgrade extracts more performance than a CPU upgrade would; the bottleneck math says so plainly.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing an eight-core, sixteen-thread Zen 4 processor with a 12 GB RDNA 3 graphics card, achieving a combined percentile of 75 across tracked systems. That number positions it above three-quarters of the database — a solidly upper-mid-tier machine. The CPU contributes an 82nd percentile ranking with an average score of 30746, statistically inseparable from rivals like the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and Core i7-13700TE, while the GPU contributes a 67th percentile ranking at 22549 average, level with the RTX 5060 Mobile and RTX 4060 Mobile. Both components are in Active production status, both sit on modern process nodes — 4 nm for the CPU, 5 nm for the GPU — and the platform is current, with AM5, DDR5, and PCIe Gen 4 throughout. In class terms: a well-balanced, efficient, upgrade-friendly mid-range desktop with a processor that outclasses its graphics card, which is exactly the shape a durable gaming build should take.

FAQ

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 8700F have integrated graphics?

A: No. The integrated graphics field is N/A for this "F" series processor, so a discrete graphics card like the RX 7700 XT in this pairing is required for any display output.

Q: How does the 8700F compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 30746 sits within one percent of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (-0.4%), Intel Core i5-13600H (+0.6%), Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (+0.9%), and Intel Core i7-13700TE (-0.9%) — a statistical dead heat across the tier.

Q: Is the RX 7700 XT good for 1440p gaming?

A: The database contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing, but the card's 67th percentile ranking, 12 GB of GDDR6, 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and average score level with the RTX 2080 and RTX 4060 Mobile indicate it is well suited to high-refresh 1440p play based on benchmark estimates.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, which covers the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 245 W TDP with headroom. The card uses two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Can this system be upgraded later?

A: Yes. The AMD Socket AM5 platform and the CPU's Active production status support future processor upgrades on the same board, and the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking means a stronger graphics card would be the more impactful next upgrade.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, running from a 4.10 GHz base up to a 5.00 GHz boost clock.

Q: Is this build suitable for video editing and streaming?

A: Yes. The Geekbench multi-core score of 13523 and Passmark multithread score of 30893 support encode and streaming workloads, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 138383 provides acceleration for GPU-enabled editing applications.