SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

17,083 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

This desktop build pairs AMD's Zen 4-based Ryzen 7 8700F processor with the RDNA 3.0-based Radeon RX 7600 XT graphics card, landing at the 71st percentile overall against all tracked CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 60th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a configuration where the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data, so all frame rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700F uses AMD Socket AM5, the current desktop platform that supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The platform does not support ECC memory, which is worth noting for users considering workstation-class builds. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the RX 7600 XT connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, meaning the graphics card will operate at half the available lane width of the CPU's PCIe allocation. This leaves additional Gen 4 lanes free for storage or other expansion cards, though the exact lane distribution beyond the GPU connection is not specified in the data.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 190 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 450 W for the entire system. This relatively modest power requirement means users with existing quality power supplies in the 450 W range can likely accommodate this build without upgrading that component. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width, measuring 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, which should fit comfortably in most mid-tower cases.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the AM5 platform has headroom in both CPU and GPU directions. The processor's 65 W TDP is low for the platform, meaning higher-TDP AM5 CPUs could drop in without additional cooling infrastructure if the motherboard's VRM design supports it. On the graphics side, the RX 7600 XT's 190 W TDP and single 8-pin connector indicate the PSU has room for a more power-hungry GPU, though the PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface on the current card means a future GPU with a x16 interface would require a motherboard that routes all 20 lanes appropriately. The DDR5 memory support and Gen 4 PCIe connectivity position this platform as current-generation, and the unlocked multiplier on the CPU (confirmed by the multiplierUnlocked field) offers overclocking potential for users seeking additional performance without changing hardware.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7600 XT's PassMark G3D score of 17132 places it at the 60th percentile, which in the data's context suggests solid 1080p performance and capable 1440p gaming, though likely not consistent high-refresh 4K. The CPU's single-thread score of 1008 in 3DMark and 3872 in PassMark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance that supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide a solid foundation for simultaneous gaming and encoding, with a PassMark multithread score of 30893 and 3DMark max-threads score of 7861. The GPU's 32 ray accelerators (RT cores) and RDNA 3.0 architecture include dedicated hardware that can assist with encoding workloads, though the data does not specify encoder capabilities directly.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 and Geekbench multicore score of 13523 indicate strong multi-threaded performance for rendering timelines and exporting projects. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample VRAM for holding video previews and effects, while its FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS supports GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11191 and R15 multicore score of 2685 demonstrate capable CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 2048 shading units and 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 throughput can accelerate viewport and final-frame rendering in compatible applications. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly useful for larger scenes that would exceed the capacity of lower-memory cards.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 100371 and data compression score of 378160 show strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and build tasks. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the single-thread score of 3872 supports fast interactive responsiveness in IDEs.

Student and office work: The 65 W CPU TDP and 190 W GPU TDP keep power consumption moderate for daily use, and the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3872 handles office productivity smoothly. The GPU's PassMark G2D score of 1030 indicates adequate 2D performance for document work and web browsing, though this is not a workload that stresses either component significantly.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the following figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay data. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348 and PassMark G3D score of 17132, combined with the CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7883 and single-thread score of 1008, suggest the following frame rate expectations:

At 1080p with ultra settings, this build should deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 3872) preventing bottlenecks in CPU-heavy games. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM ensures texture-heavy scenes at 1080p will not exceed memory capacity, which is a common limitation on 8 GB cards. Estimated performance should comfortably exceed 60 FPS in most modern titles at 1080p ultra, with competitive esports titles likely reaching much higher rates given the CPU's single-thread capabilities.

At 1440p with ultra settings, the GPU's 60th percentile standing suggests moderate performance, with estimated frame rates falling to the 50-70 FPS range in demanding AAA titles. The 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 128-bit bus width are modest for this resolution, potentially limiting performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenes. Users seeking higher 1440p refresh rates may need to adjust settings from ultra to high.

At 4K with ultra settings, this combination would likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles, with estimates suggesting sub-40 FPS performance in most AAA games. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 22.57 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s are insufficient for the 4K pixel count at high detail levels, and the CPU would become increasingly irrelevant as the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at this resolution.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who primarily play at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors, where the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1008, PassMark single-thread 3872) and the GPU's 60th percentile standing combine for a smooth experience. It also suits 1440p gamers willing to adjust settings from ultra to high, given the GPU's VRAM capacity of 16 GB provides headroom for high-resolution textures even if raw throughput limits frame rates.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering at moderate scales will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM adequate for projects that do not require extreme multi-GPU setups. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 22117 and extended instructions score of 28474 indicate strong performance for security-sensitive workloads and applications using modern instruction sets.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's integer math score of 100371 and multithread score of 30893, which accelerate build times. Students and small business users get a system that handles office work, web browsing, and light content creation without the power draw of higher-end configurations, thanks to the 65 W CPU TDP and 190 W GPU TDP.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance favoring the CPU. The Ryzen 7 8700F sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 7600 XT sits at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. This 22-percentile gap indicates the GPU will be the limiting factor in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, as the CPU has more relative headroom than the graphics card.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (PassMark score 378160), and multithreaded rendering (Cinebench R23 multicore 26646), the CPU delivers near-top-tier performance while the GPU remains underutilized. In gaming scenarios, the GPU's 60th percentile standing becomes the primary constraint, with the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 3872, 3DMark single-thread 1008) sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p but not at higher resolutions where the GPU's limited throughput becomes the bottleneck.

The FPS scaling between 1080p and 4K would likely show a steep drop, far steeper than the resolution difference alone would suggest, because the GPU's modest FP32 throughput (22.57 TFLOPS) and pixel rate (176.3 GPixel/s) cannot scale with pixel count. Conversely, the CPU's 16 threads and high single-thread score mean that even at 1080p, most games will be GPU-limited rather than CPU-limited, making the GPU the component to upgrade first for better gaming performance.

FAQ

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's 60th percentile standing and FP32 throughput of 22.57 TFLOPS with a pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s indicate sub-40 FPS estimates at 4K ultra in demanding titles, making this a 1080p or adjusted-settings 1440p gaming configuration.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7600 XT have and is it enough?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. This capacity is ample for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and even 4K textures, though the bandwidth may limit performance in memory-intensive scenes.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No. The integratedGraphics field for the Ryzen 7 8700F lists "N/A", meaning a discrete GPU is required for display output. The RX 7600 XT provides that functionality.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, with the CPU having a 65 W TDP and the GPU a 190 W TDP. A 450 W unit should suffice, though the data does not specify whether higher wattage provides additional headroom.

Q: Can this CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes. The multiplierUnlocked field is true for the Ryzen 7 8700F, indicating overclocking support, though the data does not specify the extent of achievable overclocks or required cooling.

Q: What memory type does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported, which may matter for users considering error-correcting memory in workstation builds.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F's average benchmark score of 30746 is 0.4% lower than the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS's average score of 30879, placing the two effectively at parity despite the 8700F having more cores and threads (8/16 versus unspecified for the rival).

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 30746, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS with an average score of 30879, a delta of -0.4%, placing the 8700F essentially at parity with that mobile processor. Against the Intel Core i5-13600H (average score 30548, delta 0.6%), the 8700F is 0.6% ahead, while versus the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (average 30468, delta 0.9%) it leads by 0.9%. The Intel Core i7-13700TE (average 31028) is 0.9% ahead of the 8700F.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 17083, placing it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 with an average score of 17037, a delta of 0.3%, meaning the RX 7600 XT is 0.3% ahead. Against the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (average 17019), it leads by 0.4%, while versus the NVIDIA Tesla M4 (average 16932) it is 0.9% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 (average 17208) is 0.7% ahead of the RX 7600 XT.

The combined system percentile is 71, reflecting a configuration where the CPU's strong 82nd percentile standing is dragged down by the GPU's more modest 60th percentile position. The combined picture shows a system that excels in CPU-heavy tasks like compilation, compression, and multithreaded productivity, while gaming performance is constrained by the GPU's mid-pack standing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F, an 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 processor from the 8000 series, with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, a RDNA 3.0 graphics card from the RX 7000 series. The CPU was released in March 2024 with a launch MSRP of $270, while the GPU followed in January 2024 with a launch MSRP of 329 USD.

The overall tier from the percentiles is solidly mid-range: the CPU at 82nd percentile is upper-tier, the GPU at 60th percentile is solidly mid-range, and the combined 71st percentile reflects a system that outperforms most tracked configurations but does not approach top-tier performance. This is a balanced mainstream build that prioritizes CPU performance for productivity while providing competent gaming capability at 1080p and moderate 1440p.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8700F features 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Base clock is 4.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

Benchmark results show strong single-thread performance with a PassMark single-thread score of 3872 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1008. Multi-threaded performance is equally impressive with Cinebench R23 multicore at 26646, Geekbench multicore at 13523, and PassMark multithread at 30893. The CPU's data compression score of 378160 and integer math score of 100371 indicate excellent throughput for productivity tasks. The floating-point math score of 62629 and extended instructions score of 28474 further confirm strong computational capabilities. The find prime numbers score of 98 is notably low, suggesting this workload may not be optimized for the architecture.

For real workloads, the 5.00 GHz boost clock and high single-thread scores translate to snappy application responsiveness, while the 16 threads and 26646 Cinebench R23 multicore score make it a capable processor for rendering, encoding, and compilation tasks. The 65 W TDP means cooling requirements are modest, and the unlocked multiplier offers overclocking headroom for users seeking additional performance.

GPU Analysis

The RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish," manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. It features 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray accelerators (RT cores). The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, and clock speeds of 1980 MHz base, 2470 MHz game, and 2755 MHz boost. Memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The GPU delivers 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) performance, with a pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 17132 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348. Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426 and Vulkan score of 48366 indicate strong compute performance. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 65 is notably low compared to DirectX 11 (167) and DirectX 9 (228), which may suggest driver optimization differences or benchmark characteristics rather than actual API performance. The GPU compute score of 8987 and G2D score of 1030 complete the picture.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing larger scenes and textures to reside in memory without spilling to system RAM. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, while not exceptional, is adequate for 1080p and moderate 1440p gaming. The 32 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the 60th percentile overall standing suggests RT performance will be modest compared to higher-tier cards. The 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supports GPU-accelerated compute in applications that leverage it, and the 1:1 FP16 ratio is useful for workloads that can use reduced precision.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds