SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 form a desktop pairing with a combined percentile of 70, placing it above most CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact configuration; all performance references below are estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, which are the only quantitative basis available.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. That gap of 25 percentile points indicates a CPU‑heavy pairing: the processor is far stronger relative to its field than the graphics card is relative to its own field. In gaming workloads, this typically means the GPU will become the limiting factor at high refresh rates and high resolutions, because the CPU has more than enough compute headroom to feed the GPU. The CPU’s single‑thread score of 1008 in 3DMark single‑thread and 3872 in PassMark single‑thread are strong, but the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 16634 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 are mid‑range figures. At 1080p with low settings, the CPU could potentially outpace the GPU, but at 1440p or 4K the GPU will almost certainly bottleneck the frame rate.

Multi‑threaded workloads are a different story. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi‑core score of 26646 and Geekbench multi‑core of 13523 put it well above average, while the GPU’s compute scores (PassMark GPU compute 8790, OpenCL 88051) are respectable but not exceptional. In tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will likely be the primary engine, and the GPU will play a supporting role. The CPU’s 16 threads and 8 cores give it substantial parallel headroom; the GPU’s 2048 shading units are modest for rendering. Overall, the balance leans heavily toward CPU‑limited workloads, and any bottleneck in gaming will come from the GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High‑refresh gaming – The CPU’s strong single‑thread performance (3DMark single‑thread 1008, PassMark single‑thread 3872) can drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU’s 57th percentile position will cap the ceiling. At 1080p with competitive settings, the CPU is likely sufficient for 144Hz class gaming, but at 1440p the GPU will be the constraint. The 8 GB VRAM and 128‑bit bus of the RX 7600 further limit high‑resolution textures.

Streaming – The 8‑core, 16‑thread CPU with a 4.10 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost provides a solid foundation for software encoding. The Cinebench R23 multi‑core score of 26646 and PassMark multithread of 30893 indicate the CPU can handle encoding alongside gaming, though the GPU’s modest compute (OpenCL 88051) may be used for hardware encoding if the software supports it.

Video editing – Timeline scrubbing and effects rely on both CPU and GPU. The CPU’s Geekbench multi‑core 13523 and PassMark integer math 100371 suggest fast rendering and export times. The GPU’s 8GB VRAM and RDNA 3.0 architecture handle effects and previews, but the 57th percentile means it is not a top‑tier editing accelerator.

3D rendering – The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi‑core 11191 and R15 multi‑core 2685 show strong CPU rendering performance. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 indicates it can accelerate some renderers, but its 8GB VRAM and 128‑bit memory bus (288 GB/s) will limit large scenes. CPU‑based rendering will be more predictable.

Software development – The 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 65W TDP and dual‑channel DDR5 support, provide a responsive environment for compilations and parallel builds. PassMark integer math 100371 and data compression 378160 are strong indicators for code compilation and packaging.

Student and office work – The CPU’s single‑thread and multi‑thread scores are far above what office tasks require, and the GPU’s 2D performance (PassMark G2D 984) is adequate for typical business apps. The system will never feel slow in spreadsheets, browsers, or document editing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8‑core, 16‑thread desktop processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It has a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The chip uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, supports dual‑channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only). It lacks integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

The benchmark suite shows a balanced performer. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 7883 in 16‑thread, 1989 in 2‑thread, 3839 in 4‑thread, 6559 in 8‑thread, and 7861 in max‑threads. The single‑thread score of 1008 is modest, but the multi‑thread scaling from 2‑thread to max‑threads is nearly linear, indicating good core utilization. Cinebench results are equally strong: R23 multi‑core 26646, R20 multi‑core 11191, R15 multi‑core 2685. Single‑core scores are 3761 (R23), 1579 (R20), and 378 (R15). Geekbench reports 13523 multi‑core and 2290 single‑core. PassMark integer math (100371), floating point (62629), and data encryption (22117) are all high, while data compression (378160) and random string sorting (45425) indicate solid productivity performance.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 30746 puts it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (avg 30879, delta –0.4%), Intel Core i5‑13600H (avg 30548, delta +0.6%), Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (avg 30468, delta +0.9%), and Intel Core i7‑13700TE (avg 31028, delta –0.9%). The 8700F is essentially in the same performance class as these processors, with deltas of less than 1% either way. This means the 8700F is a solid mid‑range CPU that trades blows with recent mobile and low‑power desktop chips.

The 16MB of shared L3 cache and 1MB L2 per core provide good data locality for many workloads. The 4nm process and 178 mm² die size with 25 billion transistors contribute to its efficiency. The CPU is unlocked (multiplier unlocked), allowing overclocking, and it is currently active in production.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is best suited for users who want a strong CPU‑first system for productivity and moderate gaming. The CPU’s 82nd percentile makes it a capable choice for content creators who spend time in video editing or 3D rendering; the high multi‑core scores will reduce export times, while the GPU’s 57th percentile is enough for real‑time previews. Software developers will benefit from the 16 threads and fast data compression scores, and the dual‑channel DDR5 support is adequate for code compilation. Students and small business workstations will find the system far exceeds the requirements of office suites, and the 65W CPU TDP keeps the system cool and quiet. For gamers, the CPU will not bottleneck even high‑refresh 1080p monitors, but the GPU will limit the frame rate at higher resolutions; this build is best for 1080p gaming with moderate settings. It is not a system for 4K AAA gaming, as the GPU’s 8GB VRAM and 128‑bit bus are not sufficient for such demands.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30746, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15171, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of the pairing is 70, meaning it outperforms 70% of desktop builds in the database.

The GPU’s benchmark suite includes: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 – 2310, Geekbench OpenCL – 88051, Vulkan – 34401, PassMark G3D – 16634, G2D – 984, and compute – 8790. The nearest rivals to the GPU are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (avg 15199, delta –0.2%), AMD Radeon Pro 560X (avg 15082, delta +0.6%), AMD Radeon 680M (avg 15270, delta –0.7%), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (avg 15063, delta +0.7%). The RX 7600 is effectively a peer of these cards, with a delta of less than 1% in either direction. The GPU’s 57th percentile confirms it is a mid‑range part, not a high‑end one.

The CPU’s nearest rivals (listed earlier) show it is also tightly clustered around the 30k score mark. The combined picture is that of a system where the CPU is clearly above average and the GPU is average; the total percentile of 70 reflects the CPU’s stronger position pulling the pair up.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is based on the Navi 33 chip, RDNA 3.0 architecture, on a 6 nm process. It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture units, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray‑tracing cores. The memory is 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128‑bit bus with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1720 MHz, boost clock 2655 MHz, and game clock 2250 MHz; memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU has a 165W TDP, dual‑slot design, and requires a single 8‑pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 450W.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are shown by its FP32 of 21.75 TFLOPS and FP16 of 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1). Pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate 339.8 GTexel/s. The benchmark scores: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 2310, OpenCL 88051, Vulkan 34401, PassMark G3D 16634, and compute 8790. These numbers place the GPU at the 57th percentile, meaning it is slightly above the median but well below top‑tier cards. The RT cores are present but not numerous; ray tracing performance is not a focus of this card.

The 8GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming and light 1440p, but the 128‑bit bus and 288 GB/s bandwidth may be a limitation for heavy texture loads. The RDNA 3.0 architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern APIs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is on AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory (dual‑channel) and provides 20 PCIe 5.0 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the AM5 platform. The CPU TDP is 65W, and the GPU TDP is 165W, giving a combined TDP of 230W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450W, which leaves headroom for a more power‑hungry CPU if upgraded later. The AM5 socket is current, so a future CPU upgrade (e.g., a higher‑core‑count Zen 4 or Zen 5 chip) could be installed without a motherboard change, provided the motherboard’s BIOS supports it. The memory support is DDR5, so any upgrade will keep the same RAM. The CPU has 20 PCIe 5.0 lanes, and the GPU uses 8 lanes of PCIe 4.0, leaving 12 lanes for NVMe SSDs or other expansion. The power connectors on the GPU are a single 8‑pin, which is easy to supply. The upgrade path is straightforward: the CPU can be swapped for a more powerful AM5 chip, and the GPU can be replaced with a higher‑tier RDNA 3 or other card without changing the platform. The only limitation is the GPU’s 8‑pin connector, but most modern PSUs provide that.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (build class: desktop) that pairs an AMD Ryzen 7 8700F CPU with an AMD Radeon RX 7600 GPU. The CPU is a high‑end mid‑range part (82nd percentile) and the GPU is a mid‑range part (57th percentile). The combined percentile is 70, meaning the system sits in the upper 30% of desktop configurations in the database. It is a well‑balanced productivity‑first machine, with the CPU carrying the heavier load in multi‑threaded tasks and the GPU providing capable 1080p gaming and general acceleration. The 8‑core/16‑thread CPU and 8GB VRAM GPU make it a versatile system for content creation, development, and everyday gaming. The system is not a high‑end enthusiast rig, but it offers a strong CPU foundation that can be upgraded with a faster GPU later. The 65W CPU TDP keeps the thermal and power envelope modest, making it suitable for compact builds.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the CPU has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for video output.

Q: What is the CPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is $270.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and type?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128‑bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5‑13600H?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30746, while the i5‑13600H scores 30548, giving the Ryzen a delta of +0.6% (slightly higher).

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 70, meaning it outperforms 70% of desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe 5.0 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The boost clock is 5.00 GHz, and the TDP is 65W.

Q: Is the GPU’s ray tracing performance strong?

A: The GPU has 32 RT cores, but its overall percentile (57th) suggests ray tracing performance is mid‑range; the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 reflects this.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds