SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and AMD Radeon RX 7400 form a desktop pairing that presents one of the most pronounced performance imbalances in the current benchmark database. The CPU is a high-end 8-core Zen 4 part with a strong 82nd percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 17th percentile, placing it in the entry-level segment. This combination produces a system where the processor is capable of far more than the graphics card can deliver, making it a build that requires careful consideration of the intended workload before purchase.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, and fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, operating at a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This is a desktop-class processor with a 65 W TDP, housed in the AMD Socket AM5. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. This is a modern, active platform with an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking.

Benchmark data shows the 8700F is a formidable multi-threaded performer. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 places it in the upper echelon of desktop processors. The single-core score of 3761 in the same test indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The Geekbench multicore score of 13523 and single-core score of 2290 corroborate this balanced performance profile. The 3DMark results show a clear scaling pattern from the 2-thread score of 1989 up to the 8-thread score of 6559, and finally to the max-thread score of 7861. This indicates that the processor efficiently utilizes all its cores, with a near-linear scaling beyond 8 threads, evidenced by the max-thread score of 7861 being close to the 8-thread score of 6559.

The PassMark suite provides insight into specific workload characteristics. The integer math score of 100371 is a strong result, beneficial for general productivity and data processing. The floating-point math score of 62629 is also substantial, supporting scientific and engineering applications. The data compression score of 378160 is excellent, making this CPU well-suited for file archiving and compression tasks. The data encryption score of 22117 confirms it handles security-related workloads effectively. The CPU's average benchmark score of 30746 places it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, and it sits directly between the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (which it trails by 0.4%) and the Intel Core i5-13600H (which it beats by 0.6%). This puts it in a competitive position against mobile and lower-power desktop parts, but its true desktop-class performance shows in its substantial multi-core scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The core issue with this build is the massive disparity between the CPU and GPU performance tiers. The Ryzen 7 8700F is a top-tier processor, while the RX 7400 is an entry-level graphics card. In any workload that heavily utilizes the GPU, the RX 7400 will be the definitive bottleneck. The CPU's potential for high framerates or complex physics calculations will be wasted because the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to keep up. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking compared to the CPU's 82nd percentile means that in gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system will perform like a low-end machine, regardless of the powerful CPU.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks such as software compilation, video encoding, or heavy multitasking, the RX 7400 is essentially a non-factor. The CPU will operate at its full potential, and the GPU will be idle or only lightly utilized. This creates a system that is exceptionally fast for some workloads and surprisingly slow for others. The data indicates that there is no workload where both components are evenly matched; the system is always limited by one or the other. The combined percentile of 50, which is the midpoint, reflects this odd pairing, but it is a misleading average that hides the true bimodal performance profile. For users whose primary focus is gaming, the RX 7400 will be the limiting factor in almost every scenario, from 1080p to higher resolutions. For users focused on productivity, the GPU is sufficient for basic display output, but the CPU is the star of the show.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 8700F's benchmark scores are consistently strong. Its Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11191 and single-core score of 1579 show a good generation-over-generation improvement. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7883 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 7861, indicating that the processor is fully saturated with 16 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 30893 further solidifies its position as a high-end productivity CPU. The single-thread PassMark score of 3872 is also competitive, ensuring snappy performance in everyday tasks. These scores place the CPU at the 82nd percentile, meaning it outperforms 82% of all processors in the database, a strong indicator of its capability.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400, on the other hand, presents a very different picture. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1103. The PassMark G3D score is 11897, and its G2D score is 1209. The GPU compute score is 5152, which is low for a dedicated graphics card. The DirectX 11 score of 97 and DirectX 12 score of 44 are telling; they show that the card is weak in modern APIs, though the DirectX 9 score of 176 is relatively better. Its average benchmark score is 2467, placing it at the 17th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S (which it beats by 1.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce 710M (which it beats by 1.4%), and the Intel HD Graphics 610 (which it beats by 1.8%). These are all integrated or very low-end mobile graphics solutions, clearly indicating the RX 7400 is at the very bottom of the dedicated GPU performance hierarchy. The combined picture is a system with a high-end CPU and a GPU that performs similarly to integrated graphics, creating a severe bottleneck for any graphics-intensive task.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not measured results. Given the RX 7400's 17th percentile ranking and its benchmark scores, which are only slightly better than integrated graphics, the gaming performance will be extremely limited. The GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 44 suggests that it will struggle with modern game engines.

Based on the CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread scores, the processor is not the limiting factor. The RX 7400 will be the bottleneck. We can estimate that in less demanding esports titles, the system might achieve playable framerates at 1080p with low to medium settings. However, in modern AAA games, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain 30 FPS even at 1080p with the lowest settings. At 1440p or 4K, the performance would be insufficient for a smooth experience in almost all games. The 8 GB of VRAM is adequate for the card's performance class, but the raw compute power is simply insufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming. The data suggests that this is a pairing for a user who does not prioritize gaming performance, as the GPU will be the primary constraint in every gaming scenario.

Who Should Build It

This build is not for gamers. The RX 7400's performance is too low for modern gaming, and the CPU's power would be wasted. Instead, this pairing targets users who need a high-performance CPU for professional or productivity tasks but only require basic graphics output. The Ryzen 7 8700F's strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 score of 26646 and PassMark multithread score of 30893, makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile large codebases, video editors working with 4K footage that rely on CPU encoding, and data analysts running complex simulations. The CPU's high integer and floating-point math scores support these workloads.

Students and small business workstations would also benefit from this build. The CPU handles office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease. The integrated-free design means that the RX 7400 is necessary for display output, but it will be more than sufficient for 2D applications and basic productivity. The data shows this is a compute-focused machine. Users in these fields will see excellent performance in their CPU-bound applications, and the low-performance GPU will not negatively impact them. This is a sensible choice for a workstation where the primary investment is in CPU compute power, not graphical fidelity.

FAQ

Q: Is this combination good for high-refresh-rate gaming?

A: No. The RX 7400 is at the 17th percentile of all GPUs, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 is very low. The GPU will be the bottleneck in all games, making high-refresh-rate gaming impossible. The CPU is not the limiting factor, but the GPU's low compute power prevents high FPS.

Q: What is the CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F has an average benchmark score of 30746. It is 0.4% slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and 0.9% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T. It also outperforms the Intel Core i5-13600H by 0.6%.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this platform?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This is the only memory type supported by the CPU.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 8700F has no integrated graphics (N/A). This means the discrete AMD Radeon RX 7400 is required for any display output.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for this system?

A: The FACT PACK specifies a suggested PSU of 200 W for the RX 7400. The system's total power draw will be low, given the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 43 W TDP.

Q: How does the GPU compare to other entry-level options?

A: The RX 7400 has an average benchmark score of 2467. It is 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon 8040S and 1.4% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce 710M. It also beats the Intel HD Graphics 610 by 1.8%, indicating it is at the very bottom of the performance chart.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and upgrade path?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5. This is a modern socket, and the CPU is from the 8000 series, so it is part of an active platform.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a current-generation desktop platform. The Ryzen 7 8700F is an active product, and the platform supports DDR5 memory. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The RX 7400 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's lanes. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 43 W TDP are both low, and the suggested PSU is only 200 W. This leaves significant headroom for a future GPU upgrade without necessarily requiring a new power supply.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the graphics card. The CPU is a high-end part with a 82nd percentile ranking and is capable of driving much more powerful GPUs. The current RX 7400, with its 17th percentile ranking, is the primary bottleneck. The system's overall performance would be dramatically improved by replacing the GPU with a higher-tier model. The PCIe Gen 4 support and the low system power draw mean that installing a more power-hungry and faster GPU is a straightforward path. The CPU is not a bottleneck in this pairing, so it would not need to be replaced for a significant time. The platform is solid, and the upgrade path is clear: keep the Ryzen 7 8700F and replace the RX 7400.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system, pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F with the AMD Radeon RX 7400. The CPU is a top-tier desktop processor, ranking at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is an entry-level component, ranking at the 17th percentile. The combined percentile of this pairing is 50, which is a direct result of averaging these two very different components. This is not a balanced system; it is a high-performance CPU paired with a low-performance GPU.

The overall tier of this build is defined by the CPU. It is a productivity powerhouse that is hampered by a weak graphics solution. This is a workstation-oriented pairing, not a gaming rig. The Ryzen 7 8700F's benchmark scores, such as its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646, indicate it belongs in a high-end desktop tier. The RX 7400, however, belongs in the entry-level or basic display tier. The resulting system is one where the user must prioritize CPU-intensive workloads to get the full value of the hardware. For any task that relies on the GPU, this system will perform like a budget machine.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not viable with this hardware. The RX 7400's low benchmark scores, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103, indicate it cannot produce the framerates needed for high-refresh displays. The CPU is not the limit, but the GPU is far too weak.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for streaming. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a strong Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 can handle game capture and encoding overhead in x264. However, the RX 7400's low gaming performance would require games to be run at very low settings, which reduces the quality of the stream content.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. Video editing software often uses CPU-based encoding and effects. The Ryzen 7 8700F's high multi-core performance, evidenced by its PassMark multithread score of 30893, will handle timeline scrubbing and rendering efficiently. The GPU can assist with some effects, but its low compute score of 5152 means it won't accelerate the process much.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the primary engine for CPU-based renderers. The 8700F's 16 threads and high Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11191 make it a capable choice for rendering still images. The RX 7400 is too weak for GPU-accelerated rendering, and its low compute performance will not be beneficial for this workload.

Software Development: This is an ideal use case. Compilation is a heavily multi-threaded task, and the Ryzen 7 8700F's 8 cores and 16 threads, along with a high 3DMark max-thread score of 7861, will significantly reduce build times. The GPU is irrelevant for coding, so its low performance is not a hindrance.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for basic tasks but will perform flawlessly. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3872 in PassMark ensures that document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work will be instant. The RX 7400 is sufficient for 2D display output and desktop compositing, making this a responsive and stable workstation for academic or business use.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds