SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

This desktop pairing combines an 8-core Zen 4 CPU with a 16 GB RDNA 2 flagship GPU, landing at the 85th combined percentile among all build combinations in the database. The processor is a strong multi-threaded performer that holds its own against mobile H-series chips, while the graphics card delivers top-tier rasterization throughput. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores and percentile positions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with a die size of 178 mm² and 25,000 million transistors. It belongs to the 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix codename. Base clock is 4.10 GHz, boosting to 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The multiplier is unlocked, making manual overclocking possible.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well from lightly threaded to fully loaded workloads. The 3DMark single-thread score is 1008, while the 2-thread score jumps to 1989, indicating strong per-core efficiency. Scaling continues through 4 threads (3839), 8 threads (6559), and peaks at 16 threads (7883), with the max-threads score of 7861 nearly identical to the 16-thread result. This near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads confirms that the simultaneous multi-threading implementation is effective and that the CPU can fully utilize all 16 logical processors.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R23 multicore score of 26646 is the headline figure, while single-core R23 reaches 3761. The ratio between multicore and single-core in R23 is roughly 7.1x, which is slightly lower than the theoretical 8x from having 8 physical cores, but the gap is expected due to thermal and power constraints. In Geekbench, the multicore score of 13523 versus a single-core score of 2290 shows similar scaling behavior. PassMark results are more granular: integer math scores 100371, floating-point math scores 62629, and extended instructions score 28474. Data compression hits 378160, while data encryption reaches 22117. Random string sorting scores 45425, and finding prime numbers is the weakest subtest at 98.

The average benchmark score across all tests is 30746, placing the CPU at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals are all within a narrow band. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS averages 30879, which is 0.4% ahead. The Intel Core i5-13600H averages 30548, putting the 8700F 0.6% ahead. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T averages 30468, with the 8700F ahead by 0.9%. The Intel Core i7-13700TE averages 31028, making the 8700F 0.9% behind. These deltas are all under 1%, meaning the 8700F sits in a performance cluster where no meaningful difference exists among these four rivals in aggregate benchmarks.

For real workloads, this means the 8700F handles compilation, rendering, and office productivity with confidence. The strong single-thread score of 3761 in R23 indicates snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and in applications that rely on one or two threads. The multicore score of 26646 in R23 is sufficient for serious content creation but not at the level of higher-core-count workstation chips. The 65 W TDP is modest for an 8-core desktop part, which suggests thermal headroom for sustained workloads in compact builds.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 88th percentile, and the combined percentile is 85. The GPU is arguably the stronger component relative to its peers, but the CPU is not a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The 16-thread 3DMark score of 7883 indicates that the CPU can feed a high-end GPU without significant constraint in CPU-bound titles.

The data suggests that in 1080p gaming at high frame rates, the CPU may become the limiting factor in certain esports titles where frame rates exceed the CPU's single-thread capability. The single-thread score of 1008 in 3DMark is solid but not at the absolute top tier. In contrast, at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, the RX 6950 XT's 88th percentile position means it will likely be the constraining component.

The GPU compute performance is strong, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 14199, which indicates that compute-heavy workloads will lean on the GPU. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 1553 is low relative to its other scores, which may indicate a weakness in physics simulations in games or in certain scientific workloads. The CPU's floating-point math score of 62629 is robust, suggesting that the CPU can handle physics calculations reasonably well, but the physics-specific benchmark being low is notable.

The memory bandwidth of the CPU is 83.2 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 interface. This is moderate for a desktop platform and could be a limiting factor in memory-bandwidth-sensitive applications. The GPU, however, has 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is far higher, so the GPU is unlikely to be bandwidth-starved in most workloads. The balance tips toward GPU-bound performance in rendering and gaming, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom for most tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85, indicating that this build outperforms 85% of all recorded configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score of 30746 places it at the 82nd percentile, while the GPU's average score of 58392 places it at the 88th percentile. The GPU is the higher-performing component relative to its peers.

In 3DMark benchmarks, the CPU scores 7883 in 16-thread, 6559 in 8-thread, 3839 in 4-thread, 1989 in 2-thread, and 1008 in single-thread. The GPU scores 4235 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This GPU score, combined with the CPU's 16-thread score, suggests that the total system is well-suited for DX12 workloads.

The GPU's Geekbench scores are notably high: 222653 in Metal, 205998 in OpenCL, and 165212 in Vulkan. The Metal score being highest indicates strong performance in Apple-adjacent rendering contexts, though this is a desktop Windows-focused build. The Vulkan score of 165212 is the lowest of the three, which may be relevant for certain games that use Vulkan as their primary API.

PassMark GPU results show a G3D score of 28070, which is the headline gaming performance metric. The DirectX 12 score is 114, DirectX 11 is 300, DirectX 10 is 164, and DirectX 9 is 303. These scores suggest that older DirectX APIs perform relatively better than newer ones, which is common for this GPU generation. The G2D score of 1063 is modest, indicating that 2D desktop workloads are not the GPU's strength.

The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11191 and R15 multicore of 2685 are consistent with the R23 result, confirming multi-generation consistency in rendering performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 13523 is lower than the R23 multicore score in absolute terms, but these are different benchmarks and not directly comparable. The PassMark multithread score of 30893 is the CPU's highest PassMark result, while single-thread scores 3872.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking and the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking indicate a build that should handle modern games at high settings, with the GPU as the primary driver of gaming performance.

At 1080p resolution, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 28070 and the CPU's strong single-thread performance suggest that this build can achieve high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU potentially limiting in esports games that favor very high refresh rates. The CPU's single-thread score of 1008 in 3DMark is respectable but not elite, so frame rates above 200 FPS in CPU-bound titles may be constrained.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes more relevant, and the RX 6950 XT's 16 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth should provide ample headroom for high-quality textures and effects. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which is the primary API for most modern games. Estimated frame rates at 1440p would be smooth for competitive and single-player titles alike, though the lack of measured data prevents precise figures.

At 4K, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck, and the 88th percentile position suggests that it can handle 4K at medium to high settings in many titles, but not at maximum settings in the most demanding games. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures, and the 295.7 GPixel/s pixel rate provides solid fill-rate performance. The CPU's 16-thread score of 7883 ensures that it will not be the limiting factor at 4K, where GPU load dominates.

The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 114 in PassMark is low, but this is a synthetic test and does not reflect real-world DX12 gaming performance, which is better represented by the 3DMark Steel Nomad score. The GPU's RT capabilities are present with 80 RT cores, but RDNA 2 ray tracing performance is generally not class-leading, so ray-traced titles may require lower settings for playable frame rates.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1440p or 4K and want high frame rates without needing the absolute top-tier GPU. The 88th GPU percentile and 82nd CPU percentile make this a strong pairing for enthusiast-level gaming. The 16 GB VRAM ensures future-proofing for upcoming titles that may exceed 8 GB or even 12 GB VRAM requirements.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 26646 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU's compute capabilities. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 14199 and OpenCL score of 205998 indicate solid performance in GPU-accelerated rendering workloads. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for most content creation tasks, though higher-core-count alternatives would be faster for heavily threaded rendering.

Software developers and data scientists will find the CPU's strong single-thread performance useful for compilation tasks, and the GPU's 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for moderate machine learning workloads. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 22117 and data compression score of 378160 indicate strong performance in security and storage-related tasks.

Students and small business users who need a versatile desktop for gaming, productivity, and occasional content creation will find this build suitable. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption reasonable, and the unlocked multiplier allows for tuning. The GPU's 335 W TDP is high, but the 700 W suggested PSU provides headroom for the entire system.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is a RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU built on TSMC's 7 nm process, with a die size of 520 mm² and 26,800 million transistors. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1860 MHz, game clock is 2100 MHz, and boost clock reaches 2310 MHz. The memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU has 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units. It includes 80 ray tracing cores, and the absence of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware. The pixel rate is 295.7 GPixel/s, texture rate is 739.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute reaches 23.65 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 47.31 TFLOPS at 2:1 ratio.

The average benchmark score is 58392, placing the GPU at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are closely matched: the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Arc A570M scores 58239 (0.3% behind), the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (0.5% behind). These deltas are all below 1%, indicating that the RX 6950 XT sits in a competitive mid-range cluster despite its high percentile.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 23.65 TFLOPS is substantial for rasterization. The 80 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but RDNA 2's RT performance is not as strong as competing architectures, so ray-traced scenes will rely more on the rasterization performance. The 16 GB VRAM is generous and prevents memory-related bottlenecks in high-resolution textures or complex scenes. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 4K gaming and compute tasks. The triple-slot cooler and 2x 8-pin power connectors indicate a high-power design, and the 335 W TDP requires adequate case airflow.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop platform from AMD. Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The motherboard should support these standards for optimal performance.

The 65 W CPU TDP is low, and the 335 W GPU TDP is high. The suggested PSU is 700 W, which provides sufficient headroom for the combined power draw and transient loads. The GPU's triple-slot design requires a case with adequate width, and the 267 mm length (10.5 inches) fits in most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count AM5 CPU, such as a Ryzen 9 series, which would slot into the same socket. This would improve multi-threaded performance for content creation and heavily threaded workloads. The GPU could be upgraded to a newer architecture with better ray tracing and lower power consumption, but the RX 6950 XT's 88th percentile position means it is not yet a bottleneck for most applications. The platform's DDR5 support and PCIe 4.0 provide a modern foundation for future upgrades. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU allows for overclocking, and the 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for frequency increases.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining an AMD Ryzen 7 8700F with an AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 65 W TDP. The GPU is a 16 GB RDNA 2 card with a 2310 MHz boost clock and 335 W TDP. The combined percentile is 85, meaning this build outperforms 85% of all recorded configurations.

The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile indicate a well-balanced system where the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers. The total benchmark picture shows a build capable of high-refresh 1440p gaming and smooth 4K gaming in most titles. The CPU's multi-threaded performance is sufficient for content creation, and the GPU's compute capabilities extend to GPU-accelerated workloads. The 16 GB VRAM provides long-term gaming headroom, and the AM5 platform offers a clear upgrade path. This is a high-tier desktop build suited for enthusiasts who prioritize rasterization performance and want a balanced CPU-GPU pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 85, meaning this build outperforms 85% of all recorded configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 30746, which is 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600H, 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, and 0.9% behind the Intel Core i7-13700TE.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM and memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this build support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 80 ray tracing cores, but RDNA 2 ray tracing performance is not class-leading, so ray-traced games may require lower settings for playable frame rates.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W, which provides headroom for the 65 W CPU TDP and the 335 W GPU TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are the gaming FPS figures measured or estimated?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions.