SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT presents a desktop build where the CPU holds a clear advantage in raw processing headroom over the GPU in most workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 30746 places it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 26011 sits in the 71st percentile among all GPUs. This 11-percentile gap indicates that the processor is the stronger component relative to its respective field, making it the primary driver of performance in compute-heavy tasks.

Thread scaling data from 3DMark reinforces this CPU-heavy balance. The 8700F scores 1989 in the 2-thread test, 3839 in the 4-thread test, 6559 in the 8-thread test, and 7883 in the 16-thread test. The scaling from 8 threads to 16 threads yields only a 20.2% improvement (from 6559 to 7883), suggesting diminishing returns beyond eight threads for many workloads. However, the max-thread score of 7861 nearly matches the 16-thread score of 7883, indicating the processor is fully utilizing its 8-core, 16-thread configuration without thermal or power throttling in benchmark conditions.

The GPU's performance profile shows a different bottleneck structure. With a PassMark G3D score of 20700 and a PassMark GPU compute score of 9550, the RX 6750 XT demonstrates solid rasterization capability but notably weaker compute throughput relative to its graphics score. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 confirms this is a capable gaming card, but the FP32 throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS means compute-heavy tasks like rendering or physics simulation will hit GPU limits sooner than CPU limits.

In gaming scenarios, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes the relevant constraint. The 8700F scores 1008 in 3DMark single-thread and 3872 in PassMark single-thread, which are strong numbers for a desktop processor. The GPU's 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is ample for 1440p gaming, but at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance will likely become the limiting factor in high-refresh-rate scenarios, as the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can feed draw calls.

The thermal and power balance favors the CPU. With a TDP of 65 watts, the Ryzen 7 8700F is a low-power processor that leaves substantial headroom for the GPU's 250-watt TDP. The suggested PSU of 600 watts indicates the system has adequate power delivery for both components under full load. This imbalance means the GPU is the component most likely to bottleneck in GPU-bound workloads, while the CPU has reserve capacity for background tasks during gaming sessions.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 6559 and single-thread score of 1008 indicate it can keep pace with fast-paced esports titles, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern game assets. The GPU's 71st percentile ranking suggests it will deliver smooth frame rates in most titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides ample parallelism for encoding while gaming. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30893 and 3DMark 16-thread score of 7883 indicate it can handle simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding. The GPU's 40 ray accelerators and DirectX 12 Ultimate support offer hardware-accelerated encoding features, though the CPU is the stronger component for this workload.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 and Geekbench multicore score of 13523 position it as capable for video editing timelines and export tasks. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 9550 provides hardware acceleration for effects and color grading, but the CPU will handle most of the heavy lifting in codec-heavy workflows. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth support smooth timeline scrubbing.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2685 and R20 multicore score of 11191 demonstrate strong CPU rendering performance. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS supports GPU-accelerated rendering engines, but the GPU's 71st percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer. The CPU will be the primary render engine in most workflows, with the GPU providing supplementary acceleration.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 100371 and data compression score of 378160 are excellent for compilation tasks and code processing. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration handles parallel builds efficiently, and the 82nd percentile CPU ranking means developers will experience responsive system performance during heavy compilation workloads. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for running multiple virtual machines or local testing environments.

Student and office work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3872 and Geekbench single-core score of 2290 deliver snappy responsiveness for document editing, spreadsheet processing, and web browsing. The GPU's 71st percentile ranking is overkill for office tasks, but the 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide headroom for occasional photo editing or light 3D visualization coursework. The 65-watt CPU TDP keeps system power consumption modest for shared workspaces.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides a clear upgrade path within the same motherboard generation. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, meaning users can upgrade memory capacity and speed without changing platforms. The socket supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and current-generation GPUs.

The CPU's 65-watt TDP leaves substantial power headroom within the suggested 600-watt PSU for the system. This means users can upgrade to a higher-TDP GPU without replacing the power supply, as long as the new GPU stays within the PSU's capacity. The motherboard socket supports future AMD processors, though specific model compatibility depends on BIOS updates and chipset support.

The GPU's 250-watt TDP and 600-watt suggested PSU indicate the system has roughly 350 watts of headroom for other components. The RX 6750 XT uses a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector configuration, which is standard for mid-range GPUs. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, meaning users should plan for a GPU upgrade before a CPU upgrade.

The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface on the GPU is backward and forward compatible, so the GPU will work in PCIe 5.0 slots with reduced throughput, and future PCIe 5.0 GPUs will work in this system's PCIe 4.0 slot, albeit with some bandwidth limitations. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide sufficient bandwidth for one full-speed GPU and additional NVMe storage.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking indicates it has headroom to support more powerful graphics cards. The CPU's 16 MB L3 cache and 4 nm process node suggest it will remain relevant for several generations. The AM5 platform's DDR5 support ensures memory upgrades remain viable without replacing the motherboard.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p resolution with high refresh rates will find this pairing well-balanced. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern game assets at this resolution, and the CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 6559 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles. The GPU's 71st percentile ranking means it outperforms the majority of graphics cards, making it suitable for enthusiast-level gaming.

Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's strong multicore performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 and Geekbench multicore score of 13523 indicate the CPU handles rendering and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 9550 provides additional acceleration for effects and preview rendering.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's integer math score of 100371 and data compression score of 378160 for compilation and build tasks. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration handles parallel builds effectively, and the 82nd percentile CPU ranking means development workloads will complete quickly. The 12 GB GPU memory supports running multiple local environments or containers.

Students in computer science or engineering programs will find this build capable of handling coursework, from programming assignments to CAD modeling. The CPU's single-thread score of 3872 in PassMark ensures responsive system interaction, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM supports moderate 3D visualization tasks. The 65-watt CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and efficient for dorm or shared living spaces.

Small business workstations that require multitasking, office productivity, and occasional media creation will benefit from this pairing. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30893 handles heavy multitasking, and the GPU's 71st percentile ranking supports graphics-intensive applications like digital signage or presentations. The 600-watt suggested PSU provides headroom for additional storage drives or expansion cards.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor from the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It uses TSMC's 4 nm process node with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock runs at 4.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The CPU has 64 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 cache per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show strong multicore performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 and Geekbench multicore score of 13523 place it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The PassMark multithread score of 30893 corroborates this, and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7883 confirms the processor scales well with thread count. The max-thread score of 7861 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score, indicating the processor maintains performance when all threads are active.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3761 and Geekbench single-core score of 2290 demonstrate strong per-core efficiency. The PassMark single-thread score of 3872 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 confirm the CPU handles lightly-threaded workloads with ease. This single-thread strength is critical for gaming and general responsiveness.

The CPU's specialized workloads show distinct strengths. PassMark integer math scores 100371, floating-point math scores 62629, and extended instructions score 28474. Data compression scores 378160, while data encryption scores 22117. The find prime numbers score of 98 and random string sorting score of 45425 provide additional context for algorithmic workloads. The physics score of 1553 in PassMark indicates decent simulation performance.

The 65-watt TDP is notably low for an 8-core desktop processor, reflecting the efficiency of the 4 nm process node. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, though ECC memory is not supported. The CPU has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required. The launch MSRP was $270, and the CPU was released on 2024-03-31.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate expectations are estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and GPU's 71st percentile ranking provide the basis for these estimates.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 and PassMark G3D score of 20700 indicate solid rasterization performance for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high texture quality settings in modern titles. The 40 ray accelerators provide hardware ray tracing support, though the GPU's RDNA 2.0 architecture is not top-tier for ray tracing workloads.

The CPU's gaming-relevant scores include a 3DMark 8-thread score of 6559 and single-thread score of 1008. These figures suggest the processor can maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios like competitive shooters or real-time strategy games. The 16 MB L3 cache and 5.00 GHz boost clock contribute to low latency in game logic and physics calculations.

At 1080p resolution, the estimated performance is likely GPU-bound in most titles, as the CPU's single-thread and 8-thread scores are strong enough to feed the GPU's rendering pipeline. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the more limiting factor, with the 12 GB VRAM handling most modern game assets at high settings. At 4K resolution, the GPU's 71st percentile ranking suggests frame rates will drop below high-refresh thresholds. The GPU's 166.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 416.0 GTexel/s texture rate support these estimates.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility ensure modern game features are accessible. The 250-watt TDP means the GPU will generate significant heat, requiring adequate case airflow. The dual-slot design and 267 mm length fit most mid-tower cases, and the 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors are standard.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 30746, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS with an average score of 30879, which is 0.4% higher. The Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30548, which is 0.6% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30468, 0.9% lower, while the Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31028, 0.9% higher. These close margins indicate the 8700F sits in a competitive mid-range CPU tier.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 26011, placing it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R9 M395X with an average score of 25891, 0.5% lower. The AMD FirePro W7100 scores 25856, 0.6% lower, and the AMD FirePro D700 scores 25842, 0.7% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile scores 25740, 1.1% lower. These margins show the RX 6750 XT is slightly ahead of its nearest competitors.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 77, indicating the system as a whole outperforms 77% of all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is the stronger component, with an 82nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 71st percentile. This means the system is CPU-heavy, with the processor providing more relative performance than the graphics card.

The GPU's benchmark breakdown shows a PassMark G3D score of 20700 and PassMark GPU compute score of 9550. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 16360, Metal score is 137249, and Vulkan score is 98089. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2548. The PassMark DirectX scores include 125 for DX10, 180 for DX11, 80 for DX12, and 263 for DX9. The G2D score is 972.

The CPU's benchmark breakdown includes a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2685 and single-core score of 378. The R20 multicore score is 11191 and single-core is 1579. The R23 multicore score is 26646 and single-core is 3761. The Geekbench multicore score is 13523 and single-core is 2290. The 3DMark scores include 7883 for 16 threads, 1989 for 2 threads, 3839 for 4 threads, 6559 for 8 threads, 7861 for max threads, and 1008 for single-thread.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F desktop processor with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT graphics card, forming a desktop-class system. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 77, meaning this system outperforms 77% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from AMD's 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with a 4 nm process node. It runs at 4.10 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost, with a 65-watt TDP. The GPU is from AMD's Radeon RX 6000 series, built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a 7 nm process node. It has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and GPU's 71st percentile ranking place this system in the upper-mid-range tier of desktop builds. The CPU is the stronger component, with an average benchmark score of 30746 versus the GPU's 26011. This suggests the system is well-suited for CPU-intensive tasks like video editing and software development, while still capable for gaming.

The GPU is end-of-life in production status, with a successor in the Navi III generation. The CPU is active in production, with a launch MSRP of $270. The GPU's launch MSRP was 549 USD. The system's power requirements are a 65-watt CPU TDP and 250-watt GPU TDP, with a 600-watt suggested PSU.

This pairing represents a balanced mid-range desktop build that prioritizes CPU performance while maintaining solid GPU capability. The 12 GB GPU memory and 16 MB CPU L3 cache provide ample resources for modern applications. The AM5 socket and PCIe 4.0 support ensure the system can accept future component upgrades within its platform generation.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning this system outperforms 77% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 30746 is 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (30879), and 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i5-13600H (30548).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the CPU has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score and what does it indicate?

A: The 3DMark 16-thread score is 7883, which nearly matches the max-thread score of 7861, indicating the processor fully utilizes all 8 cores and 16 threads without throttling.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU wattage is 600 watts, based on the GPU's 250-watt TDP and the CPU's 65-watt TDP.

Q: What is the GPU's PassMark G3D score and how does it compare to its nearest rival?

A: The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 20700, and its average benchmark score of 26011 is 0.5% higher than the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25891).