SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT form a desktop pairing built around a modern 8-core processor and a last-generation mid-range graphics card. The CPU, part of the 8000 series built on TSMC's 4 nm process with Zen 4 (Phoenix) architecture, presents a strong foundation for multitasking and threaded workloads, while the GPU, based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, targets 1080p gaming. The data in this FACT PACK shows a system that is well-balanced for its intended use, though the specific performance dynamics warrant a closer look at how each component contributes to the overall experience.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, specifically the Phoenix codename. It operates with a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, all within a 65 W TDP. This efficiency is notable, as it suggests the CPU can deliver high performance without demanding an excessive cooling solution or power supply. The processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, featuring 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, which helps explain its strong performance-per-watt characteristics.

The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. This arrangement provides 8 MB of L2 cache total and 16 MB of L3, which is a reasonable amount for a mainstream desktop processor. The memory support is DDR5 via a dual-channel bus, offering a theoretical memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This is a key advantage for the platform, enabling high data throughput for both gaming and productivity tasks.

Benchmark results for the 8700F are strong, placing it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 indicates excellent multi-threaded performance, making it suitable for video editing and 3D rendering. The single-core score of 3761 in the same test is also solid, which is crucial for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench multicore score of 13523 and single-core score of 2290 reinforce this picture of a balanced high-performance CPU. Data-specific tests from PassMark show a data compression score of 378160 and an integer math score of 100371, implying rapid handling of complex calculations and file operations.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the 8700F's average benchmark score of 30746 is virtually identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (30879, delta of -0.4%) and the Intel Core i7-13700TE (31028, delta of -0.9%). It is slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600H (30548, delta of 0.6%) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (30468, delta of 0.9%). These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the 8700F performs on par with these mobile and low-power desktop alternatives, despite being a dedicated desktop part with a higher boost clock. This suggests the 8700F is a very efficient performer, able to match the multi-threaded output of other high-end chips while maintaining a lower TDP.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all FPS discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3872) is excellent, providing a solid foundation for frame generation. The GPU, with a PassMark G3D score of 17166, is positioned as a mid-range part, suggesting it will be the primary determiner of frame rates in most gaming scenarios.

Based on these scores, the pairing is expected to deliver high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p resolution. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s, should be sufficient for most titles at this resolution with high or ultra settings. The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, allowing the RX 6650 XT to operate near its full potential. For competitive titles like first-person shooters, the system should easily achieve frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p, given the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1008.

At 1440p, the system will still be capable, but users will likely need to adjust settings from ultra to high to maintain smooth performance. The GPU's memory bandwidth and compute power (10.79 TFLOPS FP32) will be the limiting factors at this resolution. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1859 indicates that the GPU can handle modern DirectX 12 titles, but it is not a high-end card designed for maximum settings at high resolutions. Overall, the system is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can provide a very enjoyable experience with high frame rates.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 30746, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, showing it is better than the vast majority of processors on the market. In specific tests, it excels in multi-threaded workloads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 and a PassMark multithread score of 30893. Its single-thread performance is also noteworthy, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3761, ensuring responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 19765, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. This is a more modest result, indicating it is a mid-range card that performs better than 65% of its peers. Its best performance comes in the PassMark G3D test with a score of 17166, which is a general measure of 3D graphics capability. In compute tasks, it scores 7532 in PassMark GPU Compute, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 10111. The Geekbench Vulkan score is 81306, suggesting solid performance in modern graphics APIs.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 74. This indicates that the system as a whole outperforms 74% of all possible combinations in the database. The picture that emerges is one of a powerful CPU paired with a capable, but not top-tier, GPU. The CPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers, but the GPU is sufficient to create a very capable gaming and productivity system. The data suggests that the CPU has significant headroom, meaning it could support a more powerful GPU in the future without becoming a bottleneck.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU is the dominant component in terms of its percentile ranking. The CPU's 82nd percentile rank is significantly higher than the GPU's 65th percentile. This indicates that the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions. The CPU's high performance, particularly in single-threaded tasks, ensures it can keep up with the GPU's frame output without causing stutters or frame drops.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the Ryzen 7 8700F will be the primary driver of performance. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 indicates it can handle these tasks with ease. The GPU's role in these scenarios is less critical, though its compute capabilities (7532 in PassMark GPU Compute) can assist in some rendering tasks that utilize GPU acceleration.

The potential bottleneck is clearly the GPU in gaming scenarios. The CPU's single-thread performance is so strong that it is unlikely to be the limiting factor until frame rates reach extremely high levels, which the RX 6650 XT cannot produce. The FPS scaling, if it were measured, would show that as resolution increases, the performance gap between the CPU and GPU would widen, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint. For a balanced system, this is not necessarily a negative; it simply means the GPU is the component that dictates the maximum graphical settings and resolution for a target frame rate.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 23 chip. It is manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC, featuring 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2055 MHz and a boost clock of 2635 MHz, with a game clock of 2410 MHz. The memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s. This configuration is typical for a mid-range card targeting 1080p gaming.

The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It also includes 32 ray accelerators (RT cores) for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The pixel rate is 168.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 337.3 GTexel/s. The compute performance is rated at 10.79 TFLOPS for FP32 and 21.59 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). These specifications indicate a card that can handle modern games at 1080p with high settings and can perform basic ray tracing, though it is not a high-end solution.

The GPU's benchmark scores are moderate. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1859, which is a measure of its performance in a modern graphics workload. The PassMark G3D score of 17166 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 10111 provide additional context for its compute and rendering capabilities. The card is listed as end-of-life, meaning it is at the tail end of its production cycle. Its launch MSRP was 399 USD. The GPU's performance, while not exceptional, is sufficient to provide a good gaming experience at 1080p, particularly in titles that do not heavily utilize ray tracing.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for a user who prioritizes CPU performance for productivity tasks but still wants a credible gaming machine. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators, software developers, and students who run multi-threaded applications like video editors, compilers, or virtual machines. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 suggests it can handle video rendering and 3D model creation with relative ease.

For gamers, this build targets those playing at 1080p resolution who want high frame rates in esports titles and good performance in AAA games. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking means it will handle most games at this resolution well, though users may need to lower settings for the most demanding titles. The system is not intended for 4K gaming or high-end VR, as the GPU's 8 GB of memory and bandwidth would be insufficient for those scenarios.

Small business workstations could also benefit from this build. The CPU's strong multi-threading and the presence of DDR5 memory support make it suitable for office productivity, data analysis, and light server duties. The GPU, while not necessary for basic office work, provides the capability for GPU-accelerated tasks like video conferencing transcoding or CAD software. The overall system is a versatile tool for a power user who needs a single machine for both work and play.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F is a high-performance desktop CPU that scores in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30746. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 26646 and single-core score is 3761.

Q: Is the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT a good GPU for gaming?

A: The RX 6650 XT is a mid-range GPU that scores in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with a PassMark G3D score of 17166. It is expected to provide good 1080p gaming performance, though it is not a high-end card.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Ryzen 7 8700F and RX 6650 XT is 74, indicating that this pairing outperforms 74% of all other CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 8700F supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus, providing a theoretical memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 176 W. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 450 W.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 8700F has no integrated graphics (N/A), meaning a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the release date and launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT was released on 2022-05-09 with a launch MSRP of 399 USD.

Build Overview

This build class is a desktop system, combining the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT GPU. The CPU, released on 2024-03-31 with a launch MSRP of $270, is a modern, active processor on the AM5 platform. The GPU, released on 2022-05-09 with a launch MSRP of 399 USD, is an end-of-life product. The pairing represents a system where the CPU is significantly more powerful relative to its peers than the GPU. The combined percentile of 74 indicates it sits above the average system, making it a solid upper-mid-range desktop configuration.

The CPU provides a high level of multi-threaded performance, making it a strong foundation for a workstation. The GPU, while not as dominant, is more than adequate for 1080p gaming. The system is overall tiered as a high-performance desktop that is well-suited for tasks that benefit from many cores, while still being a capable gaming machine. The data suggests that this is not a budget build, but rather a system that prioritizes CPU performance for productivity, with the GPU as a secondary but important component.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The system is expected to excel at 1080p gaming, with the CPU's single-thread score of 3872 in PassMark ensuring high frame rates. The GPU's 10.79 TFLOPS of compute power can drive a 144Hz monitor in esports titles, though more demanding AAA games may require medium-to-high settings to maintain such high frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-threading makes it an excellent choice for streaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 indicates it can handle encoding game footage while simultaneously running a game, minimizing the performance impact on the game itself. The GPU can also assist with encoding, but the CPU is powerful enough to handle this task alone.

Video Editing: For video editors, the CPU is a powerhouse. The PassMark multithread score of 30893 and the integer math score of 100371 suggest fast rendering times and smooth timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM can help with effects and color grading, but the CPU is the primary driver for this workload.

3D Rendering: The multi-core performance of the 8700F is ideal for CPU-based rendering engines. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 shows it can handle complex scenes efficiently. The GPU can accelerate viewport previews, but final renders will be CPU-bound, making this a productive machine for 3D artists.

Software Development: Developers will benefit from the CPU's high thread count for compiling code and running tests in parallel. The Geekbench multicore score of 13523 and the data compression score of 378160 indicate fast build times and quick handling of large codebases. The GPU is sufficient for running multiple virtual displays and IDE acceleration.

Student and Office Work: For general productivity, this system is overkill but highly responsive. The CPU's single-thread score of 3872 ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The system can handle spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing with ease, while the GPU is more than capable of handling presentation graphics or light photo editing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700F is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream socket for AMD desktop processors. This provides a clear upgrade path to newer processors within the same socket family, should a user require more cores or higher performance in the future. The CPU supports DDR5 memory, which is the current standard, and uses a dual-channel memory bus. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for high-speed NVMe SSDs and the GPU.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the motherboard's PCIe Gen 4 slot. The CPU's 65 W TDP is very low, meaning a modest power supply is sufficient for the processor. The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, and its TDP is 176 W, requiring a single 8-pin power connector. The system's total power draw is well within the range of a standard 550-650 W power supply, leaving headroom for future upgrades.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be to replace the GPU with a more powerful model. The CPU's high percentile ranking (82) suggests it has substantial headroom and would not bottleneck a significantly faster graphics card. This would allow the system to handle 1440p or even 4K gaming more effectively, or to accelerate GPU-based workloads like rendering or machine learning. The CPU's strong multi-threading and the AM5 platform's longevity mean the system can remain relevant for several years with only a GPU upgrade.