SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 6400 — Benchmark Database Analysis

This pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 4 desktop processor with a low-profile Radeon RX 6000-series graphics card, targeting a desktop build where CPU throughput heavily outweighs GPU rendering capability. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 35th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a stark performance asymmetry that defines every workload outcome. The combined system percentile is 59, placing it in the mid-tier of desktop configurations, but the individual component scores tell a more nuanced story about what this build can and cannot do.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, using the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It operates with a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The CPU's cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor includes 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance for a 65 W part. In Cinebench R23, the 8700F scores 26,646 in multi-core and 3,761 in single-core. The multi-core figure represents a substantial capability for rendering and compilation workloads, while the single-core score indicates solid responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. Geekbench results show 13,523 multi-core and 2,290 single-core, reinforcing the same pattern. The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal efficiency: 2-thread score of 1,989, 4-thread score of 3,839, 8-thread score of 6,559, and 16-thread score of 7,883. The near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads (6,559 to 7,883, a 20% gain) suggests that the processor extracts most of its performance from the first 8 cores, with the additional threads providing diminishing returns in heavily threaded workloads.

PassMark scores provide workload-specific insights. Integer math scores 100,371, floating-point math scores 62,629, and extended instructions score 28,474. Data compression hits 378,160, while data encryption reaches 22,117. These figures indicate a processor that excels at arithmetic-heavy and compression tasks but shows relatively modest encryption throughput. The average benchmark score is 30,746, placing the CPU at the 82nd percentile. Compared to nearest rivals, the 8700F sits within a tight band: it trails the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS by 0.4% (30,879 vs. 30,746), leads the Intel Core i5-13600H by 0.6% (30,548), leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T by 0.9% (30,468), and trails the Intel Core i7-13700TE by 0.9% (31,028). This places the 8700F in a competitive position against mobile and low-power desktop chips, though its desktop-class 65 W envelope delivers these scores efficiently.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700F uses AMD Socket AM5, which provides a modern platform foundation. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, offering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the processor itself, which is sufficient for a single GPU and one or two NVMe drives. ECC memory is not supported, which may matter for certain workstation use cases but is irrelevant for gaming and general productivity.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 6400, uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 bus interface, which limits bandwidth compared to full x16 slots but is adequate for a card of this performance tier. The GPU's suggested PSU is 250 W, and its TDP is 53 W, so the combined system draw with the 65 W CPU remains modest. A typical 500 W power supply would provide ample headroom, though the database does not specify a system-level PSU recommendation. The GPU is single-slot and requires no power connectors, simplifying installation in compact cases.

A sensible next upgrade would involve replacing the RX 6400 with a higher-tier GPU, since the CPU's 82nd-percentile performance can drive much faster graphics cards without becoming the limiting factor. The AM5 socket also supports future Ryzen processors within the same generation, allowing a CPU upgrade without changing the motherboard. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes are sufficient for a high-end GPU and a fast NVMe SSD, so the platform does not need immediate overhaul for most upgrades.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite demonstrates a clear strength in multi-threaded workloads. Cinebench R20 multi-core scores 11,191, while R15 multi-core scores 2,685, and single-core scores are 1,579 (R20) and 378 (R15). PassMark multi-thread scores 30,893, with single-thread at 3,872. The 3DMark max-thread score of 7,861 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score of 7,883, confirming that the processor does not benefit from more than 16 threads. Physics in PassMark scores 1,553, and prime number finding scores 98, indicating modest performance in specific scientific workloads.

The GPU presents a very different picture. Its average benchmark score is 6,001, placing it at the 35th percentile. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 176. PassMark G3D scores 7,673, while G2D scores 722. DirectX 11 scores 70, DirectX 12 scores 30, and DirectX 10 scores 54. Geekbench OpenCL scores 32,011 and Vulkan scores 16,372. GPU compute in PassMark is 2,812. Compared to nearest rivals, the RX 6400 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (6,000, 0% delta), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (5,996, 0.1% delta), the AMD FirePro W4100 (5,987, 0.2% delta), and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M (5,986, 0.3% delta). These rivals are all older or lower-tier parts, indicating that the RX 6400's absolute performance is quite limited despite its modern architecture.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU delivers top-quartile performance while the GPU delivers bottom-quartile performance. This imbalance suggests that CPU-bound tasks will feel responsive, but any GPU-accelerated workload will be severely constrained.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who have minimal GPU requirements. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 26,646 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the 100,371 PassMark integer math score, which indicate fast compilation and data processing. Students and office workers running productivity suites, web browsers, and document editing will find the single-thread score of 3,761 (Cinebench R23) and 2,290 (Geekbench) more than adequate for responsive daily use.

Small business workstations handling data compression, encryption, or spreadsheet-heavy tasks will see strong performance from the CPU's 378,160 data compression score and 22,117 encryption score. Content creators working with 2D graphics, audio processing, or light video editing (where the GPU can assist) may find the CPU sufficient for rendering timelines, but the GPU will limit effects and preview quality. Gamers at 1080p with low settings or esports titles may find the RX 6400 adequate, but the CPU's headroom far exceeds what the GPU can feed.

The build is not suitable for 3D rendering, machine learning training, or high-end gaming, as the GPU's 35th percentile performance and 4 GB VRAM will bottleneck those tasks regardless of the CPU's capability.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps values, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from empirical testing. The CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread scores suggest it can feed a GPU at high frame rates, but the RX 6400's low benchmark scores indicate the GPU will be the limiting factor in most games.

Based on the GPU's 35th percentile ranking and its PassMark G3D score of 7,673, expect playable frame rates only at 1080p with low-to-medium settings in modern titles. Esports games like Counter-Strike or League of Legends may run at higher settings, but the 4 GB VRAM will cause texture quality to be reduced in newer titles. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain playable frame rates even at low settings, and its 128.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64-bit bus width will choke on high-resolution textures. The CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock will prevent it from being the bottleneck in these scenarios, but the GPU's 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly a quarter of what modern mid-range GPUs offer.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F scores 26,646 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6400 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 6400 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 128.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 7 8700F use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, offering 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RX 6400 sits at the 35th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 6,001, placing it near the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 8700F has no integrated graphics (N/A), so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 53 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 250 W for the GPU alone.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz and a base clock of 4.10 GHz.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable. The RX 6400's 35th percentile performance and 4 GB VRAM will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can produce. At 1080p, expect low-to-medium settings for 60 FPS in esports titles, but modern AAA games will struggle to maintain 30 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU's 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 26,646 Cinebench R23 multi-core score can handle software encoding while gaming, but the GPU's lack of dedicated encoding hardware (no tensor cores, minimal RT cores) means streaming will rely on the CPU, which may impact gaming performance.

Video editing: CPU-based rendering in Premiere or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the 16 threads and 16 MB L3 cache, but GPU-accelerated effects and timelines will be severely limited by the RX 6400's 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM.

3D rendering: The CPU excels at CPU-based renders (Blender Cycles, V-Ray), with a PassMark multi-thread score of 30,893, but GPU rendering is impractical due to the RX 6400's low compute scores (2,812 in PassMark GPU compute).

Software development: Excellent. Compilation and testing benefit from the 100,371 integer math score and 378,160 data compression score, making this a strong choice for developers working on large codebases.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 3,761 (Cinebench R23) and 2,290 (Geekbench) ensures snappy application startup and smooth multitasking, while the low TDP (65 W CPU, 53 W GPU) keeps power draw minimal for daily use.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing AMD's top-tier 8000-series CPU with an entry-level Radeon RX 6000-series GPU. The combined percentile of 59 places it in the mid-range of all systems, but this aggregate figure masks the extreme variance between components. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking makes it a high-end processor, while the GPU's 35th percentile makes it a low-end graphics solution. The result is a system that feels fast in CPU-bound tasks but slow in GPU-bound tasks, suited for productivity, development, and light gaming rather than graphics-intensive workloads. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier from the percentiles is mid-range, driven almost entirely by the CPU's strength.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the GPU limits nearly every graphics-related workload, while the CPU has excess headroom. The CPU's 82nd percentile versus the GPU's 35th percentile creates a 47-point gap, meaning the GPU will be the limiting factor in gaming, video rendering, and any GPU-accelerated compute. The FPS scaling, though estimated, would show that increasing resolution from 1080p to 1440p would cause frame rates to drop dramatically due to the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the CPU's performance would remain constant.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data compression, and multi-threaded rendering, the CPU will perform at its full potential, and the GPU will sit idle. The 3DMark thread scaling shows the CPU reaches 7,883 at 16 threads, nearly matching its max-thread score of 7,861, indicating no CPU bottleneck in multi-threaded scenarios. For a balanced upgrade, replacing the RX 6400 with a GPU in the 70th percentile or higher would allow the CPU to drive much higher frame rates and enable GPU-accelerated workloads. The platform's PCIe Gen 4 support and 20 CPU lanes can accommodate such an upgrade without changing the motherboard.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a 6 nm RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU built on the Navi 24 chip, containing 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units, with 12 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The base clock is 1,923 MHz, boost clock is 2,321 MHz, and game clock is 2,039 MHz. Memory runs at 2,000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, providing 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 64-bit bus. The GPU offers 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.130 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 74.27 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show the GPU's limitations. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 is very low, indicating poor performance in modern DirectX 12 titles. PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30 is even weaker, while DirectX 11 scores 70 and DirectX 9 scores 93. Geekbench Vulkan scores 16,372, which is moderate but not competitive with modern GPUs. The average benchmark score of 6,001 places it at the 35th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (6,000, 0% delta) and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (5,996, 0.1% delta). The 12 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the low compute throughput means ray tracing will be usable only at low settings and resolutions. For rendering, the GPU can handle 2D tasks and light 3D workloads, but its 4 GB VRAM and limited bandwidth make it unsuitable for high-resolution textures, complex scenes, or GPU-based rendering applications. The GPU is end-of-life, with the Navi III generation as its successor.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds