SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

25,432 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U and AMD Radeon 860M pairing represents a specific segment of the mobile market: a high-efficiency, 8-core CPU married to an integrated graphics solution based on newer RDNA architecture. This analysis draws exclusively from the supplied benchmark data to paint a clear picture of what this combination offers for various workloads, where its strengths and weaknesses lie, and who benefits most from building a system around it. It is crucial to note that the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussion is therefore framed as an estimate derived from the raw CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, using the Phoenix codename and manufactured on a 4nm process by TSMC. It operates within a 28W TDP, featuring a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy is robust, offering 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, alongside a 16 MB shared L3 pool. These specifications position it as a high-performance mobile part designed to balance throughput with power efficiency.

The benchmark scores confirm a strong multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 12,719 points in multi-core and 1,677.5 points in single-core, while Geekbench yields 8,766 and 2,077 points respectively. The 3DMark results show scaling from 932 points in single-thread to 5,427 points in 16-thread tests. This scaling indicates that the processor effectively utilizes all of its 8 cores, with the max-thread score of 5,402 nearly matching the 16-thread score of 5,427. This suggests that the CPU is not bandwidth-limited in synthetic workloads and can sustain high performance under full load.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 7840U sits at a 0% deltaPct against the Intel Core i7-11700KF, with an average benchmark score of 25,432 versus 25,423. It is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (25,446, -0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (25,485, -0.2%). It shows a slight 0.3% lead over the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25,365). This places the 7840U in a performance tier where it matches previous-generation desktop parts and current high-end mobile chips, making it a very capable processor for demanding applications. The 77th percentile vs all CPUs further reinforces its position as a top-tier performer.

The PassMark results provide insight into specific workload characteristics. The data encryption score of 17,691 and data compression score of 288,604 indicate strong performance in security and data-handling tasks. The floating-point math score of 51,767 and integer math score of 90,852 show a balanced ALU/FPU design, which is beneficial for scientific computing and financial modeling. The extended instructions score of 20,432 highlights that the Zen 4 core handles AVX-512 and similar workloads efficiently. The single-thread score of 3,565 is competitive, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and lighter gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is defined by the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning that the upgrade path is not about swapping the CPU on a desktop motherboard but rather about the system's overall capabilities. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for professionals who require data integrity in their work, such as financial analysts or researchers. The PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for a fast NVMe SSD and other peripherals.

The integrated GPU has a TDP of 15 W and uses system-shared memory, meaning that its performance is directly tied to the speed and configuration of the system's DDR5 RAM. The bus interface for the GPU is PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU's TDP is 28W, and while the data pack does not list a specific suggested PSU for the GPU, the combined power draw of this CPU and an IGP is inherently low, making it suitable for compact laptops and mini-PCs where thermal and power budgets are tight. A sensible next upgrade for a system in this class would be to ensure it is configured with fast, dual-channel DDR5 memory to maximize the performance of both the CPU and the integrated graphics. Storage upgrades to a PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drive would also fully utilize the available lanes.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread score of 932 in 3DMark and 3,565 in PassMark indicates it can handle the frame pacing demands of high-refresh-rate displays. However, the GPU's compute power is the limiting factor for achieving very high frame rates in modern titles, as detailed in the Gaming Performance section. This pairing is better suited for esports titles where the CPU is the primary driver.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides ample headroom for encoding a video stream while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,719 and the 16-thread 3DMark score of 5,427 suggest that the CPU can handle the encoding workload without causing significant frame drops in the game itself, although the quality of the stream will depend on the software encoder and bitrate settings.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this CPU. The high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the Geekbench multi-core score of 8,766, will significantly accelerate timeline scrubbing, rendering, and exporting in applications like Adobe Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The CPU can handle complex timelines with multiple layers and effects, while the GPU assists with effects and transitions that are GPU-accelerated.

3D Rendering: The CPU is a workhorse for 3D rendering. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1,990 and the R23 score of 12,719 directly demonstrate its capability in CPU-based render engines like Blender's Cycles or V-Ray. The 77th percentile ranking indicates it will outperform a majority of other CPUs in these tasks, making it a viable option for freelance 3D artists or students.

Software Development: The Ryzen 7 7840U excels in this workload. The PassMark data encryption score of 17,691 and extended instructions score of 20,432 are particularly relevant for compiling large codebases and running virtual machines or containers. The 16 threads allow for parallel compilation, significantly reducing build times, while the single-thread performance keeps the IDE responsive.

Student and Office Work: This is a scenario where the hardware is overqualified in some respects. The single-thread performance ensures that document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet manipulation are instant. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,565 guarantees a fluid user experience. The low 28W TDP of the CPU also means that a laptop built on this platform will have excellent battery life, which is critical for all-day use on campus or in meetings.

Gaming Performance

The data pack explicitly states that there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination (dataIsMeasured is false). Therefore, all figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon 860M's performance is anchored by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 22,759 and Vulkan score of 30,043. These scores place it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, showing it is a capable IGP but not a high-end discrete solution.

Given the GPU’s average benchmark score of 26,401, it is on par with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26,421, -0.1%) and surprisingly close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26,331, 0.3%). This is an unusual comparison, as the RTX 5060 is a discrete desktop GPU, but the data shows the 860M is in that performance ballpark in synthetic benchmarks. For gaming, this translates to the ability to play esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant at high frame rates on 1080p with medium-to-high settings, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance is the more critical factor. For more demanding AAA titles, the user should expect to play at 1080p with low-to-medium settings to achieve a playable 30-60 FPS. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate are the primary constraints here. This is not a platform for 1440p or 4K gaming, as the GPU lacks the raw throughput for those resolutions in modern titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system presents a fascinating balance. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 25,432 and a 77th percentile ranking, is significantly more powerful than the GPU, which sits at the 72nd percentile with an average score of 26,401. In gaming, the GPU is almost certainly the bottleneck in modern, graphically intensive titles. The CPU's high performance will not be fully utilized if the GPU cannot render frames fast enough. For example, the CPU's 16-thread score of 5,427 suggests it can handle complex game logic and physics, but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS will limit the resolution and detail settings.

However, in productivity and compute workloads, the relationship reverses. The CPU is the clear workhorse, handling tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation. The GPU's role is secondary, accelerating specific effects or providing display output. For instance, in a video editing suite, the CPU will handle the heavy lifting of decoding and encoding, while the GPU will accelerate effects like blurs or color grading. The bottleneck in this scenario is not a component but rather the system's memory bandwidth, which is shared between the CPU and GPU. The 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth is a finite resource, and at times, the CPU and GPU will compete for it, potentially causing minor stutters in demanding multi-tasking scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This platform is ideal for users who prioritize CPU performance in a mobile form factor. The target audience includes content creators who need a powerful processor for on-the-go video editing and 3D rendering, as evidenced by the strong Cinebench and Geekbench multi-core scores. Software developers will benefit from the 16 threads and high encryption scores for rapid compilation and secure data handling. Students in engineering, computer science, or digital media programs will find the CPU performance sufficient for all academic workloads, from running simulations to rendering projects, while the integrated GPU handles all standard display and light-gaming needs.

For gamers, this is a platform for esports and older titles. Those who play at 1080p and are willing to adjust settings will find it adequate for a smooth experience, but it is not designed for high-fidelity, high-resolution gaming. This is a workstation-first, gaming-second machine. The small business workstation market is also a good fit, as the ECC memory support ensures data integrity for financial records and the multi-threaded performance handles office suites, databases, and light server duties with ease. The low power draw of the entire platform makes it an excellent choice for always-on mini-PCs or thin-and-light laptops for professionals.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on the same 4nm process as the CPU. It operates with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The GPU has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. This hardware configuration allows for the modern graphics API support, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest game engines and features like hardware-accelerated ray tracing, albeit at a performance level consistent with an IGP.

The GPU's memory interface is "System Shared," meaning it uses a portion of the system's DDR5 RAM, with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent." This is a critical point, as the performance of the 860M is highly sensitive to the speed of the installed memory. Its raw compute capabilities are quantified by a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s, a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s, and an FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS. The FP16 performance is identical at 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1), which is unusual and indicates a limitation in the shader design for half-precision workloads.

In terms of general compute, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 22,759 and Vulkan score of 30,043 show that the 860M is a significant step up from older integrated graphics. Its performance is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26,421, -0.1%) and even the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26,553, -0.6%). This means that for non-gaming GPU tasks like video transcoding, photo editing with GPU acceleration, or running machine learning inference, the 860M provides a solid level of performance. The presence of 8 RT cores means that games with ray tracing enabled will run, but the 3.072 TFLOPS of rasterization performance suggests users will likely need to disable this feature to maintain a playable frame rate.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance level of the AMD Radeon 860M compared to other GPUs?

A: Based on its average benchmark score of 26,401, it is effectively tied with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26,421, -0.1%) and shows a surprising 0.3% lead over the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26,331). It lags behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary by 0.6% (26,553) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 by 1.1% (26,683).

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7840U's multi-core performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840U has an average benchmark score of 25,432, which is a 0% deltaPct compared to the Intel Core i7-11700KF (25,423). It is slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (25,446) by 0.1% and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (25,485) by 0.2%, but it is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25,365).

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in professional workstations for enhanced data integrity.

Q: What is the total amount of cache available to the CPU?

A: The CPU features a shared L3 cache of 16 MB, in addition to 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 cache per core.

Q: What is the socket type for this processor?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840U uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, indicating it is soldered onto the motherboard.

Q: Are there measured gaming frame rates for this specific CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the data pack explicitly states that there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance, and what does it mean?

A: The GPU has an FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS. This number represents its theoretical single-precision floating-point computing power, which is a key indicator of its rasterization performance in games and its general compute capability for applications.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance of this platform is represented by a combined percentile of 75. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U CPU demonstrates high-tier performance, with an average benchmark score of 25,432 and a percentile rank of 77 among all CPUs. Its flagship results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,719 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 8,766. The AMD Radeon 860M GPU, on the other hand, has an average benchmark score of 26,401 and sits at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with its best results being a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30,043.

The combined picture is one of a CPU-leading platform. The CPU is in the top quarter of all processors, making it a powerhouse for productivity. The GPU, while also above average, is the weaker link. The 0.3% lead of the RTX 5060 over the 860M in the GPU's nearest rivals is a statistical anomaly, but it highlights that the 860M is more in line with a low-end discrete GPU rather than a high-end one. In practice, this translates to a system that will excel at CPU-bound tasks like rendering, compiling, and encoding, but will be constrained in GPU-bound tasks like high-fidelity gaming. The platform's overall 75th percentile ranking reflects its strong average performance, but users must align their expectations with the reality that the CPU is the star of this show, and the GPU is a capable supporting actor.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds