SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

29,955 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile pairing represents a high-end laptop configuration, placing in the 78th percentile overall among all tested builds. The CPU sits at the 81st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 75th percentile of all GPUs, indicating a well-matched duo where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. This combination targets users who need strong multi-threaded productivity and modern GPU features in a portable chassis, though the data shows no measured frame rates exist for this specific pairing.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 5070 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 20355 places it within 0.1% of the RTX 3070 Ti’s average score of 29945 (the delta is -0.1%), suggesting similar raw rasterization performance. With 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 384.0 GB/s, the GPU can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 979 and 2-thread score of 1904 provide adequate frame pacing for esports titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means specific refresh-rate claims remain estimates.

Streaming workloads benefit from the GPU’s 144 tensor cores and 36 RT cores, which handle encoding and AI-based features without offloading too much work to the CPU. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 28633 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 ensure that simultaneous game encoding and gameplay remain fluid. The 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 design with a 5.10 GHz boost clock provides ample headroom for background streaming tasks while the GPU manages the primary rendering.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve leverages both components. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 indicate strong compute acceleration for effects and color grading. The CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 11846 and PassMark integer math score of 98682 handle timeline scrubbing and export encoding efficiently. The 25,000 million transistors in the CPU and 21,900 million in the GPU suggest modern architectures with dedicated media engines.

3D rendering tasks favor the CPU’s multi-threaded muscle. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2222.84 and R23 score of 15102 demonstrate solid rendering throughput, while the PassMark floating-point math score of 59921 indicates strong geometry processing. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 13.13 TFLOPS and FP16 at 13.13 TFLOPS (1:1) support GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit very large scenes. The CPU’s 16 MB shared L3 cache helps keep rendering threads fed.

Software development workflows see balanced performance. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 345536 and random string sorting score of 40364 show strong handling of build tools and code compilation. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth on a dual-channel DDR5 bus reduces bottlenecks when compiling large projects. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility ensure modern graphics debugging tools run correctly, while the CPU’s single-thread score of 3753 in PassMark handles IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work are handled with ease, as the CPU’s integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a fallback for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU idles. The CPU’s 35 W TDP and the GPU’s 50 W TDP keep overall power draw manageable for a laptop chassis, though the combined load still requires adequate cooling. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking means it outperforms the majority of CPUs in everyday tasks, while the GPU’s 75th percentile ensures smooth 4K video playback and light photo editing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a near-balanced pairing with the CPU holding a slight edge in percentile ranking. The CPU’s 81st percentile versus the GPU’s 75th percentile indicates the processor is the stronger relative component, but the delta is not extreme. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 1376 and 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 show the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s rendering output at 1080p. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1904 and 4-thread score of 3651 reveal that lightly-threaded games will not be CPU-limited.

The GPU’s nearest rival comparison shows a 0.1% delta against the RTX 3070 Ti, meaning the RTX 5070 Mobile performs essentially identically to that older desktop-class card. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 8845HS, shows a 0% delta, indicating the 7840HS is statistically indistinguishable from its newer sibling. This balance means neither component will consistently hold the other back in most workloads, though the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM could become a bottleneck in VRAM-hungry titles at 1440p ultra settings.

Memory bandwidth presents a potential constraint. The CPU’s 89.6 GB/s system memory bandwidth and the GPU’s 384.0 GB/s dedicated bandwidth serve different pools, but the GPU’s relatively narrow 128-bit bus limits its ability to feed the 4608 shading units. This explains why the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20355, while strong, does not break into higher percentiles. The CPU’s 16 MB L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core mitigate some system memory latency issues.

FPS scaling remains theoretical without measured data. Based on the GPU’s similarity to the RTX 3070 Ti (0.1% delta) and the CPU’s parity with the 7840HS (0% delta), frame rates should scale predictably with resolution: 1080p will be GPU-bound in most titles, while 1440p will shift more load onto the GPU. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM will likely become the limiting factor, causing texture detail reductions or stutter in high-fidelity games.

The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3753 and Cinebench R15 single-core score of 274 indicate strong per-core performance, reducing the likelihood of CPU bottlenecks in games that rely on a few threads. The GPU’s pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.2 GTexel/s provide adequate fill rates for 1440p rendering, but the 48 ROPs may limit heavy overdraw scenarios.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Mobile compare to the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile’s average benchmark score is 29928, which is 0.1% lower than the RTX 3070 Ti’s average score of 29945. This places them within statistical parity, meaning the newer mobile GPU matches the older desktop-class card in overall performance.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7840HS significantly different from the Ryzen 7 8845HS?

A: No. The 7840HS has an average benchmark score of 29955, identical to the 8845HS’s average score of 29955, showing a 0% delta. The two CPUs are effectively interchangeable in performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective) providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may limit 4K texture-heavy workloads.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor. It uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and thread counts?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture (Phoenix codename), built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: What API support does the GPU offer?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with the latest games and graphics applications that use ray tracing or mesh shaders.

Q: How does the GPU perform in compute tasks?

A: The GPU scores 122238 in Geekbench OpenCL and 116960 in Geekbench Vulkan, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 8279. These scores indicate solid performance for GPU-accelerated rendering and machine learning inference.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p high-refresh displays will find this pairing capable, given the GPU’s parity with the RTX 3070 Ti. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking ensures that even CPU-intensive titles like strategy games or simulators will run smoothly. However, users planning to play at 4K should consider the 8 GB VRAM limitation, which may force lower texture settings in the most demanding titles.

Content creators who edit video or work with 3D graphics will appreciate the balanced performance. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 122238 provide a solid foundation for rendering workflows. The 144 tensor cores accelerate AI-based features like denoising and upscaling, while the 36 RT cores handle ray-traced effects in real-time previews.

Software developers building large projects will benefit from the CPU’s high multi-threaded scores, particularly the PassMark data compression score of 345536 and integer math score of 98682. The 16 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency during compilation, and the support for ECC memory adds reliability for long-running build processes. The GPU’s compute capabilities also enable local testing of GPU-accelerated libraries.

Students and small business users will find this overkill for basic tasks but useful for future-proofing. The CPU’s integrated Radeon 780M provides fallback graphics, and the 35 W CPU TDP keeps battery drain reasonable. The GPU’s 50 W TDP is modest for a discrete card, allowing thinner laptop designs without excessive heat.

Mobile workstation users in engineering or scientific fields will benefit from the combination. The CPU’s PassMark floating-point math score of 59921 supports numerical simulations, while the GPU’s 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates CUDA-based workloads. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most professional 3D modeling and analysis tools, though extreme simulations may require external GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29955, placing it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its strongest results include a PassMark multi-thread score of 28633 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 11846. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 and R15 multi-core score of 2222.84 confirm strong sustained multi-threaded performance. Single-thread scores are also solid, with Geekbench single-core at 2031 and PassMark single-thread at 3753.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29928, placing it at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score of 20355 is the headline result, with Geekbench OpenCL (122238) and Vulkan (116960) showing strong compute capabilities. The PassMark GPU compute score of 8279 and DirectX 12 score of 93 provide context for its gaming and compute performance. The GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 3070 Ti, scores 29945, a delta of -0.1%, confirming near-identical overall performance.

Combined, the CPU and GPU produce a system-level score that places this build at the 78th percentile overall. The CPU outperforms the GPU in relative percentile ranking (81 vs 75), suggesting the processor is the stronger component. The nearest CPU rivals are the Ryzen 7 8845HS (0% delta), Ryzen 7 5800XT (0.3% delta), and Ryzen 7 7840H (0.3% delta), indicating the 7840HS sits at the top of its performance class. The GPU’s rivals include the RTX 2080 Ti (0.5% delta) and RX 6800 (-0.6% delta), showing it competes with previous-generation high-end desktop cards.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20355 and its 0.1% delta against the RTX 3070 Ti suggest that in 1080p ultra settings, this laptop should deliver frame rates comparable to a desktop RTX 3070 Ti. Esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant should comfortably exceed 144 FPS, while AAA games at 1080p ultra will likely range between 80 and 120 FPS depending on title optimization.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 384.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM become more significant factors. Expect frame rates roughly 20-30% lower than 1080p, with most modern games hitting 60-90 FPS at high settings. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 6092 and max-thread score of 7316 ensure it can feed the GPU at this resolution without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 979 and PassMark single-thread score of 3753, means games that rely heavily on one or two cores will still perform well. The 2-thread score of 1904 and 4-thread score of 3651 support this conclusion, as they show strong scaling up to four threads. However, the lack of measured FPS data means these estimates should be treated as approximations rather than guarantees.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5070 Mobile features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is the primary limitation, as the 4608 shading units and 144 TMUs can theoretically process more data than the 128-bit bus can feed. The memory clock of 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective) is modern but the narrow bus width constrains peak throughput.

The GPU’s 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads. The FP32 performance of 13.13 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 13.13 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) indicate balanced compute capability. The pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.2 GTexel/s are sufficient for 1440p gaming, though the 48 ROPs may limit performance in fill-rate-bound scenarios.

The GPU’s benchmark scores tell a story of consistent, mid-to-high-end performance. The PassMark G3D score of 20355 places it above the majority of GPUs, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 shows strong compute throughput. The DirectX 12 score of 93 and DirectX 11 score of 192 indicate modern API support, with the Vulkan score of 116960 confirming excellent low-level performance. The PassMark G2D score of 896 is modest, but this is expected for a laptop GPU focused on 3D workloads.

At 50 W TDP, this mobile GPU is power-efficient, enabling its inclusion in thin-and-light laptops. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides ample bandwidth for data transfer, though the IGP slot width suggests it is designed for soldered laptop configurations rather than upgradeable MXM modules. The GPU’s release date of April 14, 2025, makes it a current-generation part, and its production status is active.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, an 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 mobile processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. It is a laptop-class configuration, as indicated by the buildClass field, combining a 35 W CPU with a 50 W GPU for a total thermal budget that fits in mainstream gaming laptops. The combined percentile of 78 means this build outperforms 78% of all tested configurations.

The CPU’s 81st percentile and GPU’s 75th percentile create a balanced system where the processor is slightly stronger relative to its peers. This is a favorable pairing for productivity tasks that benefit from multi-threading, while the GPU handles gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads adequately. The 4 nm CPU process and 5 nm GPU process indicate modern, efficient manufacturing that contributes to the laptop’s portability.

This is not an ultra-high-end configuration, as the GPU’s 75th percentile shows there are faster mobile GPUs available. However, the near-parity with the RTX 3070 Ti means real-world gaming performance will satisfy most users. The CPU’s position at the 81st percentile, with rivals like the Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 5800XT, confirms it is a top-tier mobile processor. This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for work but still want a competent gaming GPU.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It operates at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boosts to 5.10 GHz, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and features a 16 MB shared L3 cache plus 1 MB L2 per core.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 and R15 multi-core score of 2222.84 demonstrate strong rendering performance, while the PassMark multi-thread score of 28633 confirms consistent throughput. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11846 and 3DMark max-thread score of 7316 align with these results, showing the CPU scales well with thread count.

Single-thread performance is also competitive, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2031, Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1761, and PassMark single-thread score of 3753. The 3DMark single-thread score of 979 and 2-thread score of 1904 indicate that lightly-threaded applications will run responsively. The PassMark physics score of 1376 suggests adequate performance for physics simulations in games.

The CPU’s specialized workloads show particular strengths. The PassMark data compression score of 345536 and integer math score of 98682 are exceptionally high, indicating strong performance in archival and encryption tasks. The floating-point math score of 59921 supports scientific computing, while the extended instructions score of 25747 shows good SIMD throughput. The data encryption score of 20627 and find prime numbers score of 88 round out a profile that suits developers and researchers.

The CPU’s percentile rank of 81 means it outperforms 80% of all CPUs in the benchmark database. Its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 7840H, show deltas of 0% and 0.3% respectively, confirming the 7840HS sits at the top of its direct competition. The Ryzen 7 5800XT, a desktop processor, trails by 0.3%, highlighting that this mobile CPU competes with desktop parts from a previous generation.