SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

29,955 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a mainstream thin-and-light gaming laptop combination: an 8-core Zen 4 "Phoenix" processor sitting in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, matched with an Ada Lovelace GPU in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 74 places the pairing firmly in the upper-middle tier of tracked builds — a balanced mobile configuration rather than a desktop-replacement flagship. No measured in-game frame rates exist for this exact pairing in the database, so all gaming figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than recorded results.

FAQ

Q: What class of machine is this pairing?

A: It is a laptop build. The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a mobile-segment processor on AMD's Socket FP8 with a 35 W TDP, and the RTX 4060 Mobile is an integrated-into-platform mobile GPU with a 115 W TDP and no separate power connectors.

Q: How does the CPU rank against the wider market?

A: It sits in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29955. Its nearest rivals are effectively tied: the Ryzen 7 8845HS (deltaPct 0), the Ryzen 7 5800XT (0.3 percent), the Ryzen 7 7840H (0.3 percent), and the Ryzen 5 9600X (0.8 percent).

Q: How does the GPU rank?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile is in the 67th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 22729. The rival set is tight: RTX 2080 (-0.7 percent), Radeon RX 7700 XT (0.8 percent), Arc B580 (-1.3 percent), and RTX 5060 Mobile (1.3 percent).

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is that a constraint?

A: It has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256 GB/s of bandwidth. For the resolutions this GPU class targets, that is workable, but it is the practical ceiling for ultra-settings texture loads at higher resolutions.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes — the Radeon 780M is integrated into the Phoenix die, giving the platform a low-power fallback for non-gaming workloads.

Q: Are there measured FPS numbers for this combo?

A: No. The database contains no measured frame-rate rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all FPS discussion here is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, plus ECC memory support.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU side of this pairing delivers consistently strong results across every suite in the database. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 15102 multi-core and 1761 single-core — figures that describe a chip capable of sustained all-thread rendering work while also holding its own in lightly threaded tasks. Cinebench R15 puts the same story in older terms: 2222.84 multi-core and 274 single-core. Geekbench lands at 11846 multi-core and 2031 single-core, and PassMark returns a multi-thread score of 28633 with a single-thread score of 3753.

The scaling profile across 3DMark CPU tests is worth reading closely. The chip scores 979 in single-thread, 1904 at two threads, 3651 at four, 6092 at eight, and 7316 at maximum threads. The jump from eight threads to sixteen is minimal — 6092 to 7316 — which is exactly what you expect from an 8-core, 16-thread design where eight physical cores carry the load and SMT adds the final increment. The near-doubling from two to four threads and four to eight shows the core count is genuinely usable, not window dressing.

Against rivals, the picture is remarkable for its tightness. The Ryzen 7 8845HS sits at an identical average score of 29955, and the Ryzen 7 5800XT and 7840H are within 0.3 percent. That the desktop Ryzen 5 9600X is only 0.8 percent away underscores that this mobile chip performs like a solid mainstream desktop processor. Its 81st percentile position against all CPUs quantifies that: better than roughly four of every five CPUs tracked.

The GPU posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 89420 and a Vulkan score of 89569 — nearly identical, indicating a compute engine that performs uniformly across both APIs. PassMark G3D lands at 17469, with GPU compute at 6816. The average score of 22729 places it in the 67th percentile, and the rival deltas are all within 1.3 percent in either direction, meaning this GPU trades blows with the RTX 2080, the RX 7700 XT, the Arc B580, and even the next-generation RTX 5060 Mobile. That last comparison is notable: a 1.3 percent gap to a successor part suggests Ada Lovelage's mid-range has aged gracefully.

The combined percentile of 74 tells the overall story: a build that clears the top quartile of all tracked configurations, led by the CPU rather than the GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

This is a GPU-limited pairing in games, and the percentile spread explains why. The CPU occupies the 81st percentile of all CPUs; the GPU occupies the 67th. A fourteen-point gap in the CPU's favor means the processor almost always has headroom left when the graphics subsystem saturates.

The PassMark physics score of 1376 is the direct evidence. Game engines lean on physics-style CPU work — draw-call submission, simulation ticks, AI updates — and a physics score at this level, paired with a single-thread score of 3753, means frame delivery is not the constraint at realistic resolutions for this GPU. The 3DMark scaling data reinforces it: even at four threads (3651), the chip delivers half of its maximum-thread throughput, which is more than most game engines can extract.

Where the balance flips is content creation. With Cinebench R23 multi-core at 15102 and PassMark multi-thread at 28633, the CPU is the faster of the two components in raw throughput terms for render workloads that scale across cores. GPU rendering via OpenCL at 89420 is competent but not the star. For workloads like video encoding that can use either component, the division of labor matters more than either device in isolation.

The 8 GB of VRAM and 256 GB/s of bandwidth are the practical limits on the graphics side. In GPU-bound scenarios at ultra settings, texture streaming — not shader throughput — is the first wall this build will hit. The 128-bit bus means bandwidth is finite relative to the chip's 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, so ultra-resolution rendering is where performance curves bend downward first.

Who Should Build It

Because this is a laptop-class pairing, "build" here means "buy the machine that carries it." The data points at several audiences.

High-refresh 1080p gamers are the primary target. A GPU trading within 1.3 percent of the RTX 2080 and RX 7700 XT has the throughput for high-refresh-rate play at mainstream resolutions, and the 81st-percentile CPU will not throttle frame delivery. Content creators benefit from the CPU's 15102 Cinebench R23 multi-core score — enough for 1080p and entry-level 4K video editing timelines — plus 96 tensor cores for AI-assisted workflows. Software developers get sixteen threads at a 5.10 GHz boost, which compiles large codebases quickly; the Geekbench multi-core score of 11846 backs that up. Students and office users are over-served in raw performance terms, but the platform's efficiency — a 35 W processor TDP on a 4 nm process — makes it a sensible fit for portable machines that also game. Small businesses get ECC memory support, an unusual and genuinely useful feature for workstation-adjacent tasks.

What the data does not support is ultra-resolution, ultra-settings gaming as the core use case. The 67th GPU percentile and the 128-bit memory bus define that ceiling.

Gaming Performance

No measured frame rates exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database — the figures below are estimates inferred from the benchmark scores, not recorded results.

Working from the PassMark G3D score of 17469 and the rival proximity to the RTX 2080, RX 7700 XT, Arc B580, and RTX 5060 Mobile — all within roughly a percent — the RTX 4060 Mobile profiles as a card that delivers high-refresh gameplay at 1080p and comfortable play at 1440p with settings dialed back from maximum. At 1080p ultra, the expectation from these scores is triple-digit frame rates in competitive titles and playable-to-smooth results in demanding AAA releases, with DLSS-class upscaling available through the 96 tensor cores to extend the margin. At 1440p ultra, the 8 GB framebuffer and 256 GB/s bandwidth become the governing factors, and the estimate shifts toward the playable-but-adjust-settings range in the heaviest titles.

The CPU side is not the limiter in any of these scenarios. With 3DMark CPU scores of 3651 at four threads and 6092 at eight, plus a single-thread result of 979, the processor has capacity to spare for game logic while streaming or running background tasks. Frame-time consistency, which is where weak mobile CPUs usually embarrass themselves, is well covered by an 81st-percentile processor.

Ray tracing deserves a specific caveat. The 24 RT cores are present and functional, but this tier of hardware generally trades ray-traced settings for frame rate rather than running both at maximum. The benchmark scores suggest rasterization-first settings are the natural home for this GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's position within 1.3 percent of the RTX 5060 Mobile and ahead of the RX 7700 XT by 0.8 percent puts it squarely in high-refresh 1080p territory, with the CPU's 3753 PassMark single-thread score ensuring the frame pipeline stays fed.

Streaming: Sixteen threads and a PassMark multi-thread score of 28633 mean encoding overhead while gaming is absorbed without cratering frame delivery; the 8-to-16-thread 3DMark scaling (6092 to 7316) shows headroom beyond what games alone demand.

Video editing: A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 handles timeline scrubbing, previews, and export on the CPU, while 89420 in Geekbench OpenCL gives GPU-accelerated effects a capable engine. DDR5 bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s supports the data flow.

3D rendering: The dual picture applies — 7316 at maximum threads in 3DMark CPU tests for CPU renderers, and the 89569 Vulkan compute score for GPU rendering paths. Neither is workstation-class, but both are respectable for a mobile platform.

Software development: A Geekbench single-core of 2031 and multi-core of 11846 make for fast compile times and responsive IDEs; containerized workloads and local test suites benefit from the full sixteen threads.

Student and office work: For everything from spreadsheets to browser-heavy research, the 81st-percentile CPU is overkill in the best sense, and the 35 W TDP keeps the platform quiet under light loads, with the integrated Radeon 780M handling display duties.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4060 Mobile is built on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 18,900 million transistors into a 159 mm² die — a density of 118.9 million transistors per square millimeter. The AD107 chip carries 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores. Clocks run from a 1545 MHz base to an 1890 MHz boost, with memory at 16 Gbps effective on a 128-bit bus producing the 256 GB/s bandwidth figure.

Throughput numbers frame the capability: 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, a pixel rate of 90.72 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 181.4 GTexel/s. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 — narrower than a desktop card's link, which can matter when assets stream across the bus, but consistent with mobile platform constraints. API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

What the benchmark scores say for rendering is straightforward. The near-identical OpenCL (89420) and Vulkan (89569) Geekbench results indicate consistent compute behavior regardless of API, useful for creative software that picks one or the other. The PassMark G3D score of 17469 and the average of 22729 place the chip in the 67th GPU percentile — mid-tier with upside. The rival table is the sharpest analytical tool here: within a band of 2.1 points across the RTX 2080, RX 7700 XT, Arc B580, and RTX 5060 Mobile, this GPU is effectively interchangeable with all of them. The 1.3 percent edge over the RTX 5060 Mobile is the standout — a generational successor that fails to pull away.

The 8 GB VRAM allocation is the main structural limit. For rendering and gaming at the resolutions this tier targets, it suffices; pushed beyond that, it becomes the constraint before compute does.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing, designated as such in the build class field, combining a mobile AMD processor with a mobile NVIDIA GPU. The combined percentile of 74 situates it in the upper-middle tier of all tracked configurations — above roughly three-quarters of the database, below the enthusiast tier.

The architecture of the pairing is coherent. A 35 W, 4 nm, 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 processor with a 5.10 GHz boost provides processing muscle that would not embarrass a mainstream desktop, while the 115 W Ada Lovelace GPU handles graphics duties with 40-series feature support. The platform fabric — DDR5 dual-channel at 89.6 GB/s, PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes — ties it together without obvious weak links at the platform level. The integrated Radeon 780M adds flexibility for power-sensitive operation.

The tier verdict: this is a well-balanced mainstream performance laptop configuration. The CPU leads the pairing at the 81st percentile versus the GPU's 67th, which produces a GPU-bound gaming profile and a CPU-strong productivity profile. For a portable machine, that bias is the correct one.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a Zen 4 "Phoenix" part manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm node, carrying 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. It runs 8 cores and 16 threads from a 3.80 GHz base to a 5.10 GHz boost, with a 35 W TDP on Socket FP8. The cache hierarchy gives each core 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2, with 16 MB of shared L3 — a configuration that favors fast per-core access over a large shared pool.

The benchmark scores translate directly into workload behavior. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1761 and Geekbench single-core of 2031 describe a processor with excellent responsiveness — snappy application launches, fast browser tabs, quick per-core game logic. The multi-core figures — 15102 in R23, 11846 in Geekbench, 28633 in PassMark multi-thread — describe sustained throughput that handles rendering, compilation, and encoding without falling into budget-mobile territory.

The 3DMark thread-scaling series is the most revealing dataset. From 979 single-thread to 1904 at two threads, 3651 at four, 6092 at eight, and 7316 at maximum, the chip scales nearly linearly through eight threads and then plateaus, confirming that the eight physical cores are the real engine and SMT supplies a final modest lift. Workloads that scale with core count get full value; those that don't still get strong per-core speed.

Rival context settles the question of where this chip stands. Identical average score to the Ryzen 7 8845HS, 0.3 percent from both the Ryzen 7 5800XT and the 7840H, and 0.8 percent from the desktop Ryzen 5 9600X — this is desktop-adjacent performance in a mobile power envelope. The utility benchmarks round out the profile: 98682 in PassMark integer math, 59921 in floating point, 345536 in data compression, and 20627 in encryption show a chip that is quick across the whole spread of everyday compute, not just in headline suites. The 81st percentile against all CPUs is the number that summarizes it: top-quintile performance, packaged for a laptop.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds