SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

29,955 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile — Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 4 mobile processor with NVIDIA's entry-level Ada Lovelace laptop GPU, targeting mainstream 1080p gaming and portable productivity. The CPU sits at the 81st percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, giving this laptop build a combined percentile of 72. This places the system firmly in the upper-midrange tier of laptop configurations, with the processor clearly outpacing the graphics solution in relative strength.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on the AD107 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 18,900 million transistors into a 159 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1455 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 6 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 96-bit bus, delivering 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a modest figure that aligns with the GPU's entry-level positioning in the 40-series mobile lineup.

The memory configuration warrants careful consideration. The 6 GB VRAM capacity and 96-bit bus width represent the primary constraints for modern gaming, particularly at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy titles. The 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but may become a limiting factor when frame buffers grow large. The benchmark data shows the GPU achieving a Passmark G3D score of 14423, which places it at the 63rd percentile overall — a solid midrange result, but not one that suggests headroom for demanding workloads.

The RTX 4050 Mobile includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The FP32 compute throughput is rated at 8.986 TFLOPS, with FP16 operating at the same 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). These specifications indicate the GPU can handle ray-traced workloads and DLSS-enabled titles, though the modest compute figures suggest performance will be acceptable rather than exceptional in such scenarios. The pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s and texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s provide additional context for rasterization throughput.

In rendering contexts, the Passmark DirectX scores tell a nuanced story. The GPU scores 184 in DirectX 9, 130 in DirectX 11, 79 in DirectX 10, and 61 in DirectX 12 tests. The relatively low DirectX 12 score compared to DirectX 9 suggests that the GPU's newer-API performance may not fully leverage its architectural advantages, though the benchmark methodology itself can influence these figures. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 and Vulkan score of 75235 indicate strong compute performance for general-purpose workloads, which bodes well for content creation tasks that leverage GPU acceleration.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 29955, placing it at the 81st percentile of all processors. This aligns closely with its nearest rivals: the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS matches exactly at 29955 (0% delta), the Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29879 (0.3% behind), the Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868 (0.3% behind), and the Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713 (0.8% behind). The 7840HS effectively trades blows with these alternatives, showing no meaningful advantage or deficit — a remarkable result given the 35 W TDP envelope.

In multi-threaded CPU benchmarks, the 7840HS achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15102 and a Geekbench multicore score of 11846. The Passmark multithread score of 28633 reinforces this strong threading performance. Single-thread performance is equally respectable: Cinebench R23 single-core scores 1761, Geekbench single-core scores 2031, and Passmark single-thread scores 3753. The 3DMark results show scaling from 979 (single-thread) to 1904 (2-thread), 3651 (4-thread), 6092 (8-thread), and 7314 (16-thread), with the max-thread score of 7316 nearly identical to the 16-thread result — indicating the CPU saturates its 16 threads efficiently.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 19049, placing it at the 63rd percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6600 at 19036 (0.1% behind), the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 at 19030 (0.1% behind), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m at 19089 (0.2% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation at 18954 (0.5% behind). The RTX 4050 Mobile sits in a tightly clustered group, with all four rivals within 0.5% of its score. The Passmark G3D score of 14423 and GPU compute score of 5947 provide additional performance data points.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU relative to their respective populations. The CPU's 81st percentile versus the GPU's 63rd percentile creates a gap that influences workload balance, as discussed later. The combined percentile of 72 reflects this intermediate positioning.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the AMD Socket FP8, a mobile platform with no upgrade path in the traditional desktop sense. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth with ECC support enabled. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8 — sufficient bandwidth for the RTX 4050 Mobile's 8.986 TFLOPS compute throughput.

The CPU's TDP is 35 W, and the GPU's TDP is 50 W, totaling 85 W for the core components. This modest power envelope means the system requires no dedicated power connectors for the GPU (listed as "None") and operates within typical laptop power delivery limits. The suggested PSU field is null, but the combined 85 W TDP suggests that any modern laptop power adapter can handle this configuration without issue.

The integrated Radeon 780M GPU provides a fallback graphics solution, though its performance is not benchmarked in this data set. For users considering upgrades, the primary constraint is the mobile platform itself — the CPU and GPU are soldered, and the system's upgradeability is limited to memory and storage. A sensible next step for users seeking more graphics performance would be to consider a laptop with a higher-tier 40-series GPU, given that the RTX 4050 Mobile's 6 GB VRAM and 96-bit bus are the most likely bottlenecks in demanding scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The 18-percentage-point gap between the CPU's 81st percentile and the GPU's 63rd percentile establishes a clear hierarchy: the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. In CPU-bound scenarios — such as physics simulations, data compression, and multi-threaded productivity tasks — the 7840HS will perform admirably, with its Passmark physics score of 1376 and data compression score of 345536 demonstrating robust throughput. The GPU, however, will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, particularly at higher resolutions where the 192.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM become constraints.

The data shows the CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 versus the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14423. These figures are not directly comparable, but the percentile positions provide the clearest evidence of imbalance. In gaming, the GPU determines frame rates in most modern titles, so the RTX 4050 Mobile's 63rd percentile positioning will cap performance regardless of the CPU's headroom. Conversely, in productivity workloads that leverage the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, the 7840HS will deliver performance near the top of its class.

The Passmark integer math score of 98682 and floating-point math score of 59921 highlight the CPU's computational strength. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 8.986 TFLOPS is respectable but not exceptional for the 40-series lineup. This combination suggests that users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks — compilation, rendering, scientific computing — will find the system well-balanced, while gamers targeting maximum frame rates may find the GPU wanting at higher settings.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, and dataIsMeasured is false. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not empirical measurements.

Based on the GPU's 63rd percentile and its Passmark G3D score of 14423, the RTX 4050 Mobile should handle 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most modern titles. The 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p textures but may require reduced settings in VRAM-hungry games. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 61 (Passmark) suggests that newer API titles may not perform as strongly as older DirectX 9 titles, which score 184 — though this benchmark disparity should be interpreted cautiously.

At 1440p, the GPU's bandwidth and VRAM constraints become more pronounced, and frame rates are expected to drop significantly compared to 1080p. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 1761) ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU's 63rd percentile caps overall performance. Ray tracing workloads, supported by the 20 RT cores, will run but likely at reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates. DLSS, leveraging the 80 tensor cores, can help recover performance in supported titles.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop configuration targets users who need strong CPU performance with capable but not top-tier graphics. The 7840HS's 81st percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for content creators working with multi-threaded applications — the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15102 and Geekbench multicore score of 11846 indicate solid rendering and encoding capabilities. Video editors leveraging CPU-based encoding will find the 16 threads beneficial, while the Radeon 780M integrated GPU provides a fallback for light graphics tasks when the discrete GPU is idle.

Gamers at 1080p resolution represent the primary audience. The RTX 4050 Mobile's 63rd percentile GPU performance, combined with the CPU's strong gaming headroom, should deliver playable frame rates at medium-to-high settings in most titles. Users targeting 1440p gaming may find the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth limiting, so this build is best suited for 1080p-focused gaming.

Software developers and students will appreciate the CPU's Passmark data encryption score of 20627 and extended instructions score of 25747, which indicate strong performance for compilation and code execution. The 35 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP keep total power demands modest, making this suitable for portable workstations. Small business users running productivity suites will find the CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3753 and multithread score of 28633 more than adequate for office workloads.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, built on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with ECC, delivering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. This configuration supports the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 and max-thread score of 7316 — the near-identical scores indicate that the CPU's 16 threads are fully utilized without additional scaling beyond that point. The 2-thread score of 1904 and 4-thread score of 3651 show expected scaling, while the 8-thread score of 6092 demonstrates that the 8 physical cores provide substantial throughput.

Real-world workload performance is strong across the board. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15102 places this CPU in a competitive position for rendering tasks, while the single-core score of 1761 ensures responsive application performance. Passmark results show particular strength in integer math (98682) and floating-point math (59921), with data compression (345536) and random string sorting (40364) also performing well. The find prime numbers score of 88 is notably lower, but this benchmark is less representative of typical workloads.

The 35 W TDP is impressive given the performance on offer. The 7840HS achieves an 81st percentile ranking while maintaining a power envelope suitable for thin-and-light laptops, and its nearest rival — the Ryzen 7 8845HS — matches its average score exactly at 29955, suggesting the 7840HS remains competitive with newer silicon.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7840HS compare to its closest rival, the Ryzen 7 8845HS?

A: The two processors have identical average benchmark scores of 29955, with a deltaPct of 0. This means the 7840HS performs exactly on par with the newer 8845HS in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU's relative performance ranking?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile sits at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19049. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6600, scores 19036 — just 0.1% behind.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The GPU has its own dedicated 192.0 GB/s bandwidth from its 6 GB GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 72, reflecting the CPU's 81st percentile and the GPU's 63rd percentile. The system sits in the upper-midrange of laptop configurations.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the 7840HS includes the Radeon 780M integrated GPU. This provides a fallback graphics solution when the discrete RTX 4050 Mobile is not in use.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and upgrade potential?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile platform. Upgrade potential is limited to memory and storage, as the CPU and GPU are soldered in typical laptop implementations.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this configuration?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores and percentile positions.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 4050 Mobile's 63rd percentile GPU performance, combined with the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1761 (Cinebench R23), should support frame rates well above 60 FPS in esports titles and older games, though the 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit settings in newer AAA releases. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14423 provides a baseline for expected performance.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and strong multi-threaded scores — 15102 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 28633 in Passmark multithread — provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The GPU's tensor cores (80) can offload encoding tasks via NVENC, and the 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supports GPU-based encoding without major frame rate impacts.

Video editing: The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 345536 and integer math score of 98682 indicate strong performance for video codec operations. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 supports GPU-accelerated effects and rendering, though the 6 GB VRAM may limit complex timelines with high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15102 and the GPU's Vulkan score of 75235 provide a balanced rendering platform for CPU-based and GPU-based renderers. The 16 threads handle CPU rendering efficiently, while the GPU's 20 RT cores support ray-traced workflows, albeit at entry-level performance.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark extended instructions score of 25747 and data encryption score of 20627 indicate strong performance for compilation and cryptographic workloads. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 35 W TDP keeps power consumption low during long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3753 (Passmark) ensures responsive application performance for everyday tasks. The 81st percentile CPU ranking provides more than adequate headroom for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, while the integrated Radeon 780M can handle light graphics tasks when the discrete GPU is disabled to save power.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking and the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking produce a combined percentile of 72, placing this configuration in the upper-midrange tier of laptop systems. The pairing favors CPU-heavy workloads — the processor outperforms its GPU counterpart by 18 percentile points, making this a system that excels in productivity, development, and content creation tasks while delivering respectable 1080p gaming performance. The 35 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP keep the system within portable power budgets, and the CPU's parity with the newer Ryzen 7 8845HS (0% deltaPct) ensures this configuration remains competitive against more recent laptop offerings. For users seeking a balanced mobile workstation with strong multi-threaded performance and entry-level discrete graphics, this pairing delivers a coherent package — though those prioritizing gaming above all else may find the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 96-bit bus a limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds