SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

29,955 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

63,775 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and AMD Radeon RX 7600M combination represents a high-performing mobile platform, with the pair ranking in the 85th percentile overall. The data available is derived from synthetic benchmarks rather than measured game frame rates; the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All FPS figures discussed below are therefore estimates grounded in the relative CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU’s 89th percentile standing among all GPUs indicates strong headroom for demanding titles. With an estimated performance profile placing it near the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 and NVIDIA CMP 30HX, the RX 7600M is positioned to handle 1080p high-refresh gaming, though exact FPS will vary by title. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking ensures it will not be the primary constraint in most gaming workloads.

Streaming: The CPU’s Zen 4 architecture with 8 cores and 16 threads provides ample parallel processing capacity for encoding and streaming tasks. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 and a 3DMark max-thread score of 7316 indicate that background streaming workloads can run concurrently with gaming without severe performance degradation. The Radeon 780M integrated graphics offer a fallback for display output, though the discrete GPU handles the rendering load.

Video Editing: The combination of a strong multi-core CPU and a mid-high-tier GPU suits 1080p and moderate 4K video editing workflows. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 28633 and Geekbench multi-core score of 11846 support smooth timeline scrubbing and faster export times. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide sufficient capacity for effects processing and GPU-accelerated rendering in most editing suites.

3D Rendering: The CPU leads in this workload, with a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2222.84 and a 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314. The GPU’s 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 269.9 GTexel/s texture rate contribute to viewport performance and final-frame rendering, though scenes with heavy ray tracing will rely on the 28 RT cores. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache helps keep render threads fed with data.

Software Development: The 8-core/16-thread configuration excels at parallel compilation tasks, with PassMark integer math scoring 98682 and data compression at 345536. The single-core Geekbench score of 2031 and 3DMark single-thread score of 979 indicate strong responsiveness for code editing and IDE operations. The dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth supports large project indexing and virtual machine workloads.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread performance is more than adequate for productivity applications, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3753. The integrated Radeon 780M can handle basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is idle, potentially extending battery life. The 35W CPU TDP and 90W GPU TDP make this a manageable thermal package for a laptop form factor.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK explicitly contains no measured FPS data for this CPU/GPU combination. All frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 places it just 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 30HX, providing a reference point for its raw compute capability.

For competitive esports titles at 1080p, the combination of the CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 6092 and the GPU’s 154.2 GPixel/s pixel rate should support very high frame rates, likely exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding games. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.10 GHz and single-thread 3DMark score of 979 help maintain high minimum frame rates.

For AAA single-player games at 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 7600M’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate, but frame rates will likely range between 60 and 100 FPS depending on the title’s optimization. At 1440p, the GPU’s 128-bit memory bus may become a limiting factor, with estimated frame rates dropping to 40-70 FPS on ultra settings.

The GPU’s RDNA 3.0 architecture with 1792 shading units and 64 ROPs suggests strong raw rasterization throughput. Games that rely heavily on ray tracing will see performance drops, as the 28 RT cores represent a smaller portion of the GPU’s total compute than NVIDIA equivalents. For competitive play, lowering settings to high or medium should yield frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional desktop sense. The Ryzen 7 7840HS is part of the 7000 series built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Memory support is limited to DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for professional workloads that require data integrity. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, allowing for fast NVMe storage and external GPU enclosures.

The CPU’s TDP is 35W, while the GPU’s TDP is 90W, combining for a 125W total thermal budget for the core components. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU, but the combined power draw indicates that a laptop power adapter in the 150-200W range would be typical, though this is not explicitly stated in the data. The GPU’s slot width is listed as IGP, suggesting it is integrated into the motherboard rather than a replaceable MXM module.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system RAM to the maximum supported capacity, as the dual-channel memory bandwidth is a shared resource between CPU and GPU workloads. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 4 lanes are also straightforward. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, scores identically at 29955, indicating that a CPU swap within the same socket would yield no performance benefit.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets mobile users who need a balanced blend of CPU and GPU performance without sacrificing portability. Gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rate displays will find the RX 7600M sufficient for most titles, with the CPU ensuring consistent frame delivery. The 81st percentile CPU ranking and 89th percentile GPU ranking indicate a well-matched pair for this use case.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM supports moderate-sized textures and compositions, while the 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 performance assists with AI-accelerated effects that use half-precision computing.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 threads and PassMark integer math score of 98682. The data encryption score of 20627 indicates capable handling of cryptographic workloads, making this suitable for security-focused development. Students in STEM fields will find the combination adequate for simulations and data analysis, with the PassMark floating-point math score of 59921 supporting scientific computing.

Small business workstations that require occasional GPU acceleration will find the RX 7600M capable, with its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 placing it in the top 11% of all GPUs. The CPU’s support for ECC memory adds reliability for long-running server-like workloads, though the mobile form factor limits expansion options.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU holds an average benchmark score of 29955, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its four nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS matches it exactly at 29955 with a 0% delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29879 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713 (0.8% lower). This indicates the 7840HS is at the top of its immediate performance class.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 63775, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP at 63830 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA CMP 30HX at 63842 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63693 (0.1% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 at 64212 (0.7% higher). The RX 7600M sits in a competitive mid-upper tier.

In CPU-specific tests, the 3DMark suite shows scaling from a single-thread score of 979 to a max-thread score of 7316, with an 8-thread score of 6092 representing 83% of the max-thread result. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 is roughly 8.6 times the single-core score of 1761, indicating excellent thread scaling. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28633 is 7.6 times the single-thread score of 3753.

The combined percentile of 85 places this pairing above the majority of mobile platforms, though the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU. The data suggests the GPU will often be the performance ceiling in gaming, while the CPU excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is built on the Navi 33 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It is fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Clock speeds are listed as a 1500 MHz base, 2070 MHz game clock, and 2410 MHz boost clock. The memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The GPU contains 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, producing a pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 269.9 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is rated at 17.27 TFLOPS for FP32 and 34.55 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU has 28 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration but no tensor cores listed, meaning AI workloads must run on the standard shader units. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 reflects strong compute capability. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, scores 0.1% higher, indicating nearly identical raw performance. The 89th percentile ranking means this GPU outperforms roughly 89% of all GPUs in the database.

For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and moderate 1440p textures, but the 128-bit memory bus limits bandwidth-hungry operations. The 64 ROPs provide good fill-rate performance for rasterization, while the 28 RT cores offer entry-level ray tracing that will struggle with heavy ray-traced scenes. The FP16 performance of 34.55 TFLOPS is notable for applications that leverage half-precision compute.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It is fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and the TDP is 35W.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. The PCIe implementation offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 and a single-core score of 1761. The Geekbench scores are 11846 multi-core and 2031 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 28633 and a single-thread score of 3753.

The 3DMark results reveal the thread scaling characteristics: 2-thread score of 1904, 4-thread score of 3651, 8-thread score of 6092, 16-thread score of 7314, and max-thread score of 7316. The near-identical 16-thread and max-thread scores indicate that the CPU does not benefit from additional threads beyond its 16 physical threads, which is expected for an 8-core/16-thread design.

The data encryption score of 20627 and extended instructions score of 25747 indicate strong throughput for cryptographic and SIMD workloads. The physics score of 1376 and find prime numbers score of 88 reflect specialized test performance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 29955 places it in the 81st percentile, with its nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 8845HS, matching it exactly.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, meaning this platform outperforms 85% of all recorded CPU/GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7840HS compare to its closest rival, the Ryzen 7 8845HS?

A: The two CPUs have identical average benchmark scores of 29955, with a 0% deltaPct, indicating no measurable performance difference in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor and beneficial for professional workstations.

Q: What is the CPU’s thread scaling efficiency in the 3DMark benchmark?

A: The 8-thread score of 6092 represents 83.2% of the max-thread score of 7316, indicating efficient scaling up to 8 threads with diminishing returns beyond that point.

Q: How does the RX 7600M compare to the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100?

A: The RX 7600M scores 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 0.7% lower than the Pro WX 9100’s score of 64212, placing them in the same performance tier.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the RX 7600M?

A: The GPU has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2410 MHz.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a well-balanced platform with the GPU holding a slight performance edge over the CPU. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 81st percentile means the CPU is more likely to become the limiting factor in GPU-bound workloads, though the gap is narrow. In gaming scenarios, the CPU’s single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 979) is strong enough to feed the GPU in most titles, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will cap performance at higher resolutions.

For multi-threaded productivity workloads, the CPU becomes the primary driver, with its 8-core/16-thread configuration delivering a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102. The GPU’s compute capability (17.27 TFLOPS FP32) is sufficient for acceleration tasks but will not bottleneck CPU-heavy workloads like compilation or data processing. The PassMark integer math score of 98682 indicates the CPU handles these tasks efficiently.

The memory subsystem is a shared potential bottleneck. The dual-channel DDR5 provides 89.6 GB/s, which is adequate for the CPU but may be insufficient for the GPU in bandwidth-intensive games. The GPU’s 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is separate and sufficient for its 128-bit bus. The 16 MB L3 cache helps mitigate CPU memory latency but does not affect GPU performance.

In ray-traced gaming, the GPU’s 28 RT cores will be the clear bottleneck, as they represent a smaller fraction of compute than the shader units. The CPU’s 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures it can keep up with the GPU’s frame generation in non-RT workloads. For content creation, the balance is favorable: the CPU’s multi-thread performance and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 63775 work in tandem, with neither component severely limiting the other in most tasks.