SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

29,955 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and AMD Radeon 860M form a mobile computing package aimed at balancing CPU-heavy productivity with integrated graphics capability. This pairing, found in laptops, leverages AMD’s Zen 4 CPU architecture and RDNA 3.5 GPU architecture to deliver a dual-purpose system. The data indicates a strong processor paired with a mid-tier integrated GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 77 against all benchmarked systems. This analysis will break down the individual component strengths, their interaction, and the realistic use cases for this hardware configuration, relying strictly on the provided benchmark scores and technical specifications.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. Its clock speeds are substantial for an integrated part, with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The GPU operates with a power envelope of 15 W, which is consistent with its IGP classification and its placement in a laptop build class. Memory details are entirely system-dependent: the 860M uses System Shared memory for both its frame buffer and bandwidth, meaning performance is heavily contingent on the speed and configuration of the host system’s DDR5 RAM.

The compute configuration includes 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. The GPU also integrates 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for real-time ray-traced effects in supported titles. Interestingly, the data shows no tensor core count, indicating this architecture relies on standard shader-based compute for AI workloads rather than dedicated tensor hardware. The theoretical fill rates are listed as 48.00 GPixel/s for pixel rate and 96.00 GTexel/s for texture rate. The FP32 performance is listed at 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 3.072 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio for these compute types.

Benchmark results for the GPU are limited to two tests: Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan. It scores 22759 in OpenCL and 30043 in Vulkan. The higher Vulkan score suggests better performance in modern graphics APIs that offer lower overhead and more direct hardware control, which is typical for gaming workloads. The average benchmark score for the 860M is 26401, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. This positioning is competitive with dedicated entry-level graphics cards; the nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with an average score of 26421, a negligible delta of -0.1%. This indicates the 860M essentially trades blows with a low-end discrete GPU. The data also shows it performing within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, although that specific comparison seems anomalous given the RTX 5060’s typical market position.

For rendering tasks, the 860M’s 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest. The benchmark scores suggest it can handle light 3D modeling and basic rendering, but for complex scenes, the reliance on shared system memory for bandwidth will be a limiting factor. The presence of 8 RT cores means ray-traced effects are possible, but the relatively low shading unit count and shared memory bandwidth will likely constrain performance in ray-traced workloads to lower resolutions and settings. The GPU is a capable air cooler for light gaming, but not a powerhouse for intensive rendering.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the processor architecture and manufacturing process of the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the codename "Phoenix" and is manufactured on a 4 nm process node by TSMC, with a die size of 178 mm².

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have, and what type of memory does it support?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and includes ECC memory support.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Radeon 860M and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550?

A: Based on the average benchmark score, the AMD Radeon 860M (26401) is 0.1% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421), indicating they have statistically identical performance.

Q: Does the Radeon 860M have dedicated tensor cores for AI workloads?

A: No, the data lists the tensor core count as null for the AMD Radeon 860M, meaning it does not have dedicated tensor hardware and relies on standard compute units.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the AMD Radeon 860M?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M has a boost clock of 3000 MHz, with a base clock of 600 MHz.

Q: What is the TDP of each component in this build?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS has a TDP of 35 W, while the AMD Radeon 860M has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: What is the CPU's performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded Geekbench tests?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 2031 in the Geekbench single-core test and 11846 in the Geekbench multi-core test.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename "Phoenix." It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, all within a 35 W TDP. The CPU is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process node, with a transistor count of 25,000 million on a 178 mm² die. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU itself. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a very capable processor. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 15102 in multi-core and 1761 in single-core. The multi-core score is particularly strong for a 35 W part, indicating sustained performance across all 8 cores. Geekbench scores of 2031 (single) and 11846 (multi) corroborate this, showing strong scaling from 1 to 16 threads. The 3DMark tests show a similar trend: 979 for single-thread, 1904 for 2-threads, 3651 for 4-threads, 6092 for 8-threads, and 7314 for 16-threads. The progression from 8 to 16 threads (6092 to 7314) demonstrates the benefit of simultaneous multithreading, though the scaling is not linear, which is typical.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29955, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. This puts it in direct competition with desktop-class processors. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, which has an identical average score of 29955, representing a 0% delta. It is also within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X. This indicates that the 7840HS delivers performance on par with or slightly ahead of several high-end desktop and mobile parts from previous and current generations.

For real workloads, the PassMark scores provide further insight. The CPU achieves a multi-thread score of 28633 and a single-thread score of 3753. Its floating-point math score is 59921, and integer math is 98682, suggesting robust performance in scientific and general-purpose computing. Data compression scores 345536, and encryption scores 20627. The physics score of 1376 and extended instructions score of 25747 round out a profile that is well-suited for heavy multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while still offering strong single-thread responsiveness for everyday tasks and gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Radeon 860M is heavily skewed toward CPU performance. The CPU sits in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 72nd percentile. This 9-point gap indicates that the processor is the stronger of the two components and will not be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive scenarios.

The data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 26401, which is on par with a discrete NVIDIA GeForce MX550, suggests that gaming performance will be limited by the integrated graphics. In a game that is not heavily multi-threaded, the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 979 and PassMark single-thread score of 3753 show ample headroom. The bottleneck will almost certainly be the GPU in gaming workloads, as it must render frames at the target resolution and quality settings.

Conversely, in CPU-intensive workloads that do not heavily utilize the GPU, such as video transcoding, 3D rendering, or code compilation, the balance shifts. The CPU’s 8-core/16-thread configuration and high multi-threaded scores (15102 in Cinebench R23, 28633 in PassMark) will be the primary driver of performance. The GPU will play a minimal role, and the system will be limited by the CPU’s ability to process data.

The memory configuration is a critical factor in this balance. The GPU uses System Shared memory, meaning its bandwidth is dependent on the system’s DDR5 RAM. While the CPU is capable of 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, the GPU will share this pool. In gaming, the shared memory bandwidth can become a secondary bottleneck, as the GPU competes with the CPU for memory access. This is a typical constraint for integrated graphics systems and is not reflected in the GPU’s raw compute scores, which are measured in isolation. The 15 W TDP of the GPU also limits its sustained clock speeds, further reinforcing that the GPU is the performance ceiling for gaming.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a target scenario for high-refresh gaming at demanding settings. The Radeon 860M’s average benchmark score of 26401 places it in the 72nd percentile, on par with an entry-level discrete GPU like the NVIDIA GeForce MX550. While the CPU’s strong 3DMark single-thread score of 979 and PassMark single-thread score of 3753 can handle game logic, the GPU will limit frame rates. The system is more suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings and 60 FPS targets, not high-refresh 144Hz+ monitors in AAA titles.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for streaming. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration and high multi-threaded scores, such as 15102 in Cinebench R23 and 28633 in PassMark, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The x264 encoder can utilize the extra threads without severely impacting game performance. The GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores means it may not offer the most efficient hardware-accelerated encoding, but the CPU’s raw power makes software encoding a viable option.

Video Editing: This workload benefits from both components, but leans heavily on the CPU. The Ryzen 7 7840HS’s PassMark multi-thread score of 28633 and data compression score of 345536 will accelerate timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export times. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16 ROPs can assist with GPU-accelerated effects and previews, but the shared memory bandwidth will be a limiting factor for high-resolution timelines. The system is capable of editing 1080p and light 4K footage, but not ideal for complex, effects-heavy projects.

3D Rendering: CPU rendering is a strong suit for this configuration. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 is excellent for a 35 W mobile processor, indicating that CPU-based rendering engines like those in Blender or V-Ray will perform admirably. GPU rendering, however, is limited by the 860M’s modest compute power. The 3.072 TFLOPS and 8 RT cores are insufficient for complex, interactive ray-traced viewports, though basic rendering tasks will complete. This is a system for CPU-centric rendering workflows.

Software Development: The CPU’s performance is the primary asset here. Compilation times will benefit from the 16 threads, as evidenced by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 and the PassMark integer math score of 98682. The strong single-thread score of 2031 in Geekbench ensures snappy UI responsiveness in IDEs and fast code indexing. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload, making this an excellent configuration for developers.

Student and Office Work: This scenario is entirely dominated by the CPU. The Ryzen 7 7840HS provides a fluid experience for web browsing, document editing, and productivity suites. The PassMark single-thread score of 3753 ensures quick application launches and responsive input. The integrated GPU is more than sufficient for driving external displays and basic 2D acceleration. The system’s 35 W CPU TDP and 15 W GPU TDP also suggest good battery life potential, though that is not directly measured in the data.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing is for users who prioritize CPU processing power in a mobile form factor but require only modest graphics capabilities. The primary target is a software developer who needs a powerful multi-threaded processor for compilation and virtualization. The 8-core/16-thread CPU with a PassMark multi-thread score of 28633 and strong integer math performance (98682) is ideal for this role. The GPU is sufficient for driving multiple monitors and basic 2D/3D UI acceleration.

Students in engineering, computer science, or data analysis fields would benefit from this configuration. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking ensures it can handle demanding computational software like MATLAB or Python data processing libraries, while the Radeon 860M is adequate for general use and light gaming. The 15 W GPU TDP contributes to a thermally efficient design that is suitable for a portable laptop.

Small business workstations that handle video conferencing, heavy spreadsheet analysis, and database management will find the CPU’s performance compelling. The high multi-threaded scores (15102 in Cinebench R23, 11846 in Geekbench multi-core) ensure smooth multitasking. The GPU is not a factor for these workloads, but its presence eliminates the need for a separate discrete graphics card, which saves power and space.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound tasks, such as audio production or code-based animation, are a secondary target. The CPU’s floating-point performance (59921 in PassMark) is strong. However, gamers targeting high-refresh or high-detail 1080p gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking and performance parity with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 indicates it is an entry-level part. This is not a system for 4K gaming or heavy GPU rendering.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; it is soldered to the motherboard. The memory support is limited to dual-channel DDR5, which is the standard for this platform. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the GPU interface is listed as PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for the integrated graphics.

The power delivery is a crucial consideration. The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 15 W, for a combined thermal design power of 50 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is null, and the power connectors are listed as "None," which is expected for an IGP. The system’s total power draw is low enough that the laptop’s battery and power adapter are the limiting factors, not a dedicated PSU. There is no headroom for adding a discrete GPU, as the laptop chassis is not designed for that.

Given that the CPU and GPU are integrated and non-upgradeable, the only meaningful upgrade path is external. The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be to ensure it is paired with fast dual-channel DDR5 memory, as the GPU’s performance is "System Dependent" on shared memory bandwidth. Increasing the memory speed or capacity will directly benefit the integrated GPU’s performance.

Since the GPU is integrated, the platform’s longevity is tied to the CPU’s performance. The Ryzen 7 7840HS is an active production part, and its performance is competitive with newer mobile CPUs like the Ryzen 7 8845HS, which has a 0% delta in average score. A user looking for a substantial upgrade would need to move to a completely new laptop platform, as there is no socket-based upgrade path for either the CPU or GPU in this build.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, a high-performance 8-core mobile processor, with the AMD Radeon 860M, an integrated graphics processor. The combination is designed to deliver strong CPU performance in a power-efficient mobile package, with the GPU providing a baseline level of graphics capability that eliminates the need for a discrete graphics card.

The overall tier of this system is defined by its combined percentile of 77, which places it in the upper quarter of all benchmarked systems. This is a strong showing, driven primarily by the CPU’s 81st percentile ranking. The GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking is respectable for an integrated part but is the lower-performing component of the pairing.

This build represents a specific philosophy: maximizing CPU throughput for productivity and development tasks while accepting entry-level gaming and graphics performance. It is not a gaming laptop, nor is it a workstation with a powerful discrete GPU. It is a productivity-focused laptop that offers a significant performance advantage in CPU-bound workloads over systems with lower-tier processors, while its integrated graphics are capable of handling light gaming and general graphics acceleration. The data shows a system that is more than the sum of its parts for CPU-heavy tasks, but is ultimately capped by its integrated graphics for any GPU-intensive work.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS delivers an average benchmark score of 29955, securing the 81st percentile among all CPUs. This places it in a dead heat with the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, which has an identical average score. It is also 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X. In specific tests, the CPU scores 15102 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1761 in single-core, plus 11846 in Geekbench multi-core and 2031 in single-core.

The AMD Radeon 860M achieves an average benchmark score of 26401, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. This is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in the provided data. Its Geekbench scores are 22759 for OpenCL and 30043 for Vulkan. The combined percentile for this pairing is 77, indicating that this laptop configuration outperforms 77% of all benchmarked systems.

The combined picture is one of significant asymmetry. The CPU is a top-tier performer, sitting in the 81st percentile and trading blows with high-end desktop parts like the Ryzen 7 5800XT. The GPU, while strong for an integrated solution, is in the 72nd percentile and is comparable to a low-end discrete GPU. The system’s overall 77th percentile ranking is dragged down by the GPU, but the CPU’s exceptional performance makes this a compelling choice for users who need maximum processing power and only require basic graphics capabilities.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds