SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

29,955 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + AMD Radeon 8050S: Database Analysis

This pairing combines an 8-core Zen 4 mobile processor with a high-end RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics solution in a laptop chassis. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is a 35 W TDP mobile chip built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the AMD Radeon 8050S is a Strix Halo integrated GPU that shares the same 4 nm node. Together they form a system that sits at the 85th percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database, with the CPU at the 81st percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile. Notably, no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination — all frame rate discussions in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is a Phoenix-generation processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, operating at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Built on the Zen 4 architecture at 4 nm, it contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Benchmark results reveal a balanced performer. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 15,102 multicore and 1,761 singlecore — a multicore-to-singlecore ratio of roughly 8.6:1, indicating strong scaling across all 16 threads. The 3DMark thread scaling is equally telling: 1,904 at 2 threads, 3,651 at 4 threads, 6,092 at 8 threads, and 7,314 at 16 threads. The jump from 8 to 16 threads adds only about 20% performance, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 threads for this workload. Single-thread performance in 3DMark is 979, while Geekbench singlecore reaches 2,031.

PassMark results show a mix of strengths. Integer math scores 98,682, floating-point math 59,921, and extended instructions 25,747. Data compression hits 345,536, while data encryption scores 20,627. Random string sorting reaches 40,364. The multithread PassMark score is 28,633, with a single-thread score of 3,753. Physics simulation scores 1,376, and prime number finding is 88 — the latter being relatively modest compared to other integer workloads.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 7840HS sits in a tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS matches its average benchmark score of 29,955 exactly (0% delta). The Ryzen 7 5800XT is 0.3% ahead at 29,879, the Ryzen 7 7840H is also 0.3% ahead at 29,868, and the Ryzen 5 9600X trails by 0.8% at 29,713. This means the 7840HS is effectively indistinguishable from its closest competitors in aggregate CPU performance — differences of less than 1% are within normal run-to-run variance.

For real workloads, the 8-core/16-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost clock handles heavily threaded tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering well, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,102. The single-core score of 1,761 in Cinebench R23 indicates snappy responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The 35 W TDP suggests this is a power-efficient chip, though the database does not provide comparative efficiency data.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is a Strix Halo integrated GPU based on RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation and operates at a base clock of 1295 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. Ray tracing hardware includes 32 RT cores. The die size is 308 mm², though transistor count is listed as unknown.

Memory is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM. The memory bus width, type, and size are all marked as "System Shared," and bandwidth is "System Dependent" — meaning performance scales with the host system's DDR5 memory configuration. The GPU's TDP is 55 W, and it uses the PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. Pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results are strong for an integrated solution. Geekbench OpenCL scores 65,818, and Vulkan scores 58,398. The average benchmark score is 62,108, placing the GPU at the 89th percentile of all GPUs — a very high position, especially for an IGP. The nearest rivals show a tight competitive field: the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 0.3% behind at 61,896, the Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 2.5% ahead at 63,693, the Radeon RX 7600M is 2.6% ahead at 63,775, and the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is 2.7% ahead at 63,830.

For rendering workloads, the 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate indicate substantial rasterization capability. The 32 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is notable for an integrated GPU. The system-shared memory architecture means bandwidth depends entirely on the laptop's DDR5 configuration — a potential bottleneck for texture-heavy workloads. The 89th percentile ranking suggests this GPU outperforms many discrete mobile GPUs, though the nearest rivals are all within 3% in aggregate score.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7840HS compare to the Ryzen 7 8845HS?

A: The two processors have identical average benchmark scores of 29,955, showing a 0% delta. They are effectively performance twins in aggregate CPU benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory exclusively. The size, type, and bus width are all marked "System Shared," with bandwidth described as "System Dependent."

Q: Does the Radeon 8050S support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 32 RT cores. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and platform?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses AMD Socket FP8. It supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with ECC capability and has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The Radeon 8050S trails the RX 7600M by 2.6% in average benchmark score (62,108 vs. 63,775). The RX 7600M is the closest rival in the GPU's nearestRivals list.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The CPU+GPU pairing sits at the 85th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 81st percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The Ryzen 7 7840HS is not designed for overclocking.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the GPU significantly outranks the CPU in percentile placement. The GPU sits at the 89th percentile while the CPU is at the 81st percentile — an 8-point gap. This suggests the Radeon 8050S is the stronger component relative to its peers, meaning CPU-bound scenarios are more likely to be the limiting factor.

In gaming workloads, the CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,314 and single-thread score of 979 indicate solid but not exceptional processing power. The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 and 179.2 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest it can push high frame rates at moderate resolutions, but the CPU may struggle to feed it in CPU-intensive titles. The 89th percentile GPU ranking versus the 81st percentile CPU ranking implies that in GPU-bound scenarios, the system performs near the top of its class, while in CPU-bound scenarios it drops relative to peers.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,102 and PassMark multithread score of 28,633 show strong multi-threaded capability, while the GPU's system-shared memory architecture could bottleneck memory-intensive compute tasks. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is the ceiling for GPU memory access, which may limit the Radeon 8050S in bandwidth-hungry workloads like large texture streaming or compute shaders.

The 35 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP indicate the system must share thermal and power budgets in a laptop chassis. The GPU's higher TDP suggests it may have priority in power allocation during combined workloads, potentially limiting CPU boost clocks under sustained load. The data does not provide dynamic clock behavior under simultaneous load, but the power envelope difference is notable.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest capability for 1080p high-refresh gaming. However, the CPU's 81st percentile and single-thread score of 979 in 3DMark may limit frame rates in esports titles that rely on single-core performance. Expect competitive frame rates in less demanding games, with the CPU as a potential limiter in CPU-heavy titles.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU with a 5.10 GHz boost clock provides headroom for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,102 indicates the CPU can handle simultaneous game and encode workloads, though the 35 W TDP may limit sustained performance. The GPU's shared memory architecture means encoding workloads compete with game rendering for bandwidth.

Video editing: The PassMark data compression score of 345,536 and integer math score of 98,682 indicate strong performance for codec operations and timeline processing. The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 can accelerate effects and transitions. The 89th percentile GPU ranking suggests smooth preview and render performance in GPU-accelerated editors.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2,222.84 and R23 multicore of 15,102 demonstrate capable CPU rendering. The GPU's 32 RT cores and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and GPU rendering. The system-shared memory may be a constraint for large scenes that exceed available system memory bandwidth.

Software development: The CPU's Geekbench singlecore score of 2,031 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,753 indicate responsive compilation and code analysis. The 16 threads handle parallel builds well. The GPU's OpenCL score of 65,818 supports GPU compute for testing and simulation workloads.

Student and office work: The 81st percentile CPU and 89th percentile GPU far exceed the requirements for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 35 W CPU TDP contributes to potential battery efficiency, though the database does not provide battery life data. The 4 nm process node for both components suggests modern power efficiency.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This limits upgradeability to laptop platforms — the CPU is not removable in most designs. The platform supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with ECC capability, meaning memory upgrades are possible if the laptop provides accessible SO-DIMM slots. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is the theoretical ceiling for both CPU and GPU memory access.

The GPU is an integrated solution with no upgrade path — it is permanently part of the system. The PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface for the GPU suggest the platform is modern, but the integrated nature of the GPU means no discrete replacement is possible in the same chassis. The system-shared memory architecture means adding more system RAM directly benefits GPU performance, as bandwidth and capacity are "System Dependent."

The CPU TDP of 35 W and GPU TDP of 55 W indicate a combined thermal envelope of approximately 90 W, though the database does not specify a suggested PSU. For a laptop, this is within normal range for a high-performance mobile system. The GPU's power connectors are listed as "None," confirming its integrated nature. A sensible next upgrade within the same platform would be increasing system RAM capacity and speed, since the GPU's performance scales with memory bandwidth and the CPU supports dual-channel DDR5.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 29,955, placing it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 15,102 and singlecore at 1,761, Geekbench multicore at 11,846 and singlecore at 2,031, and 3DMark max threads at 7,316. PassMark multithread scores 28,633 with single-thread at 3,753. The nearest rival is the Ryzen 7 8845HS at an identical 29,955, followed by the Ryzen 7 5800XT at 29,879 (0.3% ahead), the Ryzen 7 7840H at 29,868 (0.3% ahead), and the Ryzen 5 9600X at 29,713 (0.8% ahead).

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 62,108, placing it at the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Geekbench OpenCL scores 65,818 and Vulkan scores 58,398. The nearest rival is the Radeon Pro W6600M at 61,896 (0.3% behind), followed by the Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63,693 (2.5% ahead), the Radeon RX 7600M at 63,775 (2.6% ahead), and the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP at 63,830 (2.7% ahead).

The combined system percentile is 85, with no measured FPS data available for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The data is marked as not measured, meaning all FPS figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The pair rank by FPS is null, and the measured FPS ultra by game dataset is empty. The combined picture shows a balanced system with a slight GPU advantage — the GPU outperforms its peers more decisively than the CPU does.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system (buildClass: "laptop") pairing an AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS processor with an AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU. The CPU is a Zen 4 (Phoenix) mobile chip on 4 nm with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU is a Strix Halo RDNA 3.5 integrated solution on the same 4 nm node. Both components are currently in active production, with the GPU released on January 5, 2025.

The system sits at the 85th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms the majority of CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU's 81st percentile and GPU's 89th percentile rank it as a high-midrange to upper-midrange mobile system. The GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, which is unusual for an integrated solution — most IGPs rank below their paired CPUs. The Radeon 8050S outperforms several discrete mobile GPUs in the nearestRivals list, including the Radeon Pro W6600M and comes within 3% of the RX 7600M.

The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.8% in aggregate score, showing the 7840HS is competitively positioned in its segment. The GPU's nearest rivals span a 5.2% range (from -2.7% to +0.3% relative to the 8050S), indicating a slightly more differentiated competitive field. This pairing represents a modern, efficient mobile platform with strong integrated graphics capability.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a laptop buyer seeking strong integrated graphics without a discrete GPU. The 89th percentile GPU ranking means gamers at 1080p resolution can expect high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU's 81st percentile providing adequate support. The 32 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, making this suitable for gamers who want ray-traced effects at playable frame rates without a discrete GPU.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15,102 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 65,818. The 8-core/16-thread configuration handles encoding, rendering, and effects processing efficiently. The system-shared memory architecture means adding more RAM directly improves graphics performance.

Software developers will appreciate the Geekbench singlecore score of 2,031 and PassMark single-thread of 3,753 for fast compile times and responsive IDEs. The 16 threads support parallel builds, and the GPU's compute capability (11.47 TFLOPS FP32) enables GPU-accelerated testing and simulation.

Students and office workers are over-served by this system's performance — the 81st percentile CPU and 89th percentile GPU far exceed the requirements for document processing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The 35 W CPU TDP suggests potential for good battery life, though the database provides no direct battery data. Small business workstations running productivity suites, database applications, or light CAD work would benefit from the strong multi-threaded CPU performance and capable GPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the database contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 1080p gaming at high settings is the expected sweet spot. The 179.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate suggest strong fill-rate performance for 1080p rendering. The system-shared memory means frame rates will vary significantly based on the laptop's DDR5 memory speed and capacity — faster memory directly increases GPU bandwidth.

The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 979 and 8-thread score of 6,092 indicate it can maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, though the 81st percentile ranking suggests it may bottleneck in extreme cases. The 16 threads handle modern games that utilize multiple cores well, as shown by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,314.

For esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, the GPU's pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s should support frame rates well above 60 FPS at 1080p, likely reaching 100+ FPS in less demanding titles. The CPU's single-thread performance of 979 in 3DMark may limit maximum frame rates in games that are heavily single-threaded. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 89th percentile ranking suggests playable frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range for demanding games, with lighter titles exceeding 60 FPS. At 1440p, the system-shared memory bandwidth becomes a more significant constraint, likely reducing performance more than on systems with dedicated VRAM.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds