SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

29,955 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + AMD Radeon 740M — Laptop Build Analysis

This mobile build pairs AMD’s 8-core Zen 4 Phoenix CPU with the entry-level Radeon 740M integrated graphics. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The combined percentile of 67 places this pairing in the upper-mid range of all tested laptop configurations, with the CPU clearly being the dominant contributor to that position.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame-rate expectations are inferred from the Radeon 740M’s benchmark results and the CPU’s capability to feed frames. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and Vulkan score of 15568 place it at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, which indicates roughly average performance for an integrated solution.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this configuration would likely struggle to maintain smooth frame rates in modern AAA titles. The GPU’s 256 shading units and 8 ROPs are modest by any standard, and the 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests that most demanding games would run at low-to-medium settings to reach playable frame rates. The 4 RT cores are present for hardware ray tracing, but with such limited compute resources, ray-traced effects would exact a heavy toll on performance.

For esports and competitive titles, the picture improves considerably. Games like Counter-Strike, Valorant, and League of Legends are far more CPU-bound and less demanding on the GPU. The Ryzen 7 7840HS’s strong single-thread performance — a Geekbench single-core score of 2031 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 979 — would help maintain high frame rates in these lighter titles. Expect 60+ FPS at medium settings in most esports games, but the exact numbers depend heavily on the specific title and resolution.

At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the overwhelming bottleneck. The 8 ROPs and 16 TMUs simply cannot fill frames fast enough at higher resolutions, and the system-shared memory bandwidth (listed as System Dependent) further constrains performance. Users should treat this as a 1080p-class gaming machine, and even then only for less demanding titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded results across all major benchmark suites. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 15102 multi-core and 1761 single-core. Geekbench shows 11846 multi-core and 2031 single-core. The 3DMark suite reveals consistent scaling: 1904 with 2 threads, 3651 with 4 threads, 6092 with 8 threads, and 7314 with 16 threads, with a max-threads score of 7316. This near-linear scaling from 2 to 8 threads and minimal gain beyond 8 threads confirms the 8-core/16-thread design is fully utilized.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 29955 places it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS matches at 0% delta, the Ryzen 7 5800XT trails by 0.3%, the Ryzen 7 7840H is also 0.3% behind, and the Ryzen 5 9600X is 0.8% behind. This means the 7840HS sits in a highly competitive band where a few percentage points separate it from desktop-class CPUs.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 12870 places it at the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 (0.2% behind), AMD Radeon Pro 455 (0.3% behind), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (0.3% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 580 (0.4% ahead). This is a mid-tier integrated GPU that trades blows with older discrete graphics cards.

The combined picture is clear: a very strong CPU paired with an average integrated GPU. The CPU outperforms 81% of all CPUs while the GPU only outperforms 53% of all GPUs. This asymmetry defines the entire character of this build.

FAQ

Q: Is this build capable of playing modern AAA games?

A: At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, yes, but not at ultra. The GPU’s 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 256 shading units are entry-level figures, and the 53rd percentile GPU ranking reflects that. The 4 RT cores allow hardware ray tracing, but performance would be severely limited with RT enabled.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest competitors?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840HS has an average benchmark score of 29955, placing it at the 81st percentile. It matches the Ryzen 7 8845HS exactly at 0% delta, edges the Ryzen 7 5800XT and Ryzen 7 7840H by 0.3%, and leads the Ryzen 5 9600X by 0.8%. This is a tightly contested performance band.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance tier relative to discrete graphics cards?

A: The Radeon 740M’s average score of 12870 puts it at the 53rd percentile. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD FirePro W5100, 0.3% ahead of both the Radeon Pro 455 and GeForce GTX 590, and 0.4% behind the Radeon RX 580. This places it in the range of older mid-range discrete GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the thermal design power of this processor?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, which is typical for a high-performance mobile processor. The GPU has a TDP of 45 W, though both share the same thermal envelope in a laptop chassis.

Q: Can this system handle productivity workloads like video editing?

A: Yes, particularly CPU-bound tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 and PassMark multithread score of 28633 indicate strong rendering capability. However, GPU-accelerated effects would be limited by the 740M’s 2.867 TFLOPS compute throughput.

Q: What is the upgrade potential for this laptop configuration?

A: The CPU is soldered to AMD Socket FP8, and the GPU is integrated, so neither component can be upgraded. Memory is DDR5 dual-channel, and the system uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, which supports fast NVMe storage upgrades.

Balance and Bottleneck

This build presents a textbook case of CPU-heavy imbalance. The processor operates at the 81st percentile while the GPU sits at the 53rd percentile, creating a 28-point gap that determines workload behavior. In CPU-bound tasks — compilation, rendering, spreadsheet calculations, data compression — the system punches far above its weight. The PassMark data compression score of 345536 and integer math score of 98682 demonstrate exceptional throughput for productivity applications.

In GPU-bound workloads, the situation reverses. Gaming at high resolutions, 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, and machine learning inference all strain the 740M’s limited resources. The GPU’s 8 ROPs become the critical constraint at higher resolutions, while the 16 TMUs limit texture throughput. The 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 figure is roughly one-third of what a modern mid-range discrete GPU offers, so any workload that scales with shader count will bottleneck hard.

FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores supports this analysis. The CPU’s 3DMark scores scale nearly linearly from 2 to 8 threads (1904 to 6092), indicating excellent multi-thread utilization. In gaming, this means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor at 1080p, but the GPU will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s ROP and TMU limitations become even more pronounced, and the CPU’s advantage becomes irrelevant.

The system-shared memory configuration adds another layer of complexity. With no dedicated VRAM, the GPU competes with the CPU for the same DDR5 bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This shared bandwidth is listed as System Dependent for the GPU, meaning actual performance varies with the specific memory configuration installed.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is a 7000-series mobile processor built on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename and contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The 8 cores and 16 threads operate at a base clock of 3.80 GHz with a 5.10 GHz boost clock. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1761 and Geekbench single-core score of 2031 are strong for a mobile part, reflecting the high 5.10 GHz boost clock. The multi-core scores — 15102 in Cinebench R23 and 11846 in Geekbench — confirm that the 8-core design scales effectively under load.

The PassMark suite provides insight into specific workload characteristics. The floating-point math score of 59921 and integer math score of 98682 indicate balanced ALU and FPU performance. The extended instructions score of 25747 shows solid AVX-512 or similar vector processing capability, which benefits scientific computing and encryption workloads. The data encryption score of 20627 and data compression score of 345536 round out a profile that handles both security and storage-heavy tasks efficiently.

The processor supports DDR5 memory with ECC capability, dual-channel configuration, and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, sufficient for a fast NVMe SSD and other peripherals. The 35 W TDP is modest for an 8-core part, reflecting the efficiency of the 4 nm process node.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics capability. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the strong multi-threaded scores — the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 and PassMark multithread score of 28633 indicate excellent parallel throughput. Students in computer science or engineering programs who run virtual machines, compile code, or analyze datasets will find the CPU more than adequate.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering will see solid performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 suggests that video encoding and 3D scene rendering in CPU-bound applications will complete reasonably quickly. However, creators who rely on GPU-accelerated effects in programs like Adobe After Effects or DaVinci Resolve will find the 740M’s 2.867 TFLOPS insufficient for smooth real-time previews.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, document processing, and database work will find this build more than capable. The PassMark integer math score of 98682 and data compression score of 345536 handle typical office workloads with ease. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive applications.

Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or older games will get acceptable performance, but those seeking high-refresh gaming in modern AAA titles should look elsewhere. The GPU’s 53rd percentile ranking and 8 ROPs make it unsuitable for demanding gaming workloads at higher resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket FP8 platform offers limited upgrade potential since the CPU is soldered. The integrated Radeon 740M cannot be replaced, so users are locked into the original GPU performance envelope. However, memory and storage upgrades remain viable. The system supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and upgrading from a smaller to a larger capacity kit can improve both CPU and GPU performance since the GPU shares system memory.

The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 CPU lanes allows for high-speed NVMe storage upgrades. A fast SSD will improve load times and overall system responsiveness without requiring any platform changes. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared between CPU and GPU, so installing faster DDR5 modules could provide a modest GPU performance boost.

The GPU’s TDP of 45 W and CPU TDP of 35 W give a combined 80 W thermal budget. This is modest by gaming laptop standards, and the absence of a suggested PSU figure reflects that this is an integrated solution with no external power requirements. The GPU uses no power connectors, and the bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

For users seeking a meaningful performance upgrade, the realistic path involves moving to a different laptop entirely — one with a discrete GPU. The CPU’s performance level (81st percentile) is sufficient for years of use, but the GPU will become the limiting factor as games and applications demand more graphics throughput.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS processor with the AMD Radeon 740M integrated graphics. The CPU is a Zen 4 Phoenix part with 8 cores and 16 threads on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.0 integrated solution with 256 shading units on the same process node. The combined percentile of 67 reflects the CPU’s strong 81st percentile ranking pulling up the GPU’s more modest 53rd percentile position.

The build class is laptop, meaning both components share a single thermal and power envelope. The CPU’s 35 W TDP and GPU’s 45 W TDP combine to 80 W total, which is manageable in most laptop chassis. The system is best characterized as a productivity-first machine with entry-level gaming capability, where the processor delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance but the graphics solution is limited to 1080p esports and older titles.

The pairing produces an overall tier that sits in the upper-middle range of tested configurations. The CPU competes with desktop parts like the Ryzen 7 5800XT (0.3% ahead) and Ryzen 5 9600X (0.8% ahead), while the GPU trades blows with older discrete cards like the GeForce GTX 590 and Radeon RX 580. This is a machine for users who need CPU horsepower and can accept integrated graphics.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 800 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz, and the memory is system-shared with no dedicated VRAM. The bandwidth is listed as System Dependent, meaning actual performance varies with the laptop’s memory configuration.

The GPU contains 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. This is a minimal configuration that emphasizes power efficiency over raw throughput. The pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 44.80 GTexel/s are modest figures that cap fill-rate-bound performance. The FP32 throughput of 2.867 TFLOPS provides a baseline for compute workloads, while the FP16 performance is identical at 2.867 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

The RDNA 3.0 architecture includes 4 RT cores for hardware ray tracing, and the API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for an integrated solution. The GPU’s release date is January 30, 2024, making it a recent addition to AMD’s IGP lineup.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and a Vulkan score of 15568, with an average benchmark score of 12870 at the 53rd percentile. The nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 (0.2% behind), Radeon Pro 455 (0.3% behind), GeForce GTX 590 (0.3% behind), and Radeon RX 580 (0.4% ahead). For rendering workloads, this GPU can handle basic 3D acceleration and video decode, but complex scenes with heavy shading or ray tracing will tax its limited resources.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is only viable for esports titles at 1080p with reduced settings. The GPU’s 53rd percentile ranking and 8 ROPs limit frame rates, though the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Geekbench 2031) helps maintain consistent frametimes in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads handle encoding workloads well — the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 supports simultaneous gaming and encoding. However, the GPU’s limited 2.867 TFLOPS may struggle with GPU-accelerated encoding features.

Video editing: CPU-based editing and rendering benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 and PassMark multithread score of 28633. Real-time previews with GPU effects will be sluggish due to the 740M’s modest compute capabilities.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in applications like Blender’s Cycles engine will perform admirably given the processor’s strong multi-threaded scores. GPU rendering is limited by the 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 RT cores.

Software development: Compilation and testing benefit from the CPU’s 81st percentile ranking. The PassMark integer math score of 98682 and data compression score of 345536 handle build pipelines and repository operations efficiently.

Student and office work: Document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing are well-served by the CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark 3753) and the ECC memory support adds reliability. The integrated GPU handles desktop compositing and video playback without issue, making this a capable general-purpose laptop configuration.