SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

80%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

29,868 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score

Top 20% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation form a laptop build class pairing with a stark performance split: the CPU sits at the 81st percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 21st percentile among all GPUs, yielding a combined percentile of 51st. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame-rate figures in this analysis are estimates derived from benchmark scores, not measured results.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix codename. Fabricated on a 4 nm TSMC process with 25,000 million transistors across a 178 mm² die, it runs at a 3.80 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.10 GHz. The 35 W TDP classifies it as a high-end mobile chip designed for thin-and-light performance laptops. The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8 and supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, plus ECC memory support — a rare feature in mobile chips.

Cache layout is 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is sufficient for the 8-core Zen 4 design, and the 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU provide solid expansion headroom for the GPU and storage.

Benchmark data shows a strong single-thread and multi-thread profile. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 23,731 multi-core and 3,350 single-core. Cinebench R20 yields 9,967 multi and 1,407 single, while R15 gives 2,392 multi and 337 single. 3DMark thread scaling is linear: 1,906 for 2 threads, 3,638 for 4 threads, 6,116 for 8 threads, and 7,409 for max threads, with a single-thread score of 976. PassMark results include 27,919 for multithread, 3,641 for single thread, and 58,724 for floating point math.

The 81st percentile ranking places this CPU above the majority of all tested processors. Its nearest rivals are a tight pack: the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29,879 (0% delta), the Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 29,955 (-0.3%), the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 29,955 (-0.3%), and the Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29,713 (+0.5%). The 7840H's average benchmark score of 29,868 is essentially identical to the 5800XT, within 0.5% of the 9600X, and just 0.3% behind the 8845HS and 7840HS. This means the 7840H is a mid-2023 mobile CPU that matches the performance of the 2022 desktop 5800XT — a strong showing for a 35 W mobile part.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently high. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 23,731 is a heavy result for a mobile 8-core, indicating sustained multi-threaded workload throughput. The single-core 3,350 in R23 is also high, reflecting the Zen 4 architecture's high IPC. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,461 shows excellent scaling from 8 threads (6,116), meaning the 8-core design uses its 16 threads efficiently.

The GPU's benchmark score is a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 run: 3,596. This places the GPU at the 21st percentile among all GPUs, a low position. The nearest rivals for the GPU are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (3,594, +0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M (3,616, -0.6%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (3,629, -0.9%), and the AMD Radeon HD 6770 (3,649, -1.5%). The GPU is within 1.5% of these old, low-end cards in the Steel Nomad test — a dramatic underperformance for a chip with the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada's architectural resources.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is 60 percentage points above the GPU in percentile terms (81st vs 21st). The combined percentile of 51st is the average of the two, reflecting a machine that is far better at CPU-bound work than GPU-bound work. The data shows a clear processor-heavy pairing, where the GPU is the limiting factor for graphics-heavy workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is a 16 GB GDDR6 GPU on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The chip is AD103, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,900 transistors on a 379 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.1 million per mm². The GPU uses the Ada Lovelace architecture, with 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, 76 ray tracing cores, and 304 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 236.9 GPixel/s, texture rate is 643.0 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 both compute at 41.15 TFLOPS with 1:1 ratio. The GPU runs at a base clock of 1425 MHz and boost clock of 2115 MHz, with a TDP of 120 W. It uses PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and a slot width of "IGP," indicating an integrated graphics processor package — it is a laptop GPU, not a discrete card. Display outputs are portable device dependent.

Despite these large compute resources — 41.15 TFLOPS FP32, 76 RT cores, 304 tensor cores — the only GPU benchmark recorded is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,596. This is the same score as the GT 545 (3,594) and within 0.9% of the GTX 1050 (3,629). The data shows a GPU that, in the Steel Nomad test, performs at the level of a decade-old entry-level desktop card. This is a major discrepancy between the architecture's compute capabilities and the measured benchmark result. The Steel Nomad test likely stresses the GPU in a way that this specific mobile implementation does not handle well, or the test's DX12 path is not optimized for this card. The 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are still present, but the score indicates the GPU is not delivering its theoretical compute in this test.

The 21st percentile ranking means 79% of GPUs in the database score higher in Steel Nomad. The nearest rivals are all old, low-end cards. This is a data-driven conclusion: the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada underperforms its architecture in this test.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU. With the CPU at the 81st percentile and the GPU at the 21st, the CPU is the stronger component in the pair. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,596 is 3.6% of the CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 7,409 — the CPU's raw compute is far higher relative to its peers than the GPU's. For CPU-bound workloads (compilation, rendering, spreadsheet, multi-threaded apps), the 7840H will not be the limiter. For GPU-bound workloads (gaming at high resolution, 3D rendering with ray tracing, AI inference), the GPU will be the bottleneck.

The combined percentile of 51st reflects this imbalance: the machine is at the median overall, but that median is the result of a high-end CPU and a low-end GPU. In gaming, the GPU will dictate frame rates, and the CPU will be underutilized. In CPU-heavy tasks, the GPU will be idle. The data shows no scenario where both components are fully stressed together.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The data is unmeasured, so all frame rates here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

The GPU's Steel Nomad score of 3,596, which is on par with the GTX 1050, suggests that gaming performance will be limited. At 1080p, the GPU is likely to deliver playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but it will struggle with modern AAA games at high settings. At 1440p and above, the GPU will be the absolute bottleneck. The CPU's high single-thread and multi-thread scores (3,350 R23 single, 23,731 multi) indicate it can handle high frame-rate CPU-bound games, but the GPU will cap the actual FPS. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is large, but the low compute score suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor. For high-refresh gaming (240 Hz), the GPU will not be sufficient. For 60 FPS at 1080p in less demanding titles, the GPU might be adequate.

The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 976 and the GPU's score of 3,596 together suggest that the CPU can feed the GPU at high frame rates, but the GPU cannot keep up. The data indicates the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming, and frame rates will be low relative to what the CPU could drive.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is capable of high frame-rate processing, but the GPU's 21st percentile score will not support high-refresh. This pairing is not suitable for competitive high-refresh gaming.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU provides enough multi-thread headroom for encoding and streaming, but the GPU's low score means the system will be GPU-limited during gameplay. The CPU can handle the streaming overhead, but the GPU will cap the game frame rate.

Video editing: The CPU's 3,350 single-core and 23,731 multi-core scores are strong for timeline editing and encoding. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for video layers, but the low benchmark score suggests the GPU will not accelerate effects-heavy rendering.

3D rendering: The GPU's 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores are present, but the Steel Nomad score of 3,596 indicates that in practice the GPU is not a high-performance renderer. The CPU's 23,731 multi-core score will be the primary workhorse for rendering.

Software development: The CPU's 8 cores, 16 threads, and 81st percentile make it a good fit for compilation, multi-threaded builds, and code analysis. The GPU is irrelevant for development.

Student and office work: The CPU's high single-core performance and 16 threads handle multitasking, spreadsheets, and coding. The GPU is not a factor in office workloads.

Who Should Build It

The CPU is a strong choice for mobile workstations focused on CPU-intensive tasks: software development, data analysis, virtual machines, and multi-threaded compilation. The GPU's low score means this pairing is not suitable for gamers targeting 1440p or higher, nor for 3D artists relying on GPU acceleration. The 16 GB VRAM and 76 RT cores are there, but the measured performance is not there. For content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound tools and only need occasional GPU acceleration, this could work. For students and office users who need a fast CPU for multitasking, the GPU is sufficient for light graphics. The CPU's 81st percentile makes it a high-performance mobile processor, but the GPU is a drag for anyone expecting GPU-heavy results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-only socket. The memory support is DDR5 dual-channel at 89.6 GB/s, and ECC is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The GPU has a TDP of 120 W and uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The system's power supply is null in the FACT PACK, so no PSU headroom is specified. The GPU is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors — it is soldered onto the board. This means the GPU cannot be upgraded. The CPU is also soldered on an FP8 socket, so the only upgrade path is a different laptop. The platform supports DDR5, which is current, and the PCIe Gen 4 lanes are standard. A sensible next upgrade would be a laptop with a more balanced GPU — one that scores closer to the CPU's 81st percentile.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score?

A: The GPU scores 3,596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 21st percentile.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 51st.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU pair.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's compute capability?

A: The GPU has 41.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 41.15 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1).

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds