SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
76%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

29,868 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score
Top 24% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H is a mobile processor built on the 4 nm TSMC process, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture. It is paired here with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, a Turing-based professional laptop GPU. This combination of a high-end modern CPU with an end-of-life professional GPU creates a unique, and sometimes contradictory, set of performance characteristics. The data indicates a system where the CPU is the clear star, while the GPU represents a significant bottleneck for graphics-intensive tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data overwhelmingly indicates that the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is the primary limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU consistently ranks in the 81st percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU scores a lowly 7th percentile against all GPUs. This massive discrepancy suggests that for most modern workloads, especially gaming and 3D rendering, the GPU will be saturated long before the CPU is pushed to its limits. The system's combined percentile of 44 reflects this stark imbalance, dragging the overall performance down to a mid-range tier despite the CPU's high-end capabilities.

Benchmark results support this bottleneck analysis. The GPU's average benchmark score is 1285, which is nearly identical to older, low-power cards like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (deltaPct of 0.3%) and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 (deltaPct of 1.4%). This means the GPU's raw graphics processing power is in a completely different league than the CPU's processing power. For instance, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23731, a result typical of high-end desktop processors. When a workload is primarily GPU-bound, such as rendering a complex scene in a game, the machine's performance will be tied to the GPU's low 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, not the CPU's substantial compute capabilities.

This imbalance has direct implications for frame rates. While the CPU could theoretically handle high frame rate calculations, the GPU's limited 6 GB of VRAM and its Turing architecture, which is now several generations old, will cap the output. The data suggests that this is a system for professional tasks that are lightly threaded or CPU-intensive, rather than one for high-end, immersive gaming. In CPU-bound scenarios like data compression (Passmark score of 341520) or integer math (Passmark score of 96692), the system will feel incredibly fast. However, in GPU-bound tasks like modern game rendering, the experience will be constrained by the graphics card's performance class, which is comparable to a GeForce GT 610 according to benchmark deltas.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP8, which is designed for mobile processors. The Ryzen 7 7840H is part of AMD's 7000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. Because this is a laptop platform (buildClass: "laptop"), the upgrade path is fundamentally different from a desktop system. The CPU is likely soldered to the motherboard, making a processor swap impractical or impossible. Similarly, the GPU is an MXM Module, which in theory is replaceable, but in practice, it is often proprietary to the laptop manufacturer and difficult to source.

The platform supports up to 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth via a dual-channel DDR5 memory bus, which is the standard for this generation of mobile processors. It also supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for workstations where data integrity is critical. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is a modern, high-bandwidth interface for connecting storage and other devices. However, the GPU itself uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is an older standard. This means that while the CPU can communicate with modern Gen 4 drives, the graphics card is limited to the older Gen 3 bandwidth.

The GPU has a TDP of 80 W and requires no additional power connectors, as it draws power directly from the motherboard. The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, which is efficient for an 8-core processor. Given the 80 W GPU TDP, a sensible next upgrade for this system would be to increase the amount of system memory to ensure the CPU is not starved for data. A more impactful, though less practical, upgrade would be to swap the MXM GPU for a newer, more powerful model, but the end-of-life status of the current card suggests that finding a compatible replacement would be difficult. The most straightforward upgrade is to replace a slower SATA drive with a PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD to take advantage of the CPU's 20 Gen 4 lanes.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H is a powerhouse of a mobile processor. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, running at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This is built on the modern Zen 4 architecture, which is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. This process node represents a significant efficiency and performance leap over older architectures. The CPU contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

The benchmark results for this CPU are exceptional. Its average benchmark score is 29868, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. This puts it in direct competition with desktop parts like the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and the newer AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, with deltaPct scores of 0% and 0.5%, respectively. This indicates that the 7840H offers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a 35 W TDP package.

Looking at specific benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23731 is particularly impressive and confirms its ability to handle heavily threaded workloads. The single-core score of 3350 is also strong, indicating good responsiveness in everyday tasks. The Passmark tests show a nuanced picture: it excels in integer math (96692), floating-point math (58724), and data compression (341520). These scores suggest the CPU is well-suited for software compilation, scientific simulations, and database management. However, the Passmark score for finding prime numbers is a low 83, which is unusual and might indicate a specific weakness in that particular instruction set or workload. Overall, the CPU data shows a processor that can handle nearly any computational task thrown at it, from video editing to complex engineering simulations.

Who Should Build It

Given the stark contrast between the powerful CPU and the weak GPU, this system is not for a general consumer or a high-end gamer. The data suggests it is a specialized tool for professionals and students who need significant CPU compute power for specific tasks but do not require high-end graphics rendering. The target user is likely a software developer who compiles large codebases, a student in a computer science or engineering program running simulations, or a data analyst processing large datasets.

For content creators, the picture is mixed. A video editor working with codecs that rely heavily on CPU encoding would see excellent performance. However, a 3D animator using GPU-accelerated rendering in software like Blender would be severely limited by the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking and high Passmark multithread score of 27919 make it a boon for compiling, data analysis, and running multiple virtual machines. The GPU's 7th percentile ranking means this is not a machine for creative professionals whose work is primarily GPU-accelerated.

For small business workstations, this could be a sensible configuration for employees who work with large spreadsheets, accounting software, or database front-ends. The fast single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3350) ensures a snappy user experience. However, for tasks like graphic design or video editing, the GPU becomes a liability. The system is essentially a high-performance CPU workstation with a basic display adapter. It is a niche product for users who understand that their primary performance need is CPU throughput, not graphical fidelity.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data shows a clear and significant bottleneck. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7461 is very high, indicating it can feed a powerful GPU effectively. However, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1285 is exceedingly low, placing it in the same performance tier as the GeForce GT 610.

Given the GPU's performance, which is comparable to a GeForce GT 610 according to its nearestRivals deltaPct of 0.3%, this system is not suitable for modern gaming. At 1080p with ultra settings, most modern titles would be unplayable, with frame rates likely in the low 20s or even single digits. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for older games, but the raw compute power is insufficient for the demands of recent releases. The GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance is a hard limit.

Even at lower resolutions like 720p, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor. While the CPU could handle a high frame rate, the GPU cannot render the frames fast enough. Older, less demanding games like "Counter-Strike: Global Offensive" or "League of Legends" might be playable at medium to high settings, but this system is not designed for gaming. The data indicates that this is a professional workstation component, and using it for gaming would result in a poor experience. The estimated FPS for any modern AAA title at 1080p would be well below acceptable standards.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a professional laptop GPU based on the Turing architecture. It has a 6 GB GDDR6 memory pool on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. The GPU has 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It also includes 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which are designed for ray tracing and AI workloads, respectively. The chip is manufactured on a 12 nm process and has a die size of 445 mm².

Despite its professional "Quadro" branding, the benchmark data shows it is severely outclassed. Its average benchmark score is 1285, which places it in the 7th percentile of all GPUs. This means it performs worse than 93% of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and the AMD Radeon R9 380, with deltaPct scores of 0.3% and -0.6%, respectively. This places its raw graphics processing power at the level of entry-level cards from over a decade ago.

The technical specifications reveal a card that is capable of specific tasks but lacks the brute force for modern gaming or rendering. The 30 RT cores are present, but their performance is limited by the low overall processing power. The 240 tensor cores can accelerate AI inference, which could be useful for machine learning tasks, but the 12 nm process node is outdated. The GPU's base clock is 945 MHz, boosting to 1380 MHz, and its memory clock is 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. These numbers are all indicative of a mid-range GPU from 2019, which is now considered end-of-life (production status) and is insufficient for modern high-resolution graphics work.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not viable with this configuration. The GPU's performance, which is comparable to a GeForce GT 610, is far too weak to drive high refresh rate monitors in modern games. The system will be entirely GPU-bottlenecked.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for streaming. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a Passmark multithread score of 27919, can handle the x264 encoding workload. The GPU's low performance will limit the game being streamed, but the CPU can easily handle the encoding process, making this a system that can stream older or less demanding titles well.

Video Editing: The experience would be mixed. The CPU's high performance (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23731) ensures smooth playback and fast timeline scrubbing. However, the GPU's low score of 1285 in 3DMark Steel Nomad means GPU-accelerated effects and exports will be extremely slow. Editors using CPU-based proxies would be fine, but GPU-accelerated rendering would be a bottleneck.

3D Rendering: This is a poor choice for 3D rendering. Most modern render engines, like Octane or Redshift, rely heavily on GPU compute. The Quadro RTX 3000's low FP32 throughput of 5.299 TFLOPS will result in very long render times. CPU-based rendering in Blender would be excellent, but this is not the typical workflow for most professionals.

Software Development: This is a strong scenario. The CPU's 16 threads and high Passmark integer math score of 96692 will significantly speed up code compilation. Running multiple virtual machines or containers will also be smooth. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a powerful and efficient developer machine.

Student and Office Work: For general office tasks, this system is overkill but effective. The CPU's single-thread performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3350, provides a very responsive system. Students in engineering or computer science running simulations would see excellent performance, though the lack of a powerful GPU would hinder any 3D modeling or CAD work that relies on GPU acceleration.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H a fast processor?

A: Yes. The data shows it is a top-tier mobile CPU, with an average benchmark score of 29868, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. It offers performance comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X.

Q: How does the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile perform?

A: The benchmark data indicates it is a low-performing GPU by modern standards. It has an average benchmark score of 1285, placing it in the 7th percentile of all GPUs, with performance similar to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610.

Q: What is the main bottleneck in this system?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU is in the 81st percentile while the GPU is in the 7th percentile, meaning the GPU will limit performance in graphics-intensive tasks.

Q: What is the architecture of the CPU?

A: The CPU is based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, and is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC.

Q: What type of memory does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and also supports ECC memory.

Q: Can this system play modern games at high settings?

A: No. There is no measured FPS data, but based on the GPU's benchmark score, which is comparable to a GeForce GT 610, it is not suitable for modern gaming. The estimated FPS at 1080p ultra would be very low.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark performance of this pairing is defined by a massive disparity between its two components. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 29868, placing it in the 81st percentile. This is a strong score, supported by a Cinebench R23 multicore result of 23731 and a Passmark multithread score of 27919. It sits alongside CPUs like the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (deltaPct -0.3%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (deltaPct -0.3%), showing it is a leader in its class.

In contrast, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile GPU achieves an average benchmark score of only 1285, placing it in the 7th percentile. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1285, and it performs near the level of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (deltaPct 0.3%) and the AMD Radeon R9 380 (deltaPct -0.6%). The combined picture is a system with exceptional CPU compute power and severely limited graphics capability. The combined percentile of 44 accurately reflects this imbalance, positioning the system as a whole in the lower half of all systems, despite its high-end processor.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, a high-end mobile CPU from the 7000 series, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, an end-of-life professional mobile GPU. The build class is a laptop. The CPU is a modern 8-core, 16-thread part based on Zen 4, while the GPU is a Turing-based part from 2019 that is now considered end-of-life.

The overall performance tier of this system is defined by its combined percentile of 44. This places it in the lower half of all systems, a direct result of the GPU's 7th percentile ranking dragging down the CPU's 81st percentile ranking. This is a system with a clear identity crisis; it has the brain of a modern high-end workstation but the graphics heart of a decade-old entry-level card. It is best suited for users who know their workloads are CPU-bound and are willing to sacrifice all modern gaming and GPU-accelerated performance for exceptional processor power. The pairing is not balanced, and the overall tier is "mid-low," driven entirely by the GPU's age and performance class.