SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

29,868 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

38,349 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

This pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 4 Phoenix mobile processor with NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell 2.0 laptop GPU, creating a high-end laptop configuration that sits at the 81st percentile overall. The data here is drawn entirely from synthetic benchmark scores; no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark results rather than direct game testing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outstrips the other, though workload-dependent bottlenecks are apparent. The CPU's 3dmark_max_threads score of 7409 and the GPU's 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 4952 indicate that in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, the RTX 5080 Mobile will be the limiting factor, while CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or data compression will strain the Ryzen 7 7840H first.

Looking at thread scaling, the CPU jumps from 1906 in 2-thread tests to 7461 in 16-thread tests, a 3.9x improvement that shows diminishing returns beyond 8 threads. This suggests that games optimized for 8 cores or fewer will see the GPU fully utilized, but titles that scale beyond 8 threads may leave performance on the table. The GPU's passmark_g3d score of 27711 versus the CPU's passmark_multithread score of 27919 puts the two components in a similar performance tier, meaning neither will consistently dominate the other in mixed workloads.

For FPS estimation, the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 result of 4952 suggests high-end 1440p gaming capability, but the CPU's single-thread score of 976 in 3dmark and 3350 in cinebench_r23 indicates that very high refresh rates at 1080p in esports titles could be CPU-limited. The 35W TDP of the CPU versus the 80W TDP of the GPU also suggests a thermal balance where the GPU has more power headroom, potentially allowing it to sustain boost clocks longer than the CPU under sustained load.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5080 Mobile is built on the GB203 chip using TSMC's 5nm process, packing 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die with a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². Memory configuration is substantial: 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus delivers 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocks running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). This bandwidth figure is critical for 4K texture streaming and AI inference workloads, where the CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth would otherwise become a bottleneck.

The GPU features 7680 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 144.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. Compute output is rated at 23.04 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), which is notable for mixed-precision workloads. Ray tracing hardware includes 60 RT cores, while 240 tensor cores handle AI acceleration. The base clock of 975 MHz boosts to 1500 MHz, and the 80W TDP with no power connectors indicates an integrated mobile design rather than a replaceable MXM module.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 4952 in 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, 166986 in geekbench_opencl, and 169754 in geekbench_vulkan. The passmark suite yields 27711 for G3D and 12134 for GPU compute. The GPU sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the RTX 4080 Mobile (deltaPct 0.6%) and the MX570 (deltaPct 0.1%). This places it in a performance class where the 16 GB VRAM and 896 GB/s bandwidth will handle 4K rendering and large model inference, but the 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 figure suggests it is not a compute monster compared to desktop workstation cards.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 29868, placing it at the 81st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (avgScore 29879, deltaPct 0%), the Ryzen 7 8845HS (avgScore 29955, deltaPct -0.3%), and the Ryzen 5 9600X (avgScore 29713, deltaPct 0.5%). This puts the 7840H squarely in a competitive mid-range desktop and high-end mobile CPU tier, with performance essentially identical to the 5800XT and slightly below the 8845HS.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 38349, also at the 81st percentile. Its nearest rivals include the MX570 (avgScore 38299, deltaPct 0.1%), the RTX 4080 Mobile (avgScore 38135, deltaPct 0.6%), and the MX570 A (avgScore 38691, deltaPct -0.9%). The RTX 5080 Mobile is thus slightly faster than the RTX 4080 Mobile but nearly identical to the MX570 in aggregate scoring, which is surprising given the architectural generational leap.

Combined, this platform achieves an 81st percentile overall, meaning it outperforms roughly 19% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The substantial CPU single-thread score (cinebench_r23_singlecore 3350) and multicore score (cinebench_r23_multicore 23731) indicate strong productivity performance, while the GPU's 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 4952 suggests it can handle modern DX12 titles at high settings. For gaming, the estimated FPS at 1440p ultra would be high for most titles, but 4K ultra would likely see the GPU at or near its limit, while 1080p high-refresh scenarios would be CPU-bound.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need both strong CPU and GPU performance in a mobile form factor. Gamers at 1440p will see the best balance, as the GPU's 896 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM handle high-resolution textures while the CPU's 8 cores provide sufficient physics and game logic throughput. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, but the 16 GB VRAM prevents memory capacity from being an issue. For 1080p esports at very high refresh rates, the CPU's single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread 976) will be the constraining factor, potentially holding back the GPU.

Content creators editing video or rendering 3D scenes benefit from the CPU's cinebench_r23_multicore score of 23731 and the GPU's compute score of 12134 in passmark_gpu_compute. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly useful for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that load large scenes. Software developers compiling code will appreciate the 16 threads and passmark_integer_math score of 96692, while data compression (passmark_data_compression 341520) and encryption (passmark_data_encryption 20162) tasks run efficiently on the Zen 4 architecture.

Students and small business users who need a single machine for coursework, office applications, and occasional gaming or rendering will find this configuration overkill for basic tasks but future-proof. The 35W CPU TDP and 80W GPU TDP suggest a laptop that balances performance with battery life, though the actual battery endurance depends on the chassis design. The integrated Radeon 780M GPU provides a low-power fallback for light tasks, potentially extending battery life when the RTX 5080 Mobile is not needed.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H is a mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It uses TSMC's 4nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The chip has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The 35W TDP is relatively low for an 8-core processor, indicating efficient power management.

Memory support includes DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes for the CPU only, and it includes the Radeon 780M integrated GPU. The socket is AMD Socket FP8, with part numbers 100-000000955 (FP7r2), 100-000000964 (FP7), and 100-000001129 (FP8). The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not available.

Benchmark results show strong multithreaded performance: cinebench_r23_multicore scores 23731, cinebench_r20_multicore scores 9967, and cinebench_r15_multicore scores 2392. The 3dmark suite shows scaling from 976 single-thread to 7461 max-threads, with 2-thread at 1906, 4-thread at 3638, and 8-thread at 6116. Passmark results include multithread 27919, single-thread 3641, integer math 96692, floating point math 58724, and physics 1301. The CPU's percentile of 81 against all CPUs means it outperforms most desktop processors from a few generations ago while consuming far less power.

The 5.10 GHz boost clock is notably high for a 35W mobile part, suggesting good single-thread responsiveness for everyday tasks. The 16 MB L3 cache is moderate by modern standards but adequate for gaming. The passmark_find_prime_numbers score of 83 is surprisingly low, indicating that the CPU's integer-heavy prime calculation performance is a weak point, though this is a niche workload.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket FP8 platform is a mobile socket, meaning the CPU is soldered and not upgradable in the traditional sense. The memory support for DDR5 on a dual-channel bus provides 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, which is fixed by the platform. The PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU limits expansion compared to newer PCIe 5.0 platforms, but for a laptop, this is generally sufficient for storage and a GPU.

The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, which is a generation ahead of the CPU's PCIe 4.0 lanes. This mismatch means the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds when communicating with the CPU, though the practical impact on gaming performance is minimal. The 80W GPU TDP with no power connectors indicates a fixed design, so upgrading the GPU is not possible.

The suggested PSU is not listed in the data, but the combined TDP of 35W (CPU) and 80W (GPU) totals 115W, which is modest for a laptop. This suggests a relatively slim power adapter is sufficient, and the platform is not power-hungry by gaming laptop standards. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be more RAM, as DDR5 is supported and the dual-channel configuration can be maxed out. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives are also viable, given the 20 available lanes.

The lack of a launch MSRP for either component means pricing is not addressed here. The production status is active for both components, so availability should be current. The platform's longevity is tied to the FP8 socket, which is specific to this generation of AMD mobile processors, so any future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard or laptop.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 81, meaning it outperforms 81% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7840H compare to its nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 5800XT?

A: The 7840H has an average benchmark score of 29868, while the 5800XT scores 29879, a deltaPct of 0%, meaning they are essentially identical in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5080 Mobile?

A: The GPU has 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, using 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7840H supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor and useful for workstation tasks.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing hardware configuration?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile has 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, with 7680 shading units.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 Mobile compare to the RTX 4080 Mobile?

A: The 5080 Mobile has an average score of 38349, while the 4080 Mobile scores 38135, a deltaPct of 0.6%, meaning the 5080 is slightly faster.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and base clock?

A: The base clock is 3.80 GHz and the boost clock is 5.10 GHz, with an 8-core, 16-thread configuration.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (8-core Zen 4 Phoenix) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (16 GB GDDR7, Blackwell 2.0). The CPU sits at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU is also at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, resulting in an overall combined percentile of 81. The platform is designed for high-end mobile gaming and productivity, with the CPU's 35W TDP and GPU's 80W TDP indicating a balance between performance and power efficiency.

The data shows no measured FPS for this exact combination, so all gaming estimates are derived from synthetic benchmarks. The CPU's strong single-thread score (cinebench_r23_singlecore 3350) and the GPU's 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 4952 indicate a system capable of high-refresh 1440p gaming and playable 4K in many titles. The 16 GB VRAM and 896 GB/s bandwidth are particularly relevant for future game releases and AI workloads. This is a top-tier mobile configuration, though the lack of price data means value assessment is left to the reader.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread 976) will likely limit frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU's 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 4952 suggests it can push very high frame rates at 1440p. The 16 GB VRAM ensures texture-heavy games do not run out of memory at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with passmark_multithread score of 27919, provide enough headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC (implied by Blackwell architecture) would offload encoding, though this is not explicitly measured in the data.

Video editing: The CPU's cinebench_r23_multicore score of 23731 and the GPU's passmark_gpu_compute score of 12134 indicate strong performance for timeline editing and effect rendering. The 16 GB VRAM handles large preview buffers and GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 60 RT cores make it capable for real-time ray tracing previews, while the CPU's 16 threads handle scene preparation. The 896 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces transfer bottlenecks for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's passmark_integer_math score of 96692 and data compression score of 341520 indicate fast compilation and data processing. The 16 GB RAM capacity (not measured but implied by DDR5 support) is sufficient for most development workloads.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic tasks, but the 35W CPU TDP and integrated Radeon 780M GPU provide an efficient low-power mode for battery-conscious use. The high single-thread score (cinebench_r23_singlecore 3350) ensures snappy response in office applications.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds