SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

29,868 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile: A Balanced Laptop Duo

This analysis examines a laptop pairing of AMD's Ryzen 7 7840H processor with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile GPU, both active mobile components built on modern architectures. The CPU is a Zen 4 (Phoenix) part on TSMC's 4 nm node, while the GPU uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process. The combined system ranks in the 78th percentile overall, indicating a high-tier laptop configuration. Crucially, no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile carries 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. This is a substantial bandwidth figure for a mobile GPU, and the GDDR7 type represents a generational leap over older memory standards. The GPU operates at a base clock of 907 MHz with a boost clock of 1425 MHz, and memory runs at 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed. The chip, designated GB206, contains 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines, producing a pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 205.2 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 13.13 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio for mixed-precision workloads.

The RTX 5070 Mobile includes 36 ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores, making it well-equipped for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-driven features like DLSS. The benchmark data supports this: the GPU scores 122,238 in Geekbench OpenCL and 116,960 in Geekbench Vulkan, showing strong compute and graphics API performance. In Passmark, the G3D score is 20,355, while the GPU compute score is 8,279. The DirectX 12 score of 93 and DirectX 11 score of 192 indicate modern API efficiency, though the DirectX 10 score of 129 and DirectX 9 score of 214 suggest legacy API performance is less of a focus. The GPU sits in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29,928.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5070 Mobile is essentially neck-and-neck with the desktop RTX 3070 Ti (deltaPct of -0.1%), meaning it trades blows within a fraction of a percent. It is 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti and 0.6% behind the Radeon RX 6800. The Radeon RX 6700 is 1.7% ahead, which is still a close margin. These comparisons suggest that for rendering tasks, the RTX 5070 Mobile should handle 1440p gaming comfortably and can manage 4K with adjusted settings, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a limiting factor for very high-resolution textures. For creative workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the 13.13 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and the tensor cores provide solid acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects and AI denoising.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU is built for the AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-specific socket, which limits the upgrade path to other FP8-compatible processors. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is adequate for a high-end GPU and NVMe storage, though the GPU itself uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. This mismatch means the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 lanes could bottleneck the GPU's full PCIe 5.0 bandwidth in theory, but in practice, the performance impact is likely minimal for gaming and most creative workloads.

The GPU is rated at a 50 W TDP, and the CPU at 35 W TDP, which together represent a modest power envelope for a laptop. There is no suggested PSU figure in the data, and the GPU uses no power connectors (it is an IGP-style component, meaning it draws power from the motherboard slot). This low power draw means a laptop with this pairing does not require an oversized power adapter, leaving headroom for other components like additional storage or a higher-capacity battery. The GPU has a slot width of "IGP," indicating it is integrated into the mainboard rather than a discrete MXM module, further restricting user upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade for this laptop would be increasing memory from the baseline, since dual-channel DDR5 at 89.6 GB/s is the data bus for both CPU and iGPU (Radeon 780M), though the discrete GPU has its own 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives are feasible, given the CPU's 20 lanes. However, the socket and IGP-style GPU mean neither core component is user-replaceable, so a meaningful upgrade would realistically involve moving to a new laptop platform rather than swapping parts. The platform's strength lies in its balance: the 35 W CPU and 50 W GPU are designed for sustained performance in a thin chassis without thermal throttling.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined system percentile is 78, with the CPU at 81st percentile and GPU at 75th percentile, suggesting a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's average benchmark score is 29,868, while the GPU's is 29,928, which are remarkably close—a 0.2% difference. This near-equality indicates that in most workloads, the system will be co-limited, with neither component being a clear bottleneck.

For gaming at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more critical. The Ryzen 7 7840H scores 976 in 3DMark single-thread and 3,350 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which are strong figures for a mobile part. These scores suggest the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at 1080p, but the GPU's 75th percentile and its close rivalry with desktop parts like the RTX 3070 Ti mean it will likely be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 384.0 GB/s bandwidth and 13.13 TFLOPS will be the primary constraint, as FPS scaling typically drops with resolution.

For CPU-heavy tasks like physics simulation or data compression, the CPU's Passmark physics score of 1,301 and data compression score of 341,520 indicate strong performance, and the GPU's compute score of 8,279 in Passmark shows it can assist in parallel workloads. In gaming, the bottleneck shifts based on title: fast-paced esports titles at 1080p will be CPU-bound, while visually demanding AAA games at 1440p will be GPU-bound. The deltaPct values against rivals are all within ±1.7%, meaning the system is finely balanced with no single component creating a significant performance gap. This balance is ideal for a laptop where power and thermal budgets are shared.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop configuration targets users who need both strong CPU and GPU performance in a mobile form factor. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will benefit from the GPU's 75th percentile standing, which matches desktop GPUs like the RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti. The CPU's 81st percentile ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,731 that is 0.5% ahead of the Ryzen 5 9600X and 0% different from the Ryzen 7 5800XT.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's 13.13 TFLOPS compute power useful. The CPU's Passmark floating-point math score of 58,724 and integer math score of 96,692 indicate strong number-crunching ability, while the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 122,238 shows it can accelerate rendering tasks. Software developers compiling code will appreciate the multi-threaded performance, with a 3DMark max-threads score of 7,409 and Passmark multithread score of 27,919.

Students and small business users running office applications, web browsing, and light productivity will find this system overqualified, but the 35 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP mean it can run efficiently without excessive battery drain. The ECC memory support is a plus for professionals requiring data integrity in financial or scientific computing. The 4 nm CPU process and 5 nm GPU process contribute to energy efficiency, making this a viable all-day workstation for mobile professionals who need to switch between gaming and productivity tasks.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU's socket and does it support ECC memory?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8 and supports ECC memory. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Mobile compare to the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 29,928, which is 0.1% lower than the RTX 3070 Ti's 29,945. This means they perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the CPU includes integrated Radeon 780M graphics. This can be useful for tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, though the discrete RTX 5070 Mobile handles demanding workloads.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU is based on Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with a die size of 178 mm² and 25,000 million transistors.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The GPU is in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 29,928, and it is most closely matched with the RTX 3070 Ti (deltaPct of -0.1%).

Q: Are there measured FPS values for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on the individual component benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There is no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's average score of 29,928, which matches the RTX 3070 Ti within 0.1%, suggests that at 1080p ultra settings, this laptop should deliver high frame rates in most titles, likely exceeding 100 FPS in esports games and reaching 60-100 FPS in AAA games. At 1440p, the GPU's 13.13 TFLOPS and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth should still produce playable frame rates, but the 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions in the most demanding titles.

The CPU's single-thread score of 3,350 in Cinebench R23 and 976 in 3DMark single-thread indicates it can handle high-refresh gaming at 1080p without bottlenecking the GPU. In CPU-intensive games like strategy titles or simulators, the 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a max-threads score of 7,409 in 3DMark should maintain stable frame pacing. However, the absence of measured FPS data means these figures are approximations. Users should expect performance in line with a desktop RTX 3070 Ti paired with a mid-range Ryzen 7, based on the deltaPct comparisons. At 4K, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS in AAA titles, and users should target 1440p or use upscaling technologies.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 35 W. The CPU is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and includes ECC memory support.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,731 and a single-core score of 3,350. The R20 multi-core score is 9,967 and single-core is 1,407, while R15 scores are 2,392 multi-core and 337 single-core. These scores indicate strong multi-threaded performance for a 35 W mobile part, with the multi-core score being 0.5% ahead of the Ryzen 5 9600X. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 1,906 for 2 threads to 7,409 for max threads, with 8-thread score of 6,116, suggesting efficient thread utilization up to 8 cores.

For real workloads, the Passmark scores provide insight: data compression at 341,520, data encryption at 20,162, extended instructions at 25,654, and floating-point math at 58,724. The integer math score of 96,692 is particularly high, benefiting office applications and database workloads. The single-thread Passmark score of 3,641 indicates responsive day-to-day performance. The CPU's average benchmark score is 29,868, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rival is the Ryzen 7 5800XT with a score of 29,879 (deltaPct of 0%). This means the 7840H is essentially equal to a desktop Ryzen 7 5800XT in overall performance, a remarkable achievement for a 35 W mobile processor.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build is a laptop-class system, as indicated by the `buildClass` field. It pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, a mobile processor from the 7000 series, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, a high-end mobile GPU from the GeForce 50-series. The combined system percentile is 78, meaning it outperforms 78% of all tracked configurations. This places it in the upper tier of laptop systems, suitable for high-end gaming, content creation, and professional productivity.

The CPU's 81st percentile and GPU's 75th percentile are closely aligned, creating a balanced platform where neither component significantly limits the other. The CPU's average benchmark score of 29,868 and GPU's 29,928 are within 0.2% of each other, reinforcing this balance. The system uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-only socket, and the GPU is an IGP-style component with no power connectors, drawing power from the motherboard. This design is optimized for laptops where space and power efficiency are critical.

The GPU's TDP of 50 W and CPU's 35 W TDP total 85 W of power consumption for the core components, which is modest for a high-performance laptop. This allows for thinner chassis designs and longer battery life compared to systems with discrete GPUs that require separate power connectors. The GPU's release date is 2025-04-14, making it a current-generation part. Overall, this is a high-tier laptop build that offers desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor, with the CPU matching a desktop Ryzen 7 5800XT and the GPU matching a desktop RTX 3070 Ti.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 29,868, which places it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT with an average score of 29,879, showing a deltaPct of 0%, meaning they are statistically identical. The Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS both score 29,955, putting the 7840H 0.3% behind them. The Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29,713, which the 7840H beats by 0.5%. In specific tests, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,731 and single-core of 3,350 are strong, while the 3DMark max-threads score of 7,409 indicates excellent multi-threading.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 29,928, placing it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti with a score of 29,945, a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the RTX 5070 Mobile is marginally slower. It is 0.5% faster than the RTX 2080 Ti (29,783) and 0.6% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30,095). The AMD Radeon RX 6700 scores 30,433, which is 1.7% ahead. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 122,238 and Vulkan score of 116,960 show strong compute performance, while the Passmark G3D score of 20,355 indicates solid gaming capability.

Combined, these scores paint a picture of a laptop that rivals desktop systems from the previous generation. The CPU matches a desktop Ryzen 7 5800XT, and the GPU matches a desktop RTX 3070 Ti. The combined percentile of 78 is slightly lower than the CPU's 81st percentile, reflecting the GPU's slightly lower 75th percentile. This means the GPU is the more likely limiting factor in performance, but the delta is small—just 6 percentile points. For users, this translates to a system that can handle virtually any modern game at 1080p or 1440p, and can accelerate professional workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and AI inference.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 75th percentile and its near-identical performance to the RTX 3070 Ti (deltaPct of -0.1%) suggest it can drive 1080p displays at high frame rates, likely exceeding 144 FPS in competitive titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 976 in 3DMark and 3,350 in Cinebench R23 ensures it won't bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions, making this a capable system for esports gaming.

Streaming: The GPU's 144 tensor cores and 36 RT cores support hardware-accelerated encoding and AI features, while the CPU's 16 threads handle concurrent encoding and gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 27,919 and 3DMark max-threads score of 7,409 suggest the CPU can handle streaming overhead without significant FPS drops, though the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous game and stream quality.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,731 and Passmark data compression score of 341,520 indicate fast video encoding and decoding. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 122,238 accelerates effects and transitions, while the 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth handles high-bitrate footage. This system should handle 4K video editing with ease, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit heavy GPU effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 threads and Passmark floating-point math score of 58,724 provide strong CPU rendering performance, while the GPU's 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates GPU-based renderers. The GPU's 0.5% advantage over the RTX 2080 Ti, a known rendering workhorse, suggests it can handle complex scenes. The 36 RT cores also speed up ray-traced rendering tasks.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 96,692 and data encryption score of 20,162 benefit compilation and cryptography workloads. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, as shown by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,461. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running test suites, and the 4 nm process ensures sustained performance under load.

Student and office work: The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3,641 ensures responsive application launches and web browsing, while the 35 W TDP conserves battery life. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics can handle basic tasks without using the discrete GPU, further extending battery life. The 81st percentile CPU ranking means this system is overkill for typical office tasks, but it provides headroom for future software demands.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds