SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

29,868 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

33,170 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile pairing represents a specific tier of laptop hardware, combining a high-end 8-core processor with an entry-level discrete GPU. This combination targets users who need substantial CPU throughput for productivity and creative workloads but do not require maximum graphical fidelity for gaming. The data indicates a system that is highly capable for multi-threaded tasks, yet the GPU will be the primary constraint in graphics-intensive applications, placing the entire build at the 80th percentile overall.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build holds a combinedPercentile of 80, indicating it outperforms 80% of all recorded system configurations in the database, placing it in the upper tier of laptop hardware.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840H has an average benchmark score of 29868, which is essentially identical to the Ryzen 7 5800XT's score of 29879, resulting in a deltaPct of 0.

Q: What is the performance difference between this CPU and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS?

A: The Ryzen 7 8845HS has an average score of 29955, which is 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 7 7840H's score, making the performance difference between the two negligible in real-world terms.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and how does it compare to the NVIDIA T550 Mobile?

A: The RTX 3050 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 33170. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA T550 Mobile, scores 33161, resulting in a deltaPct of 0, showing they are statistically tied in performance.

Q: What is the memory configuration and bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bus and bandwidth support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a total memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have an integrated GPU, and if so, what is it?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H integrates a Radeon 780M graphics solution, which can handle display output and light graphical tasks when the discrete GPU is not in use.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a clear picture of a processor with strong multi-threaded capabilities and a GPU that performs at the entry level of the discrete graphics market. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 29868, sits at the 81st percentile among all CPUs. This score is virtually identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (deltaPct: 0) and only 0.3% behind both the Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS, while being 0.5% ahead of the Ryzen 5 9600X. This indicates the 7840H is a well-positioned mid-to-high-range mobile processor, offering performance on par with the previous generation's desktop parts.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU demonstrates its strength, scoring 23731 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 9967 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. The scaling from 2 threads (1906) to 16 threads (7461) in the 3DMark tests shows excellent utilization of its 8 cores and 16 threads. Single-thread performance is also robust, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 976 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3350, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and applications that rely on single-core speed.

The GPU presents a contrasting story. Its average benchmark score of 33170 places it at the 78th percentile among all GPUs. It is statistically tied with the NVIDIA T550 Mobile (deltaPct: 0), slightly behind the AMD Radeon Pro 570 (deltaPct: -0.1%), and marginally ahead of the NVIDIA P104-100 (deltaPct: 0.6%) and T600 Mobile (deltaPct: 1%). The Geekbench scores of 50038 (OpenCL) and 49051 (Vulkan) indicate that while it is a capable graphics processor, its performance is firmly in the entry-level segment for modern gaming and rendering tasks.

The combined picture is of a system where the CPU is the dominant component in terms of relative performance. The 80th combined percentile is buoyed significantly by the CPU's strong showing. This is a configuration designed for users who prioritize compute-heavy tasks like video encoding, 3D modeling, and software compilation, where the CPU's 16 threads can be fully utilized, rather than for users seeking high-end gaming performance, where the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this platform is the AMD Socket FP8, which houses the Ryzen 7 7840H. This processor is built on the Zen 4 architecture (codename "Phoenix") using a 4 nm process at TSMC, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, running at a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. For expansion, the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth requirements.

The GPU has a TDP of 45 W and uses no external power connectors, indicating it draws power directly from the motherboard. The CPU has a TDP of 35 W. The total power envelope of this system is relatively modest, allowing for thinner laptop designs with adequate cooling solutions. There is no suggested PSU for the GPU, as this is a mobile component integrated into a laptop chassis.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform is limited, as it is a mobile solution. The CPU is soldered, and the GPU is typically integrated into the motherboard. Consequently, users are generally locked into this hardware configuration for the life of the laptop. However, the primary upgradeable component is the system's RAM, which can be increased to improve performance in memory-sensitive applications. Storage can also be upgraded via the PCIe Gen 4 lanes, allowing for faster NVMe SSDs. Given the CPU's high performance, the most impactful upgrade would be ensuring the system has sufficient dual-channel DDR5 memory to avoid starving the processor in multi-threaded workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed towards the CPU. With a CPU percentile of 81 versus a GPU percentile of 78, the raw scores are close, but the nature of the tasks differs greatly. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 27919 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23731 highlight its immense compute power, capable of handling complex simulations, video rendering, and code compilation with ease.

The bottleneck in this system is unequivocally the GPU for graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming scenarios, the RTX 3050 Mobile will be the limiting factor, preventing the high frame rates that the CPU could otherwise support. For example, in a game that is well-optimized for multi-threading, the CPU could easily feed frames to a more powerful GPU, but the RTX 3050 Mobile's 4 GB of VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the first constraint hit. This is typical for this class of laptop, where the CPU is chosen for productivity, and the GPU is an afterthought for light gaming.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks such as data compression (Passmark score of 341520), encryption (20162), and physics calculations (1301), the GPU plays no role, and the CPU performs at its full potential. The system is effectively balanced only in light to medium graphical workloads. For any modern game at high settings, the system becomes GPU-bound, meaning the CPU will be underutilized while waiting for the GPU to render frames. This is not a "balanced" build for gaming; it is a high-performance workhorse with a modest graphics capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a suitable platform for high-refresh gaming. The RTX 3050 Mobile's performance, indicated by its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 421, suggests it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at high resolutions and settings in modern titles. Esports titles may run acceptably, but the 4 GB VRAM and entry-level compute power will prevent consistent triple-digit frame rates in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU is more than capable of handling the encoding workload for streaming. With 16 threads and a strong multi-core score, the Ryzen 7 7840H can handle x264 encoding without impacting gameplay performance, provided the game is not CPU-bound. The GPU also has NVENC capabilities, though its encoding quality and speed may be inferior to the CPU's software encoding in some scenarios.

Video Editing: This is a strong use case for this build. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads will dramatically accelerate video export and rendering timelines. The GPU will assist with effects and previews, but the heavy lifting will be done by the processor, which scores 23731 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, making this a capable machine for content creators.

3D Rendering: Similar to video editing, the CPU is the workhorse here. Rendering engines that rely on CPU ray tracing will benefit greatly from the 16 threads. GPU rendering is possible but will be slow due to the RTX 3050 Mobile's limited compute performance (5.501 TFLOPS) and 4 GB VRAM, which is insufficient for complex scenes.

Software Development: The high multi-threaded performance is a boon for developers. Compilation times will be reduced, and running multiple virtual machines or containers will be smooth. The Passmark integer math score of 96692 indicates strong performance for general-purpose computing and code execution.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity tasks like word processing and web browsing. However, the fast single-thread performance ensures a responsive system, and the 8 cores provide headroom for multitasking with many applications open simultaneously. The integrated Radeon 780M would also provide a power-efficient mode for basic tasks.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is targeted at users who need a high-performance mobile workstation for CPU-intensive tasks. The primary audience is content creators, specifically video editors and 3D modelers who work with software that can utilize many cores for rendering and export. The data shows that the CPU is in the top 20% of all processors, making it a formidable tool for these workloads. Developers and engineers who compile large codebases or run complex simulations will also find the processing power highly beneficial.

For gamers, this is not a target build for high-refresh or high-fidelity gaming. It is more suited for casual gamers who play less demanding titles or are willing to lower settings and resolutions. The GPU, while being at the 78th percentile, is still an entry-level mobile part that will not satisfy enthusiasts. Students in STEM fields who require a powerful CPU for data analysis, programming, or CAD work, but do not prioritize gaming, would also find this a suitable choice. Small business workstations that need to handle heavy spreadsheet analysis, data processing, or light virtualization would also benefit from this configuration.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H is a member of the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture and codenamed "Phoenix". It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, packing 25,000 million transistors into a 178 mm² die. The CPU features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It includes a substantial cache hierarchy: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded environments. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23731 is a strong indicator of its ability to handle heavy rendering workloads, while the Passmark multithread score of 27919 confirms its prowess in parallel processing. The single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3350, ensuring that the CPU does not lag in everyday tasks. The data suggests that this CPU is a high-performance mobile part that rivals many desktop processors from the previous generation, as evidenced by its 0% deltaPct against the Ryzen 7 5800XT.

Build Overview

This build is classified as a laptop configuration, combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile. The pairing creates a system with a very high ceiling for general and compute performance, but a lower ceiling for graphics performance. The combined performance percentile is 80, placing it in the upper echelon of laptop builds. The CPU is the star of the show, operating at the 81st percentile, while the GPU, at the 78th percentile, is a capable but not exceptional component. This is a laptop designed for work first and play second, offering a powerful processing platform with a discrete GPU that provides a significant step up from integrated graphics but is not designed for high-end gaming.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is based on the Ampere architecture and uses the GA107 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. It has 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 16 dedicated RT cores and 64 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1065 MHz with a boost clock of 1343 MHz. It is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. The memory runs at 1500 MHz, or 12 Gbps effective.

In terms of raw compute, the GPU delivers 5.501 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a pixel rate of 42.98 GPixel/s. Its benchmark scores, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 421, place it at the 78th percentile. This indicates that while it is a functional discrete GPU, its performance is at the entry level for modern gaming. The 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for modern titles at high resolutions, as it will quickly run out of memory. The presence of RT and tensor cores means it supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, but its low compute power limits the effectiveness of these features, making them viable only on lower settings or resolutions.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as an approximation. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 421 is low, indicating that the RTX 3050 Mobile is not designed for high-fidelity gaming.

Based on the GPU's performance percentile and compute capabilities, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium to low settings. In less demanding esports titles, such as Counter-Strike or Valorant, the system may achieve playable frame rates, potentially exceeding 60 FPS. However, in modern AAA titles, the 4 GB VRAM and limited compute power will cause performance to drop significantly. Users can expect to lower graphical settings to maintain a stable 60 FPS at 1080p in most games. At 1440p, the system will struggle significantly, and a 4K resolution is not viable for gaming. The CPU is more than capable of handling game logic and physics, but the GPU will be the definitive bottleneck in all gaming scenarios.