SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + AMD Radeon 890M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

29,868 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 890M

9,210 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H and AMD Radeon 890M represent a specific class of mobile computing, pairing a high-performance 8-core processor with an integrated graphics solution that relies entirely on system memory. This configuration is built for laptops, specifically targeting users who need substantial CPU horsepower for productivity and creative work without the power draw or physical footprint of a discrete GPU. The data shows a system with a combined percentile of 63, positioning it above the median of all tested hardware pairings, with the CPU acting as the clear performance leader.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H is a mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, and fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It houses 8 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that provides a strong balance between single-thread responsiveness and multi-threaded throughput. The base clock is set at 3.80 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, allowing the chip to scale performance dynamically based on workload demands. The processor’s thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 35 W, a figure that suggests it is designed for performance-oriented laptops where efficient cooling is available.

The cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This layout ensures that frequently accessed data is kept close to the processing cores, reducing latency and improving execution efficiency. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, yielding a theoretical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation-class tasks where data integrity is paramount. For expansion and connectivity, the processor provides PCIe Gen 4 lanes, specifically 20 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark data indicates that the 7840H is a robust performer across various workloads. In the 3DMark suite, the processor scores 7461 in the 16-thread test and 7409 in the max-thread test, showing that scaling from 16 to all available threads yields marginal gains. Single-thread performance is recorded at 976 in the 3DMark single-thread test. Cinebench results are particularly strong: the R23 multi-core score of 23731 is a high figure for a 35 W mobile chip, while the R23 single-core score of 3350 demonstrates that the Zen 4 architecture provides excellent per-core efficiency. PassMark tests further illustrate the CPU’s capabilities, with a multi-thread score of 27919 and a single-thread score of 3641. The floating-point math score of 58724 and integer math score of 96692 indicate strong arithmetic processing capabilities, which are essential for scientific computing and financial modeling.

In terms of its standing, the 7840H achieves a percentile of 81 against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 81% of all processors in the database. Its average benchmark score is 29868. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT, which has an average score of 29879 and a deltaPct of 0. It trades blows with the newer Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS, both scoring 29955 with a deltaPct of -0.3, indicating the 7840H is just slightly behind. It is 0.5% ahead of the Ryzen 5 9600X, which scores 29713. This places the 7840H firmly in the upper mid-range tier of processors, competitive with desktop parts from a previous generation and current high-end mobile parts.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this laptop configuration is defined by the stark contrast between the CPU and GPU. The Ryzen 7 7840H is a top-tier mobile processor, while the Radeon 890M is a mid-range integrated GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 29868 places it in the 81st percentile, a high-water mark for mobile computing. The GPU, however, tells a different story. The Radeon 890M has an average benchmark score of 9210, which places it in the 45th percentile against all GPUs. This means the integrated graphics are strictly average, outperforming only about half of the graphics solutions in the database.

Specific GPU benchmark results confirm this position. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the 890M scores 590, a modest result for modern gaming loads. Geekbench scores are more promising: OpenCL scores 37254 and Vulkan scores 40808, suggesting the compute capabilities are respectable. PassMark results show a G3D score of 8076, which is a general measure of graphics performance, and a G2D score of 979, which reflects 2D desktop acceleration. DirectX 11 performance is the strongest of the legacy API tests, with a score of 73, while DirectX 12 scores 37 and DirectX 10 scores 33. The GPU compute score of 4157 indicates that the chip can handle some general-purpose compute tasks.

The GPU’s nearest rivals show it is closely matched with older discrete solutions. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (avg score 9221), 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (avg score 9273), and 0.9% behind the GeForce GTX 465 (avg score 9294). It is 1% ahead of the GeForce GTX 850M (avg score 9302). This data indicates that the 890M offers performance comparable to a low-end discrete GPU from several generations ago, but it is not in the same league as modern mid-range or high-end discrete graphics cards. The combined system percentile is 63, which reflects the CPU’s strength being partially offset by the GPU’s mediocrity.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All FPS discussions are therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The data suggests that the CPU will never be a limiting factor in gaming, but the GPU will restrict frame rates to levels consistent with its 45th percentile standing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance in this system is pronounced. The CPU operates at the 81st percentile, while the GPU sits at the 45th percentile. This creates a clear bottleneck scenario where the integrated graphics will limit performance in graphics-intensive tasks. For gaming, the CPU’s high single-thread score of 3350 in Cinebench R23 and 976 in 3DMark single-thread tests ensures that it can feed the GPU with data faster than the GPU can render frames. The bottleneck is the GPU’s rendering throughput, which is constrained by its 1024 shading units and system-shared memory.

The data supports this conclusion via the lack of scaling in FPS estimates. Since the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 590 is low, any game that relies heavily on rasterization will be GPU-limited. Conversely, the CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 7409 and high PassMark multi-thread score of 27919 indicate that CPU-bound tasks like physics calculations, AI logic, and game world simulation will not cause performance dips. The CPU is also unlikely to be a bottleneck in productivity applications. For instance, the data compression score of 341520 and encryption score of 20162 in PassMark show that the CPU can handle data-intensive workloads without breaking a sweat.

The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is a shared resource between the CPU and GPU. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will consume a significant portion of this bandwidth for texture streaming and frame buffer access. This could lead to situations where the CPU is waiting for memory access, effectively creating a secondary bottleneck. However, for standard productivity tasks, the memory bandwidth is ample. The system is balanced only in the sense that neither component is severely underpowered for its respective role, but they are not well-matched for high-end gaming. The GPU will be the primary limiter in any 3D application, while the CPU will excel in all other tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is not well-suited for high-refresh gaming. The GPU’s 45th percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 590 indicate that frame rates will be low, even at 1080p with reduced settings. The CPU is not the issue; its high single-thread score of 3350 ensures it can handle game logic, but the GPU will cap FPS well below what high-refresh monitors require. Estimated performance would be suitable for esports titles at lower settings, but not for demanding AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU is a strong asset for streaming. With 8 cores and 16 threads, there is enough headroom to encode video using x264 software encoding while maintaining game performance. The multi-thread score of 27919 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 score of 23731 indicate that the CPU can handle the encoding workload without dropping frames. However, the GPU’s low performance means that the game being streamed will run at lower frame rates and visual quality. The 890M does not have dedicated hardware encoders that are as robust as those on discrete GPUs, so software encoding via the CPU is the more viable path.

Video Editing: This laptop can handle video editing tasks, but with caveats. The CPU’s multi-thread performance is excellent, as evidenced by its 23731 score in Cinebench R23, which will accelerate video encoding and rendering timelines. The GPU’s 45th percentile performance means that GPU-accelerated effects and color grading will be sluggish. The system’s DDR5 memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is sufficient for editing high-resolution video, but the lack of a discrete GPU with high VRAM will limit the complexity of effects that can be applied in real-time.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the workhorse here. With a max-thread score of 7409 in 3DMark and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9967, the processor will render scenes in CPU-based engines like Blender’s Cycles or Autodesk Arnold at a competitive pace. The GPU will offer minimal acceleration in GPU-based renderers due to its low compute score of 4157 in PassMark and 5.939 TFLOPS FP32 performance. Users should expect to rely on the CPU for final renders, with the GPU serving only as a preview device.

Software Development: The CPU is excellent for compilation tasks. The PassMark integer math score of 96692 and extended instructions score of 25654 indicate that the CPU can process code compilation and unit testing quickly. The 16 threads are ideal for parallel build systems like Ninja or Make. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong choice for a developer’s laptop.

Student and Office Work: This system is overqualified for standard office tasks. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures snappy responsiveness in web browsers, office suites, and communication apps. The GPU’s G2D score of 979 is sufficient for desktop rendering and 4K video playback. The 35 W TDP of the CPU means that battery life will be reasonable, and the system will remain quiet under light loads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is defined by the AMD Socket FP8, which is specific to mobile systems. This means that the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, and there is no upgrade path for the processor itself. Users are locked into the Ryzen 7 7840H for the life of the laptop. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. Since the GPU relies on system memory, the amount and speed of the RAM will directly impact graphics performance. Upgrading to faster or higher-capacity DDR5 modules could provide a modest boost to the GPU’s effective bandwidth, but the maximum bandwidth is capped at 89.6 GB/s.

The PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This allows for fast NVMe SSDs and potentially an external GPU enclosure, though the latter is not a common laptop use case. The GPU has a TDP of 15 W, and the CPU is rated at 35 W. The suggested PSU field is null, and the GPU has no power connectors, indicating that the system relies on the laptop’s internal power delivery. There is no headroom to add a discrete GPU internally. The most sensible next upgrade for this platform is to maximize the RAM capacity and speed, as this is the only user-replaceable component that affects both CPU and GPU performance. A user could also upgrade the storage to a PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drive to reduce load times.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H?

A: The CPU is in the 81st percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29868. It is nearly identical in performance to the Ryzen 7 5800XT, with a deltaPct of 0.

Q: How does the Radeon 890M compare to older discrete GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 45th percentile. It is 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and 1% ahead of the GTX 850M, indicating performance similar to a low-end discrete GPU from several generations ago.

Q: Is the Radeon 890M good for gaming?

A: The GPU has a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 590 and a PassMark G3D score of 8076, placing it below the median. It is suitable for light or older games, but will struggle with modern AAA titles.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for this system?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The GPU’s memory is system shared, meaning its bandwidth is system dependent.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded?

A: No, the CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile socket. The processor is not user-replaceable and is soldered to the motherboard.

Q: Does the processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7840H has ECC memory support enabled, which is beneficial for workstation tasks that require high data integrity.

Q: What is the transistor count and process node for the CPU?

A: The CPU is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC and contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is ideal for users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. Software developers will benefit from the 8-core, 16-thread CPU and its high integer math score of 96692, which accelerates compilation. Data analysts and engineers using CPU-bound tools like MATLAB or Python will see excellent performance, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23731 indicates strong number-crunching ability. Students in STEM fields will find this sufficient for all coursework, including light 3D modeling and simulation, where the CPU handles the heavy lifting. Small business workstations that run accounting software, databases, or virtual machines will appreciate the 16 threads and ECC memory support. Gamers should avoid this configuration unless they primarily play esports titles, as the GPU’s 45th percentile performance will limit visual fidelity and frame rates. Content creators who work with 4K video may find the CPU’s encoding speed beneficial, but they will need to rely on CPU rendering and be patient with GPU-accelerated effects.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build featuring the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H processor paired with the AMD Radeon 890M integrated graphics. The system’s combined percentile is 63, indicating it is better than most configurations in the database, but this is driven almost entirely by the CPU. The Ryzen 7 7840H is a high-end mobile CPU, sitting in the 81st percentile, while the Radeon 890M is a mid-range integrated GPU in the 45th percentile. This pairing creates a machine that excels in CPU-intensive tasks but is average in graphics performance. It is a balanced system in the sense that it can handle a wide range of tasks, but it is not specialized for high-end gaming or professional 3D rendering.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, codenamed Strix Point. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, containing 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 raster operation pipelines (ROPs). For ray tracing, it includes 16 dedicated RT cores. The chip has no dedicated VRAM; instead, it uses the system’s DDR5 memory, making its bandwidth and capacity system dependent.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are modest, with an FP32 throughput of 5.939 TFLOPS and the same figure for FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 185.6 GTexel/s. The TDP is rated at 15 W, and it has no power connectors. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8. Benchmark performance shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 590, which is a modern DX12 test, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 40808. PassMark results include a G3D score of 8076 and a compute score of 4157. These figures place the GPU in the 45th percentile, comparable to older discrete GPUs like the GTX 960.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s ray tracing performance will be limited by the 16 RT cores and the lack of dedicated VRAM. The system-shared memory will be a bottleneck for large textures and complex scenes. The GPU is more suited for light 3D work, 2D acceleration, and video playback than for serious rendering tasks. The data indicates that while the GPU is capable of running modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate, its raw performance is below the median, making it a component for basic graphics duties rather than a performance driver.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + AMD Radeon 890M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

AMD Radeon 890M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds