SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + AMD Radeon 760M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

29,868 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 760M

6,019 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H paired with the AMD Radeon 760M represents a mobile-first design philosophy where CPU compute takes clear precedence over integrated graphics. This combination targets a laptop class of systems, and the benchmark data confirms a substantial performance gulf between the two components, with the processor ranking in the 81st percentile among all CPUs while the graphics solution sits at just the 35th percentile among all GPUs.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, sharing the same 4 nm TSMC process node as the CPU it accompanies. The GPU operates with a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2599 MHz, and it draws its memory from the system pool rather than dedicated VRAM. Memory size, type, and bus width are all marked as "System Shared," which means bandwidth is wholly dependent on the host system's DDR5 configuration. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s sets the theoretical ceiling for the iGPU, though real-world figures will vary with the specific memory configuration.

The GPU's compute resources are modest by discrete standards. It packs 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operating units, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 41.58 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 83.17 GTexel/s. Floating point performance is rated at 5.323 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a 1:1 ratio indicating no dedicated half-precision acceleration. The API support is modern — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 — which means the hardware is capable of running contemporary graphics features, even if the raw throughput limits how well they perform.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of an entry-level graphics solution. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 400, which is a very low figure reflecting the iGPU's position. Geekbench OpenCL returns 20255, and Geekbench Vulkan reaches 30336. PassMark results are telling: DirectX 10 scores 19, DirectX 11 scores 52, DirectX 12 scores 25, and DirectX 9 scores 65. The 2D graphics score is 890, while the 3D graphics score is 5310. GPU compute via PassMark comes in at 2840.

The average benchmark score of 6019 places the Radeon 760M in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. Among its nearest rivals, the delta to the AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a mere 0.3 percent, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M also sits 0.3 percent ahead. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is 0.4 percent ahead, while the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 trails by 0.5 percent. These margins are essentially noise — the 760M trades blows with a decade-old mobile discrete GPU and a low-end desktop card. For rendering workloads, this means the integrated GPU can handle light or legacy tasks, but any serious 3D rendering will be bottlenecked by the 5.323 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and the shared memory subsystem.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers a multi-threaded 3DMark score of 7461 with 16 threads and 7409 at max threads. The single-thread score is 976, with 2-thread at 1906, 4-thread at 3638, and 8-thread at 6116. Cinebench results are strong for a mobile part: R15 multi-core hits 2392 and single-core 337; R20 multi-core reaches 9967 with single-core at 1407; R23 multi-core scores 23731 and single-core 3350. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 27919 and single-thread of 3641. Data compression scores 341520, data encryption 20162, extended instructions 25654, floating point math 58724, integer math 96692, and physics 1301. Random string sorting hits 38938, and find prime numbers scores 83.

These CPU figures place the Ryzen 7 7840H in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29868. The nearest rivals show how tight the competition is: the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29879 with a 0 percent delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 29955 at -0.3 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS also scores 29955 at -0.3 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713 at 0.5 percent. The 7840H is effectively a statistical tie with these desktop and mobile parts, differing by less than a percentage point across the board.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 6019 places it at the 35th percentile, a stark contrast to the CPU's 81st. The combined percentile for this pairing is 58, which reflects the CPU pulling the average up significantly. The combined picture is that of a system with exceptional processor performance for its class, but graphics capabilities that lag far behind. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion must therefore be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It uses the AMD Socket FP8 and is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The thermal design power is rated at 35 watts, which is a mobile-appropriate figure for sustained workloads in a laptop chassis. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 only, running on a dual-channel bus with a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which adds a reliability dimension for workstation use. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are listed as Radeon 780M, though the build pairing specifies the Radeon 760M as the active GPU.

The benchmark scores translate to real-world capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23731 indicates a processor that can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads — video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation would all benefit from this level of throughput. The single-core score of 3350 is equally impressive, meaning responsive everyday use and strong performance in lightly threaded applications. PassMark integer math at 96692 and floating point math at 58724 show balanced ALU and FPU performance. Data encryption at 20162 and compression at 341520 are solid figures for a mobile chip.

The 0 percent delta to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT, a desktop part, is remarkable. This mobile processor matches a desktop chip from the previous generation, which speaks to the efficiency of Zen 4 at 4 nm. The slight 0.3 percent deficit to the 8845HS and 7840HS suggests these are essentially the same silicon with minor clock differences. The 0.5 percent lead over the Ryzen 5 9600X, despite the 9600X having fewer cores, highlights the strength of the 7840H's 8-core configuration in multi-threaded tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H sits in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29868.

Q: How does the Radeon 760M compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Radeon 760M has an average score of 6019, placing it 0.3 percent behind the AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, 0.4 percent behind the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, and 0.5 percent ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro P2000.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 floating point performance?

A: The Radeon 760M delivers 5.323 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with the same 5.323 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor and beneficial for data integrity in workstation tasks.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 7 7840H use?

A: The processor uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket for the Phoenix platform.

Q: What DirectX version does the integrated GPU support?

A: The Radeon 760M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), alongside OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 58, reflecting the wide gap between the CPU's 81st percentile and the GPU's 35th percentile.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 7 7840H and the Radeon 760M is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor's 81st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 35th percentile creates a situation where the CPU will almost never be the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads. The 46-percentage-point gap between the two components means the GPU is the bottleneck in any task that involves rendering or graphical output.

For gaming, the bottleneck is absolute. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23731 and single-core score of 3350 are far beyond what the Radeon 760M's 5.323 TFLOPS can feed. Even at low resolutions and graphical settings, the GPU's 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs will saturate long before the CPU's 8 Zen 4 cores break a sweat. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 25 and DirectX 11 score of 52 are extremely low, confirming that the GPU cannot translate the CPU's compute power into frame rate.

In CPU-bound workloads — content creation, compilation, data processing — the balance flips. The 7840H's 23731 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 341520 PassMark data compression score indicate the processor can handle demanding tasks, but the GPU's 2840 PassMark GPU compute score limits acceleration. Offloading parallel compute to the GPU would not yield benefits given the low compute throughput. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared between the CPU and GPU, so memory-intensive workloads on the GPU will contend with CPU memory access, further limiting graphics performance.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent since no measured FPS data exists for this combination. However, the benchmark scores provide a clear projection: the CPU can deliver high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios, but the GPU will cap frame rates at low levels in any graphical application. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 400 is the most direct indicator of gaming potential, and it suggests very modest frame rates even at 1080p with low settings.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Radeon 760M's PassMark 3D score of 5310 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400 indicate entry-level integrated graphics performance. The GPU's 35th percentile ranking and its proximity to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, a GPU from the early 2010s, sets expectations accordingly.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this system would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in modern titles. The DirectX 12 score of 25 and DirectX 11 score of 52 suggest that even older games with demanding settings would not run smoothly. Esports titles with low graphical requirements might achieve 30-60 FPS at 720p or 1080p with reduced settings, but the GPU's 16 ROPs limit fill-rate-heavy scenes. The 5.323 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is insufficient for modern game engines that rely on heavy shader work.

At 720p or with low graphical presets, the system becomes more viable. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3350 ensures that frame pacing and physics calculations are handled without issue, but the GPU remains the hard ceiling. The shared memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is a further constraint, as the GPU must compete with the CPU for the same memory pool. For users expecting to game on this laptop, the realistic expectation is very low settings at 720p for modern AAA titles, or medium settings for older or less demanding games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The upgrade path for this platform is defined by the AMD Socket FP8 and the mobile class of the build. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is available for those who need it. PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides adequate connectivity for NVMe storage and other peripherals. The GPU is an IGP with a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, meaning it uses the system's PCIe lanes rather than a dedicated slot.

The TDP for the CPU is 35 watts, and the GPU is rated at 15 watts, though the GPU's power connectors are listed as "None" since it is integrated. No suggested PSU is listed for this pairing, which is typical for a laptop where the power supply is fixed. The 4 nm TSMC process node keeps power efficiency high, allowing for sustained performance in a thin chassis.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on memory capacity and speed. Since the GPU relies on system memory, faster DDR5 modules would directly improve graphics bandwidth and overall system responsiveness. The CPU's 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 8-core configuration are already strong, so a CPU upgrade within the FP8 socket would offer marginal gains. The GPU cannot be upgraded because it is integrated into the silicon. For users needing more graphics power, the only real path is a new system with a discrete GPU, as the IGP's 35th percentile ranking leaves no headroom for improvement within this build.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with the AMD Radeon 760M integrated graphics. The CPU is a mobile processor from the 7000 series, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads on the Zen 4 architecture with a 4 nm process node. The GPU is an RDNA 3.0 integrated solution on the same Phoenix die, sharing memory with the CPU. The combined percentile of 58 places this system in the mid-range of all builds, driven almost entirely by the CPU's strong 81st percentile performance.

The tier of this build is that of a productivity-focused laptop with incidental gaming capability. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23731 and PassMark multi-thread score of 27919 make it a capable workstation processor, while the GPU's PassMark 3D score of 5310 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 400 relegates it to light graphics tasks. The average benchmark score of 29868 for the CPU versus 6019 for the GPU highlights the disparity — this is a system built for compute, not for graphics.

The 35-watt TDP of the CPU and 15-watt TDP of the GPU indicate a power-efficient design suitable for all-day battery life in a portable chassis. The 4 nm process node from TSMC, shared by both components, contributes to this efficiency. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR5 support provide sufficient data throughput for the CPU's multi-threaded workloads, though the GPU's "System Dependent" bandwidth means graphics performance scales with memory quality.

Who Should Build It

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with the Radeon 760M is suited for users whose primary workload is CPU-intensive and who require only occasional or light graphics acceleration. Content creators working with video encoding, image processing, or software compilation would benefit from the 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23731 and PassMark data compression score of 341520 indicate strong performance in rendering and data manipulation tasks. Single-thread performance of 3350 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive application behavior.

Developers and data analysts would find the CPU's capabilities well-matched to compilation, testing, and data processing workflows. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for long-running compute jobs where data integrity is critical. Students and small business users running office applications, web development tools, or light programming would benefit from the CPU's responsiveness, with the integrated GPU handling basic display output and video playback.

Gamers should look elsewhere unless their library consists of older or low-demanding titles. The GPU's 35th percentile ranking and PassMark DirectX scores of 25 for DX12 and 52 for DX11 place it far below the threshold for modern gaming. The system is not suitable for 1080p gaming at medium or high settings, and even 720p would require low presets for contemporary games. The target user is one who prioritizes processor performance over graphics, accepts the integrated GPU's limitations, and uses the system for productivity rather than entertainment.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + AMD Radeon 760M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

AMD Radeon 760M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds