SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX

33,091 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile form a laptop pairing that targets the middle of the mobile performance spectrum. The CPU is a high-end 8-core part from the Dragon Range series, while the GPU is an entry-level Ada Lovelace chip. The benchmark data shows a system with strong multi-threaded compute capabilities and solid 1080p-class graphics performance, but with a clear imbalance favoring the processor. This analysis examines the raw scores, platform constraints, and workload suitability to determine what this build does well and where it falls short.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It operates within a 55 W TDP and features a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This is a Dragon Range part, built on the AMD Socket FL1, and represents the high end of AMD's mobile 7000 series. The chip includes a 32 MB shared L3 cache, alongside 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core. It supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, yielding a theoretical memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and includes support for ECC memory. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a basic display output capability, though most workloads will rely on the discrete GPU.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 18452.5 points in multi-core and 1850 points in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly telling, placing the CPU in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs tested. This suggests that the processor can handle demanding parallel workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with significant headroom. The single-core score of 1850 is also robust, indicating solid responsiveness in everyday tasks and games that rely on a few fast threads. In Geekbench, the multicore score of 13613 and single-core score of 2366 reinforce this picture of a balanced, high-throughput processor.

The 3DMark thread scaling tests provide further insight. The score jumps from 1997 with 2 threads to 3815 with 4 threads, then to 6604 with 8 threads, and finally to 7967 with 16 threads. This scaling is near-linear up to 8 threads, showing that the Zen 4 cores are efficient and that the scheduler handles the workload well. The max-thread score of 7967 is slightly lower than the 16-thread score of 7993, which is a minor anomaly but indicates that the chip is fully utilizing its 16 threads. PassMark results show a multithread score of 32581 and a single-thread score of 3947, with the integer math score of 105773 being particularly high, suggesting strong performance in data processing and general computation tasks.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the 7745HX is virtually tied with the Intel Core i7-13650HX, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, all showing a 0% delta. It is only 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H. This means that in pure CPU compute, the 7745HX is at the top of its class, matching desktop-class parts like the 7800X3D in average benchmark score. For real workloads, this translates to a CPU that will not be the limiting factor in most laptop builds, offering performance that rivals desktop processors from a generation ago.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is built on AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This is a BGA-style socket, meaning the processor is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be swapped by the user. The upgrade path is therefore limited to the entire laptop, not the CPU alone. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which is the current standard and offers a significant bandwidth advantage over older DDR4. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is sufficient for the CPU's 8 cores, though it is not the highest available on the market.

PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU. This is a forward-looking feature, allowing for fast NVMe SSDs and future expansion. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is more conservative. This is not a bottleneck for the RTX 4050 Mobile, as the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute capabilities are the limiting factors, not the bus. The CPU also has an unlocked multiplier, which is unusual for a mobile part, but given the thermal constraints of a laptop, overclocking headroom is likely minimal.

The TDP of the CPU is 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 50 W. Combined, these are modest figures for a gaming laptop, suggesting that the system can be cooled by a reasonably sized heatsink and fan assembly. The GPU has no power connectors listed, as it is an IGP-class mobile part that draws power from the motherboard. There is no suggested PSU listed, which is typical for a laptop where the power supply is integrated into the chassis. A sensible next upgrade would be to move to a higher-tier GPU within the same laptop generation, if the chassis allows, or to wait for a platform with a newer socket and more powerful CPU options. However, given the soldered nature of the components, the most practical upgrade is to the entire system.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD107 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, with an effective data rate of 16 Gbps. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, which are essential for ray tracing and DLSS features. The base clock is 1455 MHz with a boost clock of 1755 MHz. The pixel rate is 84.24 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 140.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.986 TFLOPS, which is the same as the FP16 figure, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark scores for the GPU are moderate. The PassMark G3D score is 14423, and the PassMark GPU compute score is 5947. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score is 74748 and the Vulkan score is 75235. These scores place the GPU in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, which is a mid-range position. The GPU is closely matched with the AMD Radeon RX 6600, showing a delta of 0.1%, and the NVIDIA Quadro K6000, also at 0.1%. It is 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla K20m and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation. This indicates that the RTX 4050 Mobile performs at the level of a desktop RX 6600, which is a capable 1080p gaming card, but it is far from a high-end solution.

For rendering workloads, the 8.986 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient for entry-level 3D modeling and animation, but it will struggle with complex scenes or high-resolution textures. The 6 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for modern content creation, as large textures and complex scenes can exceed this capacity. The RT and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects and AI-based upscaling, which can improve visual quality in supported games and applications. However, the relatively low bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s means that the GPU may be constrained in memory-heavy tasks. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest gaming features, but the raw performance is a limiting factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear performance imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. This means that the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads, such as video encoding, software compilation, and physics simulations, the system will perform exceptionally well. In GPU-bound workloads, such as high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering with ray tracing, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The combined percentile of the system is 73, which is a weighted average of the two components. This suggests that the system as a whole is above average, but the GPU drags down the overall score. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so FPS estimates must be derived from the benchmark scores. Based on the PassMark G3D score of 14423, the GPU is capable of running most games at 1080p with medium to high settings, but it will likely struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1440p or with ultra settings. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1023, ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

The bottleneck is most pronounced in games that are graphically intensive. The CPU can easily feed the GPU with data, but the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause stuttering or texture pop-in in modern titles with large open worlds. In CPU-bound games, such as esports titles or real-time strategy games, the system will perform very well, as the CPU's high clock speed and 8 cores provide ample processing power. The PassMark physics score of 1697 is moderate, but the integer math score of 105773 suggests that the CPU can handle complex game logic and AI calculations without issue.

The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s for the CPU is adequate but not exceptional. In mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU will need to handle both the game logic and the encoding workload. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18452.5 indicates that the CPU has enough headroom to handle this, but the GPU may become a bottleneck if the streaming software uses the GPU for encoding, which is common with NVIDIA's NVENC. Overall, the system is well-balanced for productivity tasks, but the GPU is the weak link for high-end gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1023, ensures that the system can drive high frame rates in esports titles. However, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 14423 limits the system to 1080p with medium settings for more demanding AAA games. Users targeting 144 Hz refresh rates will need to lower settings or rely on DLSS to achieve playable frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18452.5, are more than sufficient for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's tensor cores also support NVENC, which can offload the encoding task. This scenario is well-supported, but the GPU's limited VRAM may cause issues when running a game and streaming software simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU's high multi-core performance, with a Geekbench multicore score of 13613, makes it excellent for video editing. Tasks like timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export will be fast. The GPU can assist with effects and color grading, but the 6 GB VRAM may limit the use of large 4K projects. The PassMark data compression score of 383322 indicates strong performance in data-intensive tasks.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2986 and R23 score of 18452.5 are strong, making it suitable for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray. The GPU's 8.986 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can accelerate GPU-based rendering, but the 6 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for complex scenes. This is a capable entry-level rendering machine, but not for professional workloads.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 105773 and extended instructions score of 28966 are excellent for code compilation and running virtual machines. The 32 MB L3 cache and 16 threads provide ample headroom for multi-threaded build tools. This is a strong choice for developers who need a portable machine for compiling code.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3947, ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications and web browsing. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics can handle basic display tasks, but the discrete GPU is available for more demanding applications. The 55 W CPU TDP is efficient enough for all-day battery life in a laptop, making this a practical choice for students.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is targeted at users who need a powerful CPU for productivity but do not require top-tier gaming graphics. It is a good fit for content creators who work with video editing or software development, as the CPU's 83rd percentile performance ensures fast processing times. The GPU is suitable for entry-level 3D rendering and light gaming, making it a versatile machine for a creative professional.

For gamers, this build is best suited for those playing at 1080p with medium settings. The GPU's 63rd percentile performance is adequate for esports and older titles, but it will struggle with the latest AAA games at high settings. Users who prioritize high-refresh gaming should look for a system with a more powerful GPU, even if it means sacrificing some CPU performance.

For students, this is an overkill but capable machine. The CPU's performance is far beyond what is needed for word processing or web browsing, but it provides headroom for more demanding tasks like programming or data analysis. The laptop form factor, with its 50 W GPU and 55 W CPU, is portable enough for carrying between classes.

For small business workstations, the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance and ECC memory support make it a reliable choice for tasks like financial modeling or database management. The GPU can handle occasional graphics work, but it is not a workstation-class solution. The 6 GB VRAM is a limitation for large datasets, but the CPU is the star of this show.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX a good processor for multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes, the CPU scores 18452.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 13613 in Geekbench multicore, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. It is on par with the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Intel Core i7-13650HX in average benchmark score.

Q: How does the RTX 4050 Mobile compare to other GPUs?

A: The GPU has a PassMark G3D score of 14423 and is in the 63rd percentile. It is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Radeon RX 6600, with a delta of 0.1%, and slightly behind the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation by 0.5%.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are not sufficient for 4K gaming. The PassMark G3D score of 14423 indicates that 1080p with medium settings is the realistic target for demanding games.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the CPU?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer mobile processor.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the CPU includes a Radeon 610M integrated GPU. This is useful for basic display tasks and can serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled or fails.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: The multiplier is unlocked, indicating overclocking capability. However, the 55 W TDP and laptop cooling constraints likely limit the practical overclocking headroom.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing. Any FPS estimates are derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining a high-end mobile CPU with an entry-level mobile GPU. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is a top-tier processor, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a mid-range graphics solution. The combined percentile of the system is 73, placing it above the majority of tested configurations. The build is best characterized as a productivity-first machine with moderate gaming capabilities.

The CPU's 83rd percentile rank indicates that it is among the top 17% of all processors, making it a flagship mobile part. The GPU's 63rd percentile rank is more modest, indicating a mid-pack graphics solution. This pairing creates a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks but is balanced by the GPU's limitations in graphics-heavy workloads. The overall tier of the build is a high-end productivity laptop with entry-level gaming performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 33091, with a 3DMark max-thread score of 7967 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18452.5. The single-thread performance is also strong, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1023 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1850. The CPU is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13650HX, has an identical average score of 33089, a 0% delta.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 19049, with a PassMark G3D score of 14423 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748. The GPU is in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, and its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6600, has an average score of 19036, a delta of 0.1%. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top performer and the GPU is a mid-range performer. The lack of measured FPS data means that these scores are the primary evidence of performance, and they suggest a system that is well-suited for CPU-bound tasks but only adequate for GPU-bound ones. The data shows that the CPU is the dominant component, and users should prioritize workloads that leverage its multi-threaded prowess.