SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX

33,091 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX + AMD Radeon 740M

The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX pairs an 8-core Zen 4 mobile processor with a Radeon 740M integrated GPU in a laptop platform. This combination targets users who prioritize strong CPU performance in a portable system without a discrete graphics card. The CPU delivers desktop-class multi-threaded throughput while the integrated GPU handles everyday graphics tasks at modest settings. No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate expectations are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 7745HX is built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It belongs to AMD's Dragon Range family, architecture Zen 4, and features 8 cores with 16 threads. Base clock rests at 3.60 GHz with a boost ceiling of 5.10 GHz. The TDP is rated at 55 W, which is typical for high-performance mobile processors aimed at thicker laptops and portable workstations. Cache consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a CPU that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark suite shows 1,023 points single-threaded, 1,997 for 2 threads, 3,815 for 4 threads, 6,604 for 8 threads, and 7,993 for 16 threads. The near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads (6,604 to 7,993) indicates the SMT implementation is efficient, though the 16-thread score barely exceeds the 8-thread result — only about 21% higher — suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 physical cores in this workload.

Cinebench R23 delivers 18,452.5 multi-core and 1,850 single-core. The multi-core figure represents strong sustained performance for a 55 W mobile part. Geekbench shows 13,613 multi-core and 2,366 single-core, reinforcing the CPU's balanced capability across both lightly and heavily threaded applications. PassMark multi-thread scores 32,581 with single-thread at 3,947, placing this processor in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

The CPU's nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the Intel Core i7-13650HX at 33,089 (0% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 8700G at 33,089 (0%), AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33,079 (0%), and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H at 33,201 (-0.3%). This effectively places the 7745HX in a dead heat with those four processors — the differences are within noise. For real workloads, this means users upgrading from a Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H laptop would see virtually identical CPU throughput, while those comparing against the 7800X3D desktop part should note the mobile chip matches it in average score despite the power envelope difference.

Benchmark Performance

The 3DMark thread scaling data reveals the CPU's multi-threading efficiency. Moving from 1 to 2 threads yields a 95% gain (1,023 to 1,997), while 2 to 4 threads adds 91% (1,997 to 3,815). The 4-to-8 thread jump shows 73% improvement (3,815 to 6,604), and 8-to-16 threads only 21% (6,604 to 7,993). This pattern suggests the processor is well-suited for workloads with up to 8 active threads, with SMT providing modest additional benefit.

Cinebench R15 shows 2,986 multi-core and 294.5 single-core. PassMark's individual tests demonstrate specialized strengths: data compression at 383,322, data encryption at 22,967, extended instructions at 28,966, floating point math at 64,297, and integer math at 105,773. The integer math score nearly doubles the floating point score, indicating strong general-purpose computation. Prime number finding scores 156, and physics 1,697.

For the GPU side, the Radeon 740M achieves 10,172 in Geekbench OpenCL and 15,568 in Vulkan. Its average benchmark score of 12,870 places it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. Nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 at 12,847 (0.2% delta), AMD Radeon Pro 455 at 12,831 (0.3%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 at 12,830 (0.3%), and AMD Radeon RX 580 at 12,928 (-0.4%). The 740M essentially trades blows with these older discrete cards, which is notable for an integrated solution.

Combined, the CPU at the 83rd percentile and GPU at the 53rd percentile yield a combined system percentile of 68. This reflects a configuration where CPU performance significantly outpaces graphics capability — a common pattern in integrated-graphics laptops from this generation.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 740M's 53rd percentile GPU ranking and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput indicate this platform cannot sustain high-refresh gaming at demanding settings. Esports titles at 1080p with competitive settings may approach playable frame rates, but the 8 ROPs and 256 shading units limit fill-rate heavy scenes. Users seeking 144 Hz gaming should expect this system to fall short in most modern titles.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 18,452.5 suggesting the processor can handle both game and stream encoding simultaneously. However, the integrated GPU's modest graphics throughput means the playable game itself will likely run at reduced quality, and the Radeon 740M lacks dedicated encoding hardware comparable to discrete solutions.

Video editing: The PassMark floating point score of 64,297 and multi-thread score of 32,581 indicate solid performance for timeline scrubbing and effects rendering in 1080p projects. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with repeated data access patterns common in editing workflows. GPU acceleration from the 740M will help with preview rendering, though export times will rely primarily on the CPU's 8 cores.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 18,452.5 translates to respectable CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender's Cycles or V-Ray. The 740M's 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 will assist with viewport display but is not competitive for GPU rendering workloads. Users should expect CPU-based rendering to dominate their workflow.

Software development: The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,993 and Geekbench multi-core of 13,613 indicate strong parallel compilation performance. The high single-thread score of 1,850 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive IDE interaction. Data encryption at 22,967 and random string sorting at 44,474 in PassMark suggest efficient handling of build tools and test automation.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance and 3,947 PassMark single-thread score handle document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease. The integrated GPU's 53rd percentile ranking is more than sufficient for productivity applications. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports smooth multitasking across many open applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 7745HX uses AMD Socket FL1, which is exclusive to mobile platforms. This means upgrades are limited to replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping the processor. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported for workstation-oriented workloads.

PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 28 CPU lanes provides substantial I/O bandwidth for fast NVMe storage and external GPU enclosures, though the laptop form factor typically limits expansion options. The Radeon 740M uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for its bandwidth needs.

The GPU's TDP is rated at 45 W, and the CPU at 55 W, suggesting a combined thermal budget around 100 W for the platform. Since the GPU has no power connectors and uses system-shared memory, the laptop's power delivery is entirely through the motherboard. The suggested PSU field is null, but for a laptop this is determined by the vendor's power brick design rather than user selection.

A sensible next upgrade for users of this platform would be moving to a laptop with a discrete GPU while retaining the same CPU generation — pairing the 7745HX with a dedicated graphics card would address the bottleneck identified in the 53rd percentile GPU score. Alternatively, users requiring more CPU throughput could consider processors in the same Dragon Range family with higher core counts, though the 7745HX already sits at the 83rd CPU percentile.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Radeon 740M's 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 44.80 GTexel/s texture rate suggest playable performance only at 1080p with low to medium settings in undemanding titles. The 22.40 GPixel/s pixel rate and 8 ROPs will bottleneck games that rely heavily on fill-rate, such as those with complex post-processing effects.

The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 580, averages 12928 compared to the 740M's 12870 — a 0.4% difference in the 740M's favor. Historically, the RX 580 could handle 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles from its era, achieving roughly 60 FPS in many games. The 740M should offer similar performance expectations, though its system-shared memory architecture means performance depends heavily on the laptop's DDR5 configuration and speed.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, the 740M may deliver 60+ FPS at 1080p with competitive settings, given the CPU's strong single-thread performance. For AAA games from recent years, expect 30-45 FPS at best with reduced resolutions and low settings. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures that frame drops from processor limitations will be rare; the GPU is the definitive limiting factor.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is built on the Phoenix2 chip using TSMC's 4 nm process, containing 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. It employs RDNA 3.0 architecture and belongs to the Navi III IGP generation. Base clock is 800 MHz with a boost of 2800 MHz. Memory is system-shared with bandwidth dependent on the host system's RAM configuration.

The GPU features 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. It includes 4 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration, though the low shading unit count limits practical RT performance. The FP32 throughput of 2.867 TFLOPS matches the FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, which simplifies mixed-precision workloads. Pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s and texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s.

API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 connectivity, which is sufficient for its bandwidth requirements. Geekbench scores of 10,172 in OpenCL and 15,568 in Vulkan show stronger performance in compute-oriented workloads than in traditional graphics rendering.

The 53rd percentile ranking among all GPUs places this integrated solution in the middle of the performance spectrum, matching older mid-range discrete cards like the GTX 590 and RX 580. For rendering workloads, the 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles basic GPU-accelerated effects in video editors, though complex scenes will strain the 8 ROPs. The system-shared memory architecture means available VRAM equals whatever portion of system RAM is allocated, which can be a limiting factor for large textures.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 68 reflects a significant imbalance between the CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 53rd percentile. In CPU-bound workloads — compilation, rendering, data processing — this platform performs admirably, matching the Intel Core i7-13650HX and Ryzen 7 7800X3D in average score. In GPU-bound workloads — gaming, GPU rendering, video encoding with hardware acceleration — the Radeon 740M becomes the clear constraint.

The 3DMark thread scaling demonstrates the CPU's 8-core design is the sweet spot, with 16 threads offering only marginal gains. This means games that scale poorly beyond 8 threads will see the CPU deliver consistent frame pacing, but the GPU will still limit overall FPS. Conversely, applications that leverage all 16 threads, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, will run at near-CPU-limited speeds.

The FPS scaling picture is entirely dependent on GPU performance since no measured FPS data exists. Given the 740M's 2.867 TFLOPS and 44.80 GTexel/s, CPU and GPU utilization in games will be heavily skewed toward the GPU as the bottleneck. Users should expect CPU utilization to remain moderate while GPU utilization maxes out in most gaming scenarios.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7745HX compare to the Intel Core i7-13650HX?

A: The two processors have nearly identical average benchmark scores — 33,091 for the 7745HX versus 33,089 for the i7-13650HX, a 0% delta. Users should expect statistically indistinguishable performance between these CPUs.

Q: Can the Radeon 740M run modern games?

A: Based on its 53rd percentile ranking and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, the 740M can run less demanding games and older titles at modest settings. Its nearest rival is the RX 580 (0.4% faster), indicating similar performance expectations. No measured FPS data exists for this specific pairing.

Q: What memory does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. The GPU uses system-shared memory, so total available graphics memory depends on the system's RAM configuration.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck for gaming?

A: The GPU is definitively the bottleneck. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 53rd, and in gaming workloads the 740M's 8 ROPs and 256 shading units will limit performance well before the CPU's 8 cores become a constraint.

Q: How does this system compare to one with a discrete GPU?

A: The Radeon 740M matches older discrete cards like the RX 580 (0.4% delta) and GTX 590 (0.3% delta), but modern discrete GPUs would significantly outperform it. The CPU's strong performance means adding a discrete GPU would create a much more balanced system.

Q: What is the CPU's production status and release date?

A: The Ryzen 7 7745HX is listed as Active in production, released on January 3, 2023. The Radeon 740M was released on January 30, 2024, and is also Active.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: The Radeon 740M includes 4 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, with only 256 shading units and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32, ray tracing performance will be limited compared to discrete GPUs with more compute resources.

Who Should Build It

This platform suits users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance in a laptop without the cost or power draw of a discrete GPU. Software developers will benefit from the 8-core/16-thread configuration and 83rd CPU percentile, with compilation times competitive with desktop parts like the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (0% delta). Students and office workers gain responsive single-thread performance (1,850 Cinebench R23 single-core) for daily tasks, plus the integrated GPU handles productivity applications without issue.

Content creators working primarily in CPU-rendered workflows — such as audio processing, data analysis, or CPU-based video encoding — will find the 18,452.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score sufficient for serious work. The PassMark integer math score of 105,773 indicates strong performance for scientific computing and financial modeling.

Gamers should approach this platform with caution. The 53rd percentile GPU limits gaming to less demanding titles at modest settings, and users seeking 1080p high-refresh gaming should look for systems with discrete GPUs. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, document management, and light database work will find the CPU's data compression score of 383,322 in PassMark particularly relevant for file operations and backup tasks.

The platform's 68th combined percentile reflects its split personality: a top-tier CPU paired with a mid-range integrated GPU. For users whose workloads are CPU-centric, this is an excellent choice. For those who need graphics performance, the imbalance will be a persistent frustration. The 55 W CPU TDP and 45 W GPU TDP suggest a system that prioritizes sustained CPU performance within a reasonable thermal envelope, making it suitable for professionals who run long compilation or rendering jobs on battery power.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX

AMD Radeon 740M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds