SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735U + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7735U

28,350 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735U and AMD Radeon 860M pairing represents a modern laptop platform that prioritizes efficiency and integrated graphics capability. This analysis examines the benchmark data for this specific combination, noting that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, which provide a reliable basis for predicting relative performance.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735U is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. It belongs to the 7000 series and is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 208 mm². The base clock is 2.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.75 GHz, while the thermal design power (TDP) is 28 W. This power envelope is typical for a mobile processor, indicating a design that balances performance with thermal constraints in thin-and-light laptops.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache. This configuration is moderate for an 8-core design, but the Zen 3+ architecture's efficiency helps mitigate the impact of the relatively modest L3. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, making it suitable for error-sensitive workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is ample for a laptop's GPU and NVMe storage needs.

In multi-threaded benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 7735U scores 10,085 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core. This is a strong result for a 28 W chip, indicating that it can handle sustained multi-core loads like video encoding or 3D rendering reasonably well. The single-core score of 1,490 in Cinebench R23 suggests that the boost clock of 4.75 GHz is effective for lightly-threaded tasks, such as office productivity or web browsing. The Geekbench scores of 7,216 multi-core and 1,442 single-core corroborate this balanced profile, showing the CPU is not lopsided in either direction.

The PassMark suite reveals specific workload characteristics. The multi-thread score is 20,723, and the single-thread score is a lower 3,236, which is typical for a mobile part that prioritizes efficiency over raw single-core speed. Notably, the data compression score is 250,457, which is exceptionally high and suggests the CPU excels at compression tasks, likely due to the Zen 3+ architecture's memory subsystem. Conversely, the find prime numbers score is 57, which is low, indicating that the CPU is not optimized for highly parallel integer workloads that are branch-heavy. The floating-point math score of 42,966 and integer math score of 79,580 are more balanced, showing competence in general computational tasks.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 28,350, placing it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6337P (deltaPct 0.1), Intel Core i9-11950H (deltaPct 0.1), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (deltaPct -0.1), and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS (deltaPct -0.4). These deltas are all within 0.4% of the 7735U's score, indicating that the performance is highly competitive with these other mobile and workstation-class parts. The data shows that the 7735U sits in a tight cluster of similarly-performing CPUs, meaning real-world differences would be negligible for most users.

For real workloads, this CPU is capable of handling typical productivity tasks with ease. The 16 threads will allow for smooth multitasking, and the strong compression performance suggests it would be good for file archiving or database operations. The 80th percentile ranking implies it outperforms a significant majority of all CPUs, which is impressive for a 28 W mobile chip.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the AMD Radeon 860M and the CPU's capabilities. The data clearly indicates that this is an integrated graphics solution, and its performance should be contextualized accordingly.

The AMD Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26,401, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (deltaPct -0.1), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (deltaPct 0.3), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (deltaPct -0.6), and NVIDIA RTX A4000 (deltaPct -1.1). These deltas are small, but the comparison to the RTX 5060 and RX 5700 XT is notable: those are discrete desktop-class GPUs, and the 860M is an integrated part. The score parity suggests the 860M is a very capable iGPU, but the context of the GPU's 15 W TDP must be considered.

Given the 860M's 72nd percentile ranking, it can be estimated that this pairing would provide playable frame rates at 1080p for esports titles and older games. For modern AAA games, the estimates would be lower, with the user likely needing to lower settings from ultra to high or medium to achieve a smooth experience. The 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a key indicator: this is roughly equivalent to a lower-end discrete GPU from a few generations ago. The 860M has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, which are modest counts but expected for an iGPU.

The CPU's 80th percentile ranking for multi-core performance means it will not be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios at lower resolutions. However, at 1080p, the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor, as the CPU's single-thread performance (1,490 in Cinebench R23 single-core) is sufficient to feed the GPU. The estimated FPS for a game like a competitive shooter could be in the range of 60-90 FPS at 1080p medium settings, while a demanding title like a recent open-world game might only achieve 30-40 FPS at 1080p low settings. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization, but the benchmark data points to a system that is viable for casual gaming rather than high-refresh competitive play.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark scores shows a system that is well-balanced for its class. The CPU's average benchmark score is 28,350, while the GPU's is 26,401. The CPU sits in the 80th percentile, and the GPU sits in the 72nd percentile, with a combined percentile of 76. This indicates that the system as a whole is positioned to outperform a majority of other laptop configurations.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,085 is a strong indicator of its productivity potential. Compared to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-11950H (avgScore 28,332), the 7735U (avgScore 28,350) is effectively tied, showing that the AMD chip can match a high-end Intel mobile H-series processor from a previous generation. The Geekbench multi-core score of 7,216 further reinforces this, showing the CPU is not a slouch in cross-platform benchmarks.

For the GPU, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 22,759, and the Vulkan score is 30,043. The Vulkan score being higher than OpenCL is typical for AMD's RDNA architecture, which has strong driver support for Vulkan. The average score of 26,401 places the 860M in the same performance tier as the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (avgScore 26,421). This is a significant achievement for an integrated GPU, as the MX550 is a dedicated, albeit entry-level, discrete GPU. The 860M also benchmarks close to the RTX 5060 (avgScore 26,331), which is a much more powerful part, but the delta of 0.3% suggests that in synthetic tests, the 860M holds its own surprisingly well.

The combination of these scores suggests a system that is more capable than a typical office laptop but not a high-end gaming machine. The CPU is strong enough for demanding productivity tasks, and the GPU is strong enough for light gaming and accelerated content creation. The overall percentile of 76 indicates that this pairing would be a solid choice for a user who wants a single device for a mix of work and play.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests that the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming workloads, while the CPU is well-equipped to handle both gaming and productivity tasks. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU's 72nd percentile, indicating that the CPU has more headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does. In a gaming scenario, this means the 860M will likely hit its performance ceiling before the 7735U does, especially at lower resolutions where CPU load is higher.

The estimated FPS scaling supports this conclusion. At 1080p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as the 3.072 TFLOPS of compute performance is the hard ceiling for frame rendering. The CPU's single-core score of 1,490 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to keep up with the GPU's frame output at this resolution. However, if the resolution were lowered to 720p, the CPU might start to become a co-bottleneck, but this is not a typical use case for a laptop with this class of GPU.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-core score of 10,085 in Cinebench R23 will be the primary driver of performance in tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering. The GPU can assist in some rendering tasks via its OpenCL or Vulkan capabilities, but the CPU will still be the workhorse. In this scenario, the CPU is the component that will be utilized to its full extent, while the GPU may be underutilized.

The PassMark data provides additional insight. The CPU's data compression score of 250,457 is a standout, suggesting that tasks involving file compression will be very fast. This is a CPU-bound task, so the GPU will not be a factor. Conversely, the CPU's find prime numbers score of 57 is low, indicating that highly parallel, integer-heavy workloads might not be the CPU's strong suit, but this is a niche scenario. Overall, the system is well-balanced, with the CPU being the stronger component and the GPU being adequate for its intended role as an integrated part.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7735U scores 10,085 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a strong result for a 28 W mobile processor.

Q: How does the Radeon 860M compare to a discrete GPU?

A: The Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26,401, placing it in the 72nd percentile. It is closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which has an average score of 26,421 (deltaPct -0.1).

Q: Is ECC memory supported by this CPU?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for error-sensitive workloads like data processing or financial calculations.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M has an FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS, which is a measure of its raw compute capability for graphics and general-purpose tasks.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 76, indicating that this system outperforms a majority of other laptop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: Does the CPU have an unlocked multiplier?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported for the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735U is built for the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard in most laptops, so upgrading the CPU in a typical user scenario is not feasible. The platform supports DDR5 memory, which is the current standard, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes for the CPU. The GPU, being an integrated part, uses the system's shared memory, and its bandwidth is system-dependent.

The GPU's TDP is 15 W, and the CPU's TDP is 28 W. The suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK, but for a laptop, the power supply is typically a compact adapter. The total system power draw is likely low, meaning that the existing laptop power brick should have sufficient headroom for the components. Since there is no discrete GPU, the only power consumers are the CPU and the iGPU, both of which are efficient.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to increase the amount of system RAM, as the GPU uses system shared memory. More memory would increase the available VRAM for the iGPU, potentially improving graphics performance in memory-constrained scenarios. Additionally, upgrading to a faster NVMe SSD would improve load times and overall system responsiveness, but this is not directly related to the CPU or GPU performance. The CPU itself is not upgradeable, so the platform's longevity depends on the laptop's other components.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process. It is part of the Navi III IGP generation, specifically Krackan Point. The GPU has a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The memory is system shared, meaning it uses the same DDR5 memory as the CPU, with bandwidth that is system-dependent. This is a key constraint: the GPU's performance is tied to the system's memory speed and configuration.

The GPU has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. It also includes 8 ray tracing cores, which is notable for an integrated GPU. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1). The TDP is 15 W, which is very efficient, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

In Geekbench, the GPU scores 22,759 in OpenCL and 30,043 in Vulkan. The Vulkan score is significantly higher, which is a good sign for modern games that use Vulkan. The average benchmark score of 26,401 places it in the 72nd percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, is a discrete GPU, and the 860M matches it in score (deltaPct -0.1). This is a strong indication of the iGPU's capability. The 8 RT cores suggest that the GPU can handle ray tracing effects, albeit likely at lower settings or resolutions due to the limited compute power.

For rendering tasks, the 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the key metric. This is sufficient for basic 3D rendering and video editing acceleration, but it is not a replacement for a high-end discrete GPU. The 512 shading units will handle shader-heavy workloads adequately, but users should expect to use lower quality settings in graphically intensive applications. The 15 W TDP reflects the efficiency of the RDNA 3.5 architecture, making it ideal for thin-and-light laptops.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop configuration, combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U CPU with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated GPU. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, and the GPU is a 15 W integrated part. This pairing is designed for a portable device that prioritizes battery life and efficiency over raw performance. The combined percentile of 76 indicates that this system is better than most laptop configurations in the benchmark database.

The CPU's 80th percentile and the GPU's 72nd percentile show that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. This is a balanced system, but with a clear emphasis on CPU performance. The system is not designed for hardcore gaming, but rather for a mix of productivity, content creation, and light gaming. The use of DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4 support ensures that the platform is current and can take advantage of modern storage and memory speeds.

The class of this build is a laptop, and its tier is above average, as indicated by the 76th combined percentile. It is a versatile machine that can handle a wide range of tasks, but it will not excel in any single, demanding area like high-refresh gaming or heavy 3D rendering. The data shows a system that is well-suited for a professional who needs a portable workstation for coding, office work, and occasional media editing, or a student who wants a laptop that can handle both schoolwork and some gaming.

Who Should Build It

The target users for this CPU+GPU pairing are those who need a portable system for a mix of productivity and light gaming. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking and strong multi-core scores (10,085 in Cinebench R23) make it an excellent choice for software developers who need to compile code or run virtual machines. The 16 threads will handle parallel compilation tasks efficiently, and the data compression score of 250,457 suggests that database or file-heavy operations will be fast.

Content creators who work with 1080p video editing or photo manipulation will find the system adequate. The CPU's multi-core performance is sufficient for rendering timelines, and the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS can accelerate effects and encoding in some applications. However, professional 3D artists or video editors working with 4K or higher resolutions would likely find the performance lacking.

Gamers who play esports titles or older games at 1080p will be satisfied. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking indicates it can handle these games at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. The system is not suitable for gamers who want to play the latest AAA titles at ultra settings, as the GPU will be the bottleneck. Students will find this a capable laptop for all academic tasks, from writing papers to running statistical software. Small business workstations that need a reliable, efficient machine for office applications, web browsing, and data entry would also be well-served by this pairing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not the target use case. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking, with an FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS, is sufficient for 60 FPS in esports titles at 1080p, but it will likely struggle to maintain high frame rates in more demanding games. Users should expect to lower settings to achieve smooth performance.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and 80th percentile ranking make it capable of handling game streaming at 1080p. The multi-core score of 10,085 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the CPU can encode video while running a game, although the game's frame rate may be impacted due to the shared GPU resources.

Video editing: The system is competent for 1080p video editing. The CPU's multi-core performance will handle timeline rendering, and the GPU can accelerate effects and encoding. For 4K editing, the 3.072 TFLOPS of GPU compute and the CPU's memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s would be limiting factors.

3D rendering: This is a demanding task that the system can only handle at a basic level. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,085 is good for a laptop, but it is not a workstation-class chip. The GPU's 8 RT cores and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are not sufficient for complex scenes. Users should expect long render times for anything beyond simple models.

Software development: This is a strong use case. The CPU's 16 threads and high integer math score of 79,580 will handle code compilation and testing efficiently. The 80th percentile ranking means it outperforms most other CPUs, making development workflows smooth and responsive.

Student and office work: This pairing excels here. The CPU's single-core score of 1,490 in Cinebench R23 is more than enough for web browsing, word processing, and spreadsheets. The efficiency of the 28 W CPU and 15 W GPU ensures long battery life, making it ideal for all-day use in classes or meetings. The system's 76th combined percentile means it will handle any academic software with ease.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735U + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7735U

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds