SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

25,147 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile: Database Analysis

This pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 3+ mobile processor with NVIDIA's top-tier Ada Lovelace laptop GPU, placing the system in the 79th percentile overall against all benchmarked configurations. The CPU alone sits in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU reaches the 81st percentile among all GPUs, indicating a well-matched high-performance laptop platform. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK — the data contains no measuredFps entries — so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores and percentile positions.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with a die size of 294 mm² housing 35,800 million transistors. The GPU features 7,424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. Memory configuration includes 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective, while the GPU base clock is 1290 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz.

Ray tracing and tensor hardware are substantial: 58 RT cores handle hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while 232 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for DLSS and other neural network workloads. The FP32 compute throughput is 24.72 TFLOPS, with FP16 also rated at 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning there is no half-precision penalty for machine learning inference tasks. Pixel fill rate reaches 133.2 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 386.3 GTexel/s, both of which are strong indicators for high-resolution rendering and texture-heavy scenes.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 24,926, which places the GPU in the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 159,575, while the Vulkan score is 145,807, indicating strong cross-API compute performance. DirectX 11 and DirectX 9 scores are 244 and 286 respectively, while DirectX 12 scores 96 and DirectX 10 scores 157 — these lower DirectX-specific numbers suggest the GPU is optimized for modern APIs rather than legacy ones. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11,191 reflects substantial parallel processing capability for non-graphics workloads.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 12 GB VRAM and 432 GB/s bandwidth means large textures and complex scenes can be held in memory without excessive swapping. The 58 RT cores accelerate ray-traced effects, while the 232 tensor cores enable DLSS frame generation and upscaling. The FP32 throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS positions this GPU well for real-time 3D rendering in applications that leverage CUDA acceleration, though the 110 W TDP is a mobile-class power envelope that will thermal-throttle under sustained load in thinner chassis designs.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,106 and a single-core score of 1,546. In Geekbench, the multi-core score is 8,114 with a single-core score of 1,699. The 3DMark multi-threaded tests show scaling from 1,773 (2 threads) to 5,697 (8 threads) and 6,870 (16 threads), with a max-threads score of 6,872 and a single-thread score of 912. This scaling pattern indicates efficient thread utilization up to the full 16-thread count, with diminishing returns beyond 8 cores.

PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 23,166 and a single-thread score of 3,296. Integer math scores 85,309, floating-point math scores 47,865, and extended instructions score 20,050. Data compression reaches 293,278, while data encryption scores 18,237. Random string sorting hits 30,388, and prime number finding scores 59. Physics simulation scores 1,073 in PassMark, which is notably lower than the other compute metrics, suggesting physics workloads are not this CPU's strongest area.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 159,575 combine with the CPU's average benchmark score of 25,147 to place the full system in the 79th combined percentile. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 81st percentile are close, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outperforms the other. The nearest CPU rivals include the AMD EPYC 9474F (avg score 25,103, delta 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (avg score 25,201, delta -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (avg score 25,284, delta -0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (avg score 25,005, delta 0.6%). These deltas are all within 0.6%, meaning the 7735HS sits in a tightly clustered performance band.

The GPU's nearest rivals show a similar pattern: the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 (avg score 38,299, delta -0.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (avg score 38,349, delta -0.6%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 (avg score 37,648, delta 1.3%), and the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (avg score 37,628, delta 1.3%). The RTX 4080 Mobile is within 0.6% of both the MX570 and RTX 5080 Mobile in average score, and 1.3% ahead of both the RTX 4070 and Tesla P4, showing that it occupies a distinctive performance tier.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, part of the 7000 series. It uses TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 210 mm². Base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.75 GHz, and the TDP is 35 W, which is a low-power mobile envelope. The socket is AMD Socket FP7, and the CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, providing 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mobile consumer chip. The integrated graphics are Radeon 680M, providing a fallback display output and basic GPU acceleration when the discrete GPU is not in use.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The PCIe support is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The processor was released on 2023-03-31 and remains in active production. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible, but the boost clock of 4.75 GHz is respectable for a 35 W part.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths and weaknesses clearly. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,106 is strong for a 35 W mobile processor, while the single-core score of 1,546 is adequate but not class-leading. The 3DMark results show a 3.87x scaling from 2 threads (1,773) to 16 threads (6,870), indicating good multi-threading efficiency. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23,166 and the integer math score of 85,309 suggest strong general compute performance, while the floating-point score of 47,865 is about 56% of the integer score, which is typical for a Zen 3+ design.

The data compression score of 293,278 is particularly high, indicating strong performance in archive and file-handling workloads. Data encryption scores 18,237, which is moderate. The prime number finding score of 59 is low, and physics simulation at 1,073 is also relatively weak, suggesting these specific workloads do not map well to the architecture. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,296 (listed twice in the data) is the same value for both single-thread and singlethread tests, indicating consistency.

For real workloads, the 16 MB shared L3 cache and 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth mean that memory-bound applications will perform adequately but not exceptionally. The 35 W TDP limits sustained all-core boost behavior, so long rendering jobs may see clock reduction after the initial burst. The 4.75 GHz boost clock is only achievable on lightly threaded workloads; sustained multi-core loads will likely settle at lower clocks due to thermal and power constraints.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4080 Mobile's 81st GPU percentile and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide ample compute for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,870 ensures the processor can feed frames at high rates, and the single-thread score of 912 in 3DMark indicates acceptable per-core performance for game logic. The 12 GB VRAM and 432 GB/s bandwidth handle modern game textures at high settings.

Streaming: The 232 tensor cores on the GPU enable NVENC-based encoding, which offloads video encoding from the CPU. The CPU's PassMark extended instructions score of 20,050 supports AVX-512-class workloads, and the 16 threads handle the overhead of streaming software alongside game execution. The data compression score of 293,278 indicates fast processing of stream data.

Video editing: The Geekbench multi-core score of 8,114 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 13,106 provide solid CPU rendering for timeline previews and export. The GPU's OpenCL score of 159,575 accelerates effects and color grading in GPU-accelerated editors. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timelines with moderate effect stacks.

3D rendering: The FP32 24.72 TFLOPS and 58 RT cores make this GPU capable of real-time ray-traced previews and final-frame rendering in GPU-accelerated engines like Blender Cycles or Octane. The CPU's 16-thread Cinebench score of 13,106 handles CPU-based rendering fallback, though the 35 W TDP limits sustained output. The 12 GB VRAM constrains very large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads with a PassMark multi-thread score of 23,166 provide fast compilation times for typical codebases. The integer math score of 85,309 indicates strong general arithmetic throughput. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large in-memory data structures, and ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 1,546 in Cinebench R23 and 3,296 in PassMark handle word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease. The Radeon 680M integrated graphics provide a low-power idle display output, while the discrete GPU remains dormant for battery savings. The 35 W CPU TDP contributes to a portable laptop form factor.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers at 1440p and high-refresh 1080p: The GPU's 81st percentile and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, combined with the CPU's 77th percentile, make this a strong pairing for esports and AAA titles at these resolutions. The 12 GB VRAM covers current game requirements, and the 432 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory starvation at high settings.

Content creators and video editors: The GPU's OpenCL score of 159,575 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 145,807 accelerate rendering and effects. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,106 handles export and encoding tasks, while the data compression score of 293,278 speeds up file transfer and archive workflows.

3D artists and CAD professionals: The 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores on the GPU enable ray-traced previews and AI-accelerated denoising. The CPU's 16 threads and 16 MB L3 cache handle scene graph traversal and physics simulation, though the PassMark physics score of 1,073 is a limiting factor for complex simulations.

Software developers: The CPU's integer math score of 85,309 and multi-thread score of 23,166 provide fast compilation and test execution. The 16 threads handle parallel builds, and the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large build caches. ECC memory support is a differentiator for data integrity.

Students in STEM fields: The single-thread performance (3,296 PassMark) handles interactive coding environments, while the multi-core performance (13,106 Cinebench R23) supports simulation and data analysis. The integrated Radeon 680M allows the discrete GPU to stay idle for battery life.

Small business workstations: The combined 79th percentile system percentile indicates broad capability. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 18,237 supports secure file operations, and the 12 GB VRAM handles GPU-accelerated database and analytics workloads.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt-R) on TSMC's 6 nm process, with a die size of 210 mm².

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 Mobile have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 18 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: What is the system's combined percentile ranking?

A: The combined system percentile is 79, with the CPU at 77 and the GPU at 81.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7735HS supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for mobile processors.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what does it mean for laptop design?

A: The TDP is 35 W, which is a low-power mobile envelope that allows for thinner laptop designs, though it limits sustained all-core boost clocks.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile delivers 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with FP16 also at 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H?

A: The 7735HS has an average benchmark score of 25,147, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 7 6800H's 25,201, making them effectively equivalent in performance.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU and GPU percentiles are close (77 vs 81), indicating a balanced pairing for most workloads. However, specific bottlenecks emerge depending on the task. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 1,073 is the limiting factor; the GPU's 81st percentile cannot compensate for a CPU that is weak in this specific workload. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like ray-traced rendering, the RTX 4080 Mobile's 58 RT cores and 24.72 TFLOPS are the primary engine, and the CPU's 77th percentile is sufficient to feed the GPU without becoming a drag.

For gaming, the 3DMark single-thread score of 912 and the PassMark single-thread score of 3,296 indicate the CPU can handle frame logic and draw calls, while the GPU's 81st percentile handles the rendering. The scaling from 2 threads (1,773) to 16 threads (6,870) in 3DMark shows that the CPU can maintain performance as thread counts increase, but the 35 W TDP means sustained multi-core loads may reduce clocks, which could bottleneck in heavily threaded game engines.

Memory bandwidth is a shared resource: the CPU's 76.8 GB/s is moderate, and the GPU's 432.0 GB/s is independent. In mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU handles encoding (if not using NVENC) and game logic simultaneously, which could strain the 16 threads. The GPU's tensor cores (232) offload AI tasks, reducing CPU load in DLSS-enabled games. Overall, the system is GPU-limited in graphics-heavy tasks and CPU-limited in physics and single-threaded logic, with no single component dominating across all workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the processor is typically soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable in most laptops. The memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, providing 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU's TDP is 110 W, and the CPU's TDP is 35 W, giving a combined 145 W thermal envelope for the compute components. The suggested PSU is not specified, meaning the power adapter requirements are determined by the laptop manufacturer.

Since the CPU is on a mobile socket and the GPU is a mobile part (slot width "IGP", no power connectors), the upgrade path is essentially limited to what the laptop's motherboard supports. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system RAM capacity and speed, as the DDR5 dual-channel configuration is the most constrained resource after the CPU and GPU. The storage interface via PCIe Gen 4 allows for fast NVMe SSDs, so upgrading to a Gen 4 drive would improve load times and file operations. The GPU cannot be swapped in most laptop designs, and the CPU is similarly fixed. For external upgrades, an eGPU enclosure is not supported given the IGP slot width and no power connectors, so the platform is sealed.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. The system ranks in the 79th combined percentile, meaning it outperforms 79% of all benchmarked configurations. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 81st percentile place both components in the upper quartile, with the GPU being the stronger of the two. The CPU's average benchmark score of 25,147 and the GPU's average score of 38,135 indicate a high-performance pairing suitable for demanding applications.

The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3+ part on a 6 nm process with a 35 W TDP, while the GPU is Ada Lovelace on 5 nm with 7,424 shading units and a 110 W TDP. The combined thermal envelope of 145 W plus other system components suggests a laptop with a robust cooling solution. The release dates (CPU: 2023-03-31, GPU: 2023-01-02) indicate this is a 2023-generation platform that remains in active production. This is a high-tier laptop configuration, positioned for gaming, content creation, and professional workloads, though not at the absolute top end given the 81st GPU percentile (the RTX 5080 Mobile is only 0.6% higher in average score).

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores (PassMark G3D 24,926, Geekbench OpenCL 159,575, Vulkan 145,807) and the CPU's performance metrics (3DMark single-thread 912, 16-thread 6,870), not from direct measurements.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 81st percentile and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest the RTX 4080 Mobile can drive most AAA titles at well above 60 FPS, with esports titles reaching 144+ FPS given the CPU's single-thread score of 3,296 in PassMark. The 12 GB VRAM and 432 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-texture packs at this resolution.

At 1440p ultra, the 133.2 GPixel/s pixel fill rate and 386.3 GTexel/s texture rate support high detail levels, but the 110 W TDP may cause clock reduction under sustained load, limiting frame rates compared to desktop equivalents. Estimated frame rates for demanding titles would range from 60-100 FPS depending on the game's optimization, while lighter titles would exceed 120 FPS.

At 4K ultra, the 12 GB VRAM becomes a limiting factor for the largest textures, and the 432 GB/s bandwidth may cause stutter in memory-heavy scenes. Estimated frame rates at 4K would be 30-60 FPS for most AAA titles, with DLSS (enabled by the 232 tensor cores) providing a significant boost to playable frame rates. Ray-traced titles at 4K would require DLSS to maintain 60 FPS, given the 58 RT cores' throughput.

The CPU's 4.75 GHz boost clock and 16 threads are sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K the GPU becomes the primary constraint. These are estimates, not measured values; actual performance will vary by game, driver, and laptop thermal design.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds