SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

25,147 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on TSMC's 6 nm process node. Its architecture is Zen 3+ under the Rembrandt-R codename, a refinement of the Zen 3 design rather than a full generational leap. The CPU operates with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz, all within a 35 W TDP envelope that suits thin-and-light laptops and compact gaming machines. The die size is 210 mm², which is substantial for a 6 nm part, reflecting the integration of the Radeon 680M integrated graphics and the memory controller.

Cache hierarchy is distributed as 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. This is a modest L3 pool by desktop standards, but for a mobile part it balances die area and power. Memory support covers DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, yielding 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, an unusual feature for a consumer mobile CPU, and the platform exposes PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The socket is AMD Socket FP7, which is a BGA package, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable in the traditional sense.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that scales well with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the 2-thread score is 1773, the 4-thread score rises to 3382, the 8-thread score reaches 5697, and the 16-thread score hits 6870. The max-thread score of 6872 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score, indicating that the SMT implementation provides full utilization without diminishing returns at the top end. The single-thread score of 912 is comparatively low, which suggests that while the CPU has strong multi-core throughput, its per-core performance is not class-leading. This pattern holds in Cinebench R23, where the multi-core score of 13106 is respectable for a 35 W part, but the single-core score of 1546 is modest. Geekbench results echo this: multi-core at 8114 and single-core at 1699.

The PassMark suite adds nuance. Integer math scores 85309, floating-point math scores 47865, and extended instructions score 20050. Data compression hits 293278, while data encryption reaches 18237. Random string sorting is 30388, and find prime numbers is a low 59. The multithread score is 23166, with a single-thread score of 3296. Physics simulation in PassMark scores 1073. The average benchmark score across all tests is 25147, placing the CPU in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 9474F at 25103 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H at 25201 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS at 25284 (0.5% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F at 25005 (0.6% ahead). These deltas are minuscule, meaning the 7735HS sits in a performance cluster where the differences are within noise. For real workloads, this translates to a CPU that handles heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, compilation, and 3D rendering competently, but it will not dominate in lightly threaded applications such as legacy games or single-threaded productivity tools.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture of CPU and GPU benchmark scores indicates a balanced mobile platform with a 72nd percentile combined ranking. The CPU's average benchmark score of 25147 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average benchmark score of 22729 places it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, though both are above the median.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, delivers strong compute results. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score is 89420 and the Vulkan score is 89569, showing consistent performance across APIs. PassMark results include G3D at 17469, G2D at 730, and GPU compute at 6816. DirectX tests show 157 in DirectX 11 and 73 in DirectX 12, with DirectX 9 at 216 and DirectX 10 at 107. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22895 (0.7% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT at 22549 (0.8% behind), the Intel Arc B580 at 23021 (1.3% ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile at 22435 (1.3% behind). These are all desktop or higher-tier mobile parts, and the RTX 4060 Mobile holds its own within a few percentage points. The 67th percentile ranking means it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all GPUs in the database.

The CPU's multi-core advantage is clear in the 3DMark thread scaling. The jump from 8 threads (5697) to 16 threads (6870) is only about 21%, which is less than the 50% gain from 4 threads (3382) to 8 threads (5697). This suggests diminishing returns from SMT at the higher thread counts, a characteristic of Zen 3+ where the core complex is already well-utilized at 8 threads. For combined workloads, the data implies that the CPU will not be the bottleneck in GPU-bound gaming, but it may limit frame rates in CPU-intensive simulations or strategy games that rely on single-thread performance.

The PassMark physics score of 1073 is a useful indicator for game physics calculations, and it aligns with the CPU's 77th percentile ranking. The floating-point math score of 47865 supports scientific and engineering applications, while the encryption score of 18237 indicates solid AES performance for VPNs and disk encryption. Overall, this pairing is above-average but not extreme; it competes with last-generation desktop parts and mid-range current mobile offerings.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay measurements.

Given the GPU's G3D score of 17469 and its 67th percentile ranking, the RTX 4060 Mobile is positioned for 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p at medium to high settings in most titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 912 in 3DMark and 1546 in Cinebench R23 suggests that frame rates in CPU-bound games will be moderate. In fast-paced esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU's single-thread performance may cap frame rates below what the GPU could deliver, potentially in the 100-150 FPS range at 1080p low settings. In AAA titles that are GPU-bound, the RTX 4060 Mobile should push 60+ FPS at 1080p ultra in many games, based on its proximity to the RTX 2080 (0.7% difference in average score), which was a capable 1440p card in its generation.

At 1440p, the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM will become limiting factors in texture-heavy games. The GPU's 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is adequate for rasterized rendering at this resolution, but ray tracing workloads will rely on the 24 RT cores, which are present but not abundant. The 96 tensor cores provide DLSS support, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported titles by rendering at a lower internal resolution and upscaling. Estimated 1440p performance is 45-70 FPS in demanding titles with DLSS enabled, and 30-50 FPS without upscaling.

The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for modern game engines that use multiple threads for streaming, physics, and AI. However, the modest single-thread performance means that games with heavy draw-call or simulation threads may see stutter or lower 1% lows. The 16 MB L3 cache is adequate but not generous; games that rely on large cache footprints may exhibit more frequent cache misses. Overall, the gaming experience is expected to be solid for 1080p high-refresh (120Hz+) in esports, and playable for AAA titles at 1080p ultra or 1440p high with DLSS. These are estimates, not measured values, and real-world results will vary by game and cooling solution.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets laptop buyers who need a balance of multi-core CPU performance and capable GPU compute without going to extreme power levels. The 35 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP suggest a device that fits in a mainstream gaming or creator laptop chassis, not an ultra-thin ultrabook nor a desktop replacement brick.

Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 4060 Mobile sufficient for high-refresh play in competitive titles and high settings in AAA games. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking ensures that most games will not be CPU-limited at this resolution, though single-thread-sensitive titles may show some limitation. Gamers targeting 1440p should expect to rely on DLSS for smoother frame rates, as the raw GPU compute is close to the RTX 2080, which was a 1080p/1440p card in its era.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-core scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13106 and Geekbench multi-core of 8114 indicate solid performance in applications like Premiere Pro or Blender that scale across threads. The GPU's 3072 shading units and 96 tensor cores accelerate these workloads through CUDA and OptiX, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity in 3D rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the 8-core/16-thread configuration, and the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth supports rapid data access. Students and office workers in non-demanding fields will find the platform overkill, but it provides headroom for future applications and multitasking. Small business workstations that run virtualization, database queries, or moderate compute tasks are a fit, given the ECC memory support and 35 W CPU efficiency.

The combined 72nd percentile ranking puts this build above the majority of laptops, making it a sensible choice for users who want one device for work and play without paying for top-tier components that may exceed their needs.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the CPU and GPU are relatively well-matched, but each has distinct limitations that surface in specific workloads. The CPU's 77th percentile versus the GPU's 67th percentile suggests the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation, compilation, or spreadsheet calculations, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will sit partially idle.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts based on resolution and settings. At 1080p with low settings, the CPU's single-thread score of 912 in 3DMark becomes the limiting factor, as the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. The result is that frame rates may plateau even if the GPU has headroom. At 1080p ultra or 1440p, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, as the 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are taxed by higher resolutions. The GPU's 67th percentile ranking means it is a mid-to-high-tier part, but not a top-tier one, so it will be the limiting factor in graphically intense scenes.

Memory bandwidth is another potential bottleneck. The CPU's 76.8 GB/s is shared with the GPU via system memory, but the GPU has its own 256.0 GB/s GDDR6 bandwidth. In mixed workloads that stress both components, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU's multi-thread score of 23166 in PassMark suggests it can handle the encoding load, but the GPU's tensor cores may be used for NVENC, freeing the CPU. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is a capacity bottleneck for high-resolution textures or large 3D scenes, potentially causing stutter if the game exceeds this limit.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, suggests that the CPU can support the GPU's full output in GPU-bound scenarios, but not vice versa. The lack of measured FPS data means this is inferred from the benchmark scores, not confirmed. The 3DMark thread scaling shows the CPU gains 21% from 8 to 16 threads, which is enough for modern games that use 8 or more threads, but not enough to compensate for the low single-thread score in games that are poorly threaded.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD107 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die size is 159 mm² with 18,900 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². This is a dense, efficient design that delivers strong performance per watt, consistent with its 115 W TDP. The GPU has 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 24 RT cores, and AI acceleration by 96 tensor cores.

The memory subsystem comprises 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. This yields 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a modest figure for a modern GPU, especially at 1440p or higher. The 128-bit bus is the primary limitation; it constrains memory bandwidth and can bottleneck performance in bandwidth-hungry scenarios like high-resolution textures or compute workloads that access large datasets.

Clock speeds are 1545 MHz base and 1890 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 90.72 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 181.4 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is rated at 11.61 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). This 1:1 FP16/FP32 ratio is notable because it means the GPU does not have dedicated half-precision hardware; it uses the same units, which can be beneficial for workloads that mix precisions.

The 96 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI features, and the 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compliant with modern graphics APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for most workloads, though a full x16 connection would be marginally better for data transfer in some compute tasks. The power connectors are listed as "None," indicating this is an integrated mobile GPU soldered to the motherboard, not a discrete card with external power.

In benchmark terms, the GPU's G3D score of 17469 places it near the RTX 2080 (0.7% difference), the RX 7700 XT (0.8% difference), and the Arc B580 (1.3% difference). These are all desktop GPUs or higher-tier mobile parts, and the RTX 4060 Mobile matches them within a few percent. For rendering, this means the GPU can handle 1080p and 1440p rasterized workloads, and with DLSS, it can achieve playable frame rates with ray tracing enabled. The 8 GB VRAM is a concern for 4K textures or large 3D scenes, but for 1080p and 1440p gaming, it is adequate.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance, and why does it matter?

A: The CPU scores 912 in 3DMark single-thread and 1546 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores indicate modest per-core performance, which affects lightly threaded workloads like legacy games or certain productivity tools.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to a desktop RTX 2080?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22729, which is 0.7% behind the RTX 2080's 22895. This places it within a few percentage points of the desktop RTX 2080.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 72, meaning this laptop configuration outperforms 72% of all systems in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for mobile CPUs and can be valuable for data integrity in workstation tasks.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth, and is it sufficient for 1440p gaming?

A: The GPU has 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth on a 128-bit bus. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but may be a limiting factor for high-resolution textures or ray tracing.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing. All frame rate estimates are derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP, and what does it mean for laptop design?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, which is a mid-range value for mobile processors. It allows for thinner laptops with adequate cooling, rather than bulky high-power designs.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS uses the AMD Socket FP7, which is a BGA (ball grid array) package. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. Users are limited to the processor that comes with the laptop, so the upgrade path is constrained to other components or a full system replacement. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, which is a current standard and offers headroom for future memory upgrades if the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots.

PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for a modern GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its performance class. Storage upgrades are possible through M.2 slots, and users can add or replace SSDs to increase capacity or speed. The memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is fixed by the DDR5 configuration, but if the laptop supports higher-speed DDR5 modules, users could potentially improve memory performance, though this is limited by the memory controller.

The GPU's TDP is 115 W, and the CPU's TDP is 35 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 150 W. The suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK, but for a laptop, the power supply is external and typically rated based on the total system draw. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase memory capacity to 32 GB or 64 GB if the laptop supports it, as the CPU's multi-thread performance benefits from larger memory pools in multitasking scenarios. Adding a second NVMe SSD for storage is also straightforward.

For the GPU, there is no upgrade path since it is soldered. The CPU's integrated Radeon 680M graphics provide a fallback for light tasks when the discrete GPU is disabled to save power, but it is not a performance alternative. The platform's overall longevity depends on the laptop's cooling solution and battery, which are not upgradeable. Users seeking more performance would need to purchase a new laptop with a newer platform, such as one featuring the RTX 50 Mobile series, which is the successor to the RTX 40 Mobile.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile in a laptop form factor. The build class is explicitly "laptop," meaning all components are integrated into a portable chassis. The CPU is a 7000-series part with Zen 3+ architecture, and the GPU is a 40-series Ada Lovelace part. Both are mid-tier offerings from their respective generations, released in 2023.

The combined percentile of 72 indicates that this system outperforms 72% of all configurations in the benchmark database. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 67th percentile show that the CPU is the stronger component. This is a mainstream-to-upper-midrange laptop configuration, suitable for gaming, content creation, and productivity. It does not compete with high-end desktop replacements or extreme mobile workstations, but it offers a balanced set of capabilities for a wide range of users.

The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with the GPU's 3072 shading units, provide a solid foundation for modern software. The 6 nm CPU and 5 nm GPU are both power-efficient, contributing to reasonable battery life and thermals for a laptop. The system is not unlocked for overclocking (the CPU's multiplier is locked), so performance is fixed at factory settings. The production status of both components is "Active," indicating they are currently in production and supported.

Overall, this build represents a sensible middle ground for laptop buyers who need more than entry-level performance but do not require flagship hardware. Its 72nd percentile ranking places it above the majority of systems, making it a capable choice for most tasks.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system is estimated to deliver high frame rates in esports titles, with the GPU's performance near the RTX 2080 supporting 100+ FPS in many games. The CPU's single-thread score of 912 may limit maximum FPS in CPU-bound titles, but the overall experience should be smooth for competitive play.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder, supported by its 96 tensor cores, offloads video encoding from the CPU. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 23166 ensures that game and stream encoding can run concurrently without severe performance degradation.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13106 and Geekbench multi-core of 8114 provide solid performance for timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and CUDA acceleration assist with effects and color grading, though 4K projects may require proxy files.

3D rendering: In Blender or similar software, the CPU's 8 cores handle CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 24 RT cores accelerate GPU rendering. The 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity, but medium-complexity scenes will render efficiently.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU's 16 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 85309 indicating strong arithmetic throughput. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth supports rapid builds and test execution.

Student and office work: The CPU's 77th percentile and 35 W TDP provide responsive performance for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet analysis without excessive fan noise or battery drain. The integrated Radeon 680M graphics offer a power-efficient fallback for light tasks.