SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

25,147 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS and AMD Radeon 860M pairing represents a modern laptop platform combining a 2023-era 8-core Zen 3+ processor with a 2025-era RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics solution. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data, which contains no measured frame rates for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussions are therefore estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The combined system places at the 75th percentile across all known pairings, indicating a mid-to-upper-tier mobile configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming — The Radeon 860M’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 places it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, which is strong for an integrated part. However, the absence of measured FPS data means that sustained 144Hz or 240Hz gaming cannot be confirmed from the factual record. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest capability for esports titles at medium settings, but frame rates remain estimates.

Streaming — The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13106, provide sufficient headroom for encoding workloads while gaming. The Radeon 860M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which include modern encoding-adjacent features, but the data does not specify dedicated encoder hardware. The 16-thread capability allows simultaneous game and encode tasks, with the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking indicating it outperforms most processors in general compute.

Video editing — The Geekbench multicore score of 8114 and Passmark multithread score of 23166 indicate solid timeline editing performance for 1080p and light 4K work. The Radeon 860M’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 provides GPU acceleration for effects and color grading, though the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 figure is modest compared to discrete solutions. The 16 MB shared L3 cache helps with large media files, and the DDR5 memory support (76.8 GB/s bandwidth) feeds both CPU and GPU efficiently.

3D rendering — Cinebench R15 multicore at 2153.4 and R23 multicore at 13106 show the CPU can handle moderate render workloads, but the Radeon 860M’s 512 shading units and 16 ROPs limit GPU-accelerated rendering. The 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, yet the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is roughly one-tenth of a dedicated midrange card. Render times will be acceptable for previews and light final frames, but production rendering favors discrete GPUs.

Software development — The Passmark data compression score of 293278 and integer math score of 85309 indicate strong performance for code compilation, especially with parallel builds across 16 threads. The single-thread Passmark score of 3296 supports fast IDE interaction and linting. The 77th percentile CPU ranking means this laptop can handle large codebases, virtual machines, and containerized builds without significant slowdowns.

Student and office work — The 3DMark single-thread score of 912 and Passmark single-thread score of 3296 deliver responsive everyday computing. The CPU’s 35W TDP, combined with the GPU’s 15W TDP, suggests efficient battery operation, though exact battery life figures are not provided. Spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing will run comfortably within the 8-core/16-thread envelope, with the 77th percentile CPU position guaranteeing headroom for background tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25147 places it at the 77th percentile among all processors. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 9474F (avg score 25103, delta 0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (avg score 25201, delta -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (avg score 25284, delta -0.5%), and AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (avg score 25005, delta 0.6%). This clustering within a 1.1% band shows the 7735HS is essentially tied with both its predecessor (6800H) and a higher-tier sibling (6900HS), while matching a server EPYC part in synthetic averages.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 26401 places it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (avg score 26421, delta -0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (avg score 26331, delta 0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (avg score 26553, delta -0.6%), and NVIDIA RTX A4000 (avg score 26683, delta -1.1%). The 860M sits within 1.1% of all these parts, meaning it trades blows with an entry-level discrete GPU (MX550), a current-gen desktop card (RTX 5060), and a professional workstation GPU (RTX A4000) in synthetic benchmarks.

The combined percentile of 75 indicates the pairing sits above three-quarters of all tested CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU’s 77th percentile is slightly higher than the GPU’s 72nd, suggesting the processor is the stronger component. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 versus OpenCL of 22759 shows the 860M performs 32% better under Vulkan, favoring modern game engines and compute APIs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate figures below are estimates derived strictly from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

The Radeon 860M’s 72nd percentile GPU ranking and Vulkan score of 30043 suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings in most titles. The 512 shading units and 32 TMUs provide adequate texture throughput (96.00 GTexel/s) for older games at high settings. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 compute aligns with integrated graphics performance from the previous generation, meaning esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs should exceed 60 FPS at 1080p with reduced settings.

At 1440p, the 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate becomes a bottleneck, as filling higher resolutions demands more pixel throughput. The 8 RT cores will enable ray tracing effects but at significantly reduced frame rates — likely halving performance versus rasterized rendering. The system-shared memory means bandwidth is system-dependent, so gaming performance will vary based on the laptop’s DDR5 configuration.

The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 5697 and 16-thread score of 6870 ensure that even at lower resolutions where GPU load decreases, the processor will not hold back frame rates. The single-thread score of 912 is adequate for game logic and physics. For competitive gaming at 1080p, the pairing should deliver playable frame rates, but users seeking high-refresh (144Hz+) experiences at maximum settings should temper expectations given the 3.072 TFLOPS GPU ceiling.

Who Should Build It

This laptop platform targets users who need a balanced 8-core CPU with better-than-average integrated graphics for light gaming and general productivity. The 77th percentile CPU makes it suitable for software developers compiling large projects, data analysts running multi-threaded queries, and students running engineering or scientific applications. The 16 threads handle virtualization and containerized workloads effectively, as evidenced by the Passmark multithread score of 23166.

Content creators working with 1080p video will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13106 sufficient for proxy editing and quick exports. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 22759 supports GPU-accelerated effects in editing suites. However, professionals requiring 4K timeline scrubbing or complex 3D rendering should look at discrete GPU options, as the 860M’s 3.072 TFLOPS and 16 ROPs will struggle with sustained heavy compute.

Small business workstations benefit from the CPU’s ECC memory support and DDR5 dual-channel bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The 35W TDP allows for slim, portable chassis designs that can run all day on battery for office tasks. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings will find this adequate for casual play, but enthusiasts seeking high-refresh AAA experiences will need to step up to a discrete GPU configuration.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7735HS compare to its closest CPU rival?

A: The 7735HS has an average benchmark score of 25147, placing it 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9474F (25103) and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25201). It sits within a 1.1% band of all four nearest rivals.

Q: What is the Radeon 860M’s performance ranking among all GPUs?

A: The 860M ranks at the 72nd percentile with an average benchmark score of 26401. It performs nearly identically to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, -0.1% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331, +0.3% delta).

Q: Does this laptop support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 860M includes 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, with only 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, ray tracing performance will be limited compared to discrete GPUs.

Q: What is the total system percentile ranking?

A: The combined CPU+GPU pairing sits at the 75th percentile among all tested combinations, indicating it outperforms three-quarters of known laptop configurations.

Q: How much VRAM does the Radeon 860M have?

A: The GPU uses system-shared memory for its frame buffer. The size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," meaning VRAM allocation depends on the laptop’s total DDR5 memory configuration.

Q: Is the CPU multi-threaded performance sufficient for video encoding?

A: With 8 cores and 16 threads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13106 and Passmark multithread score of 23166 indicate solid encoding capability. The Geekbench multicore score of 8114 confirms strong parallel workload handling.

Q: What API support does the GPU offer?

A: The Radeon 860M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 is 32% higher than its OpenCL score of 22759, indicating better performance under Vulkan workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture with a 4nm process node from TSMC. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. The GPU’s base clock is 600 MHz with a boost clock of 3000 MHz, delivering pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Memory bandwidth is system-dependent, as the GPU shares the laptop’s DDR5 memory. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and the TDP is rated at 15W. The 8 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs are portable-device-dependent, meaning the laptop manufacturer determines available ports.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and Vulkan score of 30043 place the GPU at the 72nd percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, scores 26421 (delta -0.1%), meaning the 860M is statistically tied with this entry-level discrete GPU. The RTX 5060’s score of 26331 (delta 0.3%) is also virtually identical, which is notable given the 860M’s integrated nature.

For rendering workloads, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is the key limiting factor. The 512 shading units can handle modern shader models, but complex scenes with heavy geometry or post-processing will strain the 16 ROPs. The 8 RT cores enable ray-traced effects in supported games, but the modest compute throughput means ray tracing at playable frame rates will require reduced resolution or settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 72nd percentile indicates the processor is the stronger component, but the gap is narrow. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data compression (Passmark score 293278), and multi-threaded productivity, the 7735HS provides ample headroom. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the 860M becomes the limiting factor.

The 3DMark multi-thread scores show scaling from 3382 at 4 threads to 6872 at max threads — a 103% improvement from 4 to 16 threads, indicating excellent multi-core scaling. The single-thread score of 912 means the CPU will not bottleneck GPU performance in lightly-threaded games. However, the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS ceiling means frame rates will plateau regardless of CPU headroom.

The FPS scaling between CPU and GPU is not measurable from the FACT PACK, as no measured FPS data exists. However, based on the GPU’s 72nd percentile and the CPU’s 77th percentile, the system is well-balanced for its class. The 35W CPU TDP and 15W GPU TDP suggest the laptop can sustain both components at full load without thermal throttling in a properly designed chassis, though the system-shared memory bandwidth could become a bottleneck in memory-intensive scenarios.

The dual-channel DDR5 support with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth feeds both the CPU and GPU. For gaming, this shared bandwidth means the GPU competes with the CPU for memory access, which can reduce performance versus a discrete GPU with dedicated VRAM. For productivity, the 16MB L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency impacts.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (8 cores, 16 threads, Zen 3+ architecture, Rembrandt-R codename) with the AMD Radeon 860M (RDNA 3.5, Krackan Point chip). The CPU is fabricated on TSMC’s 6nm process with a 210 mm² die size, while the GPU uses TSMC’s 4nm process. Both components are currently in active production, with the CPU released on 2023-03-31 and the GPU on 2025-02-28.

The combined system ranks at the 75th percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25147 (77th percentile) and the GPU’s average score of 26401 (72nd percentile) combine to place this platform in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations. It outperforms the majority of laptops on the market, particularly those with older integrated graphics or lower-core-count processors.

The GPU’s nearest rival being the NVIDIA RTX 5060 (delta 0.3%) is surprising for an integrated part, but the 860M achieves this with 15W TDP versus the RTX 5060’s discrete power envelope. The CPU’s performance parity with the AMD EPYC 9474F (delta 0.2%) — a server-class processor — highlights the 7735HS’s strong multi-threaded capabilities for a mobile part.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS features 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt-R codename). It operates at a base clock of 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.75 GHz, within a 35W TDP. The processor is built on TSMC’s 6nm process with a 210 mm² die size, and it is not multiplier-unlocked.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, providing 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is valuable for workstation and reliability-focused uses. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), and it includes integrated Radeon 680M graphics as a fallback.

Benchmark scores show strong scaling: 3DMark scores range from 1773 (2 threads) to 6872 (max threads), with the 8-thread score of 5697 indicating efficient thread utilization. Cinebench R23 multicore of 13106 and single-core of 1546 demonstrate balanced performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 8114 with single-core of 1699 confirms the architecture’s efficiency.

The Passmark suite reveals specific strengths: data compression (293278), floating-point math (47865), integer math (85309), and extended instructions (20050) all indicate robust compute capabilities. The random string sorting score of 30388 suggests good memory-bound performance. The 77th percentile ranking places this CPU above most processors in the database, with its nearest rivals being the EPYC 9474F (delta 0.2%) and Ryzen 7 6800H (delta -0.2%).

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. The memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, and the platform supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU’s TDP of 15W and the CPU’s 35W TDP mean no dedicated PSU is required; the suggested PSU field is null, confirming this is an integrated laptop solution.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which provides adequate bandwidth for an integrated graphics solution. The system-shared memory architecture means GPU performance scales with the laptop’s DDR5 configuration — higher-speed memory will improve both CPU and GPU performance. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared between the processor and graphics, so users should prioritize dual-channel memory configurations.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity and speed, as the system-shared GPU benefits directly from faster DDR5. The CPU’s ECC support may appeal to users running memory-sensitive workloads. The 16 MB L3 cache and 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide expansion potential for storage drives (NVMe SSDs) and other peripherals.

The production status of both components is Active, meaning software updates and driver optimization will continue. The GPU’s release in 2025 and CPU’s release in 2023 suggest this platform spans two generations of AMD technology, which may limit BIOS-level upgrades. The socket FP7 is specific to this CPU family, so future processor upgrades would require a new motherboard or laptop. For storage, the PCIe Gen 4 lanes support high-speed NVMe drives, and the dual-channel DDR5 supports up to the system’s rated capacity.