SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

35,909 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing represents a mainstream desktop combination built around AMD’s Zen 4 architecture and NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace generation. The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for its class, while the GPU offers modern feature support with a moderate performance envelope. This analysis draws exclusively on measured benchmark data to characterize the platform, component-level performance, and real-world gaming results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the foundation for AMD’s 7000 series desktop processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The platform also includes ECC memory support, which is a relevant consideration for users running memory-sensitive workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes available from the processor itself, which means high-speed storage and expansion cards can be connected directly to the CPU without sharing bandwidth with other devices.

The CPU has a TDP of 105 W, which is a moderate figure for an 8-core desktop part. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, carries a TDP of 115 W and a suggested PSU rating of 300 W. Combined, these power requirements are modest for a desktop build, meaning a typical mid-range power supply will provide sufficient headroom. The system’s overall power envelope is such that a capable air cooler for the CPU and a dual-slot GPU should fit comfortably in most standard ATX or even smaller form factor cases, given the GPU’s dimensions of 240 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width.

For a sensible next upgrade, the AM5 socket provides a clear path. Since the Ryzen 7 7700X is part of the 7000 series, users can look to newer processors within the same socket generation, assuming they maintain compatibility with the existing DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 support. The platform’s active production status suggests continued support, though the exact future processor options are not specified in the data. The GPU, however, is marked as end-of-life with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, meaning that an upgrade would require a new graphics card rather than a firmware or driver update. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the RTX 4060 is a consideration; while it is sufficient for current games, a future GPU upgrade would likely use a wider interface, but the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU would accommodate that without bottleneck.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is based on the AD107 chip, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. It features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. The GPU includes 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, which are dedicated hardware for ray-traced lighting and AI-accelerated tasks. Its base clock is 1830 MHz, boosting to 2460 MHz. The memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2125 MHz, with an effective data rate of 17 Gbps.

The pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 15.11 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a 1:1 ratio, which indicates that the GPU treats half-precision and single-precision workloads identically. This is typical for consumer GPUs where FP16 does not provide a throughput advantage. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the full range of modern graphics APIs.

Benchmark results for the GPU show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 48643. In PassMark tests, the GPU scores 19545 for G3D (DirectX), 9213 for GPU compute, and lower scores for older DirectX versions: 236 for DirectX 9, 175 for DirectX 11, 103 for DirectX 10, and 76 for DirectX 12. The DirectX 12 score being lower than DirectX 11 is notable; it suggests that the GPU’s performance varies significantly across different API workloads, with the newer API not necessarily translating to higher raw throughput in all synthetic tests. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17639, and it sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, -0.2% delta), AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, 0.5% delta), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509, 0.7% delta). These comparisons indicate that the RTX 4060 performs in line with a narrow band of older or integrated-class GPUs in aggregate benchmarks, which is surprising given its modern architecture, but the synthetic scores reflect a specific workload mix that may not fully represent gaming performance.

For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor at higher resolutions, as several games in the measured data show significant frame rate drops at 3840x2160 compared to 1920x1080. The 128-bit memory bus and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and some 1440p titles, but they constrain texture-heavy scenes or large datasets. The ray tracing and tensor cores enable features like DLSS and ray-traced effects, though the raw compute for such workloads is modest relative to higher-tier GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are comprehensive. In 3DMark tests, the Ryzen 7 7700X scores 8859 with 16 threads, 2112 with 2 threads, 4074 with 4 threads, 7057 with 8 threads, 8852 with max threads, and 1090 in single-thread. The scaling from 2 to 4 threads is nearly linear (2112 to 4074), while the jump from 4 to 8 threads is also strong (4074 to 7057). The max threads score of 8852 is slightly lower than the 16-thread score of 8859, indicating that the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are fully utilized without significant diminishing returns. The single-thread score of 1090 is the baseline for lightly threaded workloads.

In Cinebench, the CPU scores 3113.5 in R15 multicore and 315 in R15 single-core, with R23 multicore at 19088 and R23 single-core at 1987. The multicore-to-single-core ratio in R23 is roughly 9.6x, which is reasonable for an 8-core/16-thread part. Geekbench scores are 12451 multicore and 2289 single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 35686 and a single-thread score of 4190. Specific workloads include data compression at 420240, data encryption at 24732, extended instructions at 32033, find prime numbers at 180, floating point math at 68986, integer math at 112601, physics at 2007, and random string sorting at 49782.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35909, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35802, 0.3% delta), Intel Core 7 250H (35728, 0.5% delta), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (35719, 0.5% delta), and Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (35670, 0.7% delta). The Ryzen 7 7700X is ahead of all these by less than 1%, meaning it performs nearly identically to these alternatives in aggregate. This is a desktop part competing closely with mobile and PRO variants, which suggests that the 7700X’s advantage lies in sustained workloads rather than peak scores.

The GPU’s percentile is 61 among all GPUs, and its average benchmark score is 17639. The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair is 73, which places the build above the majority of all possible pairings. The pair’s rank by FPS across games is 1888 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 122.7 across all measured games at ultra settings. This average FPS is heavily influenced by older or less demanding titles, as the measured data includes games like CS:GO at 403.6 FPS and Valorant at 422 FPS at 1080p, which skew the average upward. The combined picture is a CPU that is strong for its class, a GPU that is mid-pack, and a pairing that delivers solid 1080p performance with diminishing returns at 4K.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a balanced desktop for gaming and productivity without excessive power draw. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking means it handles multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation effectively. The GPU’s 61st percentile indicates that it is suitable for 1080p gaming at high settings and entry-level 1440p, but it will struggle with 4K in demanding titles. Gamers at 1920x1080 will find that the measured FPS exceeds 60 in most titles, with esports games like Valorant (422 FPS) and CS:GO (403.6 FPS) far exceeding high-refresh monitor thresholds. At 2560x1440, many titles still achieve playable frame rates, such as Call of Duty: Warzone at 145 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 122 FPS, but more demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 42.1 FPS.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, which allow for parallel processing. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19088 and Geekbench multicore score of 12451 indicate that rendering tasks will complete reasonably quickly. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p video editing and moderate 3D scenes, but large projects with high-resolution textures may exceed the memory capacity. Software developers compiling code will find the CPU’s integer math score of 112601 and floating point score of 68986 useful for build times, though the GPU’s compute score of 9213 is not a primary factor for most development tasks. Students and small business workstations would find this build capable for office applications, web browsing, and light multitasking, given the CPU’s single-thread performance of 4190 in PassMark and the GPU’s adequate 2D score of 1037.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4060 have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700X is at the 85th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 35909.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 4060 is at the 61st percentile, with an average benchmark score of 17639.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The pair is at the 73rd percentile among all possible CPU-GPU combinations.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games for this pair?

A: The average FPS across all measured games at ultra settings is 122.7, with a rank of 1888 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a base clock of 4.50 GHz.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data covers a wide range of games at three resolutions: 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160, all at ultra settings. At 1080p, the pair delivers high frame rates in many titles. Valorant leads at 422 FPS, followed by CS:GO at 403.6 FPS and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X at 221.6 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 163 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 184 FPS, and Minecraft at 181 FPS. More demanding titles drop below 60 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 53.5 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 51.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 30 FPS. The Medium is the lowest at 36.6 FPS.

At 1440p, the frame rates drop but remain playable for many games. Valorant still hits 360.1 FPS, CS:GO 280.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone 145 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 122 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 143 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 42.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 35.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 16.7 FPS. The Medium is at 31.2 FPS. At 4K, the performance is generally not suitable for competitive or demanding gaming. Valorant manages 288.7 FPS, CS:GO 162.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone 123 FPS, but most other titles drop below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 is at 25.8 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26.9 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended at 10.5 FPS, and The Medium at 27.3 FPS.

The data shows a clear pattern: the build excels at 1080p for esports and older titles, maintains playability at 1440p for many games, and struggles at 4K for all but the lightest workloads. The ratio of FPS from 1080p to 4K varies by game; for example, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 53.5 to 25.8 FPS (a 52% reduction), while Call of Duty: Warzone drops from 163 to 123 FPS (a 25% reduction), indicating that some games are more GPU-bound than others.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 4.50 GHz, boosting to 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. It has an integrated Radeon Graphics unit, which provides basic display output without a discrete GPU.

The CPU’s benchmark scores indicate strong multi-threaded performance. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8859 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 8852, confirming that all 16 threads are used effectively. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19088 places it in a competitive position for rendering workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 35686 is complemented by a single-thread score of 4190, which is important for tasks that rely on a single core, such as many game engines or legacy software. The data encryption score of 24732 and data compression score of 420240 highlight its capability in security and archiving tasks. The find prime numbers score of 180 is a measure of pure integer throughput, and the extended instructions score of 32033 indicates good SIMD performance.

The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking places it above the majority of CPUs, but its nearest rivals are all within 0.7% in average score. This means that while the 7700X is a solid performer, it does not offer a significant advantage over close alternatives in aggregate benchmarks. The real-world impact is that the CPU will not be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, as its single-thread performance is high enough to feed the GPU at 1080p. For productivity, the 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for typical multitasking and content creation, though users with heavily threaded workloads might benefit from more cores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining an AMD Ryzen 7 7700X with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The CPU is a high-mid-range part, sitting at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range part at the 61st percentile. The combined percentile of 73 reflects a system that is better than average overall, but the individual component strengths are uneven. The CPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is more modest. The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for a stationary workstation or gaming rig with standard expansion capabilities.

The overall tier, based on the percentiles, is that of a mainstream performance system. It is not a high-end enthusiast build, but it is above the median. The CPU’s 85th percentile means it outperforms most processors, while the GPU’s 61st percentile means it is slightly above the median GPU. The pairing is balanced in the sense that the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming, but the GPU will limit performance at higher resolutions or with demanding graphics settings. The system is well-suited for 1080p gaming and moderate productivity tasks, with the ability to handle 1440p in less demanding titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU can be assessed by comparing their percentiles and the FPS scaling across resolutions. The CPU is at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is at the 61st percentile, indicating that the GPU is the weaker component relative to its own class. In gaming, this means that the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data supports this: as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, the frame rates drop significantly, which is typical of a GPU-bound scenario. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS drops from 53.5 at 1080p to 25.8 at 4K, a reduction of 27.7 FPS. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar FPS across resolutions, as the CPU’s workload does not change with resolution. Instead, the consistent drop in FPS with resolution indicates that the GPU’s rendering capabilities are the limiting factor.

However, there are cases where the CPU may limit performance. In esports titles like Valorant (422 FPS at 1080p) or CS:GO (403.6 FPS), the GPU is able to render frames so quickly that the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the constraint. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1090 in 3DMark and 4190 in PassMark are high, but they still cap the maximum frame rate in these lightly threaded games. The fact that Valorant’s FPS at 1080p (422) is only slightly higher than at 1440p (360.1) suggests that the CPU is reaching its limit, as the GPU should be less stressed at lower resolutions. In contrast, a game like Call of Duty: Warzone, which uses more threads, shows a larger drop from 163 FPS at 1080p to 145 FPS at 1440p, indicating that the GPU is more involved.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the dominant component. The multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 19088, Geekbench 12451) indicate that the CPU will handle rendering and compiling tasks well. The GPU’s compute score of 9213 is lower than the CPU’s integer math score of 112601, but for GPU-accelerated workloads like video encoding or machine learning, the GPU’s tensor cores and 8 GB VRAM are the limiting factors. Overall, the system is balanced for 1080p gaming, where the CPU and GPU work in concert, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions, and the CPU is the bottleneck only in extremely high-FPS esports scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, this pair delivers frame rates that exceed 144 Hz in esports titles. Valorant runs at 422 FPS, CS:GO at 403.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X at 221.6 FPS. These numbers mean that a 144 Hz or even 240 Hz monitor can be fully utilized in competitive shooters. For less demanding titles like Minecraft (181 FPS) and Counter-Strike 2 (184 FPS), the system also maintains high refresh rates. However, in AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 (53.5 FPS) or Red Dead Redemption 2 (51.2 FPS), a high-refresh display will not be fully utilized without lowering settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 35686 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19088 indicate that the CPU can handle encoding workloads. The GPU’s tensor cores and NVENC (not explicitly stated, but implied by Ada Lovelace architecture) could also be used for hardware encoding, which would offload the CPU. In games where the GPU is not fully utilized, such as CS:GO at 403.6 FPS, there is plenty of spare GPU capacity for encoding, but in GPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 53.5 FPS, hardware encoding might reduce performance slightly.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is the key asset here. The Geekbench multicore score of 12451 and the Cinebench R23 score of 19088 suggest that video exports and rendering will be efficient. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p timelines with effects, but 4K projects with high bitrates may exceed the memory capacity. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS can accelerate effects, but the 128-bit memory bus may limit bandwidth-intensive operations.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles) will benefit from the 8 cores and 16 threads, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19088 providing a reference point. GPU-based rendering will use the RTX 4060’s 3072 shading units and 24 ray tracing cores. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 is a measure of DX12 performance, which is relevant for real-time rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is a constraint for scenes with large textures or high polygon counts, and the 272.0 GB/s bandwidth may be a bottleneck for complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 112601 and floating point score of 68986 indicate strong performance for compilation and code execution. The data encryption score of 24732 is useful for security-related tasks. The high single-thread performance (PassMark 4190) ensures that build tools that are not fully parallelized will still run quickly. The GPU is not a major factor for most development tasks, except for GPU programming (CUDA/OpenCL), where the 9213 compute score provides a baseline.

Student and office work: For typical office applications, web browsing, and document editing, this system is overkill. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 4190 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness, and the integrated Radeon Graphics can serve as a backup if the discrete GPU is not needed. The GPU’s 2D score of 1037 is adequate for desktop rendering. The power efficiency (CPU TDP 105 W, GPU TDP 115 W) means that the system will not generate excessive heat or noise during light workloads, making it suitable for a quiet study or office environment.