SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

35,909 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is a 30-series Ampere part built on Samsung's 8 nm process. Its GA102 chip contains 28,300 million transistors across a 628 mm² die. The card ships with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth. That memory configuration is the defining feature of this GPU—the capacity is double what most contemporaries offered, and the bandwidth figure supports heavy 4K texture workloads and large scene buffers without spilling into system memory.

Clock behavior is modest by modern standards. The base clock is 1395 MHz with a boost of 1695 MHz. Memory runs at 1219 MHz, or 19.5 Gbps effective. These clocks are not the headline; the sheer width of the chip is. The RTX 3090 packs 10,496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. That translates to a pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 556.0 GTexel/s. For raw rasterization throughput, the data shows a GPU that was designed to push high resolutions with heavy post-processing.

Ray tracing and tensor hardware are both substantial. There are 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores. FP32 throughput is 35.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1). That balanced FP32/FP16 ratio means the card handles traditional shader work and half-precision compute with equal efficiency—useful for neural network inference and certain rendering techniques that leverage FP16 accumulation. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support are all present, so modern graphics APIs are fully covered.

Benchmark scores place this GPU in the 73rd percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 27,565. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5,118. Geekbench OpenCL returns 172,758, while Vulkan scores 53,927. PassMark G3D is 26,645, and GPU compute is 15,356. The nearest rival data shows a tight cluster: the RTX 4070 Mobile is 0.5% behind, the RX 6700 XT is 0.5% behind, the Radeon Pro Vega 20 is 1% ahead, and the RX 7800M is 1.1% ahead. These deltas are small, meaning the RTX 3090 sits in a crowded performance band where a few percent separates competitors.

For rendering, the takeaway is capacity and bandwidth. The 24 GB frame buffer allows scenes with high-resolution textures, complex geometry, and ray-traced effects to stay resident in VRAM. The 936.2 GB/s bandwidth keeps that data flowing. The RT core count of 82 provides hardware acceleration for ray-traced shadows, reflections, and global illumination—though the Ampere generation does this less efficiently than newer architectures. The tensor cores are capable but not the fastest available; they handle DLSS and basic AI workloads competently.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 79, which places the system in the upper tier of desktop configurations. Balance can be assessed by comparing the CPU's 85th percentile against the GPU's 73rd percentile. The CPU is the stronger component by percentile, suggesting it has more headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Ryzen 7 7700X scores 8,859 in 3DMark 16-thread and 8,852 at max threads. Its average benchmark score is 35,909. The RTX 3090's average is 27,565. When both are under load, the CPU is further above its rival set than the GPU is above its own. This means the GPU is more likely to be the constraining factor in highly parallel tasks that stress both simultaneously.

For gaming, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-thread and 8-thread scores matter more; at higher resolutions, the GPU's fill rate and bandwidth dominate. The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,112 and 4-thread score of 4,074 indicate strong low-thread performance, which is critical for frame pacing and draw call handling. The GPU's 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 189.8 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest it can feed high-resolution displays, but the balance data indicates the GPU will limit frame rates in 4K scenarios where pixel throughput is the bottleneck.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All FPS discussion must be treated as estimated from the benchmark scores. The percentile gap—CPU at 85, GPU at 73—implies that in CPU-bound titles at 1080p, the GPU will have idle capacity; in GPU-bound titles at 4K, the CPU will wait. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,859 versus max-thread 8,852 shows the CPU scales almost linearly to 16 threads, so it will not starve the GPU in multi-threaded game engines.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor from the 7000 series. It uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die is 71 mm² with 6,570 million transistors. Base clock is 4.50 GHz, boost is 5.40 GHz. TDP is 105 W. It fits AMD Socket AM5 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. PCIe is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, and integrated Radeon Graphics are present. The launch MSRP is $399.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. This layout favors workloads with moderate data reuse per core and a shared pool for inter-thread communication. The 5 nm process and 5.4 GHz boost clock combine to deliver strong single-thread performance—a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,090 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1,987 confirm this.

Multi-threaded scores are equally telling. Cinebench R23 multi-core is 19,088, R15 multi-core is 3,113.5, and Geekbench multi-core is 12,451. PassMark multithread is 35,686, with integer math at 112,601 and floating-point math at 68,986. Data compression scores 420,240, encryption 24,732, and extended instructions 32,033. These numbers indicate a processor that handles heavily threaded productivity work, compilation, and scientific computing without strain.

The nearest rivals show how tightly grouped this segment is. The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 averages 35,802, just 0.3% behind. The Intel Core 7 250H averages 35,728, 0.5% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 averages 35,719, 0.5% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H averages 35,670, 0.7% behind. The 7700X leads all four, but the margins are small. This is a competitive mid-range-to-upper-mid-range CPU where the 85th percentile reflects a position among the better-performing desktop chips, though not the absolute top.

For real workloads, the 8-core/16-thread layout is a sweet spot. It handles video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation efficiently without the scheduling complexity of higher-core parts. The 5.4 GHz boost ensures snappy single-thread response in UI-driven applications and legacy code. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is dual-channel DDR5 territory, adequate for most applications but not exceptional.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The 79th combined percentile places this system in the upper tier of desktop builds. The CPU's 85th percentile and GPU's 73rd percentile define a pairing that is CPU-leaning in relative strength. The intended user is someone who needs strong multi-threaded CPU performance and a large VRAM buffer for GPU-accelerated work.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K will see the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth as assets for high-resolution textures and ray tracing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,118 and PassMark G3D of 26,645 indicate solid DirectX 12 rasterization capability. The 82 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, though Ampere's RT efficiency is lower than later generations.

Content creators and 3D renderers benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,088 and the GPU's FP32 throughput of 35.58 TFLOPS. Video editors using GPU acceleration will leverage the 24 GB frame buffer for large timelines and effects. The tensor cores support AI-accelerated features like DLSS and some denoising algorithms.

Software developers will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 112,601 and data compression of 420,240—compilation and data processing are heavily integer-bound. Students and small business workstations get a balanced system that handles office productivity, data analysis, and moderate rendering without compromise. The ECC memory support is a niche advantage for data integrity in professional workloads.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35,909, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, averages 35,802, a 0.3% difference. The Intel Core 7 250H is 0.5% behind at 35,728, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is 0.5% behind at 35,719, and the Core Ultra 9 185H is 0.7% behind at 35,670. The 7700X leads this group, but the margins are under 1%.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 27,565, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the RTX 4070 Mobile at 27,435 (0.5% behind), the RX 6700 XT at 27,425 (0.5% behind), the Radeon Pro Vega 20 at 27,839 (1% ahead), and the RX 7800M at 27,883 (1.1% ahead). The GPU sits in a dense performance cluster where the delta between rivals is minimal.

The combined percentile is 79. This is a coherent pairing: the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU, but both are above the median. The 3DMark 16-thread CPU score of 8,859 versus the GPU's Steel Nomad score of 5,118 shows a system that can feed high-resolution displays while maintaining responsive CPU throughput. The PassMark GPU compute score of 15,356 and CPU multithread of 35,686 indicate balanced compute capacity—neither component is drastically underpowered relative to the other.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. All gaming performance statements below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Expect strong 1440p performance and capable 4K performance. The GPU's 73rd percentile and 24 GB VRAM suggest it can handle ultra settings at 1440p with high frame rates, while 4K will see lower but playable rates depending on the title's optimization. The CPU's 85th percentile and single-thread score of 1,090 ensure that CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p or high frame rates will not be the limiting factor.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,118 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 110 and DirectX 11 of 220 are less useful for direct comparison, but the G3D score of 26,645 supports the estimate of high settings at 1440p. The RTX 3090's 82 RT cores will handle ray-traced effects at playable rates at 1440p, but at 4K, ray tracing will tax the Ampere architecture. Use DLSS where available—the tensor cores support it—to improve frame rates.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p or 1440p, the 85th-percentile CPU and 73rd-percentile GPU combine to drive high frame rates. The CPU's 2-thread score of 2,112 and 4-thread score of 4,074 handle game logic and draw calls, while the GPU's 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 fills frames. Expect high settings at 1440p with refresh rates above 144 Hz in esports titles, and lower but still elevated rates in AAA games.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU can handle encoding alongside gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,088 indicates enough headroom for x264 encoding at reasonable presets, or you can use the GPU's NVENC encoder, which leverages the tensor cores. The 24 GB VRAM leaves ample memory for game and streaming buffers simultaneously.

Video editing: The PassMark multithread score of 35,686 and GPU compute of 15,356 support timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export. The 24 GB VRAM is particularly suited for 4K or 8K editing projects, where large preview buffers and effect stacks fit comfortably.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 19,088 on the CPU and 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 on the GPU provide dual paths for rendering. CPU-based renderers will use all 16 threads, while GPU-based renderers use the 10,496 shading units and 328 tensor cores. The 82 RT cores accelerate ray-traced previews.

Software development: PassMark integer math of 112,601 and data compression of 420,240 are strong indicators for compilation speed and code indexing. The 16 threads handle parallel builds, and the 32 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 1,090 and PassMark single-thread of 4,190 ensure snappy application launches and document handling. The ECC memory support adds data integrity for spreadsheets and databases. This is overkill for basic tasks, but the headroom means no slowdowns under multitasking.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is AMD Socket AM5. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 24 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it does not saturate the available Gen 5 lanes—there is headroom for future GPUs that might use Gen 5.

The CPU TDP is 105 W. The GPU TDP is 350 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 750 W. Adding the CPU's 105 W and other system components, a 750 W supply is adequate but leaves limited headroom for aggressive overclocking. The CPU's unlocked multiplier invites overclocking, but that would increase power draw beyond the 105 W TDP.

The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU with better ray tracing and higher efficiency, given the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support. The CPU has room to pair with a faster GPU—its 85th percentile means it will not bottleneck a higher-tier card. Memory can be upgraded to higher-capacity DDR5 kits, but the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is a platform limit unless faster DDR5 modules are available. The socket AM5 platform supports future AMD CPU releases, so a CPU upgrade is possible without changing the motherboard.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3090 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus with 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC memory support.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing and tensor core count?

A: The GPU has 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 750 W.

Q: What is the GPU's bus interface?

A: The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 part on Socket AM5, and the GPU is an Ampere-based card with 24 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile is 79, with the CPU at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 73rd percentile. The CPU leads its nearest rivals by under 1%, and the GPU sits in a tight cluster with rivals within 1.1%. This is a balanced upper-tier desktop configuration where the CPU has more relative headroom than the GPU, making it suitable for high-refresh gaming, content creation, and professional workloads that benefit from strong multi-threaded CPU performance and a large GPU memory buffer.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds