SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

35,909 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070: Benchmark Database Analysis

This pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 4 desktop processor with NVIDIA's Ampere-generation RTX 3070, creating a desktop build that sits at the 73rd combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairs in the database. The CPU alone ranks in the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 61st percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a configuration where the processor carries more relative performance weight than the graphics subsystem. Measured frame rates across 53 games at three resolutions provide the basis for this analysis, with the pair achieving an average FPS of 136.3 across all tested titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build ranks in the 73rd combined percentile among all tested CPU+GPU pairs, with a pair rank of 1512 out of 3732 total pairs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7700X compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700X has an average benchmark score of 35,909, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35,802) and 0.7% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (35,670).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3070 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does this CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7700X supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and ECC memory support.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 3070 sits in the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17,208.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

Q: What is the measured average FPS across all tested games for this pair?

A: The pair achieves an average of 136.3 FPS across all games tested, ranking 1512th out of 3732 pairs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite reveals a strong multi-threaded performer with competitive single-thread results. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 7 7700X scores 19,088 in multi-core and 1,987 in single-core tests. The Geekbench results show 12,451 multi-core and 2,289 single-core, while 3DMark tests demonstrate scaling from 1,090 single-thread to 8,859 at 16 threads and 8,852 at max threads. This near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads indicates efficient utilization of all available cores.

The GPU's benchmark profile shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,162, with Geekbench OpenCL at 112,821 and Vulkan at 21,022. PassMark G3D scoring reaches 22,214 with GPU compute at 11,195. The GPU's average benchmark score of 17,208 places it 0.7% above the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17,083) and 1.5% below the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17,468).

Combined, the CPU's 85th percentile and GPU's 61st percentile produce a 73rd combined percentile, reflecting a processor-heavy configuration. The measured FPS data confirms this balance: at 1920x1080, the pair averages well above 100 FPS in most titles, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom for the GPU to operate near its limits.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on TSMC's 5 nm process with Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael). It operates with a base clock of 4.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz, within a 105 W TDP. The chip contains 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, with a cache hierarchy of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3.

Benchmark data indicates strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,088) is roughly 9.6 times the single-core score (1,987), showing excellent scaling across all 8 cores. PassMark multi-thread score of 35,686 versus single-thread of 4,190 represents an 8.5x multiplier. The 3DMark thread scaling from 2 threads (2,112) to 16 threads (8,859) demonstrates a 4.2x improvement, with diminishing returns beyond 8 threads (7,057) as memory bandwidth becomes a factor.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 35,909 places it just 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and 0.5% ahead of both the Intel Core 7 250H and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. The nearest rival with a higher score is the NVIDIA Tesla K40c at 1.5% ahead, but that is a GPU comparison. The 85th percentile ranking indicates this processor outperforms 85% of all CPUs in the database.

For real workloads, the PassMark results show 112,601 in integer math, 68,986 in floating-point math, and 32,033 in extended instructions. Data compression scores 420,240 while encryption reaches 24,732. These figures suggest strong performance in compute-heavy tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations, while the single-thread score of 4,190 supports responsive everyday use and gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between CPU (85th percentile) and GPU (61st percentile) creates a configuration where the GPU is the primary limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. This is evident in the FPS scaling across resolutions: at 1920x1080, the average FPS across all games is 136.3, but this drops significantly at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes increasingly constrained.

Evidence from specific titles illustrates this pattern. In Counter-Strike 2, the pair achieves 209 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 138 at 1440p, and 77 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 63.2%, indicating GPU-bound scaling. Similarly, Call of Duty: Warzone shows 160.8 FPS at 1080p versus 121.7 at 4K, a 24.3% reduction. The relatively smaller drop in Warzone suggests the CPU contributes more significantly to frame rates in this title.

At 1080p, the CPU's 85th percentile performance allows the GPU to reach its limits in most titles, but in lighter e-sports titles the CPU can still hold back the GPU. Valorant at 480.7 FPS at 1080p and CS:GO at 459.9 FPS demonstrate CPU headroom, while heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (63.9 FPS at 1080p) show the GPU as the bottleneck. The 73rd combined percentile versus the GPU's 61st percentile confirms that upgrading the GPU would yield the largest FPS gains in most scenarios.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data across 53 games at ultra settings provides a comprehensive picture. At 1920x1080, the pair delivers excellent performance in competitive titles: Valorant (480.7 FPS), CS:GO (459.9 FPS), Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege (248 FPS), and Counter-Strike 2 (209 FPS). Minecraft achieves 206-208.8 FPS depending on version, and Roblox reaches 270 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong for competitive gaming: Valorant (405.6 FPS), CS:GO (315.3 FPS), Rainbow Six Siege (163 FPS), and Call of Duty: Warzone (143.5 FPS). Heavier titles show playable results: Cyberpunk 2077 (45 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (41.4 FPS), and Microsoft Flight Simulator (63 FPS).

At 3840x2160, the GPU's 8 GB memory and 61st percentile performance become limiting. Only Valorant (326.3 FPS) and CS:GO (191.2 FPS) maintain high frame rates. Most AAA titles fall below 60 FPS: Cyberpunk 2077 (28.6 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (27.5 FPS), and Control (44 FPS). Call of Duty: Warzone at 121.7 FPS is an outlier, suggesting optimizations favor this title.

The pair's average FPS of 136.3 across all games and resolutions, with a rank of 1512 out of 3732 pairs, places it in the upper half of configurations. For 1080p and 1440p gaming, this build delivers smooth experiences in most titles, while 4K gaming requires reduced settings or upscaling for demanding games.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers primarily playing at 1920x1080 or 2560x1440 resolutions. The measured FPS data supports high-refresh-rate monitors in competitive titles: Valorant (480.7 FPS at 1080p), CS:GO (459.9 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege (248 FPS) all exceed 240 Hz requirements. For 1440p, these titles still deliver 405.6, 315.3, and 163 FPS respectively, making this an excellent choice for e-sports enthusiasts.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 85th percentile multi-threaded performance. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 19,088 and PassMark multi-thread of 35,686 indicate capable rendering performance, while the GPU's 11,195 PassMark compute score provides acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers will appreciate the 8-core/16-thread configuration for compilation tasks and virtual machines. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and PCIe Gen 5 support (CPU) provide fast data movement. Students and small business users building a workstation for productivity applications will find the single-thread performance (4,190 PassMark) more than adequate, though the GPU's 61st percentile may be overkill for office workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path. The Ryzen 7 7700X supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so a future GPU upgrade would not be bottlenecked by the bus interface.

The CPU's TDP of 105 W and the GPU's 220 W TDP suggest a total system power draw that a 550 W PSU (as suggested for the GPU) can accommodate. The GPU's power connector is a single 12-pin, and the card measures 242 mm (9.5 inches) in length with a dual-slot design. The CPU's unlocked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: true) allows overclocking for additional performance.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-performing GPU, as the 61st percentile GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads. The 73rd combined percentile versus the CPU's 85th percentile indicates that GPU headroom exists within the platform. The CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock and 8 cores will continue to support GPU upgrades without becoming a significant limiting factor in most titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining AMD's Ryzen 7 7700X (8 cores, 16 threads, Zen 4 architecture) with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3070 (Ampere architecture, 8 GB GDDR6). The CPU launched on 2022-09-26 with a launch MSRP of $399, while the GPU launched on 2020-08-31 with a launch MSRP of 499 USD.

The combined percentile of 73 places this build in the upper-middle tier of all configurations. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking (top 15% of all processors) is notably stronger than the GPU's 61st percentile (top 39% of all GPUs). This creates a build that excels in CPU-bound workloads and delivers solid gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K gaming requiring compromises.

The pair's average FPS of 136.3 across all tested games, with a rank of 1512 out of 3732 pairs, confirms its position as a capable gaming system. The CPU's average benchmark score of 35,909 and the GPU's 17,208 place both components within competitive ranges of their respective nearest rivals, with the CPU leading its closest competitors by 0.3-0.7% and the GPU leading its closest rival by 0.7%.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, this build delivers exceptional frame rates in competitive titles. Valorant achieves 480.7 FPS, CS:GO 459.9 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege 248 FPS, all exceeding 240 Hz display capabilities. At 1440p, these titles still reach 405.6, 315.3, and 163 FPS respectively, making high-refresh gaming viable at both resolutions.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 35,686 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 19,088 indicate sufficient processing power for x264 encoding while gaming, while the GPU's NVENC capabilities (via its 184 tensor cores) offer dedicated hardware encoding.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance (85th percentile) accelerates timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 11,195 PassMark compute score supports GPU-accelerated effects, and the 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth handles large frame buffers. Data compression score of 420,240 suggests efficient codec operations.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 19,088 and PassMark floating-point math of 68,986 demonstrate strong CPU rendering capability. The GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides real-time viewport acceleration, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit very large scenes. The pair's 73rd combined percentile supports moderate rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads with 5.40 GHz boost clock accelerate compilation. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and PCIe Gen 5 support (CPU) benefit large codebases. PassMark integer math of 112,601 indicates strong performance for compute-intensive development tasks, while ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance (4,190 PassMark, 1,987 Cinebench R23) provides responsive everyday computing. The 85th percentile CPU ranking ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU's 61st percentile is more than sufficient for standard productivity tasks, making this build capable but potentially over-specified for basic office workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is built on the GA104 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It features 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, along with 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1725 MHz.

Memory consists of 8 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 20.31 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio) provide substantial compute capability. Pixel rate reaches 165.6 GPixel/s with texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17,208 places it in the 61st percentile, just 0.7% above the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17,083) and 1% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17,037). The nearest higher-scoring rival is the NVIDIA Tesla K40c at 17,468 (1.5% ahead). This positioning indicates the RTX 3070 remains competitive with newer mid-range cards, though it trails the top performers.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The 220 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU provide clear power requirements. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,162 and PassMark G3D score of 22,214 indicate solid DirectX 12 performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 112,821 demonstrates strong compute capability for rendering and GPU-accelerated workloads. The GPU's end-of-life production status, with the GeForce 40 series as successor, means it represents previous-generation technology that still delivers competitive performance in its percentile class.