SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

40,081 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines AMD’s 8-core Ryzen 7 7700 with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4060 in a desktop configuration. The data shows a component set aimed at 1080p high-refresh gaming and mainstream productivity, with a combined percentile rank of 74 across all CPU-GPU pairs. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, platform characteristics, and workload suitability.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD107 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1830 MHz with a boost clock of 2460 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2125 MHz, which translates to 17 Gbps effective.

The RTX 4060 includes 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation processors. For accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads, it features 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores. Pixel fill rate is 118.1 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 also rated at 15.11 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface and has a TDP of 115 W.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest rivals are surprisingly close: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509 (0.7% lower). This clustering indicates that the RTX 4060’s raw compute performance sits in a well-populated mid-range tier.

In rendering workloads, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 reflects the GPU’s capability in modern DirectX 12 titles. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 show strong general compute performance, while the Passmark G3D score of 19545 confirms its position. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 9213 indicates that non-graphics compute tasks are handled competently, though not at the level of higher-tier cards. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a limiting factor for 4K texture-heavy scenarios, but the 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p rendering tasks.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The data in this section is measured, not estimated. The measured FPS figures at ultra settings across a wide range of titles provide a clear picture of gaming performance.

At 1920x1080, the RTX 4060 delivers strong frame rates in esports titles: Valorant hits 419.4 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 406.7 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 186.4 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 219 FPS, while Roblox and Minecraft run at 235.6 FPS and 181 FPS respectively. For AAA titles at 1080p, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 157.7 FPS, and Assetto Corsa hits 109 FPS. Heavier titles show the GPU’s limits: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 55.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 47.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 26.7 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down as expected. Valorant remains high at 357.7 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive still delivers 280.1 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone maintains a playable 142.9 FPS. However, demanding titles struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 39.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34.9 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 16 FPS. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 51.2 FPS, which is playable but not smooth.

At 3840x2160, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become evident bottlenecks. Valorant still manages 287.2 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 162.5 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 120.6 FPS, which is respectable. But most AAA titles fall below 30 FPS: Cyberpunk 2077 at 28.5 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 9.6 FPS. The average FPS across all games is 120.6, with a pair rank of 1968 out of 3732 pairs, placing this configuration in the top half of all CPU-GPU pairings.

The data shows that this GPU is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming, capable of 1440p in less demanding titles, and only marginal for 4K in esports or older games.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It uses a 5 nm process at TSMC with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The TDP is rated at 65 W, which is notably efficient for an 8-core desktop part. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Ryzen 7 7700 sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40081. Its nearest rivals are extremely close: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40048 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core 5 221E scores 40144 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 scores 40246 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40313 (0.6% higher). This tight clustering around the 40000 mark indicates that the 7700 is a well-balanced mid-to-high-end desktop processor.

In multi-threaded workloads, the 7700 delivers strong results. Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 18760, while the single-core score is 1930. Geekbench multi-core reaches 15371 with a single-core score of 2525. The 3DMark 16-thread test scores 8484, and the max-thread test scores 8479, showing that scaling from 16 threads to max threads provides negligible gains, confirming the 8-core/16-thread design is fully utilized.

Single-thread performance is also competitive. The 3DMark single-thread score is 1049, and the 2-thread score is 2043, indicating excellent per-core efficiency. Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 3047 with a single-core score of 308. Passmark single-thread scores 4063.

For specialized workloads, the Passmark tests show strong results: data compression scores 405084, data encryption scores 23858, extended instructions score 96902, floating-point math scores 66246, and integer math scores 110295. The multithread Passmark score is 34470, with physics at 1978 and random string sorting at 101836. The find prime numbers test scores 197, which is a lower relative result but not indicative of real-world weakness.

These scores indicate that the Ryzen 7 7700 is capable of handling video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and other multi-threaded tasks with ease, while maintaining strong responsiveness in single-threaded applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Ryzen 7 7700 uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides a clear upgrade path within the same socket generation. The CPU supports DDR5 memory only, utilizing dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is relevant for workstation and small business server workloads where data integrity is critical.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, while the RTX 4060 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means the GPU is not bandwidth-limited by the CPU’s PCIe lanes, and there is headroom for future expansion cards. The platform supports the latest connectivity standards, making it future-proof for storage and peripheral upgrades.

The RTX 4060 has a TDP of 115 W and a suggested PSU rating of 300 W. The Ryzen 7 7700 has a TDP of 65 W. Combined, the system requires a modest power supply, leaving significant headroom for upgrades. The GPU uses a single 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design measuring 240 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting factor in gaming scenarios. The CPU’s 87th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 61st percentile indicates that moving to a higher-tier GPU would yield better gaming performance without necessarily requiring a CPU upgrade. The AM5 socket supports future Ryzen processors, potentially allowing a drop-in CPU upgrade while retaining the motherboard and DDR5 memory. The 300 W PSU suggestion leaves room for a more power-hungry GPU, though a larger PSU would be needed for top-tier cards.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks show a processor performing at the 87th percentile among all CPUs. The average benchmark score is 40081, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 at 40048 (0.1% lower). This places the 7700 in a tightly contested performance tier where small percentage differences separate competitors.

The GPU benchmarks show the RTX 4060 at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 17639. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666 (0.2% higher), showing that the 4060 sits at the boundary of its performance tier.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair is 74, and the pair ranks 1968 out of 3732 pairs by FPS performance. The average FPS across all measured games is 120.6. This combined picture indicates a system that is well above average but not at the top tier, with the CPU being relatively stronger than the GPU.

In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 8484 in 16-thread, 8479 in max-thread, 6933 in 8-thread, 3931 in 4-thread, 2043 in 2-thread, and 1049 in single-thread. These scores show excellent scaling from 2 to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond 8 threads as expected from an 8-core design.

Cinebench R23 results of 18760 multi-core and 1930 single-core confirm the CPU’s balanced performance. Geekbench scores of 15371 multi-core and 2525 single-core align with the other benchmarks. Passmark multithread score of 34470 and single-thread score of 4063 round out the picture.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 19545 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 show consistent performance across different benchmark methodologies. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 indicate the GPU handles compute workloads efficiently.

The combination of an 87th percentile CPU with a 61st percentile GPU creates a system where the CPU has significant headroom, and the GPU is the bottleneck in most gaming and graphics-intensive workloads.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The measured performance data suggests specific user profiles that would benefit from this configuration.

1080p gamers seeking high refresh rates are the primary target. The FPS data shows that at 1920x1080, esports titles like Valorant (419.4 FPS), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (406.7 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege (219 FPS) run at extremely high frame rates, well beyond the 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitor requirement. AAA titles at 1080p also perform well, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 157.7 FPS and Assetto Corsa at 109 FPS, though demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 55.7 FPS require lower settings for high-refresh play.

1440p gamers can use this system for less demanding titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 120.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 142.9 FPS. However, AAA titles at 1440p dip below 60 FPS, so this resolution is only suitable for esports or older games.

Content creators working with video or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15371 indicate efficient rendering and encoding. The Passmark data compression score of 405084 and integer math score of 110295 suggest strong performance in data-intensive tasks.

Software developers compiling code will appreciate the 8-core, 16-thread design with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The Passmark extended instructions score of 96902 indicates good SIMD performance for optimized code.

Students and small business workstations can leverage the ECC memory support and 65 W TDP for efficient, reliable operation. The CPU’s integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback display output, though the RTX 4060 handles graphics duties.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The percentile disparity between the CPU (87th) and GPU (61st) is the primary evidence of imbalance. The CPU has a 26-percentile-point advantage over the GPU, indicating that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing.

In gaming workloads, the GPU is the limiting factor. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows this clearly. At 1080p, the average FPS across games is strong, but the drop at higher resolutions is steep. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 goes from 55.7 FPS at 1080p to 39.1 FPS at 1440p to 28.5 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU-limited system, where the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed the GPU at lower resolutions but the GPU runs out of compute and memory bandwidth at higher resolutions.

The CPU’s benchmark scores support this. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8484 and max-thread score of 8479 show that the CPU is not overwhelmed by gaming workloads, which typically use fewer threads. The single-thread score of 1049 indicates strong per-core performance for game logic and physics.

In CPU-intensive workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU becomes the primary performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760 and Passmark multithread score of 34470 show that the CPU can handle these tasks efficiently, while the GPU’s compute scores (Passmark GPU Compute 9213) are secondary.

The pair rank of 1968 out of 3732 and average FPS of 120.6 across games indicate that this pairing performs above the median but is not optimized for maximum frame rates. The GPU is the bottleneck for high-resolution gaming, but the CPU provides a solid foundation that would support a GPU upgrade without needing a platform change.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile rank for the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is 74, placing it above the majority of all CPU-GPU pairs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7700 compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, scores 40048, which is 0.1% lower. The Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40313, which is 0.6% higher.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games for this configuration?

A: The average FPS across all measured games is 120.6, with the pair ranking 1968 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: Does the RTX 4060 support ray tracing and AI acceleration?

A: Yes, the RTX 4060 includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 APIs.

Q: What type of memory does the Ryzen 7 7700 support?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC memory support.

Q: What is the TDP of the RTX 4060 and what PSU is suggested?

A: The RTX 4060 has a TDP of 115 W, and the suggested PSU rating is 300 W.

Q: What is the socket type for the Ryzen 7 7700?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 uses AMD Socket AM5 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, the RTX 4060 delivers exceptional frame rates in esports titles, with Valorant at 419.4 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 406.7 FPS. This configuration is ideal for 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors in competitive shooters.

Streaming: The Ryzen 7 7700’s 8-core, 16-thread design with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz handles encoding workloads, while the RTX 4060’s tensor cores can assist with AI-based streaming features. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 34470 ensures smooth simultaneous gaming and encoding.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15371 indicate that this system can handle video editing timelines and exports efficiently. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM supports GPU-accelerated effects at 1080p and 1440p.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the Ryzen 7 7700 provides strong performance with its 8 cores and 16 threads. GPU rendering is possible but limited by the RTX 4060’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The Passmark floating-point math score of 66246 supports this use case.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 1049 in 3DMark and Passmark single-thread score of 4063 ensure fast compilation of individual files, while the multi-thread scores handle parallel builds. The ECC memory support adds reliability for development servers.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 115 W TDP of the GPU make this an efficient system for daily tasks. The integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU provide a backup display option. The Passmark data compression score of 405084 shows fast file operations for document-heavy workflows.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor on the Zen 4 (Raphael) architecture, using the AM5 socket with DDR5 memory support. The GPU is based on Ada Lovelace architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

The overall tier of this pairing is solidly mid-range. The CPU ranks at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile of 74 places this system above the majority of configurations. The pair ranks 1968 out of 3732 by FPS performance, with an average of 120.6 FPS across games.

This is a balanced system with a CPU that has headroom for future GPU upgrades. The RTX 4060 is the limiting factor in gaming at higher resolutions, but the platform is well-suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming and productive workloads. The AM5 socket provides a clear upgrade path, and the 300 W PSU suggestion leaves room for more powerful graphics cards. This is a sensible choice for users seeking a capable desktop for gaming and productivity without demanding 4K performance.