SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

40,081 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

131,938 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti form a desktop pairing that combines a high-endlast-generation GPU with a current-generation mid-range CPU. The data shows a system sitting at the 91st combined percentile, with the GPU at the 95th percentile overall and the CPU at the 87th percentile. This configuration is defined by the RTX 3090 Ti’s massive 24 GB memory pool and the Ryzen 7 7700’s efficient 8-core Zen 4 architecture, making it a compelling, if unusual, match for both extreme resolution gaming and professional workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture and the GA102 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The board features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. The 21 Gbps effective memory speed is among the highest in the GeForce 30-series lineup, and this bandwidth is the primary enabler for high-resolution texture streaming and large dataset manipulation. The GPU’s base clock is listed at 1560 MHz with a boost clock of 1860 MHz, while the memory operates at 1313 MHz.

For compute and rendering tasks, the RTX 3090 Ti packs 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. The pixel rate is 208.3 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 625.0 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for heavy shader workloads. The chip contains 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks like DLSS. The FP32 performance is listed at 40.00 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1), making this a raw compute powerhouse for the Ampere generation.

Benchmark results reinforce the GPU’s high-end positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 5741, placing it in the upper echelon of GPUs. In compute-oriented tests, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 174441, and the Vulkan score is 215633. The average benchmark score of 131938 places the RTX 3090 Ti at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Relative to its nearest rivals, it sits 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA L4, but trails the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation and the NVIDIA A10M by 2.4% each, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 by 2.6%. This suggests that while the 3090 Ti is not the absolute fastest, it remains within striking distance of professional workstation cards, making it highly capable for 3D rendering, video editing, and GPU-accelerated compute where the 24 GB VRAM buffer is a decisive advantage.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform centers on the AMD Socket AM5, which supports the Ryzen 7 7700’s Zen 4 Raphael architecture. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, and ECC memory is enabled, which is a boon for workstation stability. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, ensuring compatibility with the fastest current NVMe storage and future expansion cards. The integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU provides a basic display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or non-GPU tasks.

The RTX 3090 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the AM5 platform’s PCIe 5.0 slots, though it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU’s TDP is 450 W, and the suggested PSU is 850 W. The CPU’s TDP is a modest 65 W, leaving substantial headroom for the GPU’s power draw. The data indicates a 1x 16-pin power connector for the GPU, and the triple-slot cooler suggests a large physical footprint, with dimensions of 336 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width.

A sensible next upgrade path from this pairing would focus on the CPU, as the GPU is already at the top of its class. The Ryzen 7 7700’s unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, but a more substantial upgrade would involve a higher-core-count Ryzen 7000-series or newer AM5 processor. The platform’s support for ECC memory and DDR5 makes it a durable base for a workstation, and the PCIe 5.0 lanes from the CPU ensure that storage and add-in cards will not be a bottleneck for years to come. The 850 W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom, but users adding additional high-power accessories should verify their unit’s capacity.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65 W. The chip has a transistor count of 6,570 million on a 71 mm² die, reflecting the density of the 5 nm node. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory, and the memory bus is dual-channel.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark tests show a progression from 1049 in single-thread to 2043 in 2-thread, 3931 in 4-thread, 6933 in 8-thread, and 8479 in max-thread tests. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 18760, while the single-core score is 1930. Geekbench results are 2525 for single-core and 15371 for multi-core. The PassMark suite shows strong integer and floating-point performance, with scores of 110295 for integer math and 66246 for floating-point math. Data compression scores are 405084, and encryption is 23858.

The average benchmark score is 40081, placing the CPU at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are a mix of mobile and desktop chips: it is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 0.2% behind the Intel Core 5 221E, 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 270, and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-13905H. These deltas are small, indicating that the 7700 is a tightly competitive mid-range performer. The real-world implication is that the 8-core/16-thread configuration is ideal for workloads that utilize up to 16 threads effectively, such as game engines, compile jobs, and moderate video rendering. The high boost clock of 5.30 GHz ensures snappy single-threaded performance for everyday tasks and gaming.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

The data indicates that this build is for users who need both high-end CPU performance and extreme GPU memory capacity. The Ryzen 7 7700’s 87th percentile CPU score and the RTX 3090 Ti’s 95th percentile GPU score suggest a system that can handle the most demanding consumer workloads. For gamers at 4K resolution, the RTX 3090 Ti’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the highest texture quality settings in modern titles. The CPU’s 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures that frame times remain consistent, even in CPU-bound scenarios.

Content creators working with large video files or 3D scenes will benefit from the GPU’s 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the CPU’s 16 threads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5741 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 215633 suggests excellent cross-API compatibility. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18760, which reflects strong multi-threaded throughput. The ECC memory support is a critical feature for data integrity in workstation environments.

Students and small business workstations can leverage this build for tasks like data analysis, where the PassMark data compression score of 405084 is relevant. The integrated graphics on the CPU provide a fallback display, but the primary workload will always be GPU-accelerated. This is not a budget-oriented system; it is a high-performance tool for professionals who require the 24 GB VRAM buffer without moving to enterprise-class GPUs. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, indicating that this is a build for those seeking top-tier performance from the previous generation.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined picture from the benchmark data shows a system with a 91st combined percentile ranking, indicating a high overall tier. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 40081, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 131938, placing it at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The asymmetry between the two percentiles suggests that the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the CPU is slightly a step behind but still well above average.

Specific CPU scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore of 18760 and a single-core of 1930. The Geekbench multicore score is 15371, and the single-core is 2525. The 3DMark max-thread score is 8479, which is close to the 16-thread score of 8484, indicating that the 8-core/16-thread design is fully utilized. The PassMark multithread score is 34470, and the single-thread score is 4063.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5741. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 174441, and the Vulkan score is 215633. These numbers show a GPU that excels in both rasterized and compute workloads. The deltaPct values against rivals are all within 2.6%, showing that the RTX 3090 Ti is in a very tight performance band with its nearest competitors, which include professional workstation cards. The combined percentile of 91 suggests that this pairing is in the top 9% of all possible CPU+GPU combinations in the database, making it a high-end build for enthusiasts and professionals.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries for any game or resolution, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all FPS discussion is framed as an estimate based on the benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU’s 95th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 87th percentile ranking, this system is estimated to deliver high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions in most modern titles. The RTX 3090 Ti’s 24 GB VRAM provides ample headroom for ultra textures, and the 1.01 TB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution rendering without stutter. The CPU’s high boost clock of 5.30 GHz should prevent bottlenecks in lightly-threaded game engines.

For esports titles, the frame rates are expected to be exceptionally high, likely exceeding what high-refresh-rate monitors can display. For AAA single-player games at 4K with ray tracing enabled, the 84 RT cores should provide playable performance, though the exact FPS will vary. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5741 is a strong indicator of DirectX 12 gaming performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 215633 suggests that Vulkan-based games will also run well. Since these are estimates, users should expect performance in line with other high-end Ampere cards, but the lack of measured data means specific FPS numbers cannot be guaranteed.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed towards the GPU. The RTX 3090 Ti’s 95th percentile versus the CPU’s 87th percentile indicates that in most gaming scenarios at high resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor. At 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the bottleneck, as the rendering load is heavy and the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU. The CPU’s 8 cores and high clock speed are sufficient to keep up with the GPU’s demands in most titles.

In compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the balance shifts. The GPU’s 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 performance will dominate tasks like ray tracing, while the CPU’s 16 threads will handle scene setup and physics. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18760 suggests that the CPU is capable of handling multi-threaded applications, but for tasks that scale beyond 16 threads, the CPU will become the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, points to the GPU being the primary driver of frame rates. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (a score of 1049 in 3DMark single-thread) becomes more important, but the GPU is still powerful enough to push frame rates high enough to make CPU limitations noticeable. The combined 91st percentile indicates a well-matched system for high-end gaming, but the data suggests that a stronger CPU would be needed to fully unlock the GPU’s potential in CPU-bound scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the memory configuration of the RTX 3090 Ti in this build?

A: The GPU features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s and an effective memory speed of 21 Gbps.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 7700 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation platforms and aids in data reliability.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3090 Ti is 850 W. The GPU has a TDP of 450 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: How does the CPU’s performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and 0.2% behind the Intel Core 5 221E, with similar small deltas against the AMD Ryzen 9 270 and Intel Core i9-13905H.

Q: What is the PCIe interface for the GPU?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which is backward compatible.

Q: Is the RTX 3090 Ti currently in production?

A: The production status is listed as end-of-life, indicating that NVIDIA has discontinued the product in favor of newer generations.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the GPU is manufactured on an 8 nm process at Samsung.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3090 Ti’s 95th percentile GPU score and the CPU’s 5.30 GHz boost clock make this a top-tier system for high-refresh gaming. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5741 indicates strong DX12 performance, and the 24 GB VRAM ensures that texture-heavy titles will not run out of memory, allowing for consistent frame rates at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The GPU’s 336 tensor cores and 84 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-enhanced features. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 215633 suggests the GPU can handle encoding overhead while maintaining game performance. The CPU’s 16 threads (3DMark max-thread score of 8479) offer additional headroom for software encoding or managing streaming software.

Video editing: The 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth allow for smooth scrubbing and playback of high-resolution video timelines. The FP32 performance of 40.00 TFLOPS accelerates effects and color grading, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18760 handles export and encoding tasks.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 40.00 TFLOPS and 84 RT cores are ideal for ray-traced renders. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 174441 shows strong compute capability. The CPU’s 8 cores and 32 MB L3 cache provide sufficient geometry processing, making this build suitable for both GPU-accelerated and hybrid rendering pipelines.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 110295 and data compression score of 405084 are relevant for code compilation and data handling. The 16 threads (3DMark 16-thread score of 8484) allow for parallel builds, and the ECC memory support ensures system stability during long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU provide a basic display output for non-intensive tasks. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1049 in 3DMark and Geekbench single-core score of 2525 ensure responsive everyday applications, while the system’s overall power is overkill for typical office workloads but provides future-proofing for more demanding academic projects.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build is a desktop-class configuration combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. The combined percentile is 91, placing it in the top 9% of all analyzed CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU is a current-generation 8-core Zen 4 part with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a previous-generation, end-of-life flagship with 24 GB of VRAM and a 95th percentile ranking. The pairing is defined by the GPU’s massive memory and compute throughput, which is complemented by a CPU that offers strong multi-threaded performance and modern platform features like DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5. While the GPU is no longer in production, its performance remains competitive with professional workstation cards, making this a high-tier build for enthusiasts and professionals seeking maximum VRAM capacity without moving to a newer, more expensive generation.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds