SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

40,081 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti pairing sits at the 85th combined percentile among all desktop configurations, indicating a well-matched system that avoids severe bottlenecking in either direction. The CPU's multi-threaded 3DMark score of 8484 at 16 threads drops only 5 points to 8479 at maximum threads, demonstrating that the 8-core/16-thread processor saturates its thread count efficiently without scaling penalties. Meanwhile, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 26896 places it at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, nearly matching the CPU's 87th percentile standing.

The balance shifts depending on resolution and workload type. At 1080p, the CPU becomes the primary limiter in esports titles — Counter-Strike 2 hits 251.4 FPS while Valorant reaches 509.8 FPS, both figures suggesting the GPU still has headroom but the CPU's single-thread score of 1049 in 3DMark constrains extreme frame rates. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1930 and Geekbench single-core score of 2525 confirm solid but not class-leading single-thread performance. At 1440p, the balance improves as GPU load increases; at 4K, the RTX 3080 Ti becomes the clear bottleneck, with demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 dropping to 39 FPS.

The FPS scaling across resolutions reveals where the GPU takes over. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 156.5 FPS at 1080p, 137.3 FPS at 1440p, and 116.6 FPS at 4K — a relatively mild drop-off that indicates both components contribute meaningfully. Conversely, Ark: Survival Ascended falls from 35.2 FPS at 1080p to 23.6 FPS at 1440p and 10 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and bandwidth are stretched thin by this title. The pair's average FPS across all tested games is 164.8, ranking 818th out of 3732 pairs — a strong placement in the top 22% of all configurations.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760 and a single-core score of 1930, with Geekbench results of 15371 multi-core and 2525 single-core. PassMark multi-thread performance reaches 34470, while single-thread scores 4063. The average benchmark score across all CPU tests is 40081, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, scores 40048 (0.1% behind), while the Intel Core 5 221E scores 40144 (0.2% ahead) — the Ryzen 7 7700 sits within a hair of these competitors, effectively trading blows at the margin.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077, combined with Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 170037 and 192697 respectively, yields an average benchmark score of 41187 at the 83rd percentile. The RTX 3080 Ti outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 by 0.8% (40870 vs 41187) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 by 2% (40377 vs 41187), while trailing the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB by 1.2% (41707) and the Tesla M40 by 1.7% (41897). These narrow margins place the 3080 Ti in a competitive mid-high tier despite being end-of-life.

The combined picture shows a system where CPU and GPU percentiles align closely (87 vs 83), producing a balanced platform. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 405084 and encryption score of 23858 indicate strong throughput for data-heavy tasks, while the GPU's PassMark compute score of 15282 suggests capable compute acceleration. This pairing consistently delivers top-quartile performance across both synthetic and real-world workloads.

# GPU Analysis

The RTX 3080 Ti packs 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1188 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed. The GA102 chip, built on Samsung's 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors across a 628 mm² die, operates at a base clock of 1365 MHz and boost of 1665 MHz. The 10240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs provide a pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 532.8 GTexel/s.

Ray tracing and tensor hardware are substantial: 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores enable the 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) throughput. This hardware supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. For rendering workloads, the PassMark G3D score of 26896 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5077 indicate strong rasterization performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 192697 suggests good API-level efficiency. The 2% lead over the RTX 5070 in average benchmark score (41187 vs 40377) shows this last-generation flagship still holds its own.

The GPU's power demands require a 750 W suggested PSU and a single 12-pin connector. At 350 W TDP with dual-slot cooling, it measures 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The 12 GB VRAM capacity, while lower than some workstation cards, proves sufficient for 1440p gaming but shows limitations at 4K in VRAM-hungry titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (10 FPS at 4K) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (33.1 FPS at 4K).

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 uses Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, ensuring forward compatibility with next-generation storage and graphics. ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use. The CPU's 65 W TDP is notably modest, leaving substantial thermal and power headroom in the platform.

The GPU's 350 W TDP and 750 W suggested PSU mean the system requires a robust power supply. The RTX 3080 Ti sits at end-of-life production status, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor — this means upgrades would move to newer architectures, but the current pair remains capable. The CPU, still in active production, offers a clearer upgrade path within the AM5 ecosystem. Being multiplier-unlocked, the Ryzen 7 7700 can be overclocked to extract additional performance without changing the platform.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU first, as the CPU's 87th percentile standing and active production status suggest it remains relevant. The CPU's nearest rivals (Ryzen AI 9 365, Core 5 221E, Ryzen 9 270, Core i9-13905H) all score within 0.6% of the 7700, indicating this processor is already near the top of its performance class. The platform's DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide bandwidth headroom for future components.

# CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 7700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael), built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 6,570 million transistors across a 71 mm² die. Base clock is 3.80 GHz with a 5.30 GHz boost. Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3.

Benchmark results show strong scaling from 2 threads to 16 threads: 3DMark scores progress from 2043 (2 threads) to 3931 (4 threads), 6933 (8 threads), and 8484 (16 threads). The near-identical score at max threads (8479) confirms the processor's thread scheduling is efficient. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 18760 versus single-core of 1930 yields a 9.7x scaling ratio, typical for an 8-core part with good frequency headroom. PassMark integer math scores 110295 while floating-point math scores 66246, with extended instructions at 96902 — indicating broad workload coverage.

The CPU's avgBenchmarkScore of 40081 sits at the 87th percentile, with nearest rivals within 0.6%. The PassMark physics score of 1978 and find prime numbers score of 197 suggest solid computational fundamentals. For real workloads, the 16 threads handle multi-threaded compilation, rendering, and streaming tasks competently. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR5 support provide adequate data throughput for most applications. The integrated Radeon Graphics offer a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU handles all rendering duties in this configuration.

# Gaming Performance

All gaming figures below are measured at ultra settings across three resolutions. Data confirms this pairing delivers high-refresh gaming at 1080p and strong 1440p performance, with 4K playable in many titles but demanding on modern releases.

At 1080p, esports titles excel: Valorant hits 509.8 FPS, CS:GO reaches 558.1 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 251.4 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 300 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X reaches 302.4 FPS. Minecraft runs at 249 FPS, and Roblox hits 328.1 FPS. Assetto Corsa delivers 149 FPS, and To The Core reaches 251.7 FPS. These figures support 240 Hz and even 360 Hz displays in competitive titles.

At 1440p, performance remains strong: Valorant stays at 483.8 FPS, CS:GO at 384.6 FPS, Rainbow Six Siege at 197 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 167.7 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 137.3 FPS. Single-player titles show playable numbers: Cyberpunk 2077 at 58.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52.3 FPS, Control at 78.8 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 71.9 FPS.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Valorant still manages 393.4 FPS, CS:GO 226.8 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege 108 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 116.6 FPS. However, demanding titles struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 39 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 33.1 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended to 10 FPS, and The Medium to 32.7 FPS. The 912.4 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB VRAM handle most 4K scenarios, but the most VRAM-intensive titles expose limitations. Pair rank of 818 out of 3732 with 164.8 average FPS confirms this system sits in the upper quartile for gaming performance.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system excels at 1080p and 1440p competitive play. Valorant at 509.8 FPS (1080p) and 483.8 FPS (1440p), CS:GO at 558.1 FPS (1080p), and Rainbow Six Siege X at 302.4 FPS (1080p) easily drive 240 Hz panels. The CPU's 87th percentile standing and GPU's 83rd percentile combine for frame rates that far exceed typical monitor refresh rates.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU handles encoding overhead while gaming. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760 and PassMark multi-thread score of 34470 provide ample headroom for simultaneous game capture and stream encoding. The GPU's NVENC-capable tensor cores (320) add dedicated encoding support.

Video editing: The CPU's 15371 Geekbench multi-core score and the GPU's 170037 OpenCL score accelerate timeline rendering and effects. PassMark extended instructions score of 96902 supports SIMD-optimized codecs. The 12 GB VRAM handles 4K timelines, while 912.4 GB/s bandwidth moves frames efficiently.

3D rendering: The GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) throughput, combined with 80 RT cores, accelerates both raster and ray-traced rendering. The CPU's 18760 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles CPU-based simulation and geometry tasks. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for scene data.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads compile code efficiently, with PassMark integer math at 110295 indicating strong integer throughput. The 405084 data compression score speeds build artifact handling. DDR5 memory bandwidth (83.2 GB/s) supports large project loads.

Student and office work: Overkill for typical productivity. The CPU's single-thread score of 4063 (PassMark) handles spreadsheet and document tasks instantly. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide backup display capability. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs low for all-day operation.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The pair sits at the 85th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 87th percentile and GPU at the 83rd percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7700 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 scores 40081 average, essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40048, 0.1% difference) and Intel Core 5 221E (40144, -0.2% difference).

Q: What is the RTX 3080 Ti's memory configuration?

A: It has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus with 912.4 GB/s bandwidth and 19 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes for many titles — Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 116.6 FPS at 4K, and Valorant at 393.4 FPS — but demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (39 FPS) and Ark: Survival Ascended (10 FPS) struggle.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and socket?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has a 65 W TDP and uses AMD Socket AM5.

Q: What power supply does the GPU require?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3080 Ti is 750 W, with a 350 W GPU TDP and single 12-pin power connector.

Q: Is this a balanced pairing?

A: Yes — the CPU's 87th percentile and GPU's 83rd percentile are closely matched, with the pair ranking 818th out of 3732 configurations by average FPS.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p performance. The measured frame rates at 1080p — Valorant at 509.8 FPS, CS:GO at 558.1 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X at 302.4 FPS — suit competitive players with 240 Hz or higher monitors. At 1440p, the system still delivers 137.3 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 167.7 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, making it ideal for gamers who prioritize frame rate over resolution.

Content creators benefit from the CPU's 18760 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 170037 OpenCL score. Video editors working with 4K timelines will appreciate the 12 GB VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth. 3D artists can leverage the 80 RT cores and 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput for ray-traced previews and final renders. Software developers compiling large codebases gain from 16 threads and high integer throughput (110295 PassMark).

Students and office workers get a system with massive headroom — the CPU's 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low during productivity tasks, while the 87th percentile CPU ensures longevity through demanding applications. Small business workstations handling data processing benefit from the 405084 data compression score and ECC memory support. The CPU's active production status and AM5 socket provide future upgrade options, while the end-of-life GPU remains performant enough for years of use. This build suits users who want top-quartile performance today without sacrificing platform longevity.