SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

40,081 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop combination whose balance shifts decisively depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the GPU is the primary constraint in most modern titles, while the CPU’s headroom becomes apparent only in lighter esports workloads. The data supports this split: the CPU’s 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs versus the GPU’s 59th percentile means the processor is the stronger component on paper, and benchmark results confirm it can feed the graphics card without becoming the limiting factor in typical gaming scenarios.

Looking at measured ultra-settings FPS across games, the pattern is clear. At 1080p, the average frame rate across all tested titles is 107.9 FPS, but this figure masks wide variance. Competitive shooters like Valorant hit 351.7 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 343.1 FPS at 1080p, while demanding single-player titles such as Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 45.7 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 43.7 FPS. The 8-core, 16-thread CPU with a 5.30 GHz boost clock is never the bottleneck in these scenarios — the RTX 3060 Ti’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth determine the ceiling.

At 2560x1440, the GPU bottleneck becomes more pronounced. Frame rates scale down roughly proportionally: Valorant drops to 303.9 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 to 102.5 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 to 32.4 FPS. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1049 in 3DMark and 1930 in Cinebench R23 single-core remain more than adequate. At 3840x2160, the GPU is overwhelmingly the constraint — Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 24.1 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 23.4 FPS, while even Call of Duty: Warzone, which manages 120.2 FPS at 4K, shows the GPU working at its limits.

The 3DMark thread scaling data reveals the CPU’s character. From 2 threads (2043) to 4 threads (3931) to 8 threads (6933), scaling is nearly linear, and the jump to 16 threads (8484) shows diminishing returns — the max-thread score of 8479 is essentially identical to the 16-thread result. This indicates the 8-core/16-thread design handles heavily threaded workloads efficiently but does not benefit from additional virtual cores beyond what it already has. For gaming, the 2-thread score of 2043 and single-thread score of 1049 suggest strong latency-sensitive performance, which matches the high FPS in esports titles.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA104 chip manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It packs 4,864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines. The 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, though the 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute figure places it in the mid-range tier of the GeForce 30-series lineup.

Memory configuration is a critical factor. The 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). This bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and most 1440p scenarios, but the 8 GB capacity becomes a limitation at higher resolutions in VRAM-hungry titles. The measured data shows this: at 4K, Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 5.9 FPS and The Medium to 20.6 FPS, suggesting texture data exceeds what the memory subsystem can efficiently handle.

The GPU’s benchmark scores place it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16,129. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,626 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, while Geekbench OpenCL (78,927) and Vulkan (47,784) scores show compute capability that outpaces its pure rasterization standing. The PassMark G3D score of 20,349 and GPU compute score of 10,006 further characterize it as a balanced mid-range card.

The RTX 3060 Ti’s nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (0.7% faster), AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (1.4% slower), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (1.4% slower). The deltaPct values are tight — within 1.7% of the AMD Radeon R9 370X — meaning the RTX 3060 Ti sits in a crowded performance band where architectural differences matter more than raw throughput. The 133.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 253.1 GTexel/s texture rate are competitive figures that support the measured frame rates in texture-heavy titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks paint a picture of a strong mainstream processor. The Ryzen 7 7700 achieves an average benchmark score of 40,081, placing it at the 87th percentile among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,760 and single-core score of 1,930 demonstrate balanced performance across threaded and latency-sensitive workloads. The Geekbench multicore score of 15,371 and single-core score of 2,525 reinforce this assessment.

In 3DMark tests, the thread scaling from 2,043 (2 threads) to 8,484 (16 threads) shows the CPU extracts nearly all available performance from its 8 cores. The PassMark multithread score of 34,470 and single-thread score of 4,063 confirm that both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads are handled competently. Specialized tasks show specific strengths: data compression scores 405,084, integer math 110,295, and random string sorting 101,836, while floating-point math (66,246) and extended instructions (96,902) are also solid.

The GPU benchmarks position the RTX 3060 Ti at the 59th percentile with an average score of 16,129. The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 73rd, indicating that together they outperform the majority of systems in the database. The pair ranks 2,334th out of 3,732 pairs by average FPS, with an average of 107.9 FPS across all tested games — a middle-of-the-pack position that reflects the GPU’s mid-range standing rather than the CPU’s higher percentile.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.6% of its average score: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (0.1% faster), Intel Core 5 221E (0.2% slower), AMD Ryzen 9 270 (0.4% slower), and Intel Core i9-13905H (0.6% slower). This tight clustering means the Ryzen 7 7700 is competitive with recent mobile and desktop parts, though none of these rivals exceed its performance by a meaningful margin. The GPU’s nearest rivals show similar clustering, with the Radeon RX 9060 just 0.7% faster and the Radeon RX 5700 XT 1.4% slower.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh or 1440p balanced settings. The data shows 1080p averages above 100 FPS in many titles, with Valorant at 351.7 FPS and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 227 FPS, making it viable for competitive play. At 1440p, frame rates remain playable in most games, though demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (32.4 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (29.8 FPS) require settings adjustments.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s strong multicore scores. The Cinebench R23 multicore result of 18,760 and PassMark multithread score of 34,470 indicate capable rendering performance, while the GPU’s 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 10,006 PassMark GPU compute score support hardware-accelerated effects. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p or 1440p editing timelines but may constrain 4K projects.

Software developers will find the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads well-suited for compilation and virtualization workloads. The PassMark integer math score of 110,295 and data encryption score of 23,858 suggest strong performance in compute-intensive development tasks. Students and small business users running office productivity, web applications, and light creative tools will find the combination more than sufficient, with the CPU’s 87th percentile ranking ensuring responsiveness across multitasking scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a Zen 4 architecture processor built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, codenamed Raphael. It features 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The 65 W TDP is notably efficient for an 8-core desktop part, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking for users who want additional performance.

The cache hierarchy comprises 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3 cache. This 32 MB L3 is significant for gaming workloads, where shared cache reduces memory latency and improves frame pacing. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC support, making it suitable for workstation tasks where data integrity matters.

The integrated Radeon Graphics provide basic display output capability, though discrete GPU owners will bypass this. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 CPU lanes offers high bandwidth for storage and expansion. The 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die reflect the density of the 5 nm process.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU’s balanced character. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,484 versus 8-thread score of 6,933 shows that adding virtual threads beyond physical cores yields a 22% improvement, which is modest but not negligible. The single-thread score of 1,049 in 3DMark and 1,930 in Cinebench R23 single-core place it competitively with recent desktop parts. The PassMark physics score of 1,978 and find prime numbers score of 197 are lower than typical gaming CPUs, suggesting that pure physics simulation is not this chip’s strongest area, but real-world gaming data shows this rarely matters.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 ranks at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40,081.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3060 Ti have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the pair’s combined percentile and average FPS?

A: The combined system ranks at the 73rd percentile, with an average of 107.9 FPS across all tested games at ultra settings.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7700 supports ECC memory, along with DDR5 on a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s process node and architecture?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti uses the Ampere architecture on Samsung’s 8 nm process, with a GA104 chip containing 17,400 million transistors.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is 0.1% faster, while the Intel Core 5 221E is 0.2% slower, meaning the Ryzen 7 7700 sits in a tightly competitive band.

Q: What resolutions does the GPU handle best?

A: The data shows strong performance at 1080p (107.9 average FPS across games), playable at 1440p in most titles, and limited at 4K where demanding games drop below 30 FPS.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is the strongest scenario for this build. Valorant delivers 351.7 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 343.1 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege 227 FPS at 1080p, easily pushing past 144Hz and even 240Hz monitors. The CPU’s single-thread performance supports these high frame rates without bottlenecking the GPU.

Streaming while gaming is viable given the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,484 and PassMark multithread score of 34,470 provide enough headroom for encoding alongside gameplay, though the GPU’s tensor cores (152) could offload encoding tasks via NVENC.

Video editing workloads benefit from the CPU’s multicore strength. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,760 and Geekbench multicore score of 15,371 accelerate timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s 78,927 Geekbench OpenCL score supports GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering with CPU-based engines will perform well. The PassMark floating-point math score of 66,246 and integer math score of 110,295 indicate strong compute throughput for Blender or similar applications, and the 8-core/16-thread design scales efficiently across rendering threads.

Software development tasks such as compilation and testing benefit from the CPU’s balanced performance. The PassMark data compression score of 405,084 and data encryption score of 23,858 support rapid build times and secure operations, while the 32 MB L3 cache reduces latency in iterative workflows.

Student and office workloads see minimal strain on this hardware. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,063 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is unavailable.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The CPU represents the higher-performing component at the 87th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 59th percentile, creating a system that is CPU-heavy in relative terms. The combined percentile of 73rd places this pairing above the majority of systems in the benchmark database.

The Ryzen 7 7700 is a 7000-series Zen 4 part on AMD Socket AM5, released in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $329. The RTX 3060 Ti is a GeForce 30-series Ampere card, released in November 2020 with a launch MSRP of 399 USD, now end-of-life. The CPU’s active production status contrasts with the GPU’s end-of-life status, meaning the processor has longer availability ahead.

This pairing is best characterized as a balanced 1080p gaming and productivity setup with 1440p capability in less demanding titles. The CPU’s headroom suggests it could support a GPU upgrade in the future, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth define the current performance ceiling for gaming workloads.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings, with dataIsMeasured true, provides concrete expectations across a wide range of titles. At 1920x1080, esports and competitive games excel: Valorant (351.7 FPS), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (343.1 FPS), and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege (227 FPS) all deliver high-refresh experiences. Mid-range titles like Minecraft (188 FPS), Roblox (197.6 FPS), and To The Core (191.7 FPS) also perform strongly.

At 2560x1440, frame rates remain respectable for most games. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 138.5 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 hits 102.5 FPS, and Valorant still manages 303.9 FPS. Heavier titles show the GPU’s limits: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 32.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 29.8 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 13.6 FPS. The 1440p experience is best suited to settings adjustments or less demanding games.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 3060 Ti is clearly out of its depth in modern AAA titles. Cyberpunk 2077 (24.1 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (23.4 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (5.9 FPS) fall below playable thresholds. Some lighter titles remain playable — Valorant (239 FPS), Call of Duty: Warzone (120.2 FPS), and Roblox (73.5 FPS) — but 4K gaming is not this build’s intended use case. The pair’s rank of 2,334 out of 3,732 by average FPS (107.9) confirms this is a mid-tier gaming system, best deployed at 1080p or modest 1440p settings.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Minecraft

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds