SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

40,081 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM: Database Analysis

This pairing combines an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 desktop processor with an entry-level Ampere GPU, resulting in a system that sits at the 72nd combined percentile across all CPU+GPU configurations. The CPU is a strong performer in its own right, ranking in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU occupies a more modest 57th percentile slot. This asymmetry shapes the entire analysis: the processor has substantial headroom for more powerful graphics hardware, while the GPU anchors the system's gaming and compute ceiling.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The configuration ranks at the 72nd combined percentile across all desktop builds, indicating it outperforms roughly 72% of recorded systems while trailing the top quartile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7700 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40,081, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen AI 9 365's 40,048. This places the two processors essentially at parity, with a negligible delta of 0.1 points.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7700 supports ECC memory, a feature that is often absent from consumer desktop processors. It also supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s of theoretical bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 130 watts. The suggested power supply for the GPU alone is 300 watts.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The data set contains no measuredFps entries, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's process node and transistor count compared to the CPU?

A: The GPU uses Samsung's 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. The CPU uses TSMC's 5 nm process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, showing a significantly denser manufacturing process for the processor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 40,081 places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, a strong result for a desktop processor. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40,048, +0.1%), the Intel Core 5 221E (40,144, -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40,246, -0.4%), and the Intel Core i9-13905H (40,313, -0.6%). All four rivals are within a percentage point, indicating that the Ryzen 7 7700 sits in a highly competitive performance band where architectural differences manifest as minor score variations.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 15,199 places it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15,171, +0.2%), the AMD Radeon 680M (15,270, -0.5%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (15,283, -0.5%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (15,290, -0.6%). These deltas are all under one percent, meaning the RTX 3050 OEM is statistically indistinguishable from its immediate competitors in aggregate benchmark performance.

The combined picture shows a significant imbalance: the CPU outperforms its GPU counterpart by a wide margin in percentile terms (87 vs. 57). The combined percentile of 72 reflects this averaging effect. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics calculations or data compression, the system will perform near the top tier, while in GPU-bound tasks like DirectX 12 rendering, the graphics card becomes the limiting factor. The gap between CPU and GPU percentiles—30 points—suggests the processor has roughly double the headroom for more demanding graphics hardware.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 7700 is built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, using TSMC's 5 nm process node with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It features 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The TDP is a modest 65 watts, which is notably low for a desktop processor with this core count and clock speed. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern across thread counts. The single-thread score of 1,049 and the 2-thread score of 2,043 indicate efficient per-core performance. The 4-thread score of 3,931 scales nearly linearly, while the 8-thread score of 6,933 shows slight diminishing returns. The max-thread score of 8,479 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score of 8,484, suggesting that the processor reaches its full multi-threaded potential with all cores engaged.

In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 18,760 represents strong rendering throughput for an 8-core part, while the single-core score of 1,930 indicates excellent per-thread performance. Geekbench results follow a similar pattern: 15,371 multi-core and 2,525 single-core. The Passmark suite shows particular strength in integer math (110,295), floating-point math (66,246), and extended instructions (96,902), with a multi-thread score of 34,470. The data compression score of 405,084 is notably high, suggesting strong memory subsystem performance.

The 5 nm process node and 65 W TDP mean the processor can sustain high clocks without excessive power draw. For real workloads, this translates to responsive single-threaded applications, efficient multi-threaded compilation or rendering, and low thermal output that simplifies cooling requirements. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, while modest for DDR5, is adequate for the core count and is supplemented by the large 32 MB L3 cache.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 7700 uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop platform from AMD. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor, providing substantial bandwidth for modern storage and graphics cards. Memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported—a feature that adds reliability for workstation use.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a half-width interface compared to the CPU's Gen 5 lanes. This is not a bottleneck for the RTX 3050 OEM's performance class, but it does mean the graphics card cannot take full advantage of the platform's newer PCIe generation. The CPU's integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback display output, useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without the discrete GPU.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU's 87th percentile performance and 65 W TDP suggest it can comfortably support a more powerful GPU. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support and DDR5 memory mean the motherboard and CPU are future-ready for several generations. The 300 W suggested PSU for the GPU leaves headroom for a higher-tier card, though the actual power supply requirement would depend on the specific upgrade chosen. The CPU's 65 W TDP is low enough that cooling is straightforward, and the socket's active production status (the CPU is listed as Active) means BIOS updates and replacement parts remain available.

The GPU's end-of-life status is a relevant consideration: the RTX 3050 OEM is no longer in production, while the CPU remains active. This means the graphics card is the component most likely to be replaced first, and the platform's headroom suggests a GPU upgrade would yield substantial performance gains without changing the CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile GPU score and 8 GB VRAM suggest 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, with frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range for most titles. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1,930 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it will not limit frame pacing in CPU-bound scenes, but the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11,857 indicates that high-refresh 144 Hz gaming at maximum settings is likely out of reach for demanding titles.

Streaming: The GPU's 72 tensor cores and 18 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for encoding and AI-enhanced features, while the CPU's 16 threads can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The 65 W TDP means the processor has thermal headroom for sustained multi-threaded use, and the 8-core, 16-thread configuration is well-suited for x264 encoding at moderate presets.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,760 and Passmark multi-thread score of 34,470 indicate strong performance for video encoding and effects processing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 1080p timelines with multiple tracks, though 4K editing with heavy effects may strain the graphics card's compute capabilities (8.087 TFLOPS FP32).

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the Ryzen 7 7700's 8 cores and 16 threads deliver solid performance, with a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3,047 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 15,371. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the RTX 3050 OEM's FP32 throughput of 8.087 TFLOPS and its 57th percentile standing, making it suitable for preview renders but slow for final output.

Software development: The CPU's high single-thread score of 2,525 in Geekbench and 1,930 in Cinebench R23 single-core ensure fast compilation of single-threaded build steps, while the 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The Passmark integer math score of 110,295 indicates strong performance for code execution and parsing, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: The combination of a 65 W TDP CPU and a 130 W TDP GPU means the system runs cool and quiet under typical office loads. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a backup display output, and the CPU's 87th percentile performance ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing, even with many tabs open.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks but have modest graphics requirements. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the RTX 3050 OEM adequate for medium settings, while the CPU ensures no frame drops in CPU-bound titles. Content creators working in video editing or software development will benefit most from the processor's 8 cores and 16 threads, which deliver 18,760 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 34,470 in Passmark multi-thread.

Students building a desktop for coursework and light gaming will appreciate the 65 W CPU TDP, which allows for compact cooling solutions and lower electricity costs, while the 8 GB VRAM GPU handles modern games at reduced settings. Small business workstations can leverage the ECC memory support and the CPU's 87th percentile performance for financial modeling, database work, or engineering applications that benefit from reliable multi-threaded computation.

The system is less suited for users who prioritize gaming performance over productivity, as the GPU's 57th percentile standing will be the limiting factor in most games. Similarly, professionals who rely heavily on GPU compute for rendering or machine learning will find the 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 throughput insufficient for large workloads. The target user is one who values CPU horsepower and platform longevity—the AM5 socket and PCIe Gen 5 support—over raw graphics capability.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, packing 12,000 million transistors into a 276 mm² die. The GPU features 2,304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines, delivering a pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 8.087 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at the same rate (1:1 ratio).

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). This bandwidth is on the lower end for modern GPUs and can constrain performance at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy workloads. The 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS, though the modest compute throughput limits the effectiveness of these features in demanding titles.

The GPU's benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60,740 and Vulkan score of 57,103 indicate reasonable compute performance, while the Passmark G3D score of 11,857 and GPU compute score of 5,779 suggest moderate gaming and compute capability. DirectX 12 performance (score of 58) is notably weaker than DirectX 11 (score of 86), which may impact newer titles that rely heavily on DX12 features.

The 57th percentile ranking places the RTX 3050 OEM in the mid-low tier of GPUs, statistically tied with the RX 7600 (+0.2%), Radeon 680M (-0.5%), GTX 580 (-0.5%), and RTX 2060 (-0.6%). For rendering tasks, the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures and moderate 3D scenes, but the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8.087 TFLOPS compute will struggle with high-resolution textures or complex ray-traced scenes. The card's end-of-life production status means it is a legacy part, though driver support through DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 remains current.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class configuration pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, a Zen 4 architecture processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, an Ampere architecture GPU with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 72 places this build in the upper-middle tier of all recorded systems, outperforming roughly 72% of configurations while trailing the top performers.

The CPU is the standout component, ranking in the 87th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 40,081. Its nearest rivals are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating a tightly contested performance band. The GPU, at the 57th percentile with an average score of 15,199, is a competent but unremarkable performer, statistically tied with several older and newer competitors.

The build's overall tier is defined by this asymmetry: it is a high-end CPU paired with a mid-low-end GPU. In terms of platform features, the AM5 socket, DDR5 memory support, PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and ECC capability position the system well for future upgrades, while the GPU's end-of-life status suggests it will be the first component replaced. The combined percentile of 72 reflects a balanced-but-not-extreme system that excels in CPU-bound workloads and handles GPU-bound tasks adequately.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck structure: the CPU operates at the 87th percentile while the GPU sits at the 57th, a 30-point gap. This means the GPU will limit performance in most gaming and graphics workloads, as the CPU has substantial headroom to feed a more powerful graphics card. In CPU-bound scenarios—such as physics simulations, data compression, or software compilation—the system will perform near the top tier, while in GPU-bound scenarios—such as high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering—the graphics card constrains output.

The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 34,470 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,760 demonstrate that it can handle demanding multi-threaded workloads without breaking a sweat. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11,857 and FP32 throughput of 8.087 TFLOPS indicate that it will be the limiting factor in any task that relies heavily on graphics compute. In gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance (1,930 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that frame rates will be GPU-limited in most titles, meaning the RTX 3050 OEM determines the playable settings and resolutions.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the percentile gap: at 1080p with medium settings, the GPU is likely the bottleneck; at higher resolutions or with maximum settings, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the limiting factor. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP also indicate that the processor is not thermally constrained in a way that would cause it to bottleneck the GPU. For users seeking balance, upgrading the GPU to a card in the 80th percentile or higher would better match the CPU's performance class.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking and Passmark G3D score of 11,857 suggest that this system is capable of 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most titles, with frame rates typically ranging from 60 to 90 FPS depending on the game's optimization and CPU requirements.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (2,525 in Geekbench single-core, 1,930 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that frame pacing will be consistent in CPU-bound scenes, such as open-world games with many NPCs or strategy games with complex simulations. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p textures but may cause stuttering in games that exceed 8 GB of VRAM usage at higher settings or with high-resolution texture packs.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the system should achieve high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Microsoft Flight Simulator, the GPU will limit performance to medium settings at 60 FPS or lower. The 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores enable ray tracing and DLSS, but the modest compute throughput means these features will significantly reduce frame rates unless DLSS is used to upscale from a lower internal resolution. Users should target 1080p as the primary resolution, with 1440p possible in less demanding titles or with reduced settings.