SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

40,081 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and Radeon RX 7700 pairing represents a mainstream desktop combination built around AMD’s current AM5 platform and RDNA 3 graphics architecture. The data shows a CPU that ranks in the 87th percentile among all processors and a GPU that sits in the 58th percentile, creating a system with strong compute headroom but a graphics component that is the more likely performance boundary in demanding titles. This analysis draws exclusively from the measured benchmark scores and specifications provided, offering a neutral assessment of what this hardware delivers.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7700 compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081, placing it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40048) and 0.2% behind the Intel Core 5 221E (40144). It is also 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40246 score, -0.4% delta) and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13905H (40313 score, -0.6% delta), showing near-identical performance among these four chips.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and what does that mean?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 ranks in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. This places it in the mid-range segment, with an average benchmark score of 15852. It is 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129 score) and 1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16014 score), while sitting 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679 score).

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory and ECC?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7700 supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation-style builds where data integrity is important.

Q: What is the socket type and PCIe generation for the CPU?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 uses the AMD Socket AM5 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. This allows for high-bandwidth connectivity to compatible NVMe storage and graphics cards.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7700 have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This large VRAM pool is a significant asset for texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution gaming.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank for this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile for the Ryzen 7 7700 and RX 7700 build is 73. This reflects a system that is better equipped on the CPU side (87th percentile) than on the GPU side (58th percentile), leading to a balanced overall tier that is slightly above the midpoint of all system pairings.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 200 W and the suggested PSU for the system is 550 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, indicating that the power supply recommendation is driven primarily by the graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture emerges from the CPU’s strong compute scores and the GPU’s mid-range graphics output. The Ryzen 7 7700 achieves an average benchmark score of 40081, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the Radeon RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15852, which lands it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. This creates a system where the processor is a top-tier component while the graphics card is a solidly mid-range performer.

The CPU’s multi-threaded workload results are particularly strong. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 7 7700 scores 18760 in multi-core and 1930 in single-core. Its Geekbench multi-core score is 15371, with a single-core score of 2525. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 1049 in single-thread to 8484 in 16-thread and 8479 in max-thread tests, indicating efficient utilization of all 16 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 34470 and integer math score of 110295 further demonstrate the CPU’s capability in heavily parallelized tasks.

On the GPU side, the RX 7700 posts a PassMark G3D score of 20974 and a GPU compute score of 10963. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2865. The Geekbench OpenCL score reaches 106028. These numbers place the GPU in a competitive mid-range position, as evidenced by its nearest rivals being the Radeon R9 370X (15862 score, -0.1% delta) and the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129 score, -1.7% delta).

The measured FPS data across games provides the most practical performance view. The system averages 125.6 FPS across all tested games at various resolutions. At 1920x1080, many titles exceed 100 FPS, including Counter-Strike 2 at 195 FPS, Valorant at 447 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS. At 2560x1440, performance remains playable in most titles, with Call of Duty: Warzone hitting 140 FPS and Valorant at 381 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 dropping to 28 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS.

The pair rank 1782 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, placing it near the middle of the database’s tracked system combinations. This aligns with the combined percentile of 73, indicating a system that delivers smooth high-refresh gaming at 1080p and solid 1440p performance, but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K in graphically intensive titles.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It operates on a 5 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 71 mm² and 6,570 million transistors. The base clock is 3.80 GHz, boosting up to 5.30 GHz, with a TDP of just 65 W. This power efficiency is notable, allowing for substantial compute performance without excessive cooling or power requirements.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the processor’s strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760 shows the chip’s ability to handle rendering workloads, while the single-core score of 1930 indicates good responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench scores of 15371 multi-core and 2525 single-core corroborate this balanced performance profile.

In real-world workloads, the PassMark scores provide insight into specific task types. The data compression score of 405084 and data encryption score of 23858 show strong throughput for storage and security tasks. The extended instructions score of 96902 and floating point math score of 66246 indicate capability in scientific and financial computations. The integer math score of 110295 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance in general-purpose computing tasks like software compilation and database operations.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in average score include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40048, +0.1% delta) and the Intel Core 5 221E (40144, -0.2% delta). These deltas are minimal, meaning the 7700 performs essentially identically to these alternatives in aggregated benchmarks. The 87th percentile ranking confirms that this is a high-end processor, with only a small fraction of CPUs outperforming it. For users coming from older platforms, the jump in multi-threaded performance is substantial, as evidenced by the 16-thread 3DMark score of 8484.

The 65 W TDP is a defining characteristic. It allows for efficient cooling solutions and lower operating costs, while still delivering performance that rivals higher-wattage parts. The processor’s active production status and unlocked multiplier also make it a flexible choice for system builders who want overclocking headroom without extreme power requirements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 7700 is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides a clear upgrade path within the same generation. The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, along with ECC memory support for error-checking in professional workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 interface offers 24 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed connectivity for modern NVMe drives and graphics cards.

The platform’s memory support is limited to DDR5, meaning users must adopt the newer memory standard. The dual-channel bus provides adequate bandwidth for the CPU’s demands, though the 83.2 GB/s figure is modest compared to what some high-end platforms offer. The ECC support is a benefit for users running long-duration compute tasks or file servers, as it protects against data corruption.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes. This provides sufficient bandwidth for the RX 7700’s data requirements. The GPU’s TDP of 200 W, combined with the CPU’s 65 W TDP, results in a suggested PSU rating of 550 W. This leaves headroom for other components like drives and fans, though users with multiple peripherals may prefer a slightly larger unit.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The 87th percentile CPU ranking versus the 58th percentile GPU ranking indicates that the processor can easily drive a more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The AM5 platform also supports future CPU upgrades within the same socket, though the 7700’s strong performance means a CPU upgrade may not be necessary for several years.

The GPU’s dual-slot design and 267 mm length require a case with adequate clearance. It uses two 8-pin power connectors, and its display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, offering versatile connectivity for modern monitors. The 550 W PSU recommendation provides a clear guideline for system builders, ensuring stable operation under load.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, using a 5 nm process from TSMC. It contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This large memory capacity is a standout feature, providing ample room for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The clock speeds are set at 1900 MHz base, 2041 MHz game, and 2459 MHz boost. The memory runs at 2438 MHz with 19.5 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It also includes 40 ray tracing cores, which support the DirectX 12 Ultimate API. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 25.18 TFLOPS.

In benchmark tests, the RX 7700 achieves a PassMark G3D score of 20974 and a GPU compute score of 10963. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2865, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 106028. These results place the GPU in the 58th percentile, with its nearest rival being the Radeon R9 370X (15862 score, -0.1% delta) — an older card with similar aggregate performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 1.7% faster, showing the RX 7700 competes directly with previous-generation mid-range offerings.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS provides substantial compute capability. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly useful for 3D rendering and video editing, where large scenes and timelines can exceed the memory capacity of 8 GB cards. The 624.1 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the memory can feed the GPU’s cores efficiently during texture-heavy operations. The 40 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games, though the implementation is less performant than NVIDIA’s dedicated RT cores, as evidenced by the GPU’s mid-range percentile ranking.

The GPU’s power draw is 200 W, requiring a 550 W PSU. Its dual-slot design and 267 mm length are standard for this class. The display outputs support modern high-refresh monitors, including HDMI 2.1a and DisplayPort 2.1, which can drive 4K displays at high refresh rates. The active production status and release date of September 2025 indicate this is a current-generation product.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks while having moderate graphics requirements. The Ryzen 7 7700’s 87th percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers, data analysts, and content creators who run multi-threaded applications. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration handles compilation, rendering, and virtualization workloads efficiently, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760 and PassMark multithread score of 34470.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find this system well-suited to their needs. The measured FPS data shows most titles exceeding 60 FPS at 1080p, with esports titles like Valorant (447 FPS at 1080p) and Counter-Strike 2 (195 FPS) delivering high-refresh experiences. At 1440p, the system maintains playable frame rates in most games, with Call of Duty: Warzone hitting 140 FPS and Ready Or Not at 99 FPS. Users who primarily play competitive shooters will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1049.

Students and professionals seeking a versatile workstation will appreciate the CPU’s efficiency. The 65 W TDP allows for quiet, low-power operation that is suitable for office environments. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computation tasks. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is beneficial for students in graphics or engineering programs who need to run CAD software or create 3D models without investing in a dedicated workstation card.

Small business workstations can leverage the platform’s longevity. The AM5 socket provides a clear upgrade path, and the DDR5 memory support future-proofs the system. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance in data encryption (23858 PassMark score) and compression (405084) makes it suitable for database servers or backup systems. However, the GPU’s 58th percentile ranking means this is not a primary choice for high-end 4K gaming or professional 3D rendering studios, where the GPU would become a bottleneck.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system excels at 1080p and 1440p esports. Valorant runs at 447 FPS at 1080p and 381 FPS at 1440p, while Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 431 FPS at 1080p. These frame rates support 240 Hz monitors in competitive titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 1930 in Cinebench R23 ensures minimal frame time spikes in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: The 8-core CPU provides ample headroom for game capture and encoding. The 16-thread 3DMark score of 8484 shows the CPU can handle streaming software while maintaining game performance. However, the GPU’s mid-range position means streamers using hardware encoding might experience lower quality settings in demanding games to maintain frame rates.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 405084 and floating point math score of 66246 indicate strong performance in codec-heavy workloads. The 16 GB GPU memory allows for smooth scrubbing through 4K timelines and applying effects without memory constraints. The system can handle proxy-less editing in most cases, though 8K projects would require more compute power.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18760 shows the CPU is capable for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS provides acceleration for GPU-render engines, though the 58th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for most scenes, but complex environments with heavy geometry may require downscaling.

Software development: The high integer math score of 110295 and extended instructions score of 96902 make this an excellent choice for code compilation and testing. The 16 threads allow for parallel build processes, and the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low during long compile sessions. The ECC memory support adds stability for critical development environments.

Student and office work: The system’s efficiency and performance make it ideal for general productivity. The PassMark single-thread score of 4063 ensures responsive application launching and document editing. The GPU’s 1206 PassMark G2D score provides smooth desktop rendering for multiple monitors. The 550 W PSU requirement means this system can run on standard office power circuits without issues.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 GPU. The CPU is part of the Ryzen 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 Raphael architecture, while the GPU belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, based on RDNA 3.0 with the Navi 32 chip. The combination represents a mainstream desktop configuration designed for balanced performance across productivity and gaming workloads.

The system’s combined percentile rank is 73, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of all tracked pairings. This is driven by the CPU’s strong 87th percentile ranking, which significantly outperforms the GPU’s 58th percentile ranking. The average FPS across games is 125.6, with the pair ranking 1782 out of 3732 tracked pairs. This puts the system slightly above the median for gaming performance, while offering much stronger compute performance than typical gaming systems.

The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide substantial multi-threading capability, as shown by the Geekbench multi-core score of 15371. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth make it well-suited for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use with standard ATX cases and power supplies.

The release dates show a generational gap: the CPU launched in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $329, while the GPU launched in September 2025. Both are marked as active in production, indicating ongoing availability. The CPU’s 5 nm process and the GPU’s 5 nm process from TSMC represent current manufacturing technology, contributing to their efficiency and performance characteristics.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU, with the processor being the stronger component by a significant margin. The CPU’s 87th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 58th percentile creates a scenario where the graphics card is the primary bottleneck in GPU-intensive workloads. This is most evident in 4K gaming, where the system’s FPS drops sharply in demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 28 FPS at 3840x2160, and Red Dead Redemption 2 drops to 26 FPS, indicating the GPU cannot sustain high frame rates at this resolution.

At 1080p and 1440p, the balance is more even. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance helps drive high FPS in esports titles, where the GPU is less stressed. Valorant at 447 FPS at 1080p and Counter-Strike 2 at 195 FPS show the CPU can feed the GPU effectively at lower resolutions. However, in more demanding games, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Ark: Survival Ascended runs at only 28 FPS at 1080p, showing the GPU struggles with the latest titles at high settings.

The FPS scaling across resolutions provides evidence of this bottleneck. Many games show a linear drop from 1080p to 1440p, then a steeper decline at 4K. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 158 FPS at 1080p, 140 FPS at 1440p, and 119 FPS at 4K. This pattern suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU maintains consistent performance. In contrast, CPU-heavy games like Valorant show less resolution scaling (447 FPS at 1080p, 381 FPS at 1440p, 305 FPS at 4K), indicating the CPU starts to become a bottleneck at very high frame rates.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU plays a lesser role. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores mean it can handle most compute tasks without GPU assistance. The GPU’s compute score of 10963 in PassMark is modest, meaning GPU-accelerated rendering would benefit from a more powerful card. Users prioritizing gaming at 4K or professional 3D rendering would be better served by upgrading the GPU, while those focused on CPU-intensive tasks like software development or data analysis will find the system well-balanced. The suggested PSU of 550 W leaves headroom for a GPU upgrade, as the 65 W CPU TDP means most of the power budget is available for a stronger graphics card.