SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

26,402 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

8,746 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile combination targets the mainstream laptop segment, pairing an eight-core Zen 3+ processor with a dedicated Ampere-based graphics solution. This analysis relies strictly on the provided benchmark data, which contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct frame rate measurements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS is an eight-core, sixteen-thread processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, code-named Rembrandt-R. It belongs to the 7000 series and is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process node, with a die size of 210 mm². The base clock is 3.10 GHz, boosting up to 4.50 GHz under load. The CPU operates within a 45 W TDP, which is typical for high-performance mobile processors. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, alongside a shared 16 MB L3 pool. Memory support is limited to dual-channel DDR5, offering a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported.

Benchmark scores indicate a processor that is strong in multi-threaded tasks but merely adequate in single-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19873 reflects the full utilization of all eight cores, while the single-core score of 2805 lags behind what top-tier desktop chips achieve. In the 3DMark suite, the processor scores 6915 in the 16-thread test and 6900 in the max-threads test, showing near-linear scaling from eight threads onward. The single-thread score of 888 is modest, placing it in a lower tier for lightly threaded applications. PassMark multi-thread score of 23393 and single-thread score of 3167 corroborate this pattern: heavy parallel workloads benefit greatly, but tasks relying on one or two cores will see less impressive results.

The average benchmark score of 26402 places the CPU in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 7435HS is virtually identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, with a delta of -0.2%, and the Intel Core i9-12900HK and Intel Core i7-1280P, both at -0.3%. It edges out the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 by 0.3%. This tight clustering suggests the 7435HS is a well-rounded performer, competitive with recent mid-range and older high-end mobile parts. The data shows no significant advantage over any of these rivals in aggregate performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains an empty `measuredFpsUltraByGame` object, and `dataIsMeasured` is explicitly false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not on actual game testing.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11664 and the CPU's multi-threaded performance suggest this system can handle modern games at 1080p with medium to high settings, but it will struggle with ultra settings in demanding titles. The GPU sits in the 44th percentile, meaning it is outclassed by a majority of current graphics solutions. For esports titles and older games, the CPU's strong multi-core score will help maintain high frame rates, but the GPU will likely become the limiting factor. In newer, graphically intensive games, expect frame rates to dip below 60 FPS at 1080p ultra, requiring settings reductions to achieve smooth gameplay. The CPU's single-thread score of 888 in 3DMark is modest, which could lead to bottlenecks in CPU-bound scenarios, but the eight cores provide enough headroom for most modern game engines that utilize multiple threads. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by title, driver, and cooling solution.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a primary target. The GPU's 44th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM limit performance in modern titles, making high-refresh (144Hz+) gaming at high settings unrealistic. The CPU can feed frames, but the GPU will struggle to exceed 100 FPS in most AAA games at 1080p, even at medium settings. For esports titles, the CPU's multi-core strength could push frame rates higher, but the GPU remains the bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU's eight cores and sixteen threads provide a solid foundation for software encoding. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19873 indicates enough headroom to handle game encoding and streaming workloads simultaneously, though the GPU's performance will cap the overall game quality. The GPU's dedicated NVENC encoder, part of the Ampere architecture, can offload the encoding task, but this relies on the GPU's tensor cores, which are modest in number.

Video Editing: This is a viable use case. The CPU's multi-threaded performance is strong, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 23393 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8346. Timeline scrubbing and export in applications like Premiere Pro will benefit from these cores. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits the use of GPU-accelerated effects and high-resolution previews, but basic editing and 1080p exports are feasible.

3D Rendering: The CPU excels here. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19873 and 3DMark max-threads score of 6900 show that the processor can handle complex scene rendering in CPU-based engines. The GPU's compute score of 4419 in PassMark is low, indicating that GPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles with OptiX) will be slow, but CPU rendering will be reasonably efficient for a laptop part.

Software Development: This is a strong scenario. The CPU's 16 threads handle compilation tasks effectively, as seen in the PassMark integer math score of 85274 and data compression score of 310038. The 16 MB L3 cache aids in code locality. Single-threaded tasks like code analysis tools will be slower, but the overall experience for multi-threaded builds is positive.

Student and Office Work: This system is overqualified for basic office tasks. The CPU's single-thread score of 3167 in PassMark is sufficient for web browsing and document editing, while the multi-core performance ensures smooth multitasking. The GPU is unnecessary for these workloads, but it does not hinder them. Battery life will be a concern given the 45 W CPU TDP, but performance will be more than adequate.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is best suited for users who need a mobile workstation with strong multi-threaded CPU performance but have modest graphics requirements. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering on a budget would benefit from the CPU's capabilities, provided they are willing to accept slower GPU-accelerated tasks. Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the sixteen threads and the fast DDR5 memory support. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the CPU power sufficient for simulations and coding. Small business workstations that run data analysis or virtualization workloads would also benefit. Gamers targeting 1080p at medium settings in less demanding titles could consider this, but those seeking high-refresh or ultra-quality gaming should look elsewhere. The GPU is not suitable for high-end gaming, so its primary role is to provide basic acceleration for productivity applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. This severely limits upgradeability, as the CPU and GPU are typically soldered onto the motherboard. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. A sensible next upgrade would be to a new laptop, as the socket is not designed for user-replaceable components. The PSU headroom is not specified in the data, but the 45 W TDP of both the CPU and GPU suggests a modest power supply is sufficient. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, so no driver or performance improvements are expected in the future. The CPU is still active, but its performance class is fixed. Users should consider this a fixed, non-upgradeable platform.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is based on the GA106 chip, built on Samsung's 8 nm process node. It features 1792 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The GPU includes 14 RT cores and 56 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though the low core count limits their effectiveness. The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1065 MHz, boosting to 1343 MHz, and the memory runs at an effective 12 Gbps. The GPU has a TDP of 45 W and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Benchmark results show a GPU that is positioned at the low end of the performance spectrum. The PassMark G3D score of 11664 places it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms only a minority of the database. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2, has an identical average score of 8743, with a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon R9 M265X is 1.2% faster, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 1.3% faster. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 55 and DirectX 11 score of 94 in PassMark are low, indicating limited modern API performance. The FP32 compute throughput is 4.813 TFLOPS, which is sufficient for light rendering tasks but will bottleneck heavier workloads. The 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for modern games and GPU-accelerated content creation, as textures and assets easily exceed this capacity.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture shows a system with a strong CPU and a weak GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 26402, placing it in the 78th percentile. It is within 0.3% of its nearest rivals, showing no clear performance leadership. The GPU's average benchmark score is 8746, placing it in the 44th percentile. It is virtually tied with the GTX 460 v2, a GPU from a previous generation. The combined percentile for this pair is 61, reflecting the CPU's strength pulling the average up.

Specific CPU scores highlight its multi-threaded capabilities: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 19873 and 3DMark 16-thread at 6915. Single-threaded scores are weaker, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 2805 and 3DMark single-thread at 888. The GPU's key scores are a PassMark G3D of 11664 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 52998. The GPU compute score of 4419 in PassMark is notably low, suggesting poor performance in compute-heavy workloads. The data indicates a mismatch: the CPU can handle demanding computational tasks, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in any graphics or compute-intensive application.

FAQ

Q: Does this laptop support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS supports ECC memory, and it uses dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type and can I upgrade it?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket. The data does not indicate user-upgradeability, and it is typically soldered in laptops, making upgrades impractical.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bus width?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U?

A: The Ryzen 7 7435HS has an average benchmark score of 26402, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 8640U's score of 26462, indicating nearly identical aggregate performance.

Q: Is the GPU capable of ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU is based on the Ampere architecture and includes 14 RT cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the performance will be limited by the low core count and 4 GB VRAM.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, up from a base clock of 3.10 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's PassMark G3D score and percentile ranking?

A: The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 11664, which places it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, indicating below-average performance compared to the broader market.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 44th percentile creates a clear bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the GPU will be the primary limiting factor, capping frame rates well below what the CPU could support. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19873, will go largely underutilized in games that are GPU-bound. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU will perform admirably, and the GPU's role is minor. The GPU's low compute score of 4419 in PassMark indicates it will also bottleneck in GPU-accelerated compute tasks, such as machine learning inference or GPU rendering. The 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for modern games at higher resolutions, causing texture loading issues and frame rate drops. The FPS scaling, estimated from the benchmark scores, shows that the GPU's performance is the primary constraint for achieving higher frame rates. The CPU has ample headroom to support a more powerful GPU, but this pairing is fixed. For a balanced system, the GPU would need to be significantly more powerful, but this specific configuration is limited by its graphics component.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds