SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS

32,354 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

63,775 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS + AMD Radeon RX 7600M — Performance Analysis

This pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 3+ mobile processor with a RDNA 3 discrete GPU in a laptop-class build. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussion below is estimated qualitatively from the benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay measurements.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, frame rate expectations must be inferred from the component benchmark scores and the overall pair ranking.

The GPU scores at the 89th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL. This places it 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 30HX. For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, this level of compute performance suggests capability with modern titles, though the 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth may constrain texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions.

The CPU's single-core score of 1455 in Cinebench R23 and 1652 in Geekbench single-core indicates adequate per-thread performance for game logic and physics. Multi-core scores of 11992 in Cinebench R23 and 9515 in Geekbench multicore suggest that CPU-bound scenarios, such as open-world titles with many NPCs, should not bottleneck the GPU in most cases.

At 1440p ultra, the estimated frame rates would likely be lower than 1080p, driven primarily by the GPU's 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The 154.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 269.9 GTexel/s texture rate provide a baseline for rasterization throughput. For 4K ultra, the 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth would likely become limiting factors, with significant frame rate drops expected compared to 1080p.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU holds an 83rd percentile position among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32354. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14400F (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (0.3% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (0.4% ahead), and the Intel Core i9-11900 (0.4% ahead). This clustering indicates the 6800HS sits in a competitive mid-range desktop-class performance band despite being a mobile part.

The GPU's 89th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775, places it near the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (0.1% ahead), NVIDIA CMP 30HX (0.1% behind), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (0.1% ahead), and AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 (0.7% behind). The GPU's average score is essentially identical to these rivals, suggesting performance parity within a tight margin.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 86, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms the vast majority of laptop configurations. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 22801 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 63775 together paint a picture of a balanced system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's data compression score of 292698 and encryption score of 18104 further suggest strong compute capabilities beyond gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

The CPU's TDP is 35 watts, while the GPU's TDP is 90 watts. The FACT PACK lists no suggested PSU for this combination, and the GPU power connectors are listed as "None," indicating this is an integrated GPU design (slot width: IGP) where power delivery is handled through the motherboard rather than external connectors. This limits upgrade potential for the GPU — replacing the GPU in a laptop is generally not feasible.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on memory and storage. Adding more DDR5 RAM would benefit the iGPU (Radeon 680M) if the discrete GPU is not in use, and faster NVMe storage would reduce load times. The CPU's production status is Active, meaning replacements are available. The GPU's release date is 2023-01-03, and it is also Active. Since the build class is laptop, the upgrade path is largely confined to what the laptop's motherboard and chassis allow — typically RAM and SSD upgrades only.

Who Should Build It

This laptop-class configuration targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance in a mobile form factor. The 83rd percentile CPU and 89th percentile GPU suggest it suits gamers at 1080p who want high settings without chasing maximum frame rates at higher resolutions. The 8 CPU cores and 16 threads are suitable for content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes while on the go.

Software developers would benefit from the CPU's Passmark integer math score of 84228 and extended instructions score of 20114, which indicate strong compile and code execution capabilities. Students and small business users would find the 35-watt CPU TDP conducive to battery life, while the GPU handles occasional graphics tasks like presentations or light CAD work. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most productivity applications, though large 3D scenes may exceed it.

Gamers at 1440p would need to lower settings to maintain playable frame rates, given the GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. Users seeking esports-level frame rates at 1080p would find the GPU's 89th percentile ranking adequate, but not exceptional. The CPU's single-core performance (1455 Cinebench R23) is sufficient for most competitive titles that are GPU-bound at lower resolutions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing, but with distinct workload-dependent behaviors. The CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 89th percentile are close, suggesting neither component dramatically limits the other in mixed workloads. However, specific benchmarks reveal where each component dominates.

For CPU-bound tasks like data compression (292698 Passmark score) or integer math (84228), the CPU is the clear workhorse. For GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or gaming at high resolutions, the GPU's 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 compute takes over. The CPU's single-thread score of 3184 in Passmark single-thread indicates it can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s may become the bottleneck at 1440p and above.

The CPU's physics score of 1009 in Passmark physics is noteworthy — this is a relatively low score compared to its other Passmark results, suggesting that physics-heavy simulations may lag behind other workloads. The GPU's pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 269.9 GTexel/s provide the fill rate needed for modern rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM is a hard ceiling for high-resolution textures.

In gaming, the balance shifts with resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance is likely sufficient, and the GPU becomes the primary limiter. At 720p or with low settings, the CPU's single-thread performance could become the constraint. The absence of measured FPS data prevents precise bottleneck quantification, but the percentile gap of 6 points (83 vs 89) suggests the CPU is slightly more likely to limit performance than the GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 86, indicating the system outperforms 86% of all configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14400F?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS has an average benchmark score of 32354, while the Intel Core i5-14400F scores 32279, putting the AMD part 0.2% ahead.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists `eccMemory` as false, so ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and how does it affect upgrades?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket. This means upgrades are limited to what fits in the laptop's motherboard, typically RAM and storage.

Q: What is the GPU's release date?

A: The GPU's release date is 2023-01-03, and it remains in Active production status.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100?

A: The RX 7600M scores 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64212, making the RX 7600M 0.7% behind.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt. It is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 208 mm². The base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and the TDP is 35 watts — a modest figure for a mobile processor.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, yielding 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The integrated Radeon 680M GPU provides a fallback graphics solution when the discrete GPU is not needed. PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU supports fast NVMe storage and the discrete GPU.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-core performer. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11992 and Geekbench multicore score of 9515 place it in the upper echelon of mobile CPUs. The Passmark multithread score of 22801 and floating point math score of 47533 further confirm its compute capabilities. Single-core scores of 1455 (Cinebench R23) and 1652 (Geekbench) are adequate for everyday tasks and gaming.

The CPU's Passmark data encryption score of 18104 and extended instructions score of 20114 indicate solid cryptographic and SIMD performance, which matters for security software and scientific computing. The find prime numbers score of 56 is notably low, suggesting that integer-heavy iterative workloads may not be this CPU's strength. The data compression score of 292698 is exceptionally high, making this CPU well-suited for file archiving and compression tasks.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS with the AMD Radeon RX 7600M in a laptop-class configuration, as indicated by the `buildClass` field of "laptop." The CPU is a mobile part with a 35-watt TDP, and the GPU is a mobile discrete part with a 90-watt TDP. The GPU's slot width is listed as "IGP," which typically means it is integrated onto the motherboard in a laptop rather than a replaceable card.

The combined percentile of 86 places this system above the vast majority of all tracked configurations. The CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 89th percentile are both above average, but not top-tier. This system occupies the upper-midrange tier of laptop performance — capable of modern gaming and productivity, but not designed for extreme 4K rendering or high-refresh competitive play at maximum settings.

The GPU's predecessor is listed as "Polaris Mobile," indicating a generational leap from the older GCN architecture to RDNA 3.0. The CPU's generation is "Ryzen 7 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))," and it is produced on a 6 nm process. Both components are in Active production status, meaning they are current products. The system as a whole represents a coherent mobile gaming and workstation platform.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 89th percentile and CPU's 83rd percentile suggest this system can drive 1080p displays at high refresh rates in esports titles, though the 128-bit memory bus may limit performance in AAA games at ultra settings. The CPU's single-core score of 3184 in Passmark single-thread supports stable frame pacing.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11992, provide headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's 28 ray accelerators and 1792 shading units can handle encoding offload if the software supports AMD's encoder. The data encryption score of 18104 adds security for stream keys and DRM.

Video editing: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 84228 and floating point math score of 47533 accelerate timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU's 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 compute aids in GPU-accelerated effects, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit large 4K projects.

3D rendering: The GPU's 269.9 GTexel/s texture rate and 154.2 GPixel/s pixel rate provide solid rasterization throughput. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11992 handles CPU-based rendering engines, but the absence of tensor cores (null in the FACT PACK) means no dedicated AI acceleration for denoising.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark extended instructions score of 20114 and data compression score of 292698 support fast compilation and code deployment. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces cache misses during large project compilation.

Student and office work: The 35-watt CPU TDP extends battery life, and the integrated Radeon 680M GPU can handle video playback and office graphics without engaging the discrete GPU. The CPU's single-core Geekbench score of 1652 is more than adequate for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet calculations.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is based on the Navi 33 chip, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with a codename of "Hotpink Bonefish." It is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors across a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units.

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate. The base clock is 1500 MHz, with a game clock of 2070 MHz and a boost clock of 2410 MHz. Compute performance is rated at 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU includes 28 ray accelerators (RT cores) for hardware ray tracing, though the tensor core field is null, indicating no dedicated AI hardware. The pixel rate is 154.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 269.9 GTexel/s. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they vary by laptop implementation.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 places it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, scores 63830, a 0.1% difference. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX scores 63842, also 0.1% ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693 (0.1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64212 (0.7% behind). This tight clustering indicates the RX 7600M performs within a narrow band of its peers, making it a predictable choice for 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds