SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS

32,354 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS paired with the AMD Radeon 860M is a laptop-class build combining an eight-core mobile processor with a modern integrated GPU. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 72nd percentile, yielding a combined percentile of 78. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is derived from benchmark scores and should be treated as estimates rather than measured results.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 860M is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture using TSMC’s 4 nm process, a newer and denser node than the CPU’s 6 nm process. The GPU is an integrated design (IGP) with a 15 W TDP, so it shares system memory rather than using dedicated VRAM. Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as “System Shared” or “System Dependent,” meaning the effective memory performance depends entirely on the host laptop’s RAM configuration. The CPU’s dual-channel DDR5 memory bus provides 76.8 GB/s of theoretical bandwidth, but the GPU’s actual bandwidth is not fixed by the GPU itself.

Clock behavior is straightforward: the base clock is 600 MHz, boosting to 3000 MHz. The GPU has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs, plus 8 ray-tracing cores. It has no dedicated tensor cores. Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 compute are both rated at 3.072 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, which means the GPU does not have separate FP16 acceleration. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it is capable of modern graphics features including ray tracing and mesh shaders.

The benchmark scores place the Radeon 860M in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26401. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 22759 and its Vulkan score is 30043. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (average 26421, delta -0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331, delta +0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, delta -0.6%), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 (26683, delta -1.1%). The delta values are all within about one percent, meaning the 860M performs nearly identically to these cards in the aggregate. However, the RX 5700 XT and RTX A4000 are desktop cards with dedicated memory, so the 860M’s shared-memory design limits its real-world rendering throughput in memory-heavy scenes.

For rendering workloads, the 8 ray-tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support allow the 860M to run ray-traced effects, but the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 figure and 16 ROPs cap the raw rasterization and ray-tracing performance. In practice, the GPU is best suited to 1080p rendering with medium settings or lower, and 4K ray tracing is likely out of reach. The OpenCL and Vulkan scores suggest the GPU handles compute tasks like video encoding or physics simulations reasonably well, but the shared memory bus will be a bottleneck when working with large textures or high-resolution render targets.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark profile is strong for a mobile part. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 11992 in multi-core and 1455 in single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 9515 multi-core and 1652 single-core. Passmark tests show a multithread score of 22801, a single-thread score of 3184, and individual tests including integer math (84228), floating-point math (47533), data encryption (18104), and data compression (292698). The average benchmark score across all tests is 32354, placing the CPU in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest CPU rivals are all within a fraction of a percent: the Intel Core i5-14400F (average 32279, delta +0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (32446, delta -0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (32233, delta +0.4%), and the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226, delta +0.4%). This means the 6800HS delivers performance essentially indistinguishable from a modern desktop i5-14400F in synthetic workloads, despite being a 35 W mobile chip.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26401, with a percentile of 72. The CPU’s percentile is 83, and the combined percentile of the pairing is 78. The CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU, which is typical for an integrated-GPU build. In the combined picture, this laptop-class pairing sits in the 78th percentile overall, meaning it outperforms 78% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is a high-tier mobile processor, while the GPU is a mid-tier integrated part; the gap between the two percentiles suggests that the GPU will be the primary performance limiter in graphics-bound tasks.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, a mobile socket.

Q: Does the Radeon 860M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 8 ray-tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU boosts up to 4.70 GHz from a base clock of 3.20 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s compute performance?

A: The GPU has a FP32 compute rating of 3.072 TFLOPS, with an equal FP16 rating.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-14400F?

A: The 6800HS has an average benchmark score of 32354, which is 0.2% higher than the i5-14400F’s 32279.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination; all frame-rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP4, so it is not field-upgradeable in a typical laptop. The memory is DDR5, dual-channel, with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and the CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. ECC memory is not supported.

The power envelope is modest: the CPU has a TDP of 35 W and the GPU has a TDP of 15 W, totaling 50 W for the two main components. This is low enough that a typical laptop power delivery system handles it without issue; no separate PSU headroom is needed. The GPU has no external power connectors and is an integrated IGP, so the only upgrade path for graphics would be to move to a different laptop with a discrete GPU, rather than upgrading within this platform.

Given the shared memory design, the most impactful upgrade would be increasing the system’s DDR5 memory capacity and speed, because the GPU’s bandwidth is system-dependent. The CPU itself is already at a high performance level (83rd percentile), so a future upgrade would likely target the GPU side, either by selecting a laptop with a discrete GPU or by using an external GPU (eGPU) if the system supports it. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU does allow for an external enclosure, but this is not a typical laptop upgrade path.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 72nd percentile reveal a clear imbalance: the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU. In gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck for most frame-rate-limited scenarios. For example, at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS and 16 ROPs will likely saturate before the CPU’s 8-core/16-thread design does. In contrast, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, code compilation, or multi-threaded productivity, the CPU can run at full capacity while the GPU remains underutilized.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists. However, based on the benchmark scores, the GPU’s performance is comparable to the GeForce MX550 (delta -0.1%) and RTX 5060 (delta +0.3%). In gaming, the GPU will limit framerates at high resolutions; the CPU will only become a limit in extremely low-resolution or low-detail settings where the frame rate exceeds the CPU’s single-thread capability. For mixed workloads like streaming and gaming, the CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 11992) can handle encoding while the GPU handles rendering, but the GPU’s limited pixel rate may still cap the overall quality.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame-rate figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and the GPU’s hardware specifications, not from direct measurements. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 26401 and percentile of 72 indicate that it is positioned at the mid-tier of laptop GPUs. With 512 shading units, 16 ROPs, and a 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 rate, the Radeon 860M is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles. At 1440p, users should expect to reduce quality settings, and 4K gaming will generally require low settings or upscaling.

The GPU’s 8 ray-tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support mean that ray-traced effects are possible, but the low shading unit count and shared memory bandwidth will make ray tracing a heavy performance hit. For esports titles, the CPU’s high single-thread score (Geekbench single 1652) can drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s pixel rate of 48 GPixel/s will still be the limiting factor. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is a 1080p-focused one, with 1440p requiring compromises.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor from the 6000 series, built on the Zen 3+ architecture (codenamed Rembrandt) and manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 35 W. The CPU has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory, dual-channel, with a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only). The CPU is not unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark performance is strong. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 11992 and the single-core score is 1455. In Geekbench, multi-core is 9515 and single-core is 1652. Passmark multithread is 22801 and single-thread is 3184. The average benchmark score is 32354, placing it in the 83rd percentile. The CPU outperforms or matches desktop-class rivals: it is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14400F and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900, while trailing the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 by only 0.3%.

These scores translate to real workloads. The multi-core performance is suitable for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11992 indicating that it can handle parallel tasks efficiently. The single-core score of 1455 ensures responsive everyday use and adequate performance for lightly threaded applications. The Passmark integer math score of 84228 and floating-point math of 47533 indicate strong arithmetic capability for scientific and engineering software. The CPU is a high-end mobile part, better than the average desktop CPU, and is only limited by its 35 W power envelope.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class pairing: the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is a mobile CPU, and the AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU. The CPU is the 83rd percentile, the GPU is the 72nd percentile, and the combined percentile is 78. This places the build in the upper tier of laptop configurations—the CPU is far above average, while the GPU is above average but not top-tier. The pairing is well-suited for a thin-and-light laptop that emphasizes CPU-heavy tasks, such as content creation, software development, and office productivity, with gaming as a secondary capability.

The CPU’s 8-core/16-thread design and strong multi-threaded scores make it a capable workstation, while the GPU’s performance is sufficient for 1080p gaming and accelerated compute. The 35 W CPU and 15 W GPU TDPs indicate that the laptop can be relatively portable, without a dedicated discrete GPU. The build is a “balanced” laptop in the sense that the CPU is the dominant component, but it is not a gaming-first machine.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing suits users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks but also want a capable GPU for light gaming and media work. Gamers targeting 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find the GPU sufficient, especially for esports and older titles. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or photo processing will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core strength; the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11992 suggests good performance in rendering software. Developers and software engineers will appreciate the 8 cores and 16 threads for compiling and running virtual machines. Students and small business workstations can use the CPU’s responsiveness for spreadsheets, word processing, and web tasks, with the GPU providing a smooth interface for presentations and light image editing.

The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS compute is also useful for tasks like OpenCL acceleration in certain applications, and the Vulkan score of 30043 indicates strong performance in Vulkan-based workloads. The CPU’s data compression and encryption scores (Passmark 292698 and 18104) are relevant for database and security tasks. Overall, this build is for users who need a portable laptop with a high-performance CPU and a GPU that can handle occasional gaming, rather than for hardcore gamers or those requiring high-end dedicated graphics.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 72nd percentile and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single 1652) suggest the pairing can achieve high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p, but the GPU’s pixel rate of 48 GPixel/s may cap the maximum refresh rate in demanding games. At 1440p, users should reduce settings to maintain frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8-core/16-thread design and Cinebench R23 multi-core 11992 allow for hardware-encoded streaming while gaming, though the GPU’s limited resources may cause encoding overhead if the GPU is used for both rendering and encoding.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance (Passmark multithread 22801) accelerates video export and rendering, while the GPU can accelerate effects and playback with OpenCL scores of 22759. The shared memory bandwidth may slow down 4K timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU handles CPU-based rendering well, and the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS and 8 ray-tracing cores provide some ray-traced acceleration, but the shared memory and low 16 ROPs mean the GPU will be the bottleneck for high-poly scenes.

Software development: The 8 cores and 16 threads, plus the strong Passmark integer math score of 84228, make compilation and testing efficient. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ensures fast code builds.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 1652 ensures snappy application launches, and the GPU is sufficient for office graphics, spreadsheets, and video conferencing, with low 35 W TDP for battery efficiency.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds