SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS

32,354 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS and AMD Radeon 8050S pairing represents a high-end mobile solution designed for thin-and-light laptops. The CPU is a 35 W part based on the Zen 3+ architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process, while the GPU is a 55 W integrated part built on RDNA 3.5 using a 4 nm node. This combination targets users who need strong multi-threaded compute and capable graphics in a portable chassis. The data indicates this is a balanced pairing, with the CPU landing in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs and the GPU in the 89th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 86. It is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It belongs to the 6000 series and carries the Rembrandt codename, representing the Zen 3+ architecture on a 6 nm process from TSMC. The die size is 208 mm². Cache is organized with 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3, which is a typical configuration for a mainstream mobile chip.

Benchmark data shows the CPU’s strengths. In Cinebench R23, it scores 11992 in multi-core and 1455 in single-core. The multi-core score indicates strong sustained performance for a 35 W processor, positioning it well for video rendering and compilation workloads. The single-core score of 1455 is moderate, sufficient for everyday responsiveness but not class-leading for lightly threaded tasks. Geekbench results follow a similar pattern: 9515 multi-core and 1652 single-core, reinforcing the CPU’s multi-threaded bias.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32354, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-14400F (avg score 32279, delta 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (avg score 32446, delta -0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (avg score 32233, delta 0.4%), and the Intel Core i9-11900 (avg score 32226, delta 0.4%). This means the 6800HS is effectively tied with these desktop and mobile parts, differing by less than half a percent. The practical interpretation is that for heavily threaded workloads, this mobile CPU trades blows with a mid-range desktop i5 and a previous-generation desktop i9, which is impressive given the power envelope.

Passmark sub-scores reveal specific workload characteristics. Integer math scores 84228, floating-point math scores 47533, and extended instructions score 20114. Data encryption scores 18104, data compression scores 292698, and random string sorting scores 30266. Physics scores 1009, and find prime numbers scores 56. These numbers suggest the CPU is particularly strong at compression tasks and integer-heavy operations, which is relevant for database work and file archiving. The single-thread score of 3184 is the same in both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread fields, confirming consistency.

For real workloads, the 6800HS is a capable content-creation processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11992 is sufficient for 1080p video exports and 3D scene rendering at moderate settings. The high data compression score of 292698 indicates strong performance in backup utilities and large file transfers. However, the single-core score of 1455 in R23 means that legacy applications or those with poor scaling will not benefit as much. The 16 MB of L3 cache is moderate, but the dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate potential memory bottlenecks.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the CPU has an average benchmark score of 32354, while the GPU has an average score of 62108. The GPU score is roughly 92% higher than the CPU score, indicating that the GPU is the more powerful component in synthetic benchmarks. This suggests that in gaming workloads, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor at lower resolutions, but the CPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions where the GPU’s frame output is lower.

The CPU’s percentile of 83 and the GPU’s percentile of 89 show that both components are above average, but the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its market. The combined percentile of 86 indicates the overall package is well above the median. Since there are no measured FPS rows, the bottleneck analysis relies on the score differential. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 22801 and physics score of 1009 are respectable, but the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS suggests it can push high frame rates at 1080p, which will require the CPU to keep up.

The data indicates that for CPU-bound scenarios, such as simulation games or high-refresh-rate esports titles at low settings, the Ryzen 7 6800HS’s single-core performance (Geekbench 1652) will be the constraint. For GPU-bound scenarios, such as modern AAA games at high settings, the Radeon 8050S will be the constraint. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared between the CPU and GPU, which could be a bottleneck in memory-heavy workloads, but the data does not provide specific FPS scaling to confirm this.

Given the GPU’s higher percentile, the system is less likely to be GPU-limited than CPU-limited in mixed workloads. The CPU’s deltaPct values against rivals are all under 0.5%, showing it is well-matched against capable competition. For productivity tasks like video editing, the CPU’s multi-core score of 9515 in Geekbench is sufficient to feed the GPU, but for gaming, the balance tilts toward the GPU being the primary performance driver.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistent across multiple tests. Cinebench R15 shows 1987 multi-core and 234 single-core. Cinebench R23 shows 11992 multi-core and 1455 single-core. Geekbench shows 9515 multi-core and 1652 single-core. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32354, placing it at the 83rd percentile. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-14400F, scores 32279, a delta of 0.2%, meaning the 6800HS is statistically identical. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 scores 32446, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the 6800HS is 0.3% slower. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32233, a delta of 0.4%, meaning the 6800HS is 0.4% faster.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 62108, placing it at the 89th percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which scores 61896, a delta of 0.3%, meaning the 8050S is 0.3% faster. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, a delta of -2.5%, meaning the 8050S is 2.5% slower. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775, a delta of -2.6%, meaning the 8050S is 2.6% slower.

The combined picture is a strong mobile platform. The CPU is in the upper tier of all processors, and the GPU is in the upper tier of all graphics cards. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 65818 is notably higher than its Vulkan score of 58398, suggesting that compute-heavy workloads like rendering will perform better than gaming workloads that rely on Vulkan. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3184 is decent for a laptop part, but the Geekbench single-core score of 1652 is modest, which may lead to lower FPS in titles that are not well-threaded. Since no measured FPS data exists, the estimated gaming performance is derived from these scores, indicating that the system can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, but 1440p or 4K gaming will require lower settings.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets laptop builders and buyers who need a portable workstation with strong compute performance. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking makes it suitable for software developers who compile code frequently, as the multi-core score of 11992 in Cinebench R23 will reduce build times. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking makes it suitable for creative professionals who work with 3D modeling or GPU-accelerated effects, as the OpenCL score of 65818 indicates strong compute capability.

Gamers at 1080p will find this pairing adequate for high-refresh gaming, but the absence of measured FPS data means the exact frame rates are unknown. The CPU’s single-core score of 1652 in Geekbench is a limiting factor for esports titles that rely on high IPC, but the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS can compensate at moderate settings. Content creators who edit 4K video will benefit from the CPU’s multithread score of 22801 in Passmark, which handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding.

Students and small business users will find this pairing overkill for office tasks, but the high percentile scores mean the system will remain responsive for years. The CPU’s data encryption score of 18104 is useful for secure file handling. The GPU’s 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs suggest good pixel fill rates for display rendering. This is not a budget build; it is a premium laptop configuration for users who need consistent performance in multi-threaded and GPU-accelerated applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket, meaning upgrades are limited to the laptop’s motherboard. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, providing 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and NVMe storage, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. ECC memory is not supported, which is typical for this class.

The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 55 W, totaling 90 W of processor power. The suggested PSU is null, but the low TDP means a typical laptop power adapter is sufficient. There is no power connector for the GPU, as it is an IGP (integrated graphics processor). The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 lanes, but the full bandwidth will not be utilized.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing the amount of DDR5 memory, as the memory is system-shared with the GPU. The GPU’s memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," meaning more system RAM will directly improve GPU performance. The CPU’s boost clock of 4.70 GHz is not unlocked, so overclocking is not an option. The production status is active for both components, meaning replacement parts are available.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU’s 89th percentile rank suggests it can drive high frame rates at 1080p, but the CPU’s single-core score of 1455 in Cinebench R23 may limit performance in CPU-bound titles. Estimated performance is suitable for competitive shooters at medium settings, but not for maxed-out AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide headroom for encoding while gaming. The Geekbench multi-core score of 9515 indicates the CPU can handle a software encoder alongside game logic, though a dedicated encoder would be preferable. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 58398 suggests it can handle the rendering load.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11992 is adequate for 1080p timeline editing and 4K exports. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 65818 accelerates effects and color grading. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with large video files.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Passmark floating-point score of 47533 is strong for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-based renderers. The 32 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the performance is not specified.

Software Development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 84228 is excellent for code compilation. The data compression score of 292698 speeds up package management and version control operations. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3184 in Passmark is more than enough for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU’s 64 ROPs ensure smooth 4K display output. The low 35 W CPU TDP ensures long battery life.

FAQ

Q: Does this pairing support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, providing 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket.

Q: Is the GPU’s memory dedicated or shared?

A: The GPU’s memory is system-shared, meaning it uses the same DDR5 memory as the CPU, and the bandwidth is system dependent.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture?

A: The GPU is based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, using the Strix Halo chip on a 4 nm process.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-14400F?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32354, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i5-14400F’s score of 32279.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank?

A: The GPU is in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 62108.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS with the AMD Radeon 8050S. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is an integrated RDNA 3.5 part with a 55 W TDP. The combined percentile of 86 places this system well above the median laptop configuration. The CPU is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, indicating a high-performance pairing. The GPU is an IGP, meaning it is integrated into the processor package, so the entire system runs on the CPU’s power budget. This is a premium mobile solution for users who need desktop-class performance in a portable form factor.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, with the chip codename Strix Halo. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 308 mm². The transistor count is listed as unknown. The GPU has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The memory is system-shared, meaning it uses the host system’s DDR5 memory, with bandwidth that is system dependent.

The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 32 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 11.47 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The TDP is 55 W, and it uses no power connectors, as it is an IGP. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, and the display outputs are portable device dependent.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 62108. This places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which scores 61896, a delta of 0.3%, meaning the 8050S is 0.3% faster. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, a delta of -2.5%, meaning the 8050S is 2.5% slower. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775, a delta of -2.6%, meaning the 8050S is 2.6% slower.

The higher OpenCL score compared to Vulkan indicates that the GPU is stronger at compute tasks than at gaming-specific rendering. The 32 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS is the primary driver of rasterization performance. The 64 ROPs ensure good pixel fill rates for high-resolution displays. Since the memory is system-shared, the GPU’s performance will scale with the amount and speed of the system’s DDR5 memory. For rendering workloads, the OpenCL score of 65818 suggests it can handle 3D modeling and GPU-accelerated effects, while the Vulkan score of 58398 indicates it can run modern games at playable framerates in 1080p with adjusted settings.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds