SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

25,201 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a balanced mainstream gaming laptop combination that sits in the 72nd percentile of all tracked CPU+GPU pairings, with the CPU holding a notably stronger relative position (77th percentile against all CPUs) than the GPU (67th percentile against all GPUs). This is a Rembrandt-generation, all-TSMC platform: a 6 nm Zen 3+ octa-core processor alongside a 5 nm Ada Lovelace discrete GPU, and the benchmark data shows a configuration tuned for high-refresh 1080p gaming and mid-tier content creation rather than enthusiast workloads. One important caveat applies throughout: no measured frame-rate rows exist for this exact combination in the database — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data — so all gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not captured gameplay results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a CPU-forward pairing. The Ryzen 7 6800H's average benchmark score of 25201 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 4060 Mobile's average of 22729 lands it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 72 sits almost exactly between those two marks, which is the statistical signature of a build where neither component catastrophically wastes the other — but where the CPU is the relatively stronger asset.

The thread-scaling benchmarks tell you where the bottlenecks live. In 3DMark's CPU profile tests, the 6800H scores 872 points single-threaded, 1695 at two threads, 3214 at four threads, 5392 at eight threads, and 6560 at sixteen threads. Note that the sixteen-thread score is marginally higher than the max-threads score of 6532 — threading beyond sixteen is not applicable here since the chip runs eight cores and sixteen threads, and the near-identical figures confirm SMT is fully exploited. Scaling from one to eight threads multiplies output more than six-fold, which means game engines that lean on four to eight threads will extract most of this chip's capability without saturating it.

What that means in practice: at 1080p, where the CPU works hardest to feed frames, the 6800H's strong per-core showing (1542 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 1761 in Geekbench single-core) keeps it ahead of the GPU's ability to render. The bottleneck at 1080p ultra settings will be the RTX 4060 Mobile, not the processor. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear limiter — its PassMark G3D score of 17469 defines the render ceiling — while the CPU has headroom to spare. This is the healthy configuration for a gaming laptop: the GPU saturates before the CPU stalls, so frame pacing stays consistent.

FAQ

Q: Is this combination good for gaming?

A: Yes, with a resolution caveat. The GPU sits in the 67th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 22729, benchmarking within a fraction of a percent of the RTX 2080 (-0.7%) and the Radeon RX 7700 XT (+0.8%). That is solidly upper-mainstream performance, best matched to 1080p high-refresh play and capable 1440p play at reduced settings. No measured FPS data exists for this pairing, so expectations are estimates from these scores.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 6800H compare to its rivals?

A: It is statistically in a dead heat with its nearest competitors. The average-score gaps are tiny: 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-13400F, and 0.4% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9474F. In practice this means platform features — like the integrated Radeon 680M and DDR5 support — matter more than raw CPU delta.

Q: Is the 8 GB of VRAM a problem?

A: It is the main constraint at higher resolutions. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The database does not include per-game VRAM measurements, so no exact figure can be given, but qualitatively this capacity is the first thing to saturate in modern AAA titles at ultra texture settings.

Q: Can this laptop handle content creation?

A: Yes. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13094, Geekbench multi-core of 9642, and PassMark multithread of 23060 put the CPU in the 77th percentile — competent for video editing, 3D work, and code compilation, though not workstation-class.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics, and does that matter?

A: It has the Radeon 680M integrated GPU. This matters for battery efficiency on a laptop platform — light tasks can run without engaging the discrete GPU — though the database contains no measured power figures for the iGPU beyond the CPU's 45 W TDP.

Q: What memory does this platform support?

A: DDR5 only, in a dual-channel configuration with 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. There is no ECC support, and the multiplier is locked.

Q: Is ray tracing viable on this GPU?

A: Partially. The RTX 4060 Mobile carries 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support. The benchmark scores indicate performance in the same band as the RTX 2080, so lighter RT implementations are playable, but demanding path-traced titles will push the estimated frame rates down sharply.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 6800H is an eight-core, sixteen-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process with a 208 mm² die. It runs a 3.20 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.70 GHz, within a 45 W TDP envelope, on Socket FP7. The cache hierarchy is conventional: 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 16 MB L3. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU — enough for the GPU plus fast NVMe storage. The multiplier is locked, so no manual overclocking is on the table.

What the scores say about the architecture: Zen 3+ is a refinement rather than a redesign, and the numbers bear that out as a strong all-rounder rather than a single-thread champion. The single-thread results — 872 in 3DMark, 242.5 in Cinebench R15, 1542 in Cinebench R23, 1761 in Geekbench, 3212 in PassMark — are competitive in the mobile class. The multi-thread results show excellent SMT efficiency: the 3DMark thread curve (1695 → 3214 → 5392 → 6560 from two to sixteen threads) is nearly linear through eight threads, and the R23 multi-core of 13094 with the R15 multi-core of 2136 shows sustained all-core throughput that holds up across benchmark generations.

The PassMark subtests reveal workload-specific strengths. Integer math at 85397 and floating point at 47989 are solid mobile-class figures; data compression at 293929 and encryption at 18260 indicate the chip handles archival and crypto workloads briskly. Extended instructions scoring 20114 confirms good vector-unit throughput, while the find-prime-numbers result of 57 is a low-priority synthetic that few real applications stress. Physics at 1046 and random string sorting at 30668 round out a profile that is broadly capable rather than specialized.

Against its rivals, the picture is one of parity: deltas of 0.2% to the Ryzen 7 7735HS, 0.3% to the Ryzen 9 6900HS, and 0.4% to the Core i5-13400F are within measurement noise. The 77th-percentile ranking against all CPUs is the more meaningful signal — this is a firmly upper-tier mobile processor, closer to the top of the database than the middle.

Who Should Build It

Since the buildClass is laptop, "building" here means choosing a machine, and the data points to several clear audiences. High-refresh 1080p gamers are the primary target: the GPU's benchmark band — within 0.7% of the RTX 2080 and 1.3% of the RTX 5060 Mobile — supports estimated high frame rates at 1080p, while the CPU's 77th-percentile standing and strong four-to-eight-thread scaling keep it from bottlenecking the pipeline. Content creators benefit from the 13094 R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 89420 Geekbench OpenCL and 6816 PassMark compute results, which cover timeline scrubbing, export acceleration, and GPU effects. Software developers get a compilation-capable sixteen-thread CPU with DDR5 bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s; students and office users get more than enough — the single-thread scores alone exceed everyday requirements. Small-business workstation use is viable for moderate 3D and CAD loads given the 181.4 GTexel/s texture rate and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, though the locked multiplier and lack of ECC rule out certified or overclockable workstation roles.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so every frame-rate statement in this section is an estimate derived from benchmark scores, not captured results.

The anchor for estimation is the GPU's average score of 22729 and its PassMark G3D result of 17469, which place it in the same performance band as the RTX 2080 (deltaPct -0.7%), the Radeon RX 7700 XT (+0.8%), the Arc B580 (-1.3%), and the RTX 5060 Mobile (+1.3%). A GPU benchmarking alongside the RTX 2080 is, by that correspondence, a GPU that historically delivers high-refresh 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p gaming in most titles, with ray tracing available but costly. The API subtests (DirectX 9: 216, DirectX 11: 157, DirectX 12: 73) follow the expected pattern of older APIs producing higher raw index numbers, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support means every current rendering feature is exposed.

On the CPU side, the 3DMark CPU-profile scores — particularly 5392 at eight threads and 6560 at sixteen — indicate the processor can drive frame rates well past what the GPU can render at 1080p ultra. The estimated conclusion: esports and competitive titles at 1080p should run at frame rates well beyond standard refresh rates, AAA titles at 1080p ultra should be comfortably playable, and 1440p ultra is where estimated frame rates will fall toward the floor of smooth play. These are score-based expectations, and per-game variation will be significant.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 67th-percentile standing and its statistical tie with the RTX 2080 make 1080p high-refresh play the estimated sweet spot; the CPU's thread-scaling curve confirms it will not be the limiter at that resolution.

Streaming: Sixteen threads with a Cinebench R23 multi-core of 13094 leave headroom to run an encoder alongside gameplay, and the 96 tensor cores on the GPU provide hardware-accelerated encoding pathways for broadcast software.

Video editing: The combination of 9642 Geekbench multi-core on the CPU and 89420 Geekbench OpenCL on the GPU covers both timeline responsiveness and export throughput; 8 GB of VRAM is the limiting factor for heavy GPU-accelerated projects.

3D rendering: With 3072 shading units, 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, and a Vulkan score of 89569, viewport work is smooth for mid-complexity scenes; final renders are competent but not workstation-class.

Software development: The PassMark multithread of 23060 and 76.8 GB/s of DDR5 bandwidth make compile times and containerized workloads comfortable for a mobile platform.

Student and office work: The single-thread scores (1761 Geekbench, 3212 PassMark) more than cover productivity suites, browsing, and media consumption, and the integrated Radeon 680M handles light display duties without engaging the discrete GPU.

GPU Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is an AD107 chip on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die measures 159 mm² and packs 18,900 million transistors — a density of 118.9M per mm². Clocks run from a 1545 MHz base to a 1890 MHz boost, with memory at 16 Gbps effective on a 2000 MHz clock. The memory subsystem is 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It connects over PCIe 4.0 x8.

The functional units: 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores. Throughput figures are 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 (with FP16 at 1:1), a pixel rate of 90.72 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 181.4 GTexel/s. API support spans DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The board is an integrated/mobile part — slot width listed as IGP, no power connectors, a 115 W TDP, and portable-device-dependent display outputs.

For rendering workloads, the compute scores are the story: 6816 in PassMark GPU compute, 89420 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 89569 in Geekbench Vulkan. The near-identical OpenCL and Vulkan figures indicate balanced driver and API performance with no pathological backend. Against rivals, the deltas are tight on all sides — 0.7% to 0.8% against the RTX 2080 and RX 7700 XT, 1.3% against both the Arc B580 and RTX 5060 Mobile — meaning this GPU occupies a well-populated performance band where generational and brand differences wash out. The 128-bit bus and 8 GB capacity are the structural limits: bandwidth-intensive and VRAM-hungry rendering tasks will hit those walls before they exhaust the shader array.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing — buildClass is laptop — combining AMD's Rembrandt mobile flagship-adjacent octa-core with NVIDIA's mainstream Ada discrete GPU. The combined percentile of 72 against all tracked pairings defines its tier: upper-mainstream, clearly above the median configuration but well below enthusiast desktop builds. The platform details reinforce the mobile identity: Socket FP7, a 45 W CPU TDP, a 115 W GPU TDP, DDR5-only memory support, and an integrated Radeon 680M as the fallback graphics solution. Both components carry Active production status in the database, with the GPU's release date recorded as early 2023. This is a coherent, current-generation-at-launch pairing with no launch MSRP recorded, and no price discussion applies.

Benchmark Performance

The exact numbers, and what they add up to. On the CPU side: 3DMark CPU profile of 872 single-thread, 1695 two-thread, 3214 four-thread, 5392 eight-thread, 6532 max-threads, and 6560 at sixteen threads; Cinebench R15 multi-core 2136 and single-core 242.5; Cinebench R23 multi-core 13094 and single-core 1542; Geekbench multi-core 9642 and single-core 1761; PassMark multithread 23060 and single-thread 3212. The CPU's average benchmark score is 25201, ranking in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest-rival deltas of 0.2%, -0.3%, -0.4%, and 0.4% against the 7735HS, 6900HS, i5-13400F, and EPYC 9474F respectively.

On the GPU side: PassMark G3D 17469, GPU compute 6816, Geekbench OpenCL 89420, Vulkan 89569, plus the API subtests (DirectX 9: 216, DirectX 10: 107, DirectX 11: 157, DirectX 12: 73) and G2D at 730. The GPU's average score is 22729, ranking in the 67th percentile, with rival deltas of -0.7% (RTX 2080), +0.8% (RX 7700 XT), -1.3% (Arc B580), and +1.3% (RTX 5060 Mobile). The combined percentile is 72, and no FPS-based pair rank exists because measured frame-rate data is absent.

The combined picture is consistent throughout the data: a CPU about ten percentile points stronger than its GPU partner, both sitting comfortably above the database median, forming a laptop configuration whose measured strength is threaded CPU throughput and whose estimated gaming ceiling is defined by a GPU in the RTX 2080 performance band. For 1080p-first gaming plus serious multitasking and content work on a mobile platform, the numbers support it; for 4K ultra or workstation rendering, they do not.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds