SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

25,201 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H and AMD Radeon 860M pairing represents a balanced mid-range laptop configuration, with a combined performance percentile of 75. The CPU, a Zen 3+ based 8-core part, delivers strong multi-threaded results that rival desktop-class processors, while the GPU, an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution, provides surprisingly competitive graphics performance for an IGP. This combination is best suited for users who need a versatile machine capable of handling both productivity workloads and moderate gaming, without the power demands of a discrete GPU. Benchmark data shows no measured FPS for this exact combination, so all gaming analysis is framed as an estimate based on the GPU's synthetic scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Navi III IGP generation, specifically designed for the Strix Point mobile platform. The GPU operates with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, which is a substantial frequency range that allows for significant performance scaling under load. Memory is entirely system-shared, meaning the GPU draws from the main system DDR5 memory pool, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent" — this makes overall memory performance a critical factor in graphics throughput.

The GPU's compute configuration is modest but well-balanced for an integrated part: it features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units. This hardware setup yields a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. More importantly for modern workloads, the Radeon 860M includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects in supported titles. The FP32 compute throughput is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating that the GPU does not have a dedicated half-precision boost path.

The GPU's benchmark scores are notably strong for an integrated solution. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 22759, while in Geekbench Vulkan, it achieves 30043. These results place the Radeon 860M at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, a remarkable position for an IGP. The nearest rivals provide context: the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421 (a 0.1% difference), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 scores 26331 (a 0.3% difference), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553 (a 0.6% difference), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 scores 26683 (a 1.1% difference). The data shows the Radeon 860M is essentially neck-and-neck with these discrete and professional GPUs, with all deltas under 1.2%. This suggests that for rendering tasks, the 860M can handle light to moderate 3D workloads, though the system-shared memory and lack of dedicated VRAM will limit performance in large scenes or high-resolution textures. The 8 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, but the low FP32 throughput means ray-traced rendering will be slow compared to dedicated high-end GPUs.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H show a processor that scales well across thread counts. In 3DMark tests, it scores 872 in single-thread, 1695 in 2-threads, 3214 in 4-threads, 5392 in 8-threads, 6560 in 16-threads, and 6532 in max-threads. The 16-thread score is only 0.4% higher than the max-thread score, indicating that the 8-core/16-thread configuration is fully utilized at the 16-thread mark. Cinebench results reinforce this: R23 multicore scores 13094, while R23 single-core scores 1542. Geekbench multicore reaches 9642 with a single-core score of 1761. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 23060 and a single-thread score of 3212.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25201, placing it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS scores 25147 (0.2% faster), the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284 (0.3% slower), the Intel Core i5-13400F scores 25292 (0.4% slower), and the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25103 (0.4% faster). This grouping shows the 6800H is positioned in a highly competitive performance tier, where the differences between these processors are negligible — all within a 0.8% spread. The 77th percentile ranking means it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPUs in the database, a strong result for a mobile part.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the more dominant component relative to its peer group. The GPU sits at the 72nd percentile, while the CPU sits at the 77th percentile, and the combined system percentile is 75. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26401, which is actually slightly higher than the CPU's average score of 25201, but the CPU's percentile ranking is higher. This indicates that while the GPU is competitive with its direct rivals, the CPU is comparatively stronger against the broader field of processors. The pairing is well-matched, with neither component drastically outperforming the other in a way that would create an obvious imbalance.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 7 6800H and the Radeon 860M is characterized by the CPU's slightly higher percentile ranking (77th) compared to the GPU's (72nd). This 5-point gap suggests that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as it trails the CPU in relative standing. The data indicates that the GPU's performance is competitive with entry-level discrete GPUs like the GeForce MX550, but it lacks the dedicated memory bandwidth that discrete solutions often provide. In CPU-bound tasks such as physics calculations, data compression, or multi-threaded rendering, the 6800H's 16 threads will keep up with or exceed the GPU's demands.

In gaming workloads, the FPS scaling will primarily be dictated by the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS compute throughput and the system-shared memory bandwidth. The CPU's single-thread score of 872 in 3DMark and 1542 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient to feed the GPU's rendering pipeline at most settings. The PassMark physics score of 1046 and integer math score of 85397 further confirm the CPU's ability to handle game logic and physics without becoming a bottleneck. However, at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed, the CPU's performance will determine the frame ceiling; the 77th percentile ranking suggests it can support high frame rates in less demanding titles.

For productivity workloads that are multi-threaded, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary workhorse. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6560 and max-thread score of 6532 show excellent scaling, with the multi-thread performance nearly doubling the 8-thread score of 5392. The GPU can assist in some compute tasks via OpenCL, where it scores 22759, but the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13094 will dominate in CPU-rendering scenarios. The PassMark data encryption score of 18260 and extended instructions score of 20114 indicate the CPU handles cryptography and SIMD workloads efficiently, further reducing the chance of a CPU bottleneck in mixed workloads.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop configuration targets users who need a single device capable of handling both professional workloads and casual gaming. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium settings will find the Radeon 860M adequate, given its 72nd percentile ranking and performance parity with the GeForce MX550. The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores enable some RT effects, but the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance will limit ray-traced titles to low settings or lower resolutions. Esports titles and older games will run comfortably, as the CPU's strong single-thread score of 872 in 3DMark supports high frame rates.

Content creators working with video editing or photo manipulation will benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's OpenCL/Vulkan compute capabilities. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and Vulkan score of 30043 suggest the iGPU can accelerate effects and encoding tasks in supported software. Software developers compiling code will see strong performance from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13094 and PassMark multithread score of 23060, which handle parallel build tasks efficiently. Students and small business users will appreciate the balanced performance for office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing, where the CPU's single-thread score of 3212 in PassMark ensures a responsive experience.

The 77th percentile CPU ranking makes this system a strong choice for professionals who rely on CPU-intensive applications like 3D modeling, simulation, or data analysis. The GPU's parity with the RTX A4000 in average benchmark score (26683 vs 26401, a 1.1% difference) is notable, though the 860M lacks the professional driver optimizations and dedicated VRAM of that workstation card. For users who primarily need a portable workstation with occasional gaming capability, this pairing hits a sweet spot between the two extremes.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 208 mm². The base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, operating at a 45 W TDP. The processor uses the AMD Socket FP7 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that scales efficiently from single-thread to multi-thread workloads. The 3DMark single-thread score of 872 is modest, but the 16-thread score of 6560 shows near-linear scaling (a 7.5x improvement over single-thread). The Cinebench R23 scores of 1542 single-core and 13094 multicore indicate that the 6800H delivers strong sustained performance, which is critical for long-running compile jobs or rendering tasks. The Geekbench multicore score of 9642 further corroborates this, placing it in a competitive range against desktop parts like the Intel Core i5-13400F, which scores 25292 in average benchmark (0.4% slower than the 6800H's 25201).

In real workloads, the PassMark results are particularly telling. The integer math score of 85397 and floating point math score of 47989 show balanced ALU and FPU performance, suitable for general productivity and scientific computing. The data compression score of 293929 and random string sorting score of 30668 indicate strong performance in file archiving and database operations. The extended instructions score of 20114 confirms robust SIMD support, benefiting applications that leverage AVX-512 or similar instruction sets. The find prime numbers score of 57 is a single-threaded integer test, which is lower relative to the multi-thread scores, but this is expected given the modest single-thread boost of 4.70 GHz. Overall, the CPU's 77th percentile ranking is justified by its ability to handle both bursty single-threaded tasks and sustained multi-threaded workloads.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H combined with the AMD Radeon 860M. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so the following gaming performance analysis is framed entirely as an estimate based on the benchmark scores. The Radeon 860M's 72nd percentile ranking and its performance parity with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (average score 26421 vs 26401, a 0.1% difference) suggest that gaming performance will be similar to that of entry-level discrete GPUs. At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, players can expect playable frame rates in esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, but AAA games will likely require medium to low settings to maintain 30-60 FPS.

The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate provide a baseline for rasterization throughput. At 1080p, the system-shared memory bandwidth will be a limiting factor, as the GPU must compete with the CPU for DDR5 bandwidth. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 872 in 3DMark ensures that game logic and draw calls are processed quickly, reducing the risk of a CPU bottleneck at lower frame rates. For 1440p gaming, the 860M will struggle to maintain high settings in demanding titles, but lighter games or those with FSR support may still be playable. At 4K, the GPU is not recommended for anything beyond the lightest 2D or indie games.

The 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for RT effects, but the low FP32 throughput means ray-traced scenes will be rendered at significantly reduced frame rates. Players should expect to disable RT in most titles or use it only in games with light RT workloads. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 indicates that the GPU performs well under modern graphics APIs, which is a positive sign for Vulkan-based games. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support and OpenGL 4.6 compatibility ensure broad software support across current titles. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, with the expectation that frame rates will vary between 30-60 FPS depending on the game's optimization.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, which places this laptop configuration above the majority of systems in the database, with the CPU at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 72nd percentile.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS?

A: The Ryzen 7 6800H has an average benchmark score of 25201, while the Ryzen 7 7735HS scores 25147, making the 6800H 0.2% faster. This is a negligible difference, indicating they perform nearly identically.

Q: What is the FP32 compute performance of the AMD Radeon 860M?

A: The Radeon 860M delivers 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 performance also at 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs.

Q: Does the Radeon 860M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 860M includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture. However, the low compute throughput will limit ray-traced performance in demanding scenarios.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and what type of memory does it support?

A: The Ryzen 7 6800H supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How does the Radeon 860M compare to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550?

A: The Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26401, while the GeForce MX550 scores 26421, a difference of 0.1%. They are effectively performance equals, placing both in the 72nd percentile of GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and process node?

A: The Ryzen 7 6800H uses the AMD Socket FP7 and is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 208 mm².

Build Overview

This build combines the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H mobile processor with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated graphics, forming a laptop-class system. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3+ part with a 45 W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 IGP with a 15 W TDP, making this a power-efficient pairing suitable for thin-and-light notebooks. The combined performance percentile of 75 indicates that this system outperforms three-quarters of all configurations in the database, a strong result for an integrated graphics solution.

The CPU's 77th percentile ranking is driven by its robust multi-threaded performance, with Cinebench R23 multicore reaching 13094 and PassMark multithread scoring 23060. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking is notable for an IGP, with Vulkan benchmark scores of 30043 that place it in the same performance tier as discrete GPUs like the GeForce MX550 and the RTX A4000. The system's overall tier is solidly mid-range, capable of handling demanding productivity tasks and moderate gaming. The absence of a discrete GPU keeps power consumption low, but the system-shared memory for the GPU means that total system memory capacity and speed will directly impact graphics performance.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is best paired with a 1080p display that supports variable refresh rates. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking and parity with the GeForce MX550 suggest that esports titles can achieve frame rates above 60 FPS at medium-high settings, though AAA games will require lower settings to approach 60 FPS. The CPU's single-thread performance will not be a limiting factor in most scenarios.

Streaming gameplay is feasible, as the CPU's 16 threads can handle both game logic and encoding. The PassMark multithread score of 23060 and 3DMark 16-thread score of 6560 provide sufficient headroom for software encoding at 1080p, though the GPU's system-shared memory may reduce overall performance when gaming and streaming simultaneously.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13094, which accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU's OpenCL score of 22759 can assist with effects and transitions, but the lack of dedicated VRAM will limit complex GPU-accelerated workflows.

3D rendering in CPU-based engines will see strong performance from the 8-core/16-thread configuration, with 3DMark max-thread score of 6532 indicating efficient scaling. The GPU can provide some assistance via Vulkan compute (score 30043), but it is not a replacement for a discrete workstation GPU.

Software development benefits from the CPU's balanced performance. Compilation tasks will utilize the 16 threads effectively, as shown by the PassMark integer math score of 85397 and data compression score of 293929, which handle parallel build processes and source code management efficiently.

Student and office work is well-served by this configuration. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3212 ensures responsive application loading and navigation, while the GPU's 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate handles 4K display output and basic graphics tasks without strain. The 45 W TDP and 15 W GPU TDP make this an efficient choice for all-day battery life.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

FAQ

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds