SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

82 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

29,879 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is a desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It is paired in this analysis with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 GPU, a combination that targets a desktop build class. The CPU holds an 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 66. The following analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data to interpret what these scores mean for real workloads, system balance, and overall platform capability.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT features 8 cores and 16 threads, operating at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. This is a Zen 3 design, codenamed Vermeer, built on TSMC's 7 nm process node with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. It connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU and has no integrated graphics.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark results show a progression from 959 in single-thread testing to 1,879 in 2-thread, 3,603 in 4-thread, 6,141 in 8-thread, and 7,683 in 16-thread tests, with a max-thread score of 7,680. The near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads (6,141 to 7,683) indicates the SMT implementation is efficient, adding roughly 25% more throughput when doubling logical cores. The Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore scores 2,398 versus 338 single-core, R20 multicore scores 9,993 versus 1,410 single-core, and R23 multicore scores 23,794 versus 3,359 single-core. The R23 multicore figure is particularly strong for a desktop 8-core part, suggesting sustained all-core boost behavior.

In Passmark tests, the CPU achieves 3,535 in single-thread performance and 28,053 in multithread performance. The integer math score of 93,942 and floating-point math score of 53,808 indicate a balance favoring integer workloads, which is typical for general-purpose desktop processing. Data compression scores 352,002, while data encryption scores 21,461 and extended instructions score 24,270. The prime number finding score of 119 and physics score of 1,355 are lower relative to other metrics, suggesting the CPU is more adept at complex multi-step calculations than at highly parallel simple iterations. The average benchmark score is 29,879, placing it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 5800XT is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, which has an average score of 29,868 with a delta of 0%. It sits 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, both scoring 29,955, and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X at 29,713. These sub-1% deltas mean that in real-world mixed workloads, the 5800XT is interchangeable with these competitors, despite being an older architecture. The 8-core/16-thread configuration with a 4.80 GHz boost clock makes it a strong choice for applications that use up to 16 threads, such as compiling code, rendering frames, or running virtual machines.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU is determined by their respective percentile standings. The CPU's 81st percentile places it well above the GPU's 50th percentile, indicating the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulation, data compression, or single-threaded operations, the 5800XT will not be the limiting factor. The Passmark physics score of 1,355 and single-thread score of 3,535 demonstrate headroom for high-frequency tasks.

Conversely, the GPU's 50th percentile suggests it is the primary constraint in graphics-intensive scenarios. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation operates at a base clock of 930 MHz with a boost of 1,680 MHz, and its 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest for a modern GPU. In gaming at high resolutions or with ray tracing enabled, the GPU will likely cap frame rates before the CPU does. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,683 indicates it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's rendering throughput will limit the final output.

The lack of measured FPS data for this combination means the exact bottleneck point is speculative, but the percentile gap of 31 points suggests a clear imbalance. For workloads that are purely GPU-bound, such as 3D rendering with ray tracing, the system will perform at roughly the level of the GPU's 50th percentile. For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or software compilation, the system will perform at near the CPU's 81st percentile. The memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s on the CPU side is a potential constraint for data-heavy tasks, but it is adequate for the GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, meaning the GPU will not starve for data from system memory.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite provides a comprehensive view of its capabilities. The 3DMark single-thread score of 959 and 2-thread score of 1,879 show strong per-core performance, which is critical for legacy applications and lightly threaded games. The 4-thread score of 3,603 and 8-thread score of 6,141 cover modern game engines that use 4-8 threads effectively. The 16-thread score of 7,683 and max-thread score of 7,680 are nearly identical, confirming that all 16 threads are utilized fully and that there is no thermal or power throttling under multi-threaded loads.

In Cinebench, the R23 multicore score of 23,794 is a strong indicator for content creation. This translates to efficient rendering in applications like Cinema 4D, with the single-core score of 3,359 ensuring responsive UI interaction. The Passmark multithread score of 28,053 and average benchmark score of 29,879 place this CPU in the upper quintile of all processors, as indicated by the 81st percentile. The data encryption score of 21,461 is notable for security-focused workloads, while the data compression score of 352,002 is excellent for file archiving and database operations.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in its data, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals. Its percentile of 50 is derived from other metrics. The combined percentile of 66 for this CPU+GPU pairing reflects the CPU's strength pulling the average up. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantial, and its 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads, but without measured scores, its exact performance tier is inferred from its specifications alone.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800XT compare to its closest rival?

A: The 5800XT has an average benchmark score of 29,879, which is exactly 0% different from the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H at 29,868. It is 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and does it support ECC?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and has ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 7 5800XT use and what PCIe version?

A: The processor uses AMD Socket AM4 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 18 Gbps.

Q: Does the GPU have ray tracing and tensor cores?

A: Yes, the GPU has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and transistor count?

A: The CPU is built on TSMC's 7 nm process with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The CPU+GPU combination has a combined percentile of 66, with the CPU at 81 and the GPU at 50.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed in AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform. The processor supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. PCIe Gen 4 is available with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and an NVMe SSD. The CPU has a TDP of 105 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 150 W, so the total system power draw is moderate.

The GPU's suggested PSU is not listed, but the 150 W TDP of the GPU and 105 W TDP of the CPU suggest a power supply with adequate headroom for both components plus system overhead. The GPU has no power connectors listed and occupies an IGP slot width, indicating it is an embedded or mobile-class part, which is unusual in a desktop build. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as it is the weaker component at the 50th percentile. Replacing the RTX 5000 Embedded with a higher-tier GPU would better match the CPU's 81st percentile performance. The AM4 platform has limited future CPU upgrade options, but within the 5000 series, a higher-core-count part could improve multi-threaded performance, though the current 8-core/16-thread configuration already delivers strong results. The memory support for DDR4 means an upgrade to faster RAM could improve the 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, but this would be a marginal gain.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 959 and Passmark single-thread score of 3,535, suggests it can handle high-refresh-rate gaming in CPU-bound titles. The 8-core/16-thread configuration ensures that modern games using more threads will run smoothly.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking, however, limits overall gaming performance. With 16 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, the GPU can handle high-resolution textures, but its 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is below many desktop gaming GPUs. The 76 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the relatively low boost clock of 1,680 MHz may constrain ray-traced frame rates. For 1080p gaming, the CPU will likely not be the bottleneck, and the GPU should deliver playable frame rates at medium settings. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and settings may need to be reduced to maintain smooth gameplay. The lack of measured FPS data means these figures are estimates based on the hardware specifications and benchmark scores alone.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance with a capable but not top-tier GPU. The CPU's 81st percentile makes it suitable for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,794 indicates efficient multi-threaded rendering. The Passmark data compression score of 352,002 is beneficial for database management and file server tasks. The CPU's 16 threads handle compilation workloads well, making it a good choice for developers.

For gamers at 1080p, this system offers a balanced experience where the CPU's high single-thread score of 3,535 ensures smooth frame delivery. At higher resolutions, the GPU's 50th percentile becomes the limiting factor, so gamers targeting 1440p or 4K may find the GPU insufficient for ultra settings. Students and small business workstations can benefit from the CPU's strong multithread performance for productivity applications, with the GPU providing 16 GB of VRAM for CUDA-accelerated tasks in scientific computing or AI inference. The system is not ideal for high-end gaming or professional 3D rendering where GPU performance is paramount, but it excels in CPU-intensive workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system consisting of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT CPU and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 GPU. The CPU is a mainstream desktop processor with an 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the majority of processors. The GPU is an embedded-class part with a 50th percentile ranking, placing it exactly in the middle of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 66 reflects a system that is strong on the CPU side but average on the GPU side.

The pairing is unusual because the GPU is designed for embedded or mobile applications, as indicated by its IGP slot width and lack of power connectors, yet it is specified in a desktop build. The CPU, on the other hand, is a standard desktop part with a 105 W TDP and a 2024 release date. This creates a system that is well-suited for compute-heavy tasks that rely on the CPU, while the GPU provides adequate but not exceptional graphics performance. The overall tier is mid-range, with the CPU lifting the system above average but the GPU holding it back from high-end status.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD103 chip manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The GPU has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. It also includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI processing.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2,250 MHz with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. The base clock is 930 MHz with a boost clock of 1,680 MHz. The GPU achieves a pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 32.69 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio for those precision levels.

The GPU has a TDP of 150 W and requires no power connectors, which is consistent with its embedded-class design. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, which is atypical for a desktop system. The GPU has no benchmark scores listed, so its 50th percentile is based on its hardware specifications relative to other GPUs. The 32.69 TFLOPS of compute is moderate, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantial for the 16 GB VRAM, indicating the GPU is designed for memory-heavy workloads like AI inference or high-resolution textures rather than raw rasterization speed.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,535 in Passmark and 959 in 3DMark single-thread ensures it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games. The GPU's 50th percentile, however, will limit maximum FPS, especially at higher resolutions, so this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, which can handle encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,794 indicates sufficient headroom for x264 encoding, though the GPU's NVENC capabilities (implied by the tensor cores) could offload this task.

Video editing workloads will see strong performance from the CPU's 16 threads, with the Passmark multithread score of 28,053 handling timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and color grading, though the 32.69 TFLOPS compute may limit heavy GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will rely heavily on the CPU. The R23 multicore score of 23,794 is solid for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 76 RT cores can accelerate ray-traced previews. The 150 W TDP of the GPU suggests it can sustain rendering loads without excessive heat.

Software development benefits from the CPU's high single-thread performance for compilation of sequential code and the 16 threads for parallel builds. The Passmark integer math score of 93,942 indicates strong arithmetic throughput, and the data encryption score of 21,461 supports secure coding workflows.

Student and office work is easily handled by this system. The CPU's 81st percentile ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports large spreadsheets or data visualization tasks. The system's 105 W CPU TDP and 150 W GPU TDP keep power consumption reasonable for a desktop workstation, though the embedded GPU form factor may complicate installation in standard desktop cases.