SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

29,879 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

178,050 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D in a desktop build that sits at the 90th combined percentile, blending a mature 5000-series CPU with an end-of-life flagship GPU. The CPU, built on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer) using a 7 nm TSMC process, delivers 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The GPU, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture (AD102 chip) on a 5 nm process, brings 14592 shading units, 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, and a 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth. Together, they form a high-end desktop configuration aimed at workloads where CPU multi-threading and GPU compute power are both critical, though the data shows the GPU vastly outclasses the CPU in relative performance.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5800XT is an 8-core, 16-thread processor with a 105 W TDP, built for the AMD Socket AM4 platform. Its Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, uses a 7 nm process from TSMC, packing 4,150 million transistors into a 74 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. Clock speeds are modest by 2024 standards—3.80 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost—but the architecture’s efficiency and the unlocked multiplier allow for overclocking headroom. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, includes ECC support, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that is strong in multi-threaded tasks but less dominant in single-thread performance. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 23794 multi-core and 3359 single-core. The multi-core score is 7.1 times the single-core score, indicating good scaling across the 16 threads. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 7683 with 16 threads and 7680 with max threads, showing near-perfect scaling from 16 threads to all available threads. The 2-thread score of 1879 and 4-thread score of 3603 demonstrate that lightly-threaded workloads benefit from the boost clock, but the single-thread score of 959 in 3DMark is comparatively low, suggesting the 4.80 GHz boost is not sustained under all conditions. PassMark tests show 93942 in integer math and 53808 in floating-point math, with a multi-thread score of 28053 and a single-thread score of 3535. These numbers place the CPU at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29879.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 5800XT is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (deltaPct 0%), which scores 29868. It trails the Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS by 0.3% (both scoring 29955), and it leads the Ryzen 5 9600X by 0.6% (scoring 29713). These deltas are within the noise of benchmarking, meaning the 5800XT is performance-equivalent to those mobile and desktop parts in aggregate. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle 16-thread rendering tasks like Cinebench R23 multi-core at 23794 points, which is competitive with newer 8-core parts. However, the single-thread score of 3359 in Cinebench R23 is where the age shows—newer architectures with higher IPC and boost clocks will pull ahead in lightly-threaded tasks like gaming or spreadsheet calculations. The PassMark data compression score of 352002 and encryption score of 21461 indicate solid throughput for archival and security workloads, while the extended instructions score of 24270 suggests reasonable AVX2/AVX-512 performance for scientific computing.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread configuration?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with a 7 nm process.

Q: What memory type does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with ECC capability and a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H?

A: The 5800XT scores 29879 in average benchmark score, which is 0% different from the 7840H’s 29868, meaning they are effectively tied in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What percentile does the GPU achieve among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 4090 D is at the 98th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 178050.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 5800XT has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4 and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, with a 105 W TDP.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29879, placing it at the 81st percentile among all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 178050, placing it at the 98th percentile among all GPUs. These scores are not directly comparable due to different test suites, but the percentile positions tell a clear story: the GPU is a top-tier part, while the CPU is upper-midrange.

In specific CPU tests, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 is the headline number, showing strong 16-thread performance. The single-core score of 3359 is less impressive, indicating that the CPU relies on core count rather than raw IPC for its position. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7683 and max-thread score of 7680 are nearly identical, confirming that the CPU does not benefit from more than 16 threads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28053 and single-thread score of 3535 reinforce this pattern: the CPU is roughly 8 times faster in multi-threaded workloads than single-threaded ones, which is expected for an 8-core/16-thread part.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8587 is a modern gaming and compute benchmark. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 278621 and Vulkan score of 246941 show strong compute performance across APIs. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, which scores 182109 (2.2% higher), and the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, which scores 183725 (3.1% higher). The RTX 4090 D also trails the RTX 5000 Ada Generation (184664, 3.6% higher) and the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187147, 4.9% higher). These deltas indicate the 4090 D is slightly behind professional workstation and datacenter cards in raw compute, but it is still at the 98th percentile, meaning it outperforms 98% of all GPUs.

The combined picture is a system where the GPU is the dominant component. The CPU at the 81st percentile will not bottleneck the GPU in most workloads, but it is not a perfect match. The GPU’s 98th percentile score is 17 percentage points higher than the CPU’s 81st percentile, suggesting that in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or rendering, the system will perform at near-flagship levels. In CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or data compression, the system will perform at upper-midrange levels. The combined percentile of 90 reflects this balance, placing the build in the top 10% of all systems.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform that supports DDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 4. The memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which is adequate for the CPU’s 8-core design but is a limiting factor compared to newer platforms using DDR5. The PCIe Gen 4 support provides 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single graphics card and one or two NVMe SSDs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it is fully compatible with the platform.

The CPU’s TDP is 105 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 425 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 800 W, which is the key power requirement for this build. The CPU’s 105 W TDP is modest by comparison, meaning the total system draw will be dominated by the GPU. The GPU requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and is a triple-slot card, measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. This physical size requires a case with ample clearance.

A sensible next upgrade on this platform would be to replace the CPU with a newer AM4 part, but the 5800XT is already at the top of the 5000 series in terms of core count (8 cores). The platform is end-of-life for new CPUs, so the only meaningful upgrade path is to move to a new socket and platform, which would require new memory (DDR5) and a new motherboard. For the GPU, the RTX 4090 D is already end-of-life, with its successor being the GeForce 50 series. Upgrading the GPU would provide a modest performance boost, but the 4090 D is already at the 98th percentile, so gains would be incremental. The 800 W PSU requirement leaves headroom for a CPU upgrade that stays within the AM4 power envelope, but any move to a higher-core-count CPU would need to account for the motherboard’s VRM capabilities.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need maximum GPU performance for gaming and compute, with sufficient CPU power to avoid major bottlenecks. Gamers playing at 4K resolution will benefit most, as the GPU’s 98th percentile score ensures high frame rates in demanding titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 and the GPU’s compute scores, which accelerate rendering and encoding tasks. Software developers who compile large codebases will see strong performance from the CPU’s 16 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 93942 indicating solid throughput for compilation and testing.

Students and small business workstations are less ideal targets, as the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3359) is not exceptional, and the GPU is overkill for office productivity. However, for research or engineering students running simulations or machine learning workloads, the GPU’s 24 GB of memory and 14592 shading units make it a powerful compute accelerator. The build’s 90th combined percentile means it outperforms 90% of systems, so it is suitable for users who want a top-tier machine without moving to the absolute latest hardware. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a niche feature that benefits scientific computing or financial modeling, where data integrity is critical.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 98th percentile score and 24 GB of memory make it capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors at 1440p or 4K. The CPU’s single-thread score of 959 in 3DMark may limit frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU will handle most of the rendering load.

Streaming: The GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture includes dedicated tensor cores (456) and RT cores (114), which accelerate encoding and real-time effects. The CPU’s 16 threads can handle encoding fallbacks, but the GPU’s hardware encoders are more efficient, so streaming at high bitrates should not strain the CPU.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 278621 combine to accelerate timeline scrubbing, effects, and exports. The GPU’s 24 GB of memory is particularly useful for 4K and 8K timelines, as it can hold multiple frames and effect layers in VRAM.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 73.54 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the CPU’s multi-thread score of 23794 make this a capable render farm node. The GPU will dominate in ray-traced renders, while the CPU handles geometry and scene setup.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 93942 and multi-thread score of 28053 provide solid compilation times. The GPU is less relevant for development, but the 24 GB of memory can be used for local testing of GPU compute code.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3359 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for web browsing and productivity apps, but the GPU is massively overkill. This scenario underutilizes the hardware, making the build inefficient for purely office tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 98th percentile average benchmark score of 178050, combined with its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8587, suggests it is one of the fastest gaming GPUs available. The CPU’s 81st percentile and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3359 indicate it will not bottleneck the GPU at resolutions above 1080p in most titles.

At 4K resolution, the GPU is the primary driver, and the system should achieve high frame rates in demanding games, with the GPU’s 24 GB of memory preventing VRAM limitations. At 1440p, the CPU’s single-thread performance may become a factor in games that rely heavily on one or two cores, but the GPU’s raw power will still produce playable frame rates. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 959 in 3DMark could limit frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU’s 443.5 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,149.1 GTexel/s texture rate will push high frame rates in less CPU-intensive games. These estimates are based on the benchmark scores, not measured data, so actual frame rates will vary by game and settings.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 part for Socket AM4, released in 2024 with a launch MSRP of $249. The GPU is a 24 GB GDDR6X Ada Lovelace part released in 2023 with a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of all systems in the database. The CPU is at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU is at the 98th percentile among all GPUs. This is a high-end pairing where the GPU is the clear performance leader, and the CPU is a capable but not flagship partner. The build is suited for gaming at high resolutions and compute-heavy workloads, but it is not a balanced system in terms of component tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The GPU’s 98th percentile is 17 points higher than the CPU’s 81st percentile, indicating that the GPU is the dominant component. In GPU-bound workloads—such as 4K gaming, ray tracing, and GPU rendering—the system will perform at near-flagship levels, with the GPU’s 73.54 TFLOPS and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth driving performance. The CPU will not bottleneck these workloads, as its 16 threads and 4.80 GHz boost clock are sufficient to feed the GPU.

In CPU-bound workloads—such as physics simulation, data compression, and single-threaded applications—the CPU becomes the limiting factor. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3359 and 3DMark single-thread score of 959 indicate that the CPU’s IPC is not competitive with newer architectures. The GPU will sit idle in these scenarios, wasting its potential. The FPS scaling in gaming would show this: at 1080p with a high-end GPU, the CPU’s single-thread performance would cap frame rates, while at 4K, the GPU would be the bottleneck. The PassMark data compression score of 352002 and encryption score of 21461 are strong, but they are CPU-bound tests that do not utilize the GPU. For a balanced system, the CPU would need to be at a similar percentile to the GPU, or the GPU would need to be paired with a higher-tier CPU to avoid leaving performance on the table in mixed workloads.