SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

29,879 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 form a desktop pairing that sits in the 81st percentile for combined performance, with the CPU and GPU individually also landing at the 81st percentile against all other components. The measured data shows a system that delivers a 160.1 average FPS across a broad game library, making it a capable high-refresh 1080p and 1440p machine, while its 8-core CPU and 12 GB GPU provide a balanced foundation for both gaming and productivity workloads. This analysis examines the benchmark results, platform characteristics, and usage scenarios to determine what this pairing does best and where its limitations lie.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, packing 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is a key differentiator, as the 12 GB capacity allows modern titles at high resolutions to store larger textures and geometry without spilling into system memory, while the bandwidth keeps data flowing to the 5888 shading units.

Clock speeds are set at a 1920 MHz base and 2475 MHz boost, with memory running at 1313 MHz or 21 Gbps effective. The compute throughput is substantial, with the GPU achieving 29.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 operations. Pixel and texture rates are 158.4 GPixel/s and 455.4 GTexel/s respectively, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for resolution-heavy workloads. The 184 texture mapping units and 64 raster output processors support these rates, while the 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores handle the AI and ray-tracing workloads that define modern rendering.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37648. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 at 37628 (0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 at 37507 (0.4% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile at 38135 (-1.3% delta). The data shows the RTX 4070 is essentially tied with a professional compute card and a previous-generation enthusiast card in aggregate scores, though the architectural differences mean the RTX 4070 excels in modern API workloads like DirectX 12 Ultimate, where it scores 103 in the Passmark test. The Vulkan score of 174152 in Geekbench indicates strong cross-platform rendering capability, while the OpenCL score of 154858 shows solid general-purpose compute performance.

For rendering workloads, the 46 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, and the 184 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-based upscaling techniques. The 12 GB VRAM is particularly relevant for 1440p and 4K texture-heavy scenes, as the measured FPS data shows games like Cyberpunk 2077 at 75 FPS at 1080p, 56 FPS at 1440p, and 37 FPS at 4K. The 504.2 GB/s bandwidth ensures that these high-resolution textures are fed to the GPU efficiently, preventing stutter in open-world titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is built on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Vermeer) and fits the AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform with a long upgrade history. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, making this a viable option for workstation builds that require data integrity. The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a single high-bandwidth GPU and a couple of NVMe drives.

The RTX 4070 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the AM4 platform’s Gen 4 support, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck between the CPU and GPU. The GPU has a TDP of 200 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W, leaving headroom for the 105 W TDP of the CPU and other components. A 550 W power supply is the minimum recommendation, but the data shows this pairing can run on that spec, though users with additional drives or peripherals might prefer more capacity for stability.

A sensible next upgrade on this platform would be a CPU with more cores or higher clock speeds, as the AM4 socket supports a range of Zen 3 processors. The 5800XT’s 8 cores and 16 threads are competitive, but upgrading to a 12 or 16-core AM4 part would improve multi-threaded workloads like video rendering or software compilation. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded to a higher-tier 40-series card, as the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot and 550 W PSU have some headroom, though a more powerful GPU would likely require a larger power supply. The platform’s DDR4 memory support means users cannot move to DDR5 without a motherboard change, so the upgrade path within AM4 is limited to CPU and GPU swaps, not memory technology.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 81st percentile for combined performance, with a pair rank of 952 out of 3732 pairs, achieving an average FPS of 160.1 across all measured games.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800XT compare to its nearest rival in multi-threaded benchmarks?

A: The CPU scores 23794 in Cinebench R23 multicore, and its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, has an average benchmark score of 29868, with a deltaPct of 0, meaning the 5800XT is statistically tied with that mobile chip.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 support ray tracing and AI upscaling?

A: Yes, the GPU features 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based techniques like DLSS, as evidenced by its high DirectX 12 Ultimate support.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070?

A: The GPU has a 192-bit memory bus with GDDR6X memory, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The measured FPS data shows 4K performance varies by title, with games like Cyberpunk 2077 at 37 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 35.3 FPS, while lighter titles like Valorant hit 390 FPS, so 4K is playable but not consistently at high refresh rates.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $249, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 599 USD.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 5800XT has an unlocked multiplier, allowing users to adjust clock speeds beyond the 4.80 GHz boost clock.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 7 5800XT and the RTX 4070 is well-matched for most gaming scenarios, but the data reveals where each component becomes the limiting factor. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 959 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3359, is strong enough to drive high FPS in esports titles. Evidence from the measured FPS shows Counter-Strike 2 hitting 254 FPS at 1080p and Valorant reaching 443 FPS, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU at these frame rates. However, at 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, as seen in the FPS drop for CPU-light games like Minecraft from 250 FPS at 1080p to 82 FPS at 4K.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads with a 3DMark max-thread score of 7680 and a Passmark multithread score of 28053 provide solid parallel processing, but the GPU’s compute capabilities can outpace it in certain tasks. The Passmark GPU compute score of 14720 is higher relative to the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 93942, suggesting that for tasks that are heavily parallel and GPU-accelerated, the graphics card is the primary driver. Conversely, the CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 21461 and data compression score of 352002 indicate that CPU-bound workloads like file archiving and encryption will be limited by the processor.

The FPS scaling across resolutions shows the balance point. For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS drops from 75 at 1080p to 56 at 1440p and 37 at 4K, a 50% reduction from 1080p to 4K, which suggests the GPU is the primary limiter at higher resolutions. In contrast, for CPU-bound games like CS:GO, the FPS drops from 559.6 at 1080p to 229.3 at 4K, a 59% reduction, but the absolute numbers remain high, indicating the CPU still has headroom. The overall picture is that at 1080p and 1440p, the pairing is balanced, with neither component consistently bottlenecking the other, but at 4K, the GPU is the clear limiting factor.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The CPU’s TDP is 105 W, and it features a 32 MB shared L3 cache, with 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core. The process node packs 4,150 million transistors into a 74 mm² die, indicating a dense design that balances power efficiency with performance.

Benchmark results position the CPU at the 81st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29879. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and single-core score of 3359 show strong performance in both parallel and single-threaded tasks. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with an average score of 29868 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS at 29955 (-0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X at 29713 (0.6% delta). This places the 5800XT in the same performance class as newer mobile and desktop chips, despite being an older architecture.

For real workloads, the 8-core/16-thread configuration is ideal for modern content creation, including video editing and 3D rendering, where the Cinebench multicore score of 23794 indicates it can handle complex scenes. The Passmark integer math score of 93942 and floating-point math score of 53808 show strong arithmetic capability for scientific and engineering applications. The Passmark data compression score of 352002 and encryption score of 21461 suggest fast file handling and secure data processing, making this CPU suitable for database servers or development environments where compilation and data manipulation are common. The single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3535, ensures responsive everyday use and good performance in lightly-threaded applications like web browsers and office suites.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who want high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, as the measured FPS data shows strong performance in competitive titles. The average FPS of 160.1 across all games means most titles will run smoothly on high refresh rate monitors, with esports games like Counter-Strike 2 at 254 FPS and Valorant at 443 FPS at 1080p. Gamers at 1440p will still see excellent frame rates, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 122 FPS and Fortnite at 77 FPS, making this a solid choice for a high-refresh 1440p build.

Content creators and video editors will benefit from the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 indicating capable rendering performance. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute also accelerate video encoding and effects processing, as seen in the Geekbench OpenCL score of 154858. For 3D artists, the 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI denoising in applications like Blender or Maya, though the data shows 4K rendering in games like Ark: Survival Ascended only hits 13.2 FPS, so heavy scenes may require lower resolutions.

Software developers will find the CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 352002 and integer math score of 93942 useful for code compilation and data processing tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes or server workloads. Students and small business workstations will appreciate the balance of performance and platform maturity, with the AM4 socket providing a stable base for office applications, which the CPU’s single-thread score of 3359 in Cinebench R23 supports, ensuring smooth multitasking in productivity suites.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s benchmark profile shows a processor that excels in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. In 3DMark, it scores 7683 in the 16-thread test, 1879 in the 2-thread test, 3603 in the 4-thread test, 6141 in the 8-thread test, 7680 in the max-thread test, and 959 in the single-thread test. Cinebench results are 2398 in R15 multicore, 338 in R15 single-core, 9993 in R20 multicore, 1410 in R20 single-core, 23794 in R23 multicore, and 3359 in R23 single-core. Passmark scores include 352002 for data compression, 21461 for data encryption, 24270 for extended instructions, 119 for find prime numbers, 53808 for floating-point math, 93942 for integer math, 28053 for multithread, 1355 for physics, 35911 for random string sorting, and 3535 for single-thread. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29879, placing it at the 81st percentile.

The GPU’s benchmark scores include 3854 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 154858 in Geekbench OpenCL, 174152 in Geekbench Vulkan, 139 in Passmark DirectX 10, 244 in Passmark DirectX 11, 103 in Passmark DirectX 12, 320 in Passmark DirectX 9, 1164 in Passmark G2D, 26927 in Passmark G3D, and 14720 in Passmark GPU compute. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 37648, placing it at the 81st percentile. The combined percentile for the build is also 81, with a pair rank of 952 out of 3732 pairs, achieving an average FPS of 160.1 across all measured games.

The combined picture shows a balanced system where the CPU and GPU are both in the upper quintile of their respective categories. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 7840H, has a deltaPct of 0, meaning the 5800XT is effectively equivalent in average score, while the GPU’s nearest rival, the Tesla P4, has a deltaPct of 0.1, showing near-identical aggregate performance. This suggests that the pairing is well-matched, with neither component being significantly stronger or weaker than the other, resulting in a system that can handle a wide range of workloads without a clear bottleneck.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070. The CPU is a mainstream 8-core processor from the 5000 series, released on 2024-07-30, while the GPU is from the GeForce 40-series, released on 2023-04-11 and now marked as end-of-life. The build class is explicitly defined as "desktop," meaning it is intended for a stationary tower or workstation configuration, not a mobile or laptop form factor.

The overall tier of this build is high, as evidenced by the 81st percentile ranking for both the CPU and GPU individually, and the same 81st percentile for the combined build. This places the system above the majority of all hardware configurations, with only 19% of builds performing better. The pair rank of 952 out of 3732 pairs indicates that this specific CPU+GPU combination outperforms roughly 74% of all possible pairings, making it a strong choice for users who want a high-performance machine without reaching the absolute top tier of enthusiast hardware.

The combination of a Zen 3 CPU and Ada Lovelace GPU represents a mature, well-tested pairing on the AM4 platform. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample parallelism for modern games and productivity apps, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth handle high-resolution textures and effects. The data indicates this is a balanced, mid-to-high-end desktop build that is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with enough compute power for content creation and light professional work.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This build excels at high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with an average FPS of 160.1 across all games. Measured data shows Counter-Strike 2 at 254 FPS at 1080p and Valorant at 443 FPS, while Call of Duty: Warzone hits 137 FPS at 1080p and 122 FPS at 1440p, making it ideal for competitive shooters and fast-paced action titles on high refresh rate monitors.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Passmark multithread score of 28053, provide enough headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s NVENC encoder, supported by the 184 tensor cores, can offload streaming tasks, allowing games like Fortnite to maintain 122 FPS at 1080p while simultaneously encoding the stream without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and the GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute make this a capable video editing machine. The 12 GB VRAM allows for smooth timeline scrubbing with high-resolution footage, and the Passmark data compression score of 352002 indicates fast export times for projects with heavy effects.

3D rendering: The 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced rendering in applications like Blender, while the CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 7680 handles geometry and physics calculations. For complex scenes, the 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most projects, though the measured 4K gaming performance of 37 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 suggests that very heavy render workloads may require lower resolutions or optimizations.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 93942 and extended instructions score of 24270 support fast code compilation and execution. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build processes, and the 16 threads allow for parallel compilation, reducing build times for large codebases.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3535, ensures responsive everyday applications like web browsers, word processors, and spreadsheets. The 81st percentile CPU ranking means it handles multitasking with many open tabs and office documents without lag, while the GPU provides acceleration for any design or presentation software that uses hardware rendering.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data is measured, meaning the following FPS figures are actual test results at ultra settings. The table below shows performance across a range of games and resolutions, demonstrating the build’s strengths and limitations.

| Game | 1920x1080 | 2560x1440 | 3840x2160 |

|------|-----------|-----------|-----------|

| Counter-Strike 2 | 254 | 168 | 94 |

| Valorant | 443 | 420 | 390 |

| Call of Duty: Warzone | 137 | 122 | 104 |

| Cyberpunk 2077 | 75 | 56 | 37 |

| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 68.7 | 51 | 35.3 |

| Fortnite | 122 | 77 | 41 |

| Minecraft | 250 | 158 | 82 |

| Grand Theft Auto V | 116.1 | 79 | 46.9 |

| Assetto Corsa | 147.9 | 104.9 | 62.5 |

| Microsoft Flight Simulator | 91.8 | 70.9 | 53.7 |

Esports titles show exceptional performance, with Valorant reaching 443 FPS at 1080p and 390 FPS at 4K, and Counter-Strike 2 hitting 254 FPS at 1080p. This makes the build ideal for competitive gaming, where high frame rates are critical. AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2 run at 75 FPS and 68.7 FPS respectively at 1080p, which is playable, but drop below 60 FPS at 4K, indicating that 1440p is the sweet spot for demanding games. Heavily optimized titles like Call of Duty: Warzone maintain 104 FPS even at 4K, showing the GPU’s ability to handle fast-paced action at higher resolutions. The average FPS of 160.1 across all games confirms that this build is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being viable for less demanding or well-optimized titles.