SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

82 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

29,879 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

This desktop pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 3 processor with NVIDIA's Ampere-based graphics card, landing at the 66th percentile among all configurations in the benchmark database. The CPU holds the 81st percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions that follow are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 959 in 3DMark places it well above typical mid-range processors, suggesting strong headroom for high-refresh gaming at 1080p. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking, however, means that at higher resolutions the graphics card will likely become the limiting factor before the CPU's frame generation capacity is exhausted. For 144Hz displays at 1080p, the combination appears workable for competitive titles, though the estimated FPS figures should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads provide substantial parallel capacity for encoding workloads alongside gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28053 and data encryption score of 21461 indicate solid throughput for software encoding, while the GPU's tensor cores can offload encoding tasks via hardware acceleration. The 8-core/16-thread configuration offers enough headroom to handle both game rendering and stream encoding simultaneously without severe contention, though the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous load at high resolutions.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 demonstrates strong rendering performance for timeline operations and export tasks. The GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 compute provide acceleration for effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines but may constrain work with large 4K projects or complex multi-layer compositions that exceed the memory footprint.

3D rendering: The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 7680 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9993 indicate capable CPU-based rendering for scenes that do not leverage GPU acceleration. The GPU's 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI denoising workflows. For GPU-accelerated renderers, the 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance places this card in the mid-range tier, suitable for preview renders and moderate final-frame production.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 93942 and extended instructions score of 24270 indicate strong performance for compilation workloads and code analysis. The 32 MB shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data structures. The dual-channel DDR4 memory bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate throughput for build servers and local development databases, though larger projects may benefit from more memory channels.

Student and office work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3535 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 1879 demonstrate responsive performance for everyday applications, document processing, and spreadsheet calculations. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking ensures smooth graphical output for productivity software and web browsing. The combination's 66th overall percentile places it comfortably above the median for general-purpose desktop workloads, making it a capable system for academic and professional office tasks that do not demand extreme compute resources.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a 3DMark 16-thread score of 7683, which nearly matches its max-thread score of 7680, indicating that the 8-core/16-thread configuration is fully utilized without significant scaling drop-offs beyond 16 threads. The single-thread score of 959 in 3DMark and 3359 in Cinebench R23 demonstrate competitive per-core performance for its generation. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28053 and average benchmark score of 29879 place the CPU at the 81st percentile among all processors, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H at 29868 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS at 29955 (-0.3% delta).

The GPU shows no benchmark entries in the database, but its percentile score of 50 places it at the median of all graphics cards. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 256-bit bus width delivers 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is substantial for a mid-range card. The GA104 chip contains 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, with a boost clock of 1410 MHz producing 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

The combined percentile of 66 indicates that this desktop configuration outperforms roughly two-thirds of all recorded builds in the database. The CPU's strong 81st percentile ranking pulls the overall position upward, while the GPU's median 50th percentile tempers the combined score. This asymmetry suggests a processor-heavy configuration where the CPU's capabilities exceed the GPU's in relative terms, making the pairing well-suited for CPU-intensive workloads that do not rely heavily on graphics performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU percentiles. The CPU's 81st percentile position versus the GPU's 50th percentile indicates that the graphics card is the bottleneck in graphics-bound scenarios. The estimated FPS figures, derived from the GPU's median performance ranking, suggest that frame rates will align with mid-range expectations rather than the CPU's high-end potential. In CPU-heavy tasks like compilation, rendering, or data processing, the processor's 81st percentile ranking will assert itself, and the GPU will not restrict throughput.

The FPS scaling pattern implied by the component scores shows diminishing returns at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (959 in 3DMark single-thread) can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's median ranking will cap maximum FPS. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM become more significant constraints, and the CPU's advantage narrows further. The 50th percentile GPU ranking means that roughly half of all graphics cards should outperform it, which limits the ceiling for high-refresh gaming at higher resolutions.

The combined percentile of 66 suggests that in balanced workloads, this system outperforms most configurations, but the specific workload determines which component dominates. For gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor. For productivity and content creation, the CPU leads, and the GPU's contributions become secondary. This imbalance is not necessarily a flaw—it depends on whether the target applications favor the CPU's strengths or the GPU's capabilities.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: The CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's median ranking suggest capable frame rates at 1080p for most titles, with the CPU providing headroom for high-refresh displays. The estimated FPS figures indicate that competitive shooters and esports titles should run smoothly, while demanding AAA games may require settings adjustments to maintain high frame rates.

Content creators at 1440p: The CPU's multi-core scores (23794 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM make this pairing suitable for video editing and graphic design at 1440p. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports texture streaming and preview rendering, while the CPU handles export and encoding tasks efficiently. The 8 GB memory capacity is sufficient for moderate project complexity.

Software developers: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 93942 and extended instructions score of 24270 indicate strong compilation performance and code analysis throughput. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces memory access latency for frequently used code paths. The dual-channel DDR4 memory with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth supports development workloads, though the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means graphics acceleration for UI tools is mid-range.

Students and small business workstations: The combination's 66th overall percentile places it above the median for general-purpose computing. The CPU's 81st percentile ensures responsive multitasking, while the GPU's median ranking provides adequate display output for productivity applications. The 8-core/16-thread configuration handles concurrent office applications, web browsing, and communication tools without strain.

Enthusiasts on a platform upgrade path: The AM4 socket with PCIe Gen 4 support provides a foundation for future component upgrades. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking means it remains competitive, but users seeking higher GPU performance can replace the RTX 3070 TiM with a higher-percentile card without changing the platform.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT holds the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29879.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29879 on average, essentially matching the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29868, 0% delta) and trailing the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and 7840HS (both 29955, -0.3% delta) by a negligible margin. It slightly outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (29713, 0.6% delta).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT supports ECC memory. It uses dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is listed as end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor and the GeForce 20 series as its predecessor.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the CPU provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The GPU's suggested power supply is 550 W, and it uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not verified measurements.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all graphics cards suggests mid-range gaming performance. The 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth indicate capability for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings in most titles. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for current games at these resolutions, though texture-heavy titles may approach the memory limit at 1440p with ultra settings.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (959 in 3DMark single-thread) provides the frame pacing headroom necessary for high-refresh gaming. In CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p, the processor's 81st percentile ranking should prevent frame rate drops, allowing the GPU to reach its maximum output. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and estimated FPS figures will be lower relative to the CPU's capabilities.

For esports titles and competitive shooters, estimated frame rates at 1080p should be high enough for 144Hz displays, given the GPU's median ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread performance. For AAA games, high settings at 1080p should produce playable frame rates, while 1440p may require medium-to-high settings to maintain smooth performance. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute will likely limit settings to medium or require upscaling.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is based on the GA104 chip built on Samsung's 8 nm process, containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The 5888 shading units operate at a boost clock of 1410 MHz, producing 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 and matching 16.60 TFLOPS FP16 throughput (1:1 ratio). The 184 texture mapping units and 96 raster output units deliver a texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s.

Memory consists of 8 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) for 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. This configuration is typical for mid-range cards of its generation and supports modern game textures at 1080p and 1440p. The 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features like DLSS, though the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests these features will perform at mid-range levels.

The GPU's lack of benchmark scores in the database means its percentile is derived from its specifications relative to other cards. The 8 GB VRAM capacity, while sufficient for current titles, may become a limitation for future games with higher memory demands. The triple-slot cooler and 270 mm length require a case with adequate clearance, and the single 8-pin power connector simplifies installation. The 220 W TDP with a 550 W suggested PSU provides clear power requirements for system builders.

Build Overview

This desktop configuration pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT, an 8-core/16-thread processor from the 5000 series based on Zen 3 architecture, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, an Ampere-architecture GPU from the GeForce 30 series. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile position produce a combined percentile of 66, indicating that this system outperforms the majority of recorded desktop builds in the database.

The CPU's release date of 2024-07-30 with a launch MSRP of $249 positions it as a recent addition to the AM4 platform, while the GPU is marked as end-of-life with no release date or MSRP listed. The pairing represents a mid-to-high-end processor with a mid-range graphics card, creating a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks while providing competent but not exceptional graphics performance. The 66th overall percentile reflects this balance, with the CPU contributing more to the combined score than the GPU.

The build class is desktop, indicating a traditional tower or SFF configuration rather than a mobile platform. The CPU's 105 W TDP and the GPU's 220 W TDP, combined with the 550 W suggested PSU, define a power envelope suitable for standard desktop builds. The GPU's triple-slot form factor and 270 mm length require a case with sufficient GPU clearance and airflow.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 5000 series, built on TSMC's 7 nm process with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The Zen 3 architecture (codename Vermeer) operates at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 105 W TDP. The CPU is unlocked for overclocking and supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory support.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3 cache. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes and uses the AMD Socket AM4. The 3DMark scores reveal strong scaling: 1879 for 2 threads, 3603 for 4 threads, 6141 for 8 threads, and 7683 for 16 threads, nearly matching the max-thread score of 7680. This indicates efficient multi-threading without significant performance degradation as thread count increases.

Cinebench scores of 2398 (R15 multi-core), 9993 (R20 multi-core), and 23794 (R23 multi-core) demonstrate strong rendering performance, while single-core scores of 338 (R15), 1410 (R20), and 3359 (R23) confirm competitive per-thread capability. PassMark tests show the CPU excelling in integer math (93942), floating-point math (53808), and extended instructions (24270), with a multi-thread score of 28053 and single-thread score of 3535. The 81st percentile ranking places it among the top fifth of all processors, with nearest rivals showing negligible performance differences.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4, which supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s peak bandwidth and ECC functionality. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and the 105 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for cooling solutions.

The GPU's suggested PSU of 550 W with a single 8-pin connector defines the power delivery requirements, while the CPU's 105 W TDP adds to the system power draw. The GPU's triple-slot cooler requires case clearance of 270 mm length, 140 mm height, and 55 mm width. The power connectors and slot width are fixed, so upgrades to higher-power GPUs would require PSU and case reassessment.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the GPU with a higher-percentile card to better match the CPU's 81st percentile performance. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores and 16 threads provide headroom for future GPU upgrades without becoming a bottleneck. The AM4 platform is mature, and the 5000 series represents a late-generation release, so CPU upgrades within the same socket are limited to other AM4 processors. The PCIe Gen 4 support ensures compatibility with current and near-future GPUs, while the dual-channel DDR4 memory may become a limitation compared to newer platforms with DDR5 support. For users seeking higher gaming performance, a GPU upgrade would yield the most significant gains given the current imbalance.